Skip to content

NFL insists it has no evidence it received Ray Rice tape

Getty Images

It appears it’s going to take Robert Mueller, or either the NFLPA’s investigation, to get to the bottom of this one.

Because even with the Associated Press doubling down on previous reports that the video of Ray Rice punching his wife in the face was delivered to the league offices, the league insists it never saw it.

Via Nancy Armour of USA Today, the league said it had no evidence that the video was delivered to its headquarters.

The AP source said he received a voicemail from an unidentified woman at the league office confirming receipt.

“Our office has found absolutely no evidence to support the claim of the anonymous ‘law enforcement source’ that he sent a video to us or that he received a telephone call to his ‘disposable cell phone’ from an unidentified female using an NFL line,” league spokesman Brian McCarthy said.

As Florio noted this morning, the only way to get to the bottom of this might be Mueller talking to whomever this mysterious source may be.

Absent that, the league has hunkered down on this position.

Permalink 107 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Baltimore Ravens, Ray Rice Case, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
107 Responses to “NFL insists it has no evidence it received Ray Rice tape”
  1. crindal3000 says: Sep 26, 2014 4:58 PM

    No one believes you NFL, go back to the your deception drawing board and try again.

  2. jda129 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:00 PM

    After an exhaustive investigation we have concluded that the dog ate the video tape.

  3. bigredgoog says: Sep 26, 2014 5:01 PM

    Curious. Is it really a tape or a thumb-drive of a digital file?

  4. donny1rodriguez says: Sep 26, 2014 5:02 PM

    They saw the tape, they didn’t see the tape. What difference does it really make?

  5. weepingjebus says: Sep 26, 2014 5:02 PM

    Why do they think this is a defense? The real scandal is you had to know it was out there, yet (officially) made no effort to track it down. Instead of getting out ahead of it and defending the shield, you let TMZ take a big dump on it right in the middle of opening week. All Goodell had to do was press a button on a high end speakerphone and shout, “There’s got to be a tape from inside the elevator, now find it!”

  6. rav3nbav3n says: Sep 26, 2014 5:02 PM

    Maybe they’re telling the truth.

  7. nflfan22 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:03 PM

    Yeah, we know. We’ve knew that 34 ray rice stories ago

  8. bigredgoog says: Sep 26, 2014 5:03 PM

    Florio, can you get the “unedited” version of the tape and post it? Seems odd that TMZ edited it.

  9. daburgher says: Sep 26, 2014 5:03 PM

    what a scumbag organization (NFL)

  10. jsmith563 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:08 PM

    sent by FEDEX someone must have signed for it?

  11. ialwayswantedtobeabanker says: Sep 26, 2014 5:08 PM

    Even in the extremely unlikely event the NFL didn’t see the video inside the elevator, the NFL should have understood how people get knocked out cold. Cole.

    They should have also made it a priority to simply obtain the video — a clip that was available with a phone call.

    The more Goodell tries to lie his way out of this, the lamer it gets.

    Goodell should have just come clean initially and stated “Ya know what? I went way too light on Rice. The public has spoken, and I recognize the error of my mistake – and rest assured, it will not be repeated. As humans, all of us continued to grow throughout our lives – and that on me.”

    And he should have tried to sound something like a human being when he said it – instead of an emotionless and detached cyborg programmed to be evasive on each and every single tough question — while continuing to lie straight to our face by stressing how much transparency will be a huge priority to him.

  12. skoobyfl says: Sep 26, 2014 5:08 PM

    Time for FBI voice prints of all NFL staff to confirm who said at NFL HQ the video is terrible.

  13. The_Hooded_Guest says: Sep 26, 2014 5:08 PM

    Enough already. Move on.

  14. angryamerican66 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:09 PM

    Any rational person would want the source to come forward, and present their evidence. A faceless “source” pointing fingers mean less than crap legally. Unless an independent investigation is done with no ties to the NFL, the players association, or anyone with an axe to grind no one should believe the findings.

  15. longsufferingkcfan says: Sep 26, 2014 5:10 PM

    This situation reminds me of the Jerry Sandusky case in that if their respective organizations would’ve just done the right thing at the beginning, they would’ve saved a lot of embarrassment. If they had told the truth and handled the situation appropriately, there would’ve been a few bad jokes for a few weeks but ultimately the scandals would’ve been perceived as the horrible acts of a single individual and not an institutional problem. In looking to keep their organization from being embarrassed, they multiplied the embarrassment big time. BTW, I understand that what Ray Rice did was terrible but Sandusky is on a whole different level of evil.

  16. orivar says: Sep 26, 2014 5:14 PM

    Why is this even a topic if they saw the tape or not? Move on already.

  17. bradybbgoat says: Sep 26, 2014 5:15 PM

    If Goodell is going to try to protect everyone then he and his whole regime are gonna go down in flames.

    Someone has to take the fall for this.

  18. jchipwood says: Sep 26, 2014 5:16 PM

    They should have borrowed Billichicks copy. He has tapes of everything.

  19. farmmbig says: Sep 26, 2014 5:16 PM

    “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”

  20. stillers213 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:16 PM

    The same guy who delivered Ryan Braun’s urine must have been the fedex driver that day. Either that or it’s global warming’s fault.

  21. thegreatgabbert says: Sep 26, 2014 5:17 PM

    Anonymous source with a disposable telephone with a female voice message on it. Jesus, what more proof do you need?

  22. packmanfan says: Sep 26, 2014 5:17 PM

    I guess they didn’t see the pics of the wounds that Adrian Peterson caused to his 4 year old son.
    How else can it be explained that he is still on a team and payroll and Ray Rice isn’t?
    With that sense of injustice I don’t believe anything the NFL tells us.
    Goodell says that they are going to get things in order.
    OK then start by suspending AP.
    Sure, he MAY be done in Minny, but have him be done in the NFL period.

  23. FlashPatterson says: Sep 26, 2014 5:17 PM

    I need at least 100 more articles on the subject before I’m ready to make my decision on this matter. So I’ll have it figured out by tomorrow at this rate.

  24. packmanfan says: Sep 26, 2014 5:20 PM

    The NFL is way too powerful and has way too many fans for a boycott of them to have any effect.
    And they know this. They know that they have the fans hooked in which is why they are being this way. They just don’t care. They will always continue to make billions no matter what they do.

  25. upperdecker19 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:22 PM

    It was the doorman that signed for it (Seinfeld)….

  26. artvan15 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:22 PM

    Well of course you’ve had time to shred every document relating to this.

  27. scw1993 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:23 PM

    jchipwood, you troll threads about random teams’ injuries, releases, scores, and other subjects, but your posts are always about belichick…you have an obsession, seek help.

  28. packmanfan says: Sep 26, 2014 5:23 PM

    You know how Goodell is always claiming that he has the support of all 32 owners of all the NFL teams?
    Um, what about the untold thousands who are so-called owners of the Green Bay Packers?
    If the anger and hatred I see by fans of other teams is any indication of how the majority of Packers owners feel, then an overwhelming majority of NFL team owners may not like him after all.

  29. ilovefoolsball says: Sep 26, 2014 5:24 PM

    Goodell: I have conducted my own investigation. I asked myself if I or anyone I know received and viewed the videotape. The answer I gave myself was no.
    I will appeal this investigation to myself, and report to myself with the findings.
    I hope to continue to work with myself to find out why I didn’t see the video.

  30. officialgame says: Sep 26, 2014 5:25 PM

    Did they ever year of tracking a package to obtain proof of delivery?

  31. packerenglishmajor says: Sep 26, 2014 5:25 PM

    They wouldn’t lie about this, right?

  32. schmitty2 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:31 PM

    Why are law enforcement officials having a hard time with this investigation? Someone at the league office admitted they received it and FedEx delivered it so they could make one call to Fedex to confirm if it was signed or not. Jesus, a part-time cop from the smallest po-dunk town in America could figure all this out.

  33. thegreatgabbert says: Sep 26, 2014 5:31 PM

    Well at least the package wasn’t delivered by a “mule”. Robert’s ears would be burning from the wisecracks.

  34. JaminJake says: Sep 26, 2014 5:31 PM

    We don’t care if you ever got it, we’re more concerned of why there was allegedly no effort to procure this tape. If they thought it would never see the light of day, they failed to realize THIS HOTEL WAS CLOSING DOWN. WHY WOULDNT AN EMPLOYEE TAKE THE VIDEO TO MAKE A SIZEABLE CHUNK OF THEIR YEARLY SALARY WHEB THEY WERE GOING TO BE OUT OF A JOB ANYWAY?Doesn’t take a genius to figure out he hit her in the elevator if she walks in and is dragged out.

  35. wmelch says: Sep 26, 2014 5:33 PM

    Nancy Armour is a hack and should not be taken seriously.

  36. afce22 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:34 PM

    Bill Simmons: Liar

  37. commonsensedude says: Sep 26, 2014 5:36 PM

    Sounds like the NFL needs public relations help from a politician. I can imagine their next statement:

    “Yes, we got a package … but I never unwrapped!!!

  38. so1ar says: Sep 26, 2014 5:36 PM

    someone’s pants are on fire!!

  39. kd75 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:37 PM

    Office mailbox cubby holes…

    Blame Angel in the mail room.

  40. mrbigass says: Sep 26, 2014 5:37 PM

    Can it be assumed that the source still has the burner with the voice mail that could be heard?

  41. ravenswhat says: Sep 26, 2014 5:38 PM

    Such liars.

  42. 3cupsanda6pack says: Sep 26, 2014 5:38 PM

    @rav3nbav3n. Now that’s funny! Where are the tapes from “Spy Gate”? Oh that’s right. Goodell had them destroyed. Perhaps the NFL’s copy of the Rice tape met with the same fate? Oh dear, the NFL WOULD NEVER DO THAT! Lol

  43. paulsmith107 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:39 PM

    Why lie about it stop already. What does anyone have to gain from saying they sent it when they didn’t but you the nfl and goodell have every reason to lie. Stop pissing on is and telling us it’s rain already and just fess up

  44. kingpel says: Sep 26, 2014 5:39 PM

    Maybe the same upstanding source who anonymously sent the tape to the NFL also SOLD it to TMZ. Ever think of that?

  45. isphet71 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:43 PM

    I would believe it if someone sent the tape to the NFL via USPS.

  46. scrp2 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:43 PM

    I believe them. When Myrtle, the NFL’s long time secretary asked law enforcement if they could send it solid state laser disc format, that kind of took the momentum out of police’s cooperation with the NFL.

  47. jlinatl says: Sep 26, 2014 5:48 PM

    If they have a “mail room”, they have receipt of everything they receive.

    If it was sent any way other than mail, their is a tracking number on the package. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the AP source could provide the tracking information to the reporter (in the event that they don’t want to provide it to anyone else) and the reporter could verify that a package was sent from Point A to the NFL office and was signed for by whomever.

  48. fundamentals425 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:49 PM

    What about simply looking at the telephone records since it came from a league line???

  49. pem34 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:51 PM

    It cost about $20 to FedEx overnight. Trking is like 40 cents at the post office or included if you do the flat rate.

    So, I just want to get this straight, the anonymous source sent a tape anonymously to someone he does not know apparently using stamps and not requiring a signature.

    sounds pretty legit

  50. chargrz says: Sep 26, 2014 5:52 PM

    I heard the NFL never saw the tape cause it was on Betamax and they only use VHS.

  51. coloradofort says: Sep 26, 2014 5:52 PM

    When the NFL speaks they look really bad……….

  52. bunjy96 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:54 PM

    It was sent via email supposedly. How does one sign for that?

  53. mazenblue says: Sep 26, 2014 5:56 PM

    VHS?

  54. yb1956 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:58 PM

    This mysterious source should be nicknamed “Deep Threat”.

  55. natijim235 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:58 PM

    the bigger question is WHY DIDN’T YOU HAVE TAPE??!!!

  56. jlinatl says: Sep 26, 2014 5:58 PM

    It should also be noted that the AP has bitten on leads before that proved to be incorrect.

    Google AP apologizes incorrect. There are 11,400,000 results.

    Not saying this is the case here but it does seem the receipt would be relatively easy to prove.

  57. artvan15 says: Sep 26, 2014 5:59 PM

    I think all future games should be cancelled until we get to the bottom of this.

  58. clashpoint says: Sep 26, 2014 6:02 PM

    Since 2008, Goodell has gotten a 300% raise. Has he really earned that much, anyone? Has the salary cap even gone up that much? The answer to both questions is a resounding NO. He’s the worst commissioner in professional sports.

  59. mydogsnameisvick says: Sep 26, 2014 6:07 PM

    A pile of cow pies. Goodell is a typical everybody’s fault but mine conservative.

  60. bushwoodcc says: Sep 26, 2014 6:21 PM

    Don’t get me wrong, the NFL screwed this up badly. But why are we beating up the NFL and letting those that handled the prosecution and judgment of the legal case off the hook here?

    At this point we really don’t know if league officials saw the tape, but we do know that law enforcement saw it, and all Rice got was a very light slap on the wrist from the court system.

    Of course it also wouldn’t surprise me if either the Ravens or the NFL had a hand in obtaining that light punishment.

  61. jayrocksd says: Sep 26, 2014 6:23 PM

    If they did receive a video with a note that said: ‘Ray Rice elevator video. You have to see it. It’s terrible.’ they probably thought it was the other Ray Rice elevator video. Plus due to the threat of malware and viruses, they probably have a policy not to insert removeable media from unknown (anonymous) sources in their NFL computers. The AP source may have sent the video, but I doubt they actually watched it.

  62. bstngrdn says: Sep 26, 2014 6:24 PM

    Well they just have to stick to this story now because they have repeated it so often. They must be praying that they are not proven wrong though because if not, there are going to be a lot of “cooked gooses”. And law enforcement isn’t involved because there’s no felony here , unless it can be shown that the NFL entered into a conspiracy with local law enforcement to sweep the Ray Rice thing under the carpet. Based on the very unusual lenient treatment that Rice got though, it is not out of the question that that is exactly what happened. And if it did, it could explain why the source of the story about the tape does not want to come forward for fear of exposing fellow law enforcement personnel.
    It looks to me like “bunker mentality” has set in and there’s a lot of people hoping that if they can just hold out long enough this will blow over.

  63. sb44champs says: Sep 26, 2014 6:28 PM

    Goodell burned the tape in the same fire pit that he burned the Spygate tapes..

  64. vbe2 says: Sep 26, 2014 6:36 PM

    Of course they don’t have any evidence, they destroyed it like they did the Patriots cheating tapes.

    They didn’t want any evidence to remain.

  65. nosleeptilsb says: Sep 26, 2014 6:39 PM

    I believe them. I also believe you people dont get out much.

  66. mx429 says: Sep 26, 2014 6:43 PM

    I’ve learned from experience that I can get along without the following: WalMart, McDonald’s, Burger King and the NBA. The NFL is easily added to that list. Goodell and his propaganda machine are insulting to everyone with a working mind.

    Stop patronizing trash and they’ll eventually have to stop feeding it to you and give you something better, they can certainly afford it.

  67. punksinplay says: Sep 26, 2014 6:46 PM

    The Ray Rice tape conspiracy theory has taken the focus off of the actual incident. The sports media has taken this to a whole another level of stupid.

  68. granadafan says: Sep 26, 2014 7:01 PM

    Get 4chan on this. They’ll hack whatever needs to be hacked to get to the bottom of videogate.

  69. keylimelight says: Sep 26, 2014 7:02 PM

    “Our office has found absolutely no evidence to support the claim of the anonymous ‘law enforcement source’ that he sent a video to us or that he received a telephone call to his ‘disposable cell phone’ from an unidentified female using an NFL line,”
    _______

    Of course you’ll have no evidence if you misplace, misfile, or “accidentally” throw away the evidence. And all these explanations assume that you even looked in the right place to find the evidence to begin with.

  70. hogdropalogonbigd says: Sep 26, 2014 7:08 PM

    They’re lying. If you never received the tape, why didn’t you issue a statement when multiple reporters reported that you had reviewed the tape in applying the initial two-game suspension? The NFL was content to let everyone know they had seen the tape when they thought it would never see the light of day. Shame on the reporters who backtracked from their initial reporting instead of calling out the NFL.

  71. tabcdef9 says: Sep 26, 2014 7:23 PM

    It appears to me, going back to NFLPA contract negotiations and before, that the NFL continues to act from about an eight grade level of consciousness. That’s with all the arrogance, self absorption, false bravado and other qualities that implies.

    I can’t remember when they’ve had the right balance in the crew that works there.

  72. revelation123 says: Sep 26, 2014 7:27 PM

    Not saying it happened, but stuff gets lost in the mail more than you’d think. Not that I think it matters that much in the first place.

  73. joker65 says: Sep 26, 2014 7:29 PM

    thegreatgabbert says:
    Sep 26, 2014 5:17 PM
    Anonymous source with a disposable telephone with a female voice message on it. Jesus, what more proof do you need?
    _________________________________
    Hahahaa! It sounds rock solid! How can anyone doubt it? Again, how about something with a signature showing it was received? No? Don’t have it? Hmmm, sounds completely made up if you ask me.

  74. thefirstsmilergrogan says: Sep 26, 2014 7:31 PM

    wasnt the purpose of the mueller investigation to answer this very question?

    and if so, how does the nfl already have the answer to it?

    and if they do, how did they get it and why haven’t they released it yet?

    something stinks in the state of park avenue…

  75. purplereign52 says: Sep 26, 2014 7:41 PM

    The horse is already dead….stop beating media…the majority of nfl fans don’t care…they want to watch football. …if we wanted to watch a soap opera we would do that…stop trying to make it more….

  76. riekki says: Sep 26, 2014 7:51 PM

    I can see an anonymous ‘law enforcement source’ sending the data to the NFL offices…
    being a good samaritan or good citizen but I don’t get the burner phone angle…I mean send a note explaining the source and the purpose and be done with it.How does this person know that the NFL hasn’t received a copy of the data from another source,this person seems to know way too much.

  77. nosleeptilsb says: Sep 26, 2014 8:30 PM

    Hey purplereign52, tried to upvote you like 40 times, for whatever reason, the sites still giving you the double goose egg.

  78. DrSteveBrule says: Sep 26, 2014 8:34 PM

    No wonder the casino shut down, the security system was still using tapes.

  79. common1sense1rules says: Sep 26, 2014 8:45 PM

    Stop. The. Madness.
    FIRST – Roger Goodell didn’t beat a woman, Ray Rice did. Direct your anger towards Rice. Or the NFLPA who is fighting to PREVENT increasing Rice’s punishment. Or the New Jersey DA’s office who had the responsibility to legally prosecute Rice but didn’t. At least GOODELL PUNISHED RICE and is now trying to increase the punishment. Who else is lifting a finger to actually take action to hold the perp accountable? Not the NFLPA. Not the law enforcement community. Not the Ravens who simply washed their hands of the situation. So because the prevailing opinion is Goodell didn’t hammer him enough initially we think Goodell is the one who should be held accountable as the villain in this mess? Seriously?
    SECOND. (Stop and think about this for minute) If you have never been THAT GUY where the buck stops in administering punitive discipline to adult employees in your organization, and by that I mean taking money from and/or denying the right to work of another adult who has to support themselves, their children and their spouse, then stop and think about that responsibility and those implications for a minute. Speaking from experience having been THAT GUY I am here to tell you it is complex, difficult and, as much as we wish it wasn’t, an imperfect process. The truth is not always crystal clear, and even when it is there are extenuating circumstances and mitigating factors that must be considered if your goal is to reach a fair and just decision. Have an opinion all you want, but recognize you and I weren’t in the room when Goodell spoke with the Mr. & Mrs. Rice and do not know what she told him that may have influenced his punishment decision, nor do we know everything Goodell knew (and did not know) at the time he rendered his initial punishment.
    THIRD – Regarding these latest allegations of the elevator tape being delivered to NFL headquarters…speaking again from professional experience let me point out not one, not two, but three glaring (did I say GLARING?) warning signs that scream “this information is HIGHLY questionable”: (1) anonymous, (2) no supporting evidence whatsoever, (3) questionable excuses for inability to provide evidence (the old “disposable cell phone” excuse).

  80. timmyp716 says: Sep 26, 2014 8:48 PM

    And there is no evidence that the NFL has no evidence………come on man how far will this lie go

  81. qdog112 says: Sep 26, 2014 8:57 PM

    This harder than finding WMD. Let’s just invade Canada and Americans will forget all about the issue.

    Show a new shiny object or just blow something up. It always works on kids and pets.

  82. marcinhouston says: Sep 26, 2014 9:39 PM

    By definition if you destroy all evidence you have no evidence.

  83. tnt2003 says: Sep 26, 2014 9:47 PM

    Goodell and NFL get over on this easy. What source? Sounds like a HOAX to me. Where is the proof of a real Law enforcement source, delivery, NFL receipt?

  84. SilentMajority says: Sep 26, 2014 10:15 PM

    Our Justice system didn’t so much as fine Ray Rice, but that’s ok because it’s the NFLs job to eliminate domestic violence from society. That’s why Roger Goodell was hired. Everybody knows that…

  85. packergator says: Sep 26, 2014 10:28 PM

    Who knew that the new NFL theme would be “plausible deniability”?

  86. sylar1888 says: Sep 26, 2014 10:52 PM

    C’mon man!!!

  87. biggs13 says: Sep 26, 2014 11:12 PM

    I never get my jury duty notices.

  88. numberonesaintsfan says: Sep 26, 2014 11:20 PM

    If the “law enforcement source” was forwarding the tape to the league as a matter of due process or as standard practice, why is the source hiding their identity? If it happened at all they must not had the authority to do so in the first place. In fact it may have been against the law. If the league office did receive a tape maybe the source should face criminal charges.

  89. dudeicle says: Sep 26, 2014 11:58 PM

    It happened in a casino, people!! Everyone knows EVERYTHING is under video surveillance IN A CASINO!!!

    If they didn’t see the video they were trying extremely hard to not see it.

    They should have known. They should have known.

  90. shovelhunter says: Sep 26, 2014 11:59 PM

    They had it along time ago. It just happens to be currently sitting in the same pile of ashes as the patriots spy gate videos. The nfl has mastered disposing evidence at this point

  91. riverhorsey says: Sep 27, 2014 12:41 AM

    USA Today had a story confirming NFL security received the tape months ago.

  92. hsteacher says: Sep 27, 2014 1:01 AM

    Oh wait, maybe the anonymous source sent the footage to NFL Films not NFL Headquarters? Just wait because this will be the next excuse from the league.

  93. myhawks1976 says: Sep 27, 2014 3:12 AM

    thegreatgabbert says:
    Sep 26, 2014 5:17 PM
    Anonymous source with a disposable telephone with a female voice message on it. Jesus, what more proof do you need?

    62 5
    Report comment

    —————————————————————–

    Many sources are anonymous. For OBVIOUS reasons. the voice mail is dated and stamped with a caller id from an NFL office number.

    But don’t let reality get in the way of your bluster!

  94. thegreatzeppelin says: Sep 27, 2014 4:35 AM

    Goodell just can’t win in the public’s opinion. If he suspends Rice for a year off the bat, the same people who are tearing into him for only two games would be up in arms about his abuse of power and over punishment. The AP and NFLPA would be making it a big story but vice versa.

    What type of case can anyone have when the “victim” not only won’t testify but defends and marries the assaulter. He was her gravy train, you would be a dumb sheep not to think that when the league questioned her she was well rehearsed on what to say to defend Ray at all costs!

    Investigator: “Mrs. Rice, please tell me your side.”

    Mrs. Rice: “Well we get a little heated at times, I hit him, he hits me; then we go upstairs and go wild…”

    Investigator: “Did Ray not use excessive force and aggression?”

    Mrs. Rice: “No, I hit him and spit on him first, I called him a sissy, he was defending himself.”

    Investigator: “Well I see this is going nowhere.”

    Outside of cases involving minors, you will find very few convictions or even prosecutions when the “victim” is the defense’s strongest witness. How do you go forward with that?

  95. dallascowboysdishingthereal says: Sep 27, 2014 6:01 AM

    I’m throwing the red flag on that statement.

  96. lunarpie says: Sep 27, 2014 7:01 AM

    Now its the NFL’s fault that Ray Rice is a wife beater…..?

    He should be locked up just like anyone else would be!

    Do the crime, do the time Ray Rice!

  97. mackie66 says: Sep 27, 2014 7:04 AM

    Mike, as an attorney, would you send a piece of evidence in the mail with out a return receipt?
    Would you send a piece of evidence through the mail,,period? Would a law enforcement officer hand deliver evidence to anyone without receiving a receipt? Answer NO……

  98. pondbridge says: Sep 27, 2014 8:09 AM

    There’s a very simple way of telling when Roger Goodell is lying: his lips move.

  99. pondbridge says: Sep 27, 2014 8:23 AM

    Want to get to the bottom of this? Goodell and head of NFL security to be suspended until a TRULY independent reviewer appointed by Congress reports back on the facts. Congressional involvement justified by NFL’s tax free status. No review board appointed by Goodell will ever be seen by anyone with a brain cell as independent, and the NFL’s version of Don Draper is now just trying to hire oilier, more convincing spinners from DC. Owners should be concerned: in an attempt to save his skin, Goodell could blow the league’s tax free status, which is worth BILLIONS to them.

  100. codespyder says: Sep 27, 2014 8:57 AM

    Talking to this mysterious source won’t clear this up. Because, guess what, the “mysterious source” could be lying.

    It’s going to come down to who do you believe?

    This may shock Florio and others here, but I’m going to believe the NFL on this.

  101. boomboombrown says: Sep 27, 2014 9:35 AM

    The NFL knows about the tape. They just tried to cover their own a”” by blowing up the situations with Hardy, MacDonald, Peterson and Upshaw to distract everyone. Been saying it since the start of this fiasco!

  102. corvusrex96 says: Sep 27, 2014 10:02 AM

    I guess Roger is squirming since his behind the scenes support of the ESPN article to blame the Ravens quickly unraveled. Nice try throwing them overboard when the league office determines all punishment

  103. jmc8888 says: Sep 27, 2014 11:05 AM

    Mueller is as dirty as they come. He spied on the American people and was not truthful to congress, illegally. Put pressure on the joint inquiry into 9/11, by order of Bush, and has links to the NFL through his law firm.

    Earth to NFL fans…is this the type of ‘honorable’ person you want to trust giving you the truth.

    I mean gee, this investigation is literally the smallest thing he’s been involved in, so MAYBE he’ll be honest with it. But given his track record, nah, he’ll probably be corrupt and hide something like he did every other time.

    If you want a coverup, Mueller is your man.

    Wake up people. It’s like hiring Jerry Sandusky to oversee your children. Or hiring a drunk to be your driver. Why anyone would think that someone who has the balls to be untruthful to Congress would give two hoots about lying to you about a sports game, well that person is being a moron.

    Why anyone would think that someone who would have the balls to pressure the most important inquiry we’ve had in half a century in order to alter it wouldn’t think twice to alter this investigation so that the outcome is favorable to the NFL, the people that hired him and who his firm has links to… a person who doesn’t really that is a moron.

    Absolutely sickened that yesterday Kornhole and Wilbon’s stand-in said Mueller was the ex-head of the FBI and an honorable man. What does a guy have to do to be noticed as a fraud and a scumbag?

    Yeah, because all the ways he’s screwed the American people time and time again and lied through his teeth is honorable. This guy is the epitome of dishonorable. He should be disbarred and in jail. Not being unquestioning believed as he runs an investigation for the people that hired him.

    Use some critical thinking skills and apply them to this man with the checkered past.

  104. beeronthefridge says: Sep 27, 2014 11:57 AM

    Like the Mafia said, “no body, no evidence!”

  105. freddiekroger01 says: Sep 27, 2014 12:13 PM

    Why is everyone treating this like Watergate (who knew what and when)? This is not politics folks. This is an HR issue that was mishandled and ultimately fixable.

  106. patw20 says: Sep 27, 2014 12:20 PM

    Does it matter…do we punish worse if we see the act? Without a tape 2 games… With a tape indefinitely. ..

    Here’s a rule NFL players…If your gonna commit domestic violence, do not allow it to be on tape.

  107. realitycheckbaby says: Sep 27, 2014 2:55 PM

    NFL insists it has no evidence it received Ray Rice tape

    What they meant was…

    NFL insists YOU have no evidence it received Ray Rice tape

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!