Skip to content

Goodell calls a franchise in London a “realistic possibility”


Although the NFL is focused more right now on making regular visits to London, the league may eventually have a team there permanently.

Commissioner Roger Goodell said Friday that he sees continued growth in the NFL’s popularity in the United Kingdom, and it could continue to grow to the point where a franchise is there.

“Every time we give our U.K. fans, and I think this is true on a global basis, an opportunity to engage with football, the fans want more, and the key to our strategy several years ago was to give them the real thing, regular season games, and I think that’s worked,” Goodell said. “I think fans have appreciated that. Every year I go back to London, I see the fans are more sophisticated. They understand the game more. They’re following it more. We expect a big audience will be in the U.K. watching the Super Bowl on Sunday, Monday morning I think their time. That’s exciting for us. We are considering playing more games in the U.K. It’s a balancing act with our schedule. As you know, we’re playing in two different stadiums this year, so that gives us a little bit more flexibility in how we do that, but I believe the future will see more games in the U.K. As far as a franchise, let’s continue to grow. Let’s continue to see that excitement and enthusiasm, passion and support continue to develop. If it does, I think that’s a realistic possibility.”

The league would still have to figure out all kinds of logistical issues before a team in London could be feasible, and a franchise there is several years off if it ever happens. But now that the NFL has finally filled its vacancy in Los Angeles, speculation may now turn to whether a team will move to London.

Permalink 115 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Top Stories
115 Responses to “Goodell calls a franchise in London a “realistic possibility””
  1. stl45fan says: Feb 6, 2016 7:30 AM

    Yeah RIGHT! NFL expands to St. Louis & London!

  2. theofficialshotcaller says: Feb 6, 2016 7:32 AM

    Send this embarrassment to London to stay, he’s done enough to ruin the game

  3. mrjdon says: Feb 6, 2016 7:33 AM

    Roger is lying again.

    The League has no intention of putting a franchise in London.


  4. gosfvr says: Feb 6, 2016 7:37 AM

    There he goes again.
    Just move all the other franchises and be done with the US.
    EFL, here we come.

  5. lewsblues says: Feb 6, 2016 7:48 AM

    let them start their own league … a la the AFL …

  6. projectshadow316 says: Feb 6, 2016 7:51 AM

    The only way this could even be feasible is if there were two separate “world conferences”, the US and Europe. Then the Super Bowl would really be able to crown a true world champion.

  7. talkingheadsknowall says: Feb 6, 2016 7:51 AM

    How about we just send Roger to London on a permanent basis and be done with all this London expansion talk.

  8. MichaelEdits says: Feb 6, 2016 7:53 AM

    Yeah, that’s what what he says, but he says lots of things that aren’t true.

  9. olefballcoach says: Feb 6, 2016 7:55 AM

    Modern Day Mafia= NFL

    They dont care who gets hurt as long as they get PAID!!

  10. haslamdrinkshisownpee says: Feb 6, 2016 7:56 AM

    I think I’ll finally stop paying attention when I have to watch the Cleveland Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Browns vs the London Tesco grocery store Jaguars at 9:00 AM. It’s only a matter of time before team naming rights are sold and you won’t even recognize the jersey with all the advertising on it. Welcome to the future.

  11. sfm073 says: Feb 6, 2016 7:59 AM

    I love football and I love watching it, but with has gone on in the NFL over the last few seasons I would love for it to all come crashing down. There are only 8 home games a year and you want to take that away from those cities, fans, workers and local small businesses?

  12. jojopuppyfish says: Feb 6, 2016 8:00 AM

    Fans tell Goodell London is a logistical nightmare

  13. Indybear says: Feb 6, 2016 8:00 AM

    Just another utterance from this lying, slimeball as he continues to ruin the game we used to know. Greed is the downfall of the NFL and it’s happening right before our eyes. We need a new Commissioner.

  14. sechristbmw says: Feb 6, 2016 8:02 AM

    Goodall will do what he always does – jam his agenda down other people’s throats.

    Listen up UK, whether you want it or not you’re getting a franchise. To the American players, enjoy the 6 hour plane rides just to get to NY.

  15. phinsfan1205 says: Feb 6, 2016 8:05 AM

    Don’t he get this is an American sport . Fans don’t want our teams to play in London or anywhere out of the US!

  16. typicalnipple says: Feb 6, 2016 8:10 AM

    Over the last few hours something has been very lacking. Stories of Big John Football.

  17. SexBoat Captain says: Feb 6, 2016 8:15 AM

    Troy Vincent for Commish please !

  18. Iknowitall says: Feb 6, 2016 8:16 AM

    The London Jaguars

  19. fjbuon says: Feb 6, 2016 8:17 AM

    This would be the final nail in the coffin in ruining the once great NFL…he can’t be gone soon enough.

  20. fwippel says: Feb 6, 2016 8:18 AM

    There is as much chance of London landing an NFL franchise as there is of Johnny Manziel starting for the Browns or any other team in 2016.

  21. johnnybuc says: Feb 6, 2016 8:19 AM

    When will sanity creep back into the NFL mindset?
    My bet is when Goodell is ousted….

  22. bigredgoog says: Feb 6, 2016 8:23 AM

    Don’t think the NFL should expand to London but if they were THAT would be the time to force two teams into a market. Then the trip for the U.S. teams could involve playing both teams back to back making the travel less onerous.

  23. bigredtuna says: Feb 6, 2016 8:29 AM

    The time difference between here and the continent would make it horrible. A 4:30pm Sunday start is 9:30pm in London. You could never have the London team play a night game away; it would be cruel to their fans to have a game start at 1:30am their time (8:30 pm in the east). That is start! It wouldn’t be over until 5:00am Monday or Tuesday morning.

    Stick to having a couple Sunday morning games with existing teams going to London and then getting a bye.

  24. sunnydee007 says: Feb 6, 2016 8:35 AM

    Goodell’s greed is ruining the NFL.

  25. GoodellMustGo says: Feb 6, 2016 8:35 AM

    Glad to see the liar has his priorities in order.

    No free agent will want to play there and if they do they’ll want so much money they’ll bust their salary cap quickly.

    “Yes if you practice hard enough you can make the NFL someday.”
    — Roger Goodell to a 10 year old girl


  26. nestrongsafety says: Feb 6, 2016 8:38 AM

    I’m sure west coast teams are going to love traveling to the UK. I don’t see this as being realistic.

  27. savior72 says: Feb 6, 2016 8:39 AM

    It will be the Titans. Next team on their list to move and alienate more loyal fans.

  28. filmex2000 says: Feb 6, 2016 8:45 AM

    Roger…letting the crazy run free yet again.

  29. TheDPR says: Feb 6, 2016 8:46 AM

    Unless airlines are planning on resurrecting a Concorde-like jet liner, this is a very bad idea. Players shouldn’t have to travel the time it currently takes to get there, even from the east coast.

  30. bobsnygiants says: Feb 6, 2016 8:48 AM

    why don’t RG go and stay in London

  31. billswillnevermove says: Feb 6, 2016 8:48 AM

    Please!!! This guy needs to go, and go fast. Worst commissioner ever!!!

  32. tyrannosaurussex83 says: Feb 6, 2016 8:53 AM

    The owners need a new “or else” option to leverage for new stadium negotiations no that LA is done so they send their favorite empty suit out to start talking it up.

  33. streetyson says: Feb 6, 2016 9:00 AM

    Whilst there’s arguments against, to those who say London is simply too far, you’re wrong. Firstly, these guys don’t fly in cattle class, and in 2019 Virgin Atlantic plan to have a next-gen supersonic business jet in the air, in service 2023, just 7yrs from now! And even with current jets, it’s only 2hrs luxery first-class travel further than going from the East Coast to Seattle, expedited through customs into limos to a luxury suite. Hardly hellish. And London has a state-of-the-art desso field (natural grass but interwoven with artificial fibres for durability, safety and consistency) to play on that puts many current NFL fields to shame.

    My suggestion would be a renewed, separated Europe or World Conference, that maybe 10yrs from now played concurrent with the NFL, and if competitive by then it’s winner gets the lowest (i.e. travelling) seed into the playoffs if it’s record is better than the worst AFC or NFC candidate.

  34. tonebones says: Feb 6, 2016 9:00 AM

    Hey Rog, why don’t you just buy a one way ticket to London, round up a bunch of English billionaires, and start a new league over there. Isn’t it always foggy over there? Geez I’d hate to think that our teams are going to be taking off and landing in the fog all the time. That’s more dangerous than concussions. What about player safety?

  35. mickton says: Feb 6, 2016 9:03 AM

    They can watch it on tv like the rest of us
    Fak goodell

  36. rosloe62 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:06 AM

    Goodall has ruined the NFL.

  37. pdabraham1 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:08 AM

    As much as I enjoy attending the games over here, the thought of the Jaguars moving to London doesn’t really fill me with much excitement.

    Keep sending three games a year over here, and we’ll be happy.

  38. babyfarkmcgeezax says: Feb 6, 2016 9:09 AM

    It’s a realistic fact that nobody wants this, nor does any logical person think this is a good idea. Fire Goodell.

  39. celticsforever says: Feb 6, 2016 9:09 AM

    You should see how much a ball will deflate in England this time of year. This soon to be London team should be preemptively fined $1 mil and docked draft picks. John the walking dead Mara agrees, and would also like to add salary cap penalties to his division rivals, just because.

  40. TB12RALLYCRY says: Feb 6, 2016 9:11 AM

    another reason he has to go………..

  41. urbusted2 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:11 AM

    How stupid would that be in so many ways?

  42. cappa662 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:19 AM

    Sounds like he’s negotiating through the media to get some NFL team more tax player money for a new stadium.

  43. jetsfan136 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:21 AM

    Every time I watch a London game the stadium is packed and they ooh and ahh on every exciting play. Why wouldn’t they love the sport if they had their own team? It’s the greatest sport there is. People posting here are too hung up on their anti-Goodell agenda and don’t give the Brits enough credit. The sport would thrive there.

  44. pfatalbert says: Feb 6, 2016 9:21 AM

    Because nfl Europe was sooooo successful…

  45. ciscomontano says: Feb 6, 2016 9:24 AM

    It’s one thing to watch a few games a year but a different thing to buy season tickets and support them. American football will never compete with soccer, rugby, or even cricket. If you ever lived there or spent time there, you would see what I’m talking about.

  46. lgbarn says: Feb 6, 2016 9:24 AM

    Just no…no reason for this except greed. Canada…maybe

    Mexico…also a no (too dangerous)

  47. cwwgk says: Feb 6, 2016 9:27 AM

    I would need to do some deep soul searching if I was offended by Roger Goodell, or any human being, to the extent so many commenters are on this site. It’s fascinating to witness the negative obsession they have over a commissioner of a football league–someone who can have no direct impact on their lives unless they allow it. I wouldn’t want anyone, much less a person I don’t know, to have such control over me.

  48. donterrelli says: Feb 6, 2016 9:28 AM

    Ugh, imagine the flights for every away game. London at Seattle or San Diego? Forget about it.

  49. 700levelvet says: Feb 6, 2016 9:40 AM

    Go Rog go…

    The other 30 owners

  50. rdav29 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:41 AM

    How about first address some of the franchises with problems here like Oakland, Tennessee, San Diego, Cleveland to name a few.

  51. huh6016 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:41 AM

    Quite delusional for a supposed leader of a billion dollar industry.

  52. uglydingo says: Feb 6, 2016 9:43 AM

    sechristbmw says:
    Feb 6, 2016 8:02 AM
    Goodall will do what he always does – jam his agenda down other people’s throats.

    Listen up UK, whether you want it or not you’re getting a franchise. To the American players, enjoy the 6 hour plane rides just to get to NY.
    Dude – 6 hour plane rides to NY detested by players and destroying a team’s fan base by relocation don’t mean anything compared to Roger generating bigger bonuses for himself.
    I still think Goodell would make a great running mate for Trump and NFL fans would want to see him elected so that a new Commissioner could be appointed.

    Trump – Goodell Make America (and the NFL) Great Again.

  53. securb2013 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:45 AM

    Roger the reason the London fans are learning more about the game is because Sports Betting is legal in the UK. End the monopoly on Sports Betting in Vegas and stop screwing with daily fantasy and your viewership will double. Every game is more interesting with $50 on the line.

  54. floratiotime says: Feb 6, 2016 9:46 AM

    Jag-U-ars anyone?

  55. billsrule2015 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:48 AM

    With the 1st overall pick in the 2019 NFL draft, the Newcastle Ninjas select…..

  56. greenbaychicksarefat says: Feb 6, 2016 9:50 AM

    Continue having 1 or 2 games a yr in London. Keep jamming the Jags down their throats, Americans don’t care about that franchise anyway. Give the Mexicans a game here and now as well as the Canadians to promote our game. But no team should be moved overseas!!

  57. upperdecker19 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:51 AM

    Maybe the London franchise can also play all of its games on Thursday nights. Because we all love that so much as well…..

  58. annes22 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:53 AM

    I’ll bet there is no shortage of players who would love to live in London and play football there. They are very enthusiastic about the game there now, and fill Wembley everytime there is a game. That is more than you can say here, about some of the stadiums.
    So what someone says a plane ride from London to NY is 6 hours.
    It’s 5 hours to the west coast here, and they go backwards and forwards all season. Most people here, have never been to London, so don’t talk about something you know nothing about!!

  59. kevjamm says: Feb 6, 2016 9:53 AM

    I think a lot of anger is misguided toward Roger Goddell. Nothing gets done without the owners permission, he is just the guy they throw out to face the press and the fans.

  60. blowfishes says: Feb 6, 2016 9:54 AM

    I’m British… I’m in the UK… I follow all Minnesota sports through choice… yet even I can see that a franchise in the UK just won’t logistically work.

    First off, the team will almost certainly carry out its entire off season in the US – this includes all but perhaps the end of training camp.

    How are street free agents brought in for a look see going to be covered? This will again be in the US where it is easier to execute. How is this going to affect the team if it’s currently playing a string of games in the UK?

    The League hasn’t had the greatest track record recently regarding the behaviour of some of its players. How can some players who perhaps have been charged or even accused of serious offenses going to be granted permission to travel to the UK – let alone earn a living there?

    Finally, the League will try to ‘force’ season tickets on the UK supporters. While that might work for two or three games a season, try getting that functioning with eight games.

    Maybe if the UK and US build closer political ties if the UK exits the European Union (EU), and maybe if a faster means of transport across the Atlantic can be sourced, then MAYBE a franchise could be successful in the UK.

  61. kevjamm says: Feb 6, 2016 9:56 AM

    Looks like the NFL has chosen London to be the new leverage city for the owners to fleece existing cities for better stadium deals. Sound familiar?

  62. jomo56 says: Feb 6, 2016 9:56 AM

    Jacksonville owner Shahid Khan owns the Fulham Football Club of London….this is a done deal.
    It’s a new market that can generate plenty of revenue on its own; plus, with other European fans traveling to the games, its a win win for Mr. Khan and the NFL. Only a matter of time. Imagine the 1st Super Bowl out the USA…..will generate absolutely insane $$$$.

  63. theofficialshotcaller says: Feb 6, 2016 10:02 AM

    Stop doing everything possible to destroy the NFL forever. If you want football in Europe start the damn NFL Europe again, the league needs a developmental league, there might not be 10 decent QBs in the entire league, terrible games on TV every week.

  64. lukedunphysscienceproject says: Feb 6, 2016 10:05 AM

    There must be two Londons. Because the one that I was in, in England, had legalized sports betting with a betting parlor on just about every other street corner.

    Considering the millions in legal fees the League has spent keeping legal sports betting out of New Jersey and Delaware, Goodell can’t possibly be considering putting a team in THAT London.

  65. fordmandalay says: Feb 6, 2016 10:05 AM

    It’s almost like they’re TRYING to kill the game.

  66. newpairofsox says: Feb 6, 2016 10:16 AM

    There’s too many cities here in the US that need a team first: Las Vegas, St Louis, Dallas…

  67. blspears says: Feb 6, 2016 10:21 AM

    Every Person I know from the UK does not even like football. Its like opening a bacon factory in Saudi Arabia.

  68. darkneptune73 says: Feb 6, 2016 10:24 AM

    If they have to send a team there, send a crappy team. That way, the project in London will fail faster than NFL Europe did.

  69. sjm1717 says: Feb 6, 2016 10:28 AM

    Any team in London would really struggle to sign any free agents…players won’t want to go there

  70. vdub1980 says: Feb 6, 2016 10:29 AM

    Coast to coast, we should start a petition to have goodell relieved of duty…….have an online site where fans can go to vote and submit to the NFLPA to fight for what we have left of what used to be something great

  71. sueb45 says: Feb 6, 2016 10:30 AM

    annes22 says:
    Feb 6, 2016 9:53 AM
    I’ll bet there is no shortage of players who would love to live in London and play football there. They are very enthusiastic about the game there now, and fill Wembley everytime there is a game. That is more than you can say here, about some of the stadiums.
    So what someone says a plane ride from London to NY is 6 hours.
    It’s 5 hours to the west coast here, and they go backwards and forwards all season. Most people here, have never been to London, so don’t talk about something you know nothing about!!
    It’s 5 hours to the west coast here…..since when? Some people here have apparently never been to the U.S. so they shouldn’t talk about something they know nothing about.

    And in case it hasn’t been said in any of the above comments: Fire Goodell!!!!!!!!!!!

  72. gmen32 says: Feb 6, 2016 10:34 AM

    Gee Toronto, maybe you should have purchased tickets to the Bills in Toronto and the Argonauts afterall. Never hurts to make it look like you actually enjoy the sport of football.

  73. FoozieGrooler says: Feb 6, 2016 10:43 AM

    Just like a politician.
    Despite evidence of overwhelming opposition from fans, he’ll just up and do it anyway.

  74. truthdispensary says: Feb 6, 2016 10:57 AM

    It’s also a “realistic possibility” that people both inside & outside of America will NEVER give a cr@p less about these games played outside the U.S.A. I know for myself, and there are countless others that agree, that I have no interest in watching games played in remote parts of the World. It doesn’t do ANYTHING for the American Fan, and in fact takes games away from the fans of the teams that are relegated to being Goodell’s ‘red headed step-children’, forced to play “in that stupid game overthere”…which is what EVERYONE in America is truly thinking. Frankly, it’s just stupid. The owner’s focus on increasing thier profits when they already have so much money it makes your head swim will NEVER, EVER resonate with the American Football Fan, whose interest in Football will continue to decrease for as long as the League continues to be more concerned about those that aren’t fans than those who are.

  75. skinsrock says: Feb 6, 2016 10:58 AM

    I’m sure once all borders have been dissolved there will be a team in London… Until then… It seems like a logistical nightmare due to Visa/Passport issues. Also, I’m pretty sure the NFLPA would have serious issue with American players having to live and work in an entirely different country and send their kids to UK schools.

  76. dragonfly99 says: Feb 6, 2016 11:00 AM

    We have cities in our own country that are more deserving of an NFL franchise. If Roger keeps pushing this, NFL fans should take a stand and there is a realistic possibility he will be out of a job.

  77. quicktaker says: Feb 6, 2016 11:02 AM

    Can’t wait for the Los Angeles Rams to fly to London for a Thursday night game. Yuck.

  78. pfffffffffffft says: Feb 6, 2016 11:02 AM

    UK commentators are much better commentators than their US counterparts. Much more analysis and better observations to give to the audience.

  79. pfffffffffffft says: Feb 6, 2016 11:05 AM

    There is tremendous interest in NFL football around the world. The Brits would probably be more discerning fans of the sport than most Americans. Seriously.

  80. whooligun says: Feb 6, 2016 11:20 AM

    Doesn’t the owner of the Jags already own a soccer team in London??

  81. gints1017 says: Feb 6, 2016 11:27 AM

    Id love to punch Rodger right square in the nose.

  82. jollyjoker2 says: Feb 6, 2016 11:40 AM

    as a player…..I don’t know if I would want to play there and this causes a lot of media grief. 50% tax rates and a low standard of living. Not sure this would work.

  83. badmoonrison says: Feb 6, 2016 11:50 AM

    Mexico or Canada are better options than faraway UK. At least those 2 countries are on the same continent as us. Get realistic and practical, Goodell.

  84. connfyoozed says: Feb 6, 2016 11:51 AM

    Goodell is delusional if he thinks that the NFLPA will ever be on board with putting a team in London, or if he thinks that the fans think that this is even remotely a good idea. I seriously don’t get the desire to do this. I mean, the NBA has talked about expanding to Europe, but they at least have a lot of European players. Even baseball potentially expanding internationally someday might make sense: again, many international players. But the NFL????

  85. purpleguy says: Feb 6, 2016 11:52 AM

    I’m too lazy to check the specifics, but I’ve flown from coast to coast in the US and from NY to London, and I don’t think the flight lengths are that much different. London ain’t exactly located on the moon folks.

  86. thingamajig says: Feb 6, 2016 11:56 AM

    If the U.S. fans stopped watching the games played in the UK now the NFL wouldn’t put a team in London. TV revenue rules all else. TV ratings for the Pro Bowl game are going down, that’s the only reason the NFL is looking for improvements. When CBS, NBC, ESPN etc talk the NFL listens.

  87. cowboysfanantijerryjones says: Feb 6, 2016 12:00 PM

    lgbarn says:
    Feb 6, 2016 9:24 AM
    Just no…no reason for this except greed. Canada…maybe

    Mexico…also a no (too dangerous)

    Mexico is just as dangerous as Detroit or Chicago or any hood most players hang out at off season.

    You do realize soccer teams that are worth more just on player salary (Brazil national team back in the day, Manchester United, Barcelona, Spain’s national team, etc etc.) than an NFL stadium go to Mexico and play.

    Please do a bit of light reading before making comments that are technically true, but don’t act like cities where current NFL teams play aren’t dangerous as well. You would be surprised of the crime rate in some of the US cities compared to Mexico city. Just say’n.

  88. jmc8888 says: Feb 6, 2016 12:03 PM

    Right now most fans on here want to see the following headline.

    New Commissioner for NFL a realistic possibility

  89. latenightroach says: Feb 6, 2016 12:06 PM

    Honolulu Hawaii would be a better choice than London for an NFL team.

  90. joe.attaboy says: Feb 6, 2016 12:09 PM

    Doesn’t the owner of the Jags already own a soccer team in London??

    Yes, he does. So do the owners of the Buccaneers, but I don’t hear word about Tampa moving to London.

    Shad Khan has made it abundantly clear, over and over, that he likes the annual London game for the revenue but the Jaguars are not moving anywhere. Jacksonville is a small market, and even with a high level of ticket sales, they need the revenue as they continue to rebuild.

    If any of the idiots making the “Jaguars are moving” cracks here paid attention, you would see that the man (and the city) have invested millions in upgrading the stadium, with more to come. You don’t put millions of dollars into locker rooms, scoreboards, fan amenities, free stuff for season ticket holders and all the other plans they’ve announced while you’re also planning to pull up and move across the freaking ocean. Time to stop making moronic comments and pay attention.

    Frankly, I’m waiting for the day the Jaguars’ London trips are over. I want my home games back. They can have all the preseason games if they want.

  91. bleck5 says: Feb 6, 2016 12:10 PM

    How about cities that actually deserve nfl franchises in America get them first like San Antonio and Las Vegas.

  92. dwinsgames says: Feb 6, 2016 12:26 PM

    The greed of the NFL owners has no bounds. If there is money to be made from a franchise in London, you can be sure it’s gonna happen.

  93. nyneal says: Feb 6, 2016 12:27 PM

    pfffffffffffft says:
    Feb 6, 2016 11:05 AM
    There is tremendous interest in NFL football around the world. The Brits would probably be more discerning fans of the sport than most Americans. Seriously.

    Then let them start their own leagues. The NFL is an American game and no NFL team should be put anywhere but in the USA.
    As for ragging on American NFL fans, then explain why there are so many crazies at soccer games around the world? I mean, officials are attacked and spectators die. Those fans are nuts.

  94. tylawspick6 says: Feb 6, 2016 12:28 PM

    Here is why Spygate and Deflatgate exist, folks.

    Two made witch hunts to promote parity against the league’s best team in order to get a fellow AFC team into London to be more greedy.


    Can’t have a mediocre or bad Jax team trying to get off the ground in London, can ya?


  95. finchy74 says: Feb 6, 2016 12:38 PM

    I thought there was a team in London. Could have sworn I saw a game between the Patriots and the London Silly Nannies on tv a few years back. They players even did a song from The Music Man at halftime.

  96. db105 says: Feb 6, 2016 12:45 PM

    There’s a realistic possibility that I’ll stop watching the NFL by then.

  97. fishyinalittledishy says: Feb 6, 2016 1:00 PM

    Americans, Americans don’t take the bait. In our lifetime there will never be a team in Londium. Until some one invents a teleporter or a vehicle that can travel at light speed there is no chance it’s ever going to happen.

  98. captainwhodat says: Feb 6, 2016 1:03 PM

    unfortunately, Goodell is the lackey of the owners…god, Mark Cuban sure was right when he talked about the demise of the NFL…

  99. psubeerman21 says: Feb 6, 2016 1:28 PM

    He knows he can’t do it, probably because the players union would have to be on board, and good luck with that. No player born and raised in the US would want anything to do with London. Most can’t stand going there for one game. Imagine half a season.

  100. cowboy2016 says: Feb 6, 2016 1:35 PM

    Simply put, I hate Roger Goodell.

  101. whispersd says: Feb 6, 2016 1:45 PM

    London is the new LA.

  102. richc111 says: Feb 6, 2016 1:46 PM

    Wanted a new city to use to extort money from a current NFL city. Applicant must be big enough to project an actual potential to have a real team but not big enough to push back when the city is only used for extortion. If the city does everything, maybe some day they might get a real chance at a team. If their good

  103. sfsaintsfan says: Feb 6, 2016 2:15 PM

    Just make sure the team is in the AFC East or the NFC East, don’t play games and force a London team down the throats of another division. London has to the in the EAST of any division.

    The whole idea of a London team is idiotic on its face, but Roger will do whatever he wants to do.

    Also, please pass a rule that NO TEAM can have as part of its stadium agreement a rule that they must play ALL 8 home games at home. Either do that, or allow ANY team to opt out of having a “home” game on the road for any reason at all.

  104. bigredgoog says: Feb 6, 2016 2:24 PM

    Still don’t think they should but if they do make it two teams and give them a salary cap of 150% of other teams for the first 5 years (and that excess has to be given to the players) to offset the disadvantages of drafting players to play and live at least for a few months in a foreign country.

    Will make the London teams competitive in free agency.

  105. ebdug says: Feb 6, 2016 3:33 PM

    Anything is a possibilty with this commissioner. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if he outlawed the pass rush tomorrow. You’d like to think the owners would step in and tell him he’s acting like a 5-year old, but they’re oblivious to the game. As long as the money keeps flowing through the chute they just don’t care.

  106. babygaga19 says: Feb 6, 2016 4:11 PM

    False. NFL and Goodell are milking Europe for fast cash. Minimally, it would take 4 teams in Europe to make this plan feasible. NFL has already crashed and burned in Europe. London is being played for today’s money.

  107. pcoisma says: Feb 6, 2016 4:56 PM

    Since LA is out of the picture NFL needs a new boogeyman to screw current markets. Hence Mexico city game this year and London.

    By the way Goodell isn’t screwing up the league. It is the rich owners that control him. The richest owners run the league now not the old guard who actually cares about the game

  108. briang123 says: Feb 6, 2016 5:15 PM

    London sliding nicely into the Boogeyman role Los Angeles played for 20 years.

  109. rportkid says: Feb 6, 2016 6:14 PM

    Whenever I see a story headline starting with “Goodell”, I chuckle because I know the story will be full of lies. That’s all he knows what to do…lie.

  110. schmoejoe says: Feb 6, 2016 6:22 PM

    They need to be 8n the AFC east. I wonder how a Patriots – London rivalry would play out.

  111. kingpel says: Feb 6, 2016 7:54 PM

    Maybe they should just give NFL Europe another try with a goal of a merger in 10 years or sooner. Here is a crazy idea. Let those teams participate in the NFL draft from rounds 5-7 and then have an additional 4 rounds from 8-12 for just the NFL Europe teams. With solid talent evaluation they could at least lay the foundation to be competitive.

    The key is the NFL would have to pay these players/staffs and not treat them like outcasts over there.

  112. rcali says: Feb 6, 2016 8:04 PM

    Everybody, I think we got this all wrong. What would be more entertaining then a half full stadium in London once the shine wears off?….and it will pretty fast. Players will be all ticked off about the travel, time change, and don’t forget those big taxes! NFL will pour millions of dollars to keep it afloat and tell lies about how well it’s working, when will all know the truth. We just sit back and enjoy the circus.

  113. gonakgod says: Feb 6, 2016 8:08 PM

    They talked about a big market like LA not having a team for so long ….. But what about new york when will they get an NFL franchise

  114. Lancane says: Feb 6, 2016 8:22 PM

    It’s rather pathetic that Goodell is so sold on a London expansion that he is blind to a North American expansion which is long overdue. With Portland, Las Vegas, Ontario, Honolulu, Vancouver, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, Orlando, Mobile, Toronto and other cities here able to sustain a franchise that he is still focused on getting into an unsteady European market not to mention the expense fiscally and physically for other teams to go to and from overseas.

  115. warren89 says: Feb 10, 2016 10:28 PM

    I think the Jaguars should move over there.Florida don’t need 3 NFL teams if they can’t have 3 NBA teams.Jacksonville is not built for professional sports like Tampa and Miami.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!