Skip to content

New coaches may now need to worry about contacting former players


The punishment imposed on the Chiefs for violating the rules of the 2015 tampering period came from an allegation that Chiefs employees had direct contact with receiver Jeremy Maclin during the pre-free agency window that allows communication only with agents who represent impending free agents. The league’s decision to publish the punishment after the 2016 tampering period ended gives rise to the possibility that other teams had impermissible communications with other impending free agents this year.

The most obvious dot-connecting arises from coaches who have changed teams during the 2016 hiring cycle and their former players. In lieu of attempting to make a list of the possible culprits, and in turn being viewed as implicitly suggesting that something improper happened, we’ll let the audience connect the fairly obvious dots on its own.

Here’s one that we already mentioned on Twitter:¬†Eagles coach Doug Pederson, who was employed by the Chiefs when the conversations occurred a year ago with Maclin, has signed former Chiefs quarterback Chase Daniel. At the Scouting Combine, Pederson made comments about Daniel that some have argued constitute minor, yet obvious, violations of the tampering rules.

If Pederson and Daniel were in contact during the tampering period,¬†the Eagles did the same thing to the Chiefs this year that the Chiefs allegedly did to the Eagles last year. If the punishment imposed on the Chiefs had been announced before the start of this year’s legal tampering period, Pederson would have been on unmistakable notice to avoid talking to Daniel.

There’s a chance Pederson already knew about last year’s issues arising from direct communications between the Chiefs and Maclin. Then again, if Pederson had been sensitive to the issue during the Scouting Combine, he arguably would have said nothing at all publicly about Daniel.

Permalink 5 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Kansas City Chiefs, Philadelphia Eagles, Rumor Mill
5 Responses to “New coaches may now need to worry about contacting former players”
  1. cinzano08 says: Mar 9, 2016 9:31 PM

    Does it matter? When you have the keystone cops running this league incompetence will reign.

  2. mongo3401 says: Mar 9, 2016 9:35 PM

    I think to be fair to all involved. Let’s just have the NFL call it like it is and say it’s the bargaining period. That’s all and accept teams,players and agents bargain for the best deal. Nothing shrouded in secrecy that does not go on anyway.

  3. kgor93 says: Mar 9, 2016 10:22 PM

    This whole thing is stupid. If you accept a job at Google, for example, you’re not banned from talking to managers at Microsoft or Apple.

  4. bobbyhoying says: Mar 10, 2016 7:15 AM

    So Andy Reid sends Doug over to Jeff yet was utterly surprised when Chase followed? Maclin wanted to go home to Missouri yet the Chiefs tampered, and Chip was blamed for letting him go? None of these guys are friends who call each other during the off season? This is laughable, except for KC.

  5. edelmanfanclub says: Mar 10, 2016 1:06 PM

    If Goodell likes you are fine to tamper with anything, if you are not you will be severely overpunished. Go on Roger start many penalties different for other teams, we already know you instruct to refs to do so anyways.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!