Skip to content

Perceived lack of consistency mars Scouting Combine exclusions, too

Getty Images

Apart from the reality that the P.R.-driven effort to exclude certain players from the Scouting Combine won’t exclude them from being considered for employment, teams also have concerns about the manner in which players are selected for non-selection to the Scouting Combine.

Supposedly, no player who has been convicted of violence or use of a weapon, domestic violence or sexual offenses will be allowed at the Scouting Combine. As one league source explained it to PFT, however, teams are having a hard time understanding why some players with criminal histories have been blocked from attending the Scouting Combine, but other haven’t.

“There is no consistency,” the source said. “Why some, why not others? . . . It’s subjective.”

It’s also possible that there is consistency, but that the communication between the league and the team regarding the line of demarcation between getting to Indianapolis and being barred has been substandard.

More probable than not, the NFL isn’t being consistent — or it’s getting its information too slowly. For example, Mississippi quarterback Chad Kelly, who was on the official invitation list as of February 1, has been uninvited.

Implemented in 2016 to bar incoming player from the Scouting Combine, the draft, and all league-related events, the procedures apparently need to be buttoned up. Or maybe the league should let the best players attend regarding of past transgressions, so that NFL teams will have a full, fair, and efficient opportunity for doing what they are going to do anyway: Evaluate the players for potential NFL employment.

Permalink 6 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Rumor Mill
6 Responses to “Perceived lack of consistency mars Scouting Combine exclusions, too”
  1. redlikethepig says: Feb 16, 2017 5:38 AM

    Pats fans whining in 5 …4 … 3 …

  2. footballisnotthatimportant says: Feb 16, 2017 5:41 AM

    Criminal history is a part of the evaluation, friendo. As well it should be.

  3. Magyver says: Feb 16, 2017 6:25 AM

    Perhaps Gregg Williams should be in charge of vetting violent college players.

    At least then we’d begin to see some consistency.

  4. elyasm says: Feb 16, 2017 8:29 AM

    The only thing about the NFL that is consistent is their inconsistency. #FireGoodell

  5. whatevnfl says: Feb 16, 2017 10:46 AM

    Because you have clowns in the League office making up things as they go along.

  6. factschecker says: Feb 16, 2017 10:54 AM

    Not getting invited isn’t totally a bad thing. It can be better to go undrafted vs being a 7th (and in some cases 6th) round pick. If you have 6 to 10 teams bidding for your service you get more money than a 7th round pick (and in extreme cases paid more than a 6th) Plus you have some say so in which team you sign a contract with (if multiple teams are bidding for your service.)

    Additionally you could wear the Combine snub as a chip on your shoulder during Camp in August. In a given year roughly 1/3 of the NFL are either combine or draft snubs. (UDFA)

    Pout and pack it in …..OR….what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!