Brandon Carr’s deal is a one-year experiment for the Ravens

Getty Images

Although not many long-term NFL contracts result in every check being cashed by the player, cornerback Brandon Carr accomplished that feat in Dallas, making all of his five-year, $50.1 million deal. That may not happen with his new four-year deal in Baltimore.

The structure shows that it’s a one-year, $6 million contract with a team-held option for each of the next three years of what could be a four-year, $23 million contract.

The good news for Carr is that the team must make its decision for the next league year by the end of the prior league year, which would put him on the market early. The bad news is that, if the team picks up the option each year, there’s a chance he’s outperforming the contract. If he’s underperforming, the Ravens won’t keep him.

That’s why the better approach would be to just do a one-year deal. Of course, the team has some say in the structure; the Ravens possibly mandated the ability to keep Carr on a year-to-year basis in lieu of signing him to a one-year deal. Still, if enough players and agents pushed hard enough for shorter-term contracts, plenty of teams would have to drop the year-to-year options and do one- or two-year deals that allow the players to get back to the market sooner than later.

With the cap going up by $10 million or more per year — and with the Management Council likely leaning on teams to not pay players based on a percentage of the salary cap — it’s in the best interests of most players to not tie themselves to any team for a long period of time.

7 responses to “Brandon Carr’s deal is a one-year experiment for the Ravens

  1. Carr won’t get many interceptions, but he does show up every Sunday. He’s just lucky Megatron doesn’t play anymore. Still can’t believe a guy gets a 50 million contract and gets torched for 329 yards.

  2. This is a silly article. Carr could have easily gotten a one year deal… but he would have had to accept less money during the one year. The ravens are paying for their options, and presumably they are paying a price that Carr’s agent thinks is reasonable.

  3. “With the cap going up by $10 million or more per year — and with the Management Council likely leaning on teams to not pay players based on a percentage of the salary cap — it’s in the best interests of most players to not tie themselves to any team for a long period of time.”
    ==========================

    That may be true of veteran players that have already attained financial security that are looking to maximize earnings but for younger guys looking to make bank it puts too much of the injury ri$k on them.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!