Skip to content

ESPN, NFL Network see ratings increase for draft

Getty Images

After a season in which NFL television ratings declined, the major event of the offseason got a boost in ratings.

Both ESPN and NFL Network reported that their ratings increased over last year. ESPN averaged 3.1 million viewers over the entire 15 hours of the draft, spread over three days and on both ESPN and ESPN2. For NFL Network, which averaged 1.5 million viewers, it was the most-viewed draft ever.

For Round 1 on Thursday night only, ESPN averaged 6.9 million viewers, while NFL Network averaged 2.5 million viewers.

Browns fans are incredibly loyal viewers of the draft: Cleveland repeated as the No. 1 local market for draft ratings, while Dayton was tied with host city Philadelphia for second. Local ratings in Philadelphia this year were significantly higher than local ratings in host city Chicago last year.

League executives will surely see the good ratings as vindication of their approach to the draft, which has included an attempt to bring in more casual fans with gimmicks that some hard-core football fans dislike. The draft is getting better with each year and at each new venue, and it shows no sign of slowing down.

Permalink 18 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Cleveland Browns, Home, Rumor Mill
18 Responses to “ESPN, NFL Network see ratings increase for draft”
  1. nfcbeastly says: May 1, 2017 4:02 PM

    It doesn’t get anymore ‘NFL City’ than it does in Philadelphia, oh btw

    “Fly Eagles Fly on the road to victory……..”

  2. Longfellow Deeds says: May 1, 2017 4:04 PM

    NFL Draft gets higher ratings than the World Series, football is king

  3. lordliftedme says: May 1, 2017 4:08 PM

    I was one of the ones glued to my TV. I thought the draft was awesome. Very entertaining, lots of intrigues and very colorful. Philadelphia was a great host for this event.

  4. oscarxray says: May 1, 2017 4:14 PM

    Alright Dayton ! 60 miles from Cincinnati and it’s a Browns Town.

  5. hanspard says: May 1, 2017 4:22 PM

    Drop the dumb zoo stuff, but other than that it was pretty good. I could do with a lot less of the “special presenter” stuff, though. Just give me the pick. I don’t need the winner of the Las Vegas Make-A-Wish City Council military whatever to do it. Just talk football for crying out loud.

  6. clemsonfanjt says: May 1, 2017 4:23 PM

    Browns fans are the most viewing fans in the Country?? Maybe that is the ONLY time of the season they seem relevant

  7. briang123 says: May 1, 2017 4:30 PM

    It will slow down once you let some clown town like Charlotte or Denver host it

  8. terripet says: May 1, 2017 4:31 PM

    Had too watch espn couldn’t listen to mr know it all Mayock

  9. mnrasslinggovjesse says: May 1, 2017 4:36 PM

    It had to be the monkey I guess…

  10. kane337 says: May 1, 2017 4:51 PM

    Jacksonville or London to host the draft next year.

  11. blah773 says: May 1, 2017 4:53 PM

    NFL brass: “hey everyone, our ratings are up for the draft! now how do we wreck this?…”

  12. txmidnite says: May 1, 2017 4:55 PM

    Philadelphia as a host city knocked it out of the park. The bar is now set incredibly high with a fun festival atmosphere. Agree with the comments about doing away with the fluffy corny special interest presenters. Let Jimmy Kimmel ad-lib onstage and announce the selections. Goodell is such a buzzkill. – Cowboy fan

  13. purplepride11 says: May 1, 2017 4:58 PM

    ESPN coverage was good. The NFL network coverage was almost unwatchable.

  14. granadafan says: May 1, 2017 5:17 PM

    So, the ratings show that despite the circus atmosphere with animals, astronauts, an unpopular commissioner, and retired ex-player of a bitter rival, and on a network with alleged SJW views (conservatives hate social issues), people will still watch the draft.

    Goodell’s ego is ready to explode.

  15. dallascowboysforever says: May 1, 2017 5:19 PM

    The NFL will always have better ratings if they keep politics away from their products and news for that matter. For those that want to mention the military and how politics have always been in sports, that’s not what I’m talking about. They can really learn from last season with Kaepernick’s fiasco and ESPN’s stance on being a liberal network willing to talk more about politics and less about sports.

    There’s a problem when Undisputed with Skip Bayless is a better show and is more entertaining to watch over First Take. It’s probably because of Matt Kellerman. ESPN used to be great but not anymore, of course. Hopefully, NFL Network continues to stay clear of that same political stuff. To add to all of that, it hurts the game when they’re constantly changing the rules and adding in so many commercial breaks as well.

  16. pastabelly says: May 1, 2017 6:02 PM

    HOPE draws ratings. When reality sets in and markets like Cleveland realize how bad their teams, are they will find out that misery, once again, does not sell.

  17. 6ball says: May 1, 2017 6:13 PM

    .
    I’m guessing that the ratings in New England were down considerably during rounds 1 & 2.
    .

  18. hockeyflow30 says: May 1, 2017 8:49 PM

    Of course the ratings are high in Ohio, this is Cleveland’s Super Bowl

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!