Skip to content

Which running back is most likely to have a big year in 2017?

Getty Images

Three big-name running backs have new teams and new starts in 2017. So which one is most likely to have a big year, all things considered? It’s the PFT Live question of the day.

The candidates are, if you’ve been paying no attention over the past two months, Adrian Peterson in New Orleans, Marshawn Lynch in Oakland, and Jamaal Charles in Denver.

Pick one of the three, battle it out in the comments, and then check out the show at 6:00 a.m. ET on NBC Sports Radio, with the simulcast starting at 7:00 a.m. ET on NBCSN.

Permalink 27 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Denver Broncos, Home, Kansas City Chiefs, Minnesota Vikings, New Orleans Saints, Oakland Raiders, Rumor Mill, Seattle Seahawks
27 Responses to “Which running back is most likely to have a big year in 2017?”
  1. jstew0103 says: May 3, 2017 6:08 AM

    The obvious choice is the back playing behind the best offensive line: Lynch.

    Who I want to have the best season? Charles. I’ve always liked him as a player and I hope he can stay healthy.

  2. 1phillyphan says: May 3, 2017 6:17 AM

    Gotta be Beastmode…The other 2 won’t play more then 10 games.
    If Healthy, Charles could go for 1,500 / 12 TDs.
    AP has a loaded backfield. I actually think the rookie Kamara will lead that team in rushing yrds

  3. patsack69 says: May 3, 2017 6:22 AM

    What about Mike Gillislee, he seems like a great fit I’m New England. And he’s on the right side of 30.

  4. wrongowright says: May 3, 2017 7:28 AM

    Where is the none of the above button? Lynch should have the best year of the three, but none will have a big year. I see Lynch as the short yardage battering ram so he will lead the Raiders in rushing touchdowns as part of a committee. Peterson will at best share carries with Ingram as Cadet and Kamara will be the receiving backs. Charles will have the worst season of the three.

  5. elyasm says: May 3, 2017 8:21 AM

    Mike Gillililisisle… Gilesele… Giellies… … …
    Rex Burkhead!

  6. dawoger says: May 3, 2017 8:51 AM

    We know AP (abusing parent) is gonna abuse that highly overrated D of minisoda come 9/11.

  7. brockwarrener says: May 3, 2017 9:06 AM

    Eddie Lacy

  8. truthbetold109 says: May 3, 2017 9:22 AM

    You have to give AP the benefit of the doubt. Last year he played behind the worst offensive line in the history of football in Minnesota.

  9. cheeseisfattening says: May 3, 2017 9:50 AM

    A now trim, out of Green Bay Eddie Lacy

  10. Frazier28/7 says: May 3, 2017 10:31 AM

    Dalvin Cook!

  11. stellarperformance says: May 3, 2017 10:46 AM

    Jamaal Williams. ROY.

  12. ariani1985 says: May 3, 2017 10:55 AM

    I don’t see any WRS on the list? is turd nation taking note of this?

  13. illumination666 says: May 3, 2017 11:27 AM

    Not sure why everyone started naming other backs. I think this is about which older back will have the better season. Not a younger back entering their 2nd contract. I don’t understand people.

  14. whatjusthapped says: May 3, 2017 1:51 PM

    Frazier28/7 says:
    May 3, 2017 10:31 AM
    Dalvin Cook!

    =======================
    We’ve got 2,000 comedians out of work and Frazier28/7 is telling jokes!

    The Vikings finished dead last in running last year and its wasn’t because they didn’t have Cook. Their offensive line was one of the worse and while you could hope for a slight improvement, Cook is not going to make much of an impact. But this a prime example that we know its spring, we have Viking fans predicting their visions of glory while reality awaits them in the fall. They should aim more realistically that they don’t finish in 3rd place, yet again.

  15. thebillscouldeventuallymove says: May 3, 2017 2:08 PM

    As a Raider fan I’m biased. But our Offensive line is better than Denver or New Orleans. So barring injury Lynch should be the winner here

  16. daysend564 says: May 3, 2017 2:08 PM

    They are all going to fail to reach the 1000 yard mark.

  17. Footballfan825 says: May 3, 2017 2:16 PM

    I never bet against Peterson. That guy is a wrecking ball. It’ll be interesting to see if Drew Brees can not throw the ball a thousand times a game…

  18. Carl Gerbschmidt says: May 3, 2017 2:32 PM

    truthbetold109 says:
    May 3, 2017 9:22 AM
    You have to give AP the benefit of the doubt. Last year he played behind the worst offensive line in the history of football in Minnesota.

    —————

    Have they gotten any better?

  19. MasMacho says: May 3, 2017 4:10 PM

    Feast Mode. All day.

  20. ckruszka says: May 3, 2017 4:19 PM

    Being a Saints fan, I’m hoping its AP.

  21. omeimontis says: May 3, 2017 4:21 PM

    I say Charles because New Orleans and Oakland have veteran quarterbacks. They will pass the ball more often than Denver. Charles is likely to get more carries than either Peterson or Lynch.

  22. raiderrob68 says: May 3, 2017 6:46 PM

    None will reach 1,000 yards. JC would have the best chance, but won’t stay healthy. AP is a backup and his numbers will reflect that. Lynch will get 12 TD’s and is the winner!

  23. beerbratscheese says: May 3, 2017 7:25 PM

    ariani1985 says:
    May 3, 2017 10:55 AM
    I don’t see any WRS on the list? is turd nation taking note of this?
    ——————–

    That’s because the poll is asking about RBs. Do Vikings fans even know the difference between a RB and a WR?

  24. cotroutslayer says: May 3, 2017 8:30 PM

    If you go with the best O-line for those three guys, it’s got to be Lynch. That said, however, I think he will be turned into a 3rd down back which could limit his yardage. Charles may have a chance if he stays healthy although the Denver O-line sucks. Peterson joined a throwing team, not a running offense. He will be limited.

    Time will tell but my money is on Lynch behind the better O-line if he proves he is more than just a 3rd down back.

  25. silentcount says: May 3, 2017 9:40 PM

    Gotta go with the guy on the team with the best passing attack. You can’t load the box against a run when Brees has so many weapons spread out. Peterson will make yardage, but so will Ingram and the new guy Kamara. Saints will be under the radar this year, the same as they were in 2009. SURPRISE!

  26. jamiebusicogmail says: May 4, 2017 2:04 PM

    Best passing attack, New Orleans lol???? I’m sorry Noooooo

  27. stratomaticfan says: May 4, 2017 8:11 PM

    Not sure what you’re smoking, silentcount.

    Oakland’s passing attack will be better than NO

    Derek Carr throwing 3 backs who can all catch (Lynch/Richard/Washington), along with 2 star WR (Cooper/Crabtree) and one of the top TEs in Jared Cook.

    All behind one of the top 3 offensive lines in football.

    If all healthy, Lynch will put up the best numbers.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!