Skip to content

Could scrapping overtime be the right answer? (Probably not)

The NFL has had 15 minutes of regular-season overtime and some degree of short-week football for more than 40 years. Suddenly, the possibility of a team playing up to 75 minutes on a Sunday followed by a game on a Thursday was deemed sufficiently pronounced to compel a 33-percent shrinkage of overtime. As former NFL senior V.P. of officiating Dean Blandino recently explained it, he suggested a 100-percent reduction of the fifth quarter. (I suppose it should now be called the seventh sixth.)

My first thought was that getting rid of overtime would result many more ties. I thought that because, before overtime was extended to the regular season in 1974, there were a lot of ties.

In 1973, there were seven ties in 182 total regular-season games, a tie rate of nearly four percent. Four teams had two ties each.

In 1970, the Chargers finished 5-6-3. That’s more of a locker combination than it is a win-loss record.

In 1965, the AFL had eight teams playing 14 games each, for a total of 56 regular-season games. Eight games — 14 percent of all of them — ended in a tie, with the Chargers finishing 9-2-3.

At a four-percent rate, the 32-team, 16-game NFL would produce 10 ties per year. That said, the changes in the rules regarding the passing game over the past four decades could make it easier for teams to move the ball and win games in regulation.

But don’t teams already try to avoid overtime by winning before the end of the fourth quarter? Few go into a protective shell midway through the fourth quarter, opting for the uncertainty of overtime over a shot at winning in regulation.

So of the 13 overtime games in 2016, how many wouldn’t have ended in a tie? Ditto for 2015, when 21 games finished regulation in a tie.

From a player health and safety standpoint, no overtime would definitely ensure that teams playing on a Sunday and then on a Thursday wouldn’t be overworked. But an uptick in ties would mean an increase in unsatisfying results. And that’s surely why the NFL added overtime 43 years ago.

So whether it’s 15 minutes or 10 minutes or true sudden death of a two-point conversion shootout (my preference), the NFL needs to find a way to keep ties to a minimum. Because everyone hates them.

Permalink 13 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Los Angeles Chargers, Rumor Mill
13 Responses to “Could scrapping overtime be the right answer? (Probably not)”
  1. tvguy22 says: Jun 19, 2017 3:19 PM

    A solution…in search of a problem.

  2. nimbushex says: Jun 19, 2017 3:21 PM

    There’s this one league that has adopted an overtime format that isn’t perfect, but generally pleases almost everyone, it’s called the NCAA.

  3. sdelmonte says: Jun 19, 2017 3:26 PM

    Every NFL fan hates them. Billions of soccer fans seem to love them.

    Frankly, one of the reasons I don’t really love soccer is that willingness to settle for ties all the time. Especially 0-0 ties. But ties really don’t kill a sport. Honestly, I miss them in hockey.

  4. mogogo1 says: Jun 19, 2017 3:39 PM

    OT doesn’t come up often enough to waste much thought on how (or if) it gets done. If I had to to vote I’d probably come down on the side of having regular season OT but it comes up so seldom it wouldn’t mean that much to me if it was eliminated until the playoffs.

  5. bigdog2372 says: Jun 19, 2017 4:12 PM

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard one fan ever complain about overtime. Or kickoffs. Or extra points. Or anything else they have attempted to “fix” in the last decade. It’s just another case of the talking heads on sports shows trying to force issues where there is none.

  6. rugolin says: Jun 19, 2017 4:45 PM

    Just adopt the CFL overtime rules of each team getting the call on the 30 yard line and see who scores the most on each exchange. Pretty simple and fans really like it.

  7. arvinkp says: Jun 19, 2017 4:45 PM

    OT should be offensive lineman kicking field goals in a NHL shootout format.

  8. icebowler says: Jun 19, 2017 4:58 PM

    What if they limited special OT rules to just the Sunday games in which one of the teams was playing the following Thursday?

  9. cometkazie says: Jun 19, 2017 5:00 PM

    I’m OK with ties.

    There shouldn’t be NFL on Thursday anyway.

  10. realfann says: Jun 19, 2017 5:56 PM

    There shouldn’t be any NFL games where one or both of the teams has less than 6 days rest since the last game.

    Feed that into the scheduling computer and all would be solved.

  11. charger383 says: Jun 19, 2017 6:31 PM

    Full extra quarter and if still tied both teams take a loss
    If nfl players can’t play extra quarter then practices are too short and not hard enough

  12. handsatlanta says: Jun 19, 2017 7:28 PM

    At a four-percent rate, the 32-team, 16-game NFL would produce 10 ties per year.

    I don’t think the question is how to resolve that but rather what effect does overtime have on the final standings. If the effect is minimal then get rid of it. Fans may not like overtime but we can deal with it – it just gives us something more to talk about.

  13. richabbs says: Jun 19, 2017 8:07 PM

    I agree, the solution is to get rid of Thursday night football and leave OT as it was.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!