Skip to content

Patriots security chief confirms Hernandez’s alibi attempt

Hernandez AP

At the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial, Patriots owner Robert Kraft was followed to the witness stand by Patriots security director Mark Briggs.  And Briggs confirmed the most important aspect of Kraft’s testimony.

Via Dan Wetzel of Yahoo! Sports, Briggs (like Kraft) testified that Hernandez said he didn’t kill Lloyd, and that Hernandez was at a “club.”

He swore on his baby’s life he was telling the truth,” Briggs said of Hernandez.

Hernandez definitely wasn’t telling the truth about his whereabouts.  The prosecution will now hope that this will help the jury conclude he also wasn’t telling the truth about his innocence.

Permalink 58 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Kraft tells jury Hernandez said he was in “club” during shooting

Hernandez AP

Testifying on Tuesday in the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial, Patriots owner Robert Kraft provided a piece of evidence that could be very useful for the prosecution.

Via Dan Wetzel of Yahoo! Sports, Kraft told jurors that Hernandez denied involvement in the murder of Odin Lloyd, explaining that he was in a “club” at the time of the shooting.

As Wetzel notes, the evidence introduced to date makes it clear that Hernandez wasn’t in a “club” at the time of the shooting.  Which indicates Hernandez lied to Kraft.

Hernandez may dispute that he gave a false explanation to the man who at the time of the shooting was Hernandez’s ultimate boss.  But Hernandez has only one way to rebut the testimony from Robert Kraft — by taking the witness stand.

That’s where the right to remain silent creates a huge dilemma for a criminal defendant.  While the accused isn’t compelled to testify in court, anything he has said out of court can be used against him.  Since it’s a statement from a party to the lawsuit, it’s not hearsay.  And as it relates to one-on-one communications, it’s unchallenged unless the defendant chooses to waive the right against self-incrimination and testify.

Hernandez most likely won’t be testifying at all.  To do so would expose him to cross-examination. Which could quickly erase any chance his lawyers have of identifying “reasonable doubt” during closing arguments.

Permalink 97 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Robert Kraft takes the stand at Aaron Hernandez murder trial

Denver Broncos vs New England Patriots, NFL Getty Images

The Patriots had largely been able to keep themselves at arms length from the Aaron Hernandez murder trial, until today.

Via multiple reports, Patriots owner Robert Kraft is in the Fall River Justice Center today, and has been called to the stand.

Trainer Brian McDonough was called to the stand in late February to testify about a series of text messages he exchanged with Hernandez. McDonough doesn’t work for the team, but worked with a number of players at Gillette Stadium.

Coach Bill Belichick and linebacker Brandon Spikes are also on the witness list, though it’s unclear if they’ll actually be asked to testify.

Permalink 67 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Jenkins admits to disposing of box, at Hernandez’s request

Jenkins AP

Shayanna Jenkins, the fiancée of accused triple-murderer Aaron Hernandez, previously faced perjury charges for allegedly lying to a grand jury about having no knowledge of disposing of a box that may have contained a key piece of evidence in the Odin Lloyd murder case.  At the trial regarding the June 2013 shooting death of Lloyd, Jenkins has admitted to disposing of the box — although she claimed to have no knowledge of its contents.

“He told me to go downstairs in our storage room and remove a box from our house,” Jenkins testified Monday, via Greg Bedard of

“I believe he said it was important, I’m not sure,” Jenkins added.  She later explained that she doesn’t remember whether he told her specifically why the box should be removed.

Jenkins admitted that she indeed disposed of the box, but that she doesn’t remember where she disposed of it.

Prosecutors have long believed that the box contained the murder weapon, a Glock used to repeatedly shoot Lloyd.  And the jury now has enough evidence to account for the absence of the murder weapon, since common sense suggests that innocent people rarely instruct a loved one to remove a box with unknown contents from the house during the early stages of an investigation arising from the murder of a friend whose body was found not far from the house from which the mystery box was removed and disposed.

On Friday, Jenkins admitted that she asked Hernandez if he killed Lloyd, and that Hernandez denied it.  The mere fact that she asked the question could become strong circumstantial evidence of guilty during jury deliberations.  While Hernandez’s denial is as useful as the standard response to the “do I look fat in these jeans?” question, the “hey, did you kill that guy?” question rarely gets floated in the households of the non-criminal.

Permalink 91 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Strange developments at Hernandez trial

Hernandez AP

On Thursday, a bomb threat interrupted the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial.  On Friday, things could get even more interesting.

The day has begun with Judge E. Susan Garsh individually questioning the jurors, in the presence of the lawyers and Hernandez.  Via Michael McCann of Sports Illustrated, the jurors were standing two feet from Hernandez while fielding and answering questions.

It’s not known what the jurors are being asked, but it’s entirely possible (if not probable) that the judge and the lawyers are ensuring that each juror will continue to serve without bias or prejudice in the aftermath of Thursday’s events, for which an arrest has been made.

Once testimony resumes, Hernandez’s fiancée, Shayanna Jenkins, is expected to testify.  Via Michele Steele of ESPN, Jenkins has arrived in court wearing her engagement ring.  Which suggests that she won’t be flipping on Hernandez today, regardless of the immunity from prosecution that she has received.

Then again, the presence of the ring will make her testimony even more credible, if she provides information that hurts Hernandez’s case.  Prosecutors believe Jenkins disposed of the murder weapon.

Permalink 41 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Hernandez’s fiancée due to testify on Friday

Jenkins AP

Apart from Thursday’s bomb threat, the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial hasn’t generated much news in recent weeks.  The circumstantial evidence points to Hernandez as the killer (or at least present during the killing) of Odin Lloyd, but there’s still no clear motive apart from Hernandez being generally reckless, completely unpredictable, and randomly violent.

Things could get far more interesting soon, when Hernandez’s fiancée, Shayanna Jenkins, shows up to testify.  Per multiple reports, Jenkins is due to take the stand on Friday.

Jenkins has received immunity, which gives the prosecution the power to compel her to testify — or to put her behind bars for contempt of court.  The question becomes whether she goes out of her way to be helpful, or whether she has truly flipped on the father of her child.

One factor that could make Jenkins flip?  A babysitter testified earlier this month that Hernandez once hit on her.  Coincidentally (or not), Jenkins hasn’t been seen in court since March 6.

If Jenkins has indeed flipped, she could testify that she disposed of a box that contained the murder weapon that still has not been found.  Prosecutors believe that’s exactly what she did.

Permalink 29 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Lloyd’s phone pinged along path to site of shooting

Tower Getty Images

Of all the snippets of evidence that have emerged during the first five weeks of the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial, an item that emerged on Thursday resonates.  Literally.

Via the Associated Press, a T-Mobile employee testified that Odin Lloyd’s cell phone pinged multiple times along the route that prosecutors claim Hernandez took from Lloyd’s home to the industrial park where Lloyd’s body later was found.

Other recent testimony has included testimony regarding tire tracks at the scene, a coincidental homage to the late January Mona Lisa Vito comments from Hernandez’s former head coach.  Another witness linked Hernandez’s DNA to evidence found on a spent bullet casing and on a marijuana cigarette found at the scene of the crime.

As to the shell casing, Hernandez’s lawyers scored points by proving that the witness hadn’t been told a piece of gum that Hernandez had chewed had been stuck to the shell casing in the dumpster where the items had been placed when found in the car Hernandez had rented.

That’s an avoidable gaffe by the prosecution that could give jurors inclined to agree with the defense powerful ammunition for deliberations.  If the government would so nonchalantly produce inherently flawed evidence of DNA on a shell casing, what other flaws may be lurking in the overall body of proof?

Permalink 15 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Judge won’t allow evidence of other shooting in Hernandez trial

Garsh AP

The judge presiding over the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial has slammed the door on the prosecution’s argument that the defense has opened the door.

Via the Boston Globe, Judge E. Susan Garsh decided Wednesday to confirm her prior ruling that evidence regarding the alleged shooting of Hernandez “friend” Alexander Bradley would not be admitted in the case regarding the alleged shooting (and murder) of supposed Hernandez “friend” Odin Lloyd.

In a hearing held with the jury out of the courtroom, prosecutor William McAuley said the defense had referred to Lloyd on 32 occasions during the trial’s opening statements Hernandez’s “friend.”  The prosecution argued that Hernandez’s lawyers had invited evidence regarding the other shooting via the suggestion that Hernandez couldn’t have shot Lloyd because Lloyd is Hernandez’s friend and Hernandez doesn’t shoot his friends.

Judge Garsh nevertheless acknowledged that Hernandez could still open the door to evidence regarding Alexander Bradley’s claim if Hernandez testifies, for example, that he has never fired a gun.  This presumes Hernandez will testify; there’s a good chance he won’t.  Criminal defendants often stay away from the witness stand, since cross-examination of the defendant often makes it easier for the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Permalink 6 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Hernandez’s lawyer may have opened the door for evidence of another shooting

Trial AP

When fashioning arguments, tactics, and strategies for trial, it’s critical that a lawyer carefully consider the ramifications of every word that may come out of his or her mouth.

In the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial, the former Patriots tight end’s lawyers may have failed to be as careful as they should have been.

Dan Wetzel of Yahoo! Sports explains the latest fascinating turn in the case arising from the death of Odin Lloyd.  By consistently referring to Lloyd as Hernandez’s friend, Hernandez’s high-priced lawyer may have inadvertently allowed evidence of another time Hernandez shot a supposed friend to be introduced.

The prosecution, per Wetzel, has filed paperwork asking Judge E. Susan Garsh to reconsider the question of whether evidence of the alleged February 13, 2013 shooting of Alexander Bradley will be utilized in the Lloyd case.  The prosecution contends that Bradley was Hernandez’s “friend and confidante” but that Hernandez allegedly shot Bradley in the face “in an isolated industrial area,” dumped Bradley’s body on the ground, and fled the scene.

Bradley survived, suing Hernandez in civil court for the shooting not long before Odin Lloyd’s murder.

Despite Judge Garsh’s prior decision to prevent such evidence, the prosecution contends that Hernandez’s lawyers have “opened the door” by consistently referring to Lloyd as Hernandez’s friend, with the clear message being that Hernadnez wouldn’t shoot a friend.

Ordinarily, evidence of other conduct by a criminal defendant can’t be used to make the defendant look generally like a bad guy.  Rule 404(b) of the Massachusetts Rules of Evidence (like the Rules of Evidence in most if not all states) provides that evidence may be admissible to prove motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident.  In Hernandez’s case, the goal would be to show motive — specifically, that Hernandez would shoot a friend over the flimsiest of actual or perceived indignities.  Bradley claims he was shot after a dispute over a bar bill that led to Hernandez refusing to take Bradley back to the bar to get the phone he’d left there that led to Bradley making “disrespectful remarks” about Hernandez.

The problem with Rule 404(b) evidence is that it can create a trial within a trial, with the trial of the main case being placed on hold while a mini-trial emerges on the question of whether the defendant did the other thing he’s accused of doing.  The bigger challenge comes from the requirement that the relevance of the evidence to the current case must substantially outweigh any unfair prejudice arising from it.

There will be plenty of prejudice to Hernandez flowing from proof that he shot another “friend” under circumstances similar to the shooting of Odin Lloyd.  The question becomes whether the prejudice is unfair to Hernandez — and whether the notion of Hernandez having a hair trigger with so-called friends supplies sufficient proof that Hernandez had a similar overreaction to something Lloyd said or did.Judge Garsh will be tempted to reiterate her prior exclusion of the evidence because it’s the kind of ruling that could result in a conviction of Hernandez being overturned by a higher court.  The judges on the higher court, however, would have to be able to set aside the overall evidence suggesting that Hernandez truly is a bad guy, and that society may be much better off with him permanently kept out of it.

Permalink 26 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Wintry weather causes Hernandez trial to start a little later on Monday

Aaron Hernandez AP

Yet another wave of wintry weather in Massachusetts has reportedly caused Aaron Hernandez’s trial to reconvene a little later than planned on Monday morning.

According to the Associated Press, court will not restart until 10:15 a.m. Eastern on Monday.

The 25-year-old Hernandez, a former Patriots tight end, faces a first-degree murder charge in the June 2013 death of Odin Lloyd.

According to the AP, weather issues have led to more than five days of delays for the trial, which is being held in Fall River, Mass. The trial is entering its fifth full week.

The National Weather Service forecasts up to seven inches of snow overnight in the area.

Updates on the trial, as well as a recap of past developments in the case, can be found by bookmarking our link to Hernandez court coverage.

Permalink 4 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Shell casing from Hernandez rental car connected to crime scene

Walsh AP

It’s not getting much better for the defense at the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial.

Via the Associated Press, Sgt. Stephen Walsh testified Wednesday that a shell casing found in the rental car used by Hernandez matched the shell casings found at the scene of Odin Lloyd’s shooting.

An employee at the rental-car company found the shell casing under the driver’s seat in the Nissan Altima Hernandez had rented.  He returned the car the day after the shooting.  The casing was put in a dumpster, and police later found it there.

Walsh told jurors that that all six .45 caliber casings had been fired by the same gun.

So while the murder weapon hasn’t been found, the presence of a matching shell casing in the car that Hernandez was driving — and in which Lloyd was a passenger — becomes very strong circumstantial evidence of guilt.

Permalink 21 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

First Patriots-related witness testifies in Hernandez murder trial

Hernandez AP

It took several weeks, but finally a witness with ties to the Patriots has taken the stand in the first Aaron Hernandez murder trial.

Via the Boston Herald, trainer Brian McDonough told the jury on Tuesday about his interaction with Hernandez the day after Lloyd was shot and killed.  Hernandez was due to meet McDonough at Gillette Stadium for injury rehab that day, but Hernandez texted McDonough to cancel.

“I will not be there today . . . suttin came up but ill jus call u when I’m back around which should be soon but ill b in touch!” Hernandez said via text.  “I truly am sorry for the hassle but something serious came up.”

McDonough isn’t a Patriots employee, but he has worked with Hernandez and other Patriots at Gillette Stadium.  McDounough and Hernandez were introduced through Alex Guerrero, Tom Brady’s personal trainer.

Also on the prosecution’s witness list are coach Bill Belichick, owner Robert Kraft, and former Patriots linebacker Brandon Spikes.  It’s unknown whether they’ll actually testify; lawyers are notorious for identifying so many witnesses that it becomes difficult to discern exactly who will and won’t show up.

Permalink 10 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Hernandez’s maids tell jury of multiple guns in the house

Prinholato AP

The first Aaron Hernandez murder trial currently isn’t going very well.

In addition to an about-face from Judge E. Susan Garsh on the question of whether she’ll allow the jury to know that Odin Lloyd sent multiple text messages to his sister after leaving his home with Hernandez and others in the early morning hours preceding Lloyd’s killing, Monday’s court session included incriminating testimony from Hernandez’s former maids.

Via the Boston Herald, Marilia Prinholato (pictured) and Grazielli Silva testified that they stumbled across multiple guns while cleaning Hernandez’s home.  Judge Garsh explained to jurors that the testimony couldn’t be used as proof that Hernandez had a “propensity” to kill, but that it could be used as evidence that he had the “means to commit the murder charge.”

In a case where the murder weapon has yet to be found, that’s a useful way of showing that the man accused of killing someone with a handgun had multiple handguns in his home.  And the handguns weren’t in a safe or any other secure location; they were found in various places throughout the home, for example, in a sock drawer and in a pair of pants that had been left on the floor.

Both maids were later asked by Hernandez to sign non-disclosure agreements.  They refused, and they were fired

More housekeepers are scheduled to testify in the prosecution’s case.

Permalink 36 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Judge in Hernandez trial reverses course on mention of Odin Lloyd text messages

Hernandez Murder Trial AP

On Friday, Judge E. Susan Garsh blocked the prosecution in the Aaron Hernandez murder trial from mentioning that Odin Lloyd sent four text messages to his sister shortly before he was killed.

The Associated Press reported that prosecutor Bill McCauley “became agitated” while objecting to that ruling and Garsh has come around to his point of view. On Monday, the Boston Globe reports that she said she’d “given more thought” to the issue over the weekend and decided that Lloyd’s sister Shaquilla Thibou can mention the messages during her testimony to corroborate that Lloyd sent them.

Neither Thibou nor anyone else can mention the content of those messages and Thibou cannot testify about any reaction she had to those messages. The messages read “U saw who I was with,” “Nfl” and “just so U know.”

Monday also brought testimony from people who were working at the industrial park where Lloyd’s body was found at the time prosecutors believe he was killed. Both Barbara Chan and Michael Ribero testified that they heard several “loud bangs” around the time it is believed that Lloyd was shot.

Permalink 47 Comments Feed for comments Back to top

Arguments continue over Odin Lloyd text messages

Garsh AP

The on-again, off-again first Aaron Hernandez murder trial has reached the “strenuously object” phase.

Via the Associated Press, the lawyers and Judge E. Susan Garsh revisited on Friday the question of whether texts sent by the late Odin Lloyd to his sister could be used at trial.  Lloyd sent the messages to alert his sister that he left in the middle of the night with “NFL.”

The prosecution called Lloyd’s sister to the witness stand, and the defense lawyers requested a conference with the judge away from the hearing of the jury.  Judge Garsh soon ordered a recess, presumably for further discussion of the issue.  When court resumed, Judge Garsh said that the court would tell the jurors that Lloyd was alive at 3:22 a.m. ET.

That wasn’t good enough for prosecutor Bill McCauley, who per the AP “became agitated,” insisting that the jury be told four text messages were sent by Lloyd, at 3:07 a.m., 3:11 a.m., 3:22 a.m., and 3:23 a.m.  Judge Garsh continued to resist, and McCauley continued to push.

“I have made a ruling,” Judge Garsh eventually said.  “My ruling stands!”

The content of the text messages has been excluded because they are hearsay (out of court statements) that apparently don’t fall within any of the potential exceptions to the hearsay rule when the person who made the statement isn’t available to testify.  By pushing as a fallback for the jury to be told that Lloyd actually sent text messages at those times, which isn’t a statement but an action, McCauley could be hoping that the jury will speculate that those late-night/early-morning messages contained requests for help, from Lloyd’s sister or from someone else.

Permalink 22 Comments Feed for comments Back to top