STARCAPS PULLS THE PLUG

As it turns out, it was wise for Saints guard Jamar Nesbit to get his lawsuit filed against the manufacturer of StarCaps.  Because the move might have given Nesbit a better place in line to get a piece of the company’s assets via the seemingly inevitable bankruptcy proceeding.
Though no bankruptcy case has been filed (yet), the company that makes StarCaps has suspended further shipments of the weight-loss product.
We’ve received notice of the problem with the NFL,” the company said in a statement e-mailed to the St. Paul Pioneer Press and other media outlets.  “We have referred the matter to our counsels and are taking all necessary steps to ensure that our customers receive product that is safe and effective.  We have temporarily suspended shipping pending the result of our investigation.”
The investigation apparently will focus on whether StarCaps contains Bumetanide.  For starters, we suggest that the company’s “counsels” consider the November 2007 report from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, which concluded that Bumetanide is present in StarCaps.
As further proof of the current state of disarry within the StarCaps family, the product’s official web site now consists of a solid blue screen containing only the words “UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE THE SALE OF STARCAPS IS SUSPENDED.”
It’s rare that a company charged with civil liability says anything other than “we will defend vigorously against these frivolous claims.”  The fact that the company is shuttering the operation and “investigating” a matter about which it knew or should have known can fairly be regarded as a classic “oh sh-t” moment in American corporate history.
Our guess is that the folks who made this stuff knew all along that Bumetanide was present.  But they apparently decided to sell as much of it as they could under false pretenses, and now that the excess bodily water is hitting the fan via the suspensions of several NFL players who have been taking StarCaps, it looks like the company will simply pull up the stakes and disappear.
If our suspicions are accurate, then this is a situation that calls for the intervention of federal authorities.  If the Department of Justice can cook up a legal theory to put the Whizzinator guys behind bars, the United States’ in-house legal department surely can fashion an air-tight criminal complaint in this case, too.

15 responses to “STARCAPS PULLS THE PLUG

  1. It was an allusion to a diuretic making the body expell excess water via number 1.
    It looks like you are about as thick-headed as your namesake.

  2. The NFL has a list of banned substances, and also a list of “OK” supplements. Starcaps water pills should have been listed as an “off limits” product, if the NFL knew about this report, especially considering the last line of the report. I can see the players diligently looking at the ingredients of products, and “assuming” that it was OK, as the banned substance wasn’t listed.
    “…The results showed that unregulated dietary supplements may put consumers at risk for unwitting consumption of prescription medications, and that it is possible for athletes to inadvertently test positive for bumetanide and face disciplinary actions.”
    Goodell NEEDS to show some leniency/compassion in this case and make an exception, as the drug manufacturer should be held 95% at fault.

  3. oh shit moment in corporate history???…dude, you have a very skewed viewpoint…it’s not even a blip in corporate history…

  4. “As it turns out, it was wise for Saints guard Jamar Nesbit to get his lawsuit filed against the manufacturer of StarCaps. Because the move might have given Nesbit a better place in line to get a piece of the company’s assets via the seemingly inevitable bankruptcy proceeding.”
    Actually, the lawsuit Nesbit filed will have no bearing on the BK proceeding, if one does commence. As soon as the BK is filed, Nesbit’s suit would be suspended and he would have to stand in line with all the other unsecured creditors to get the dregs of whatever is left over when the government and secured creditors plunder the company.

  5. Im guessing something like this will happen:
    The StarCaps company disolves their corporate charter, reopen under another name, continue to decieve people, never pay a dime towards their fraud… only in America!

  6. Mike,
    as far as I know Bumex or Bumetanide is a prescription only diurectic.
    Thus, the FDA and the feds should be arresting and fining this corporation for dispensing a Rx med. without a prescription.

  7. The fact that the November 2007 report from the National Center for Biotechnology Information concluded that Bumetanide is present in StarCaps, the players who have been taking Starcaps and got caught have a real uphill battle.
    The published 2007 report changes everything.
    Just like the 2007 report may be used against Starcaps in a court of law because the company have access to the publication, the 2007 report may be used against the players by the NFL for the same reason – – it ahs been public information since Nov. 2007.

  8. Walking Deadman is right that bumetanide is a regulated, prescription-only drug. Also, and like other prescription drugs, when prescribed, the “patient” is to be informed of risks, side effects, interactions, etc., which, of course, was not on the StarCaps label.

  9. >>John Cittebart says:
    October 30th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
    The fact that the November 2007 report from the National Center for Biotechnology Information concluded that Bumetanide is present in StarCaps, the players who have been taking Starcaps and got caught have a real uphill battle.
    The published 2007 report changes everything.
    Just like the 2007 report may be used against Starcaps in a court of law because the company have access to the publication, the 2007 report may be used against the players by the NFL for the same reason – – it ahs been public information since Nov. 2007.<<
    Exactly. The report was made available almost a year ago. Since it concluded almost a year ago that the pills had an ingredient on them that the NFL has banned, why should the league show any kind of leniency?
    It’s been said already, but I’ll say it again anyway- If you’re going to take a substance that is not on the approved list the league or the team provide, then you need to be diligent about doing your research. Have a batch tested privately before taking it, and then order only from that batch number. If you don’t want to pay for it, see if your team will pay for it. It’s a small amount of money to help protect both your reputation and your paycheck.

  10. @ AllSeeingEye,
    First, I hate Favre. my “namesake” is a joke due to how so many stupid people idolize a guy who throws into triple coverage.
    Point is, the expression is the s*** hitting the fan. And “excess bodily water” ain’t the same as s***. It’s water.
    I guess you couldn’t see that, one eye.

  11. I dunno. People are trying all the time to apply strict liability to different behavioral issues. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. The issue here, as Florio would put it, is whether the zero tolerance enforcement is “reasonable” under a contract (not tort- the case is slam dunk for tort) interpretation. It is a balancing test between appropriate due diligence by the players, and the fact thta the company committed fraud (and also violated the FDA Act) regarding its ingredients.
    I can see nailing the players if they are supposed to do the equivalent of a patent prior art search before ordering food off the health club menu (the 2007 report couldn’t have been too visible if it didn’t even force the product to cease using illegal drugs back then), but this really seems like a special case where there is a bigger burden on the NFL than for some supplement that listed its ingredients properly.
    If I was any of these players, I would mount a strong defense as a group, and go on every TV and radio show everywhere, and try to paint the NFL as being ridiculously unreasonable, go meet with Arlen Specter, etc. Goodell and the league are PR-conscious, and their case against some diet doctor might be pretty good, I wouldn’t want to be their Counsel if this one ended up in court. It doesn’t explain away in sound-bite terms the same way as “you hit the QB’s knees, you get fined because we can’t have Brady out for the year without losing TV revenue”).
    If there is a suspension out of this one for those who took StarCaps, I think there will be a huge issue that gives the NFL a bigger black eye than if they caught some star in a DWI or holed up in a hotel room with Madonna.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.