King: Competition Committee will consider "modified sudden death" rule

As any of you who routinely visit this address know, we hate the current overtime rule. 

Actually, “hate” isn’t strong enough.  We despise it.  We loathe it.

And we recently had become convinced, given the lack of any serious chatter for change after the 2009 NFC title game, that a sudden-victory field goal on the first drive of overtime in a Super Bowl would be the only thing that would prompt a too-little, too-late change to the rule.

But maybe the three-point, one-drive win by the Saints has finally gotten the attention of enough people with enough influence.  Peter King of SI.com and NBC reports that the league’s Competition Committee will consider a “modified sudden death” rule during the upcoming league meetings in Orlando.

In response, NFL Network’s Rich Eisen says via Twitter that “[i]t’s coming,” explaining that the first team to score six points would get the win.  Eisen says he’s heard it would be used in the playoffs at first.

Though we still prefer an approach that ensures one possession for each team, the first-to-six rule will make the cries of “just play defense” a little more persuasive.  So in the case of a first-drive touchdown, we’d give the other team a chance to match or beat it (via eight points), with the format converting to sudden death if each team scores a touchdown on the first drive. 

Then again, if they fix this rule, what else will we be able to bitch about?  Oh, right.  We’ve still got tampering, the Rooney Rule, and the Louis Murphy thing.

42 responses to “King: Competition Committee will consider "modified sudden death" rule

  1. well with lawyers, it is never about what makes sense.
    it is about the semblance of a horse race (like it is with the media) and the peddling of influence.
    flawrio, flawrio is thy name. mindless emotions rule your day.

  2. Can’t wait….
    Now we’ll cue up all the Viking whiners claimed they were robbed in the NFC Championship Game.
    Note: 5 turnovers…..5 turnovers…read with me…5 turnovers.

  3. Favre lost the game. And he couldn’t play Manning. Favre lost the game. Vikings lost the game. Favre lost the game. etc. etc. etc.

  4. IF the team winning the toss scores, then IF the other team matches, then it’s sudden death, it creates the same exact scenario the everyone cries about: team who wins the toss can take the ball down the field and win.
    It continues to be a stupid suggestion that simply keeps the same paradox, just with more time in between.

  5. The only “solution” that holds water continues to be turning off the clock at the end of the 4th quarter if the game is tied, and the team with the ball keeps it at the current down and distance. (Remember the Saints had the ball at the end of regulation and got it in overtime)
    This is, of course, only a solution if you continue to forget that football is arbitrarily a 60 minute game and if neither team wins, then there’s nothing more fair than a two-sided coin to determine possession.

  6. In my opinion there is absolutely nothing wrong with the current overtime format. If you lose the coin toss, so what? You kick off deep and cover the kick. Average starting field position after a kick off is something like your own 25 or 30 yard line, which is a good 25-30 yards outside of field goal range. Play some defense, and get the ball back and go down and score. Its that simple.
    The ONLY overtime situation I’d like to see in the NFL other than the current one is to play a full overtime period (10 min maybe?).

  7. You have proven yourself to be a sissy again… The current rules are correct. I can’t stand crybabies like you who complain that you didn’t get a fair chance… Guess what MORON… Both teams have 60 minutes to score more points than the other team! You were probably that little kid that cried when you lost any game in gym class or little league.
    NEWSFLASH: People HATE you… Go hang out with the figure skaters you spineless loser!

  8. Leave it the way it is now. Each team had the chance to win it in regulation.
    Football consists of 3 phases. Offense, defense and special teams.
    There is nothing wrong with the way it is done in the NFL.

  9. “[I]n the case of a first-drive touchdown, we’d give the other team a chance to match or beat it (via eight points), with the format converting to sudden death if each team scores a touchdown on the first drive.”
    Huh??? So glad you’re not going to that meeting.
    First to six in sudden death is what I’ve been advocating. It’s the only solution that keeps the great traditions of coin toss (now that they’ve eliminated the Phil Luckett factor) and sudden death while ensuring both teams have a fair chance.

  10. Yeah but what happens when a Tom Brady gets hurt in a game that would have been over with the old OT rules?

  11. I (in my own mind) invented the 6 point thing.
    Remember I emailed it to you like 3 years ago Florio?

  12. What a bunch of morons who can’t understand how stupid the current OT rules are. It is embarrassing for the NFL that the only major sport to have such a elementary method of determining OT. Can’t you just see MLB going into extra innings and the visiting team scores a run in the top of the 10th inning so it means the game is over……….LMAO. Bunch of dumb freakin rednecks that can’t understand the logic that people with a few more brains than they have are finally figuring out that it is the craziest OT rule in all of major league sports. Damn idiots should have to have a certain level of IQ in order to be allowed to post, LMAO

  13. @ Augustus
    The Louis Murphy thing is referencing when the Raider WR was arguably robbed of a TD in week 1 of this past season versus the Chargers. The scrutiny was wether or not he established possession of the ball long enough or throughout the catch.
    The “Louis Murphy Thing” made me wonder about this scenario: If a RB were trucking toward the goal in the open field with defenders chasing, and the RB jumps from the 5 yard line or so, ball extended, crosses the plane, but a defender knocks the ball loose while the RB is still airborn, isn’t that still a TD. I’m pretty sure it is, which is why Louis Murphy’s catch should have been a TD. He caught the ball, and as soon as his feet hit the play should have been over. The tangle up with the defender should have been moot at that point in the play.
    My .02 on the matter.

  14. lil_bit_special……you’re right that football does allow a defense to score but if it only takes a long range FG to win in OT, it severely minimizes a defenses chance of scoring. Hockey and basketball allow the defense to score but at least both teams get a chance at the ball or puck. It is quite rare that a defense scores in OT in football.

  15. @FootballOnly
    After I read your post, I conclude YOU are the idiot.
    Sudden Death in Baseball?
    Talk about apples and oranges.

  16. I say immediate implementation of this rule on Al Davis is required…. can we get a vote on this?

  17. cballlv11 says:
    February 27, 2010 5:31 PM
    You have proven yourself to be a sissy again… The current rules are correct. I can’t stand crybabies like you who complain that you didn’t get a fair chance… Guess what MORON… Both teams have 60 minutes to score more points than the other team! You were probably that little kid that cried when you lost any game in gym class or little league.
    NEWSFLASH: People HATE you… Go hang out with the figure skaters you spineless loser!
    __________________________________________________
    Why would you read an entire column and comment on it if you hate him? Insulting him in an internet thread and calling him a moron makes me really question your intelligence as well. I’m just saying…

  18. buzzpiss…..you are indeed the fool, you can’t even understand the freakin’ concept. There is no other major sport that goes to OT without allowing both teams the opportunity to score. It’s easy to say any two sports are like apples and oranges you idiot…..try lookin’ at the big picture and the concept of not allowing both teams the opportunity to score in OT. I know they play 60 min. and both teams have ample opportunity to score but all sports play a regulation time……ah hell, tryin’ to explain something so simple to someone so stupid is a waste of time.

  19. Sure glad there is more intelligent people who run the NFL than the idiot posters who can’t understand how damn dumb the current OT rule is. I don’t care what 2 teams are playing, a coin flip and a long FG are no way to end a game. I can about guess where most of the posters in favor of the current system are from and it’s not surprising, these areas of the country aren’t known for brains, only brawn, LMAO

  20. Bret Favre, OT, Peterson fumbles,12 men in the huddle, refs,choking. All those things do not matter. We LOST, plain and simple. Its time to look forward to september!! It just amazes me listening to the Packer Fans, how can you hate a man so bad who you absolutley beleived was GOD. Keep making your anti Favre and Viking posts. Just remember he plays for us now and he kicked your ass twice last year.

  21. Haven’t we had 12+ hour baseball games? I’d never be awake for that.. I could handle a 5-6 hour football game though.

  22. @FootballOnly
    So if I follow your “logic” what would you like next? 7 game playoff format?
    Look, I got my point across without calling you an idiot.

  23. “it’s not surprising, these areas of the country aren’t known for brains, only brawn, LMAO”
    Upon reflection, I conclude FootballOnly prefers mashed bananas and strained peas to apples and oranges.

  24. Then again, if they fix this rule, what else will we be able to bitch about?
    Felons in the NFL maybe?

  25. RayDaMayor says:
    Can’t wait….
    Now we’ll cue up all the Viking whiners claimed they were robbed in the NFC Championship Game.
    Note: 5 turnovers…..5 turnovers…read with me…5 turnovers.
    ——-
    Hey, Ray, the Viking turnovers almost — I repeat almost — cost the Vikings the NFC title game. It was the refs who made sure the Vikings lost by making some horrendous calls against the Vikings (see the Leber non-interference penalty) and turning a blind eye to other things in favour of the Vikings or against the Saints (see the numerous non-calls on flagrant roughing the passer, the 4th down attempt where the Saints runner was hit, fumbled and recovered the ball short of 10-yard marker and the non-catch in overtime by Meacham). You and I both know that, if the refs had called the game straight-up, the Vikings would have won hands down, despite the turnovers.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.