More on the Hargrove declaration

Getty Images

Earlier today, we reported that the declaration signed by former Saints (now Packers) defensive end Anthony Hargrove wasn’t harvested by the NFL but submitted by the union.  As a result, we’re now very intrigued by what the declaration says.

I’m still trying to get my eyes on it — and I eventually will (especially if someone else shakes it loose from the tree).  For now, though, the May 2 letter from Commissioner Roger Goodell to Hargrove mentioning that the declaration came from the NFLPA makes general reference to some of the contents of the declaration.

Goodell tells Hargrove that his “declaration makes clear that the [pay-for-performance/bounty] program existed at the Saints, and establishes that you knew about it and participated in it.”  Goodell also tells Hargrove that the “declaration acknowledges that you lied, but claims that you were instructed to do so by the coaching staff.”  Goodell explains to Hargrove that, if the coaches told him to lie, “it in no way absolved you from your obligation to cooperate with the investigation.”

Goodell’s words suggest that the league doesn’t necessarily believe that Hargrove was told to lie — which possibly means that the coaches who have admitted to everything else regarding the program denied telling Hargrove to lie.

We still want to see the full Hargrove declaration, but it now appears very unlikely that the declaration admits that any players contributed money to a “pay-for-injury” program or that any players deliberately tried to injure opponents.

This video is no longer available. Click here to watch more NBC Sports videos!

3 responses to “More on the Hargrove declaration

  1. Florio, you have altered Goodell’s writing for an unknown purpose: who put the brackets “[pay-for-performance/bounty]” in that quote? You?
    That bracket wording is vital to the understanding of what Goodell told Hargrove.
    Whose words are “pay-for-performance’ versus “bounty”? – those are two separate things and cannot be interchanged…
    …unless your goal is to keep it convoluted.
    If Hargrove admits to participating in a “bounty” program, then there is no doubt that “players deliberately tried to injure opponents” – what is a bounty? Tackling an opposing player? Nonsense.

  2. The term “bounty” simply means a reward for something. The issue here is what is that “something”? Was it for forced fumbles, interceptions, key tackles (such as on 3rd down), QB sacks/hurries/knockdowns/remember me hits? Or was it for knockouts, cart-offs, and in general causing injury to specific players?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.