Holmgren admires McCarthy’s composure

AP

In the wake of last year’s “Fail Mary” debacle, many were furious.

But Packers coach Mike McCarthy was his normal, steady self, and one of his predecessors said he envied the restriant.

Former Seahawks and Packers coach Mike Holmgren was interviewing McCarthy on KJR 950 (audio here), and admitted he wouldn’t have been so cool about the simultaneous-catch touchdown call.

“There’s not a question in my mind that was as an interception,” Holmgren said (via ESPN.com). “The thing is, when I watched your press conference the next day, and Mike you’re a real gentleman, I would have been fined. There’s no question in my mind, I would have been fined. And you handled that about as well as I’ve seen a coach handle that. Was that difficult?”

“Thanks,” McCarthy replied. “No question that was difficult, but it was the best thing for our football team, and I never lost sight of that. That was my vision of what I needed to do when I walked into the post-game press conference, and I think it was very apparent what happened. There’s good calls in our league and not-so-good calls, and not-so-good calls sometimes go the other way, . . .

“You knew there was going to be a storm that was going to follow that situation, and I was just trying to get our football team to move on as quickly as possible.”

McCarthy’s ability to keep things level is admirable, but he also quickly recognized he couldn’t let it become a distraction for his team, which it easily could have been.

38 responses to “Holmgren admires McCarthy’s composure

  1. Many NFL coaches would’ve been fined & possibly suspended with their reactions after that call. Bill Parcells and Bill Belicheck immdiately come to mind. And no 1 would’ve blamed them.

  2. The whole ‘fail mary’ debacle would have never happened if the defender had been taught to “just knock the ball down”.

    Mac needs to teach his players better and his composure won’t even be an issue.

  3. Its past history. I’ve got an inkling that this year will be the real debacle and it starts tonight with Seattle.

    1. The Packers did nothing in the draft to shore up a horrid offesnive line. Inside of going 1 and 2 in the draft to get some bodies who can play, they picked a DE who now looks suspect. He has played in one play in preseason and will miss game three tonight.

    2. They spent too much on Lacy. I see him as a player who gets hurt by game 5 and misses the season, each year.

    3. They have a hose of undrafteds on the team first string trying to match up with 1st and second round receivers and backs. This is not how you build s superbowl team.

    Packers go 0-5 and shell shock their fans and finish a miserable 6-11.

  4. Yea….I thought MM had Carte Blanch to flip out.
    But it would have done no good.
    And the Pack choked in the playoffs

  5. That’s why McCarthy will be coaching in Green Bay for a long time to come.

    Stability and consistency leads to winning.

  6. If I were coach, I would have probably approached it like Holmgren and been fined.

    McCarthy isn’t much of a public speaker, but he sure is a good coach and a classy guy.

    I’m sure now we’ll be treated to some Viking troll making fun of his weight now.

    And for the record, I think Les Frasier is a pretty good guy and a decent coach as well.

  7. The day after that game, I remember McCarthy’s press conference. He answered the question very calm and cool. He just wanted to forget about it and move on. But the media keeps drilling him and the players about it……. At least Holmgren can look beyond those Seahawk blinders and admit it was one of the worst calls to end a football game. Anyone else that thinks different, your just embarrassing and fooling yourself..Two fingers on the ball doesn’t equal to possession…

  8. blacknole08 says:
    Aug 23, 2013 4:52 PM
    Oh and the correct call was made. It was simultaneous and the offense always keeps possession when both guys catch it.
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Your emotions are clouding your judgment. The receiver must “control the ball all the way through the catch.” Not only did Tate arrive late, he at first had two hands on the ball…….disengaged one hand while descending….and re-engaged his hand as he hit the turf. That is NOT controlling the ball all the way through (your supposed catch.)

    “We rule in favor of the ex-Superbowl coach Holmgren…..your Honor.”

  9. trollsetter says:
    Aug 23, 2013 4:55 PM
    With that defense the Packers are pretenders. It will show tonight.
    /////////////////////////////////////

    Wow…..thanks for the heads-up Mr. Vegas. Now I don’t even need to bother watching it.

  10. Call was 100% correct. There’s no such thing as having “more” possession, ergo Tate had a TD. I hear if you close your eyes quietly in bed at night, you can still hear the crying of Packers fans all the way from Green Bay!

  11. Funny how only the seahawks fans and people who hate the packers say it’s a catch. A true fan of the game who understands the rules, know it was an interception.

  12. @slbasegame257 says:
    Aug 23, 2013 4:56 PM
    The Packers are packing sour grapes. It was a TD catch. GO HAWKS
    ——-
    Is there a more scummy franchise that the seahawks? Juicing players…

  13. I didn’t see any problem w/this so called “Failed Mary” play. There shouldn’t have been any possible “storms” brewing in the 1st place. Good on McCarthy for whatever he feels he handled though. Crazy talk.

  14. stellarperformance says: Aug 23, 2013 6:21 PM

    blacknole08 says:
    Aug 23, 2013 4:52 PM
    Oh and the correct call was made. It was simultaneous and the offense always keeps possession when both guys catch it.
    /////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Your emotions are clouding your judgment. The receiver must “control the ball all the way through the catch.” Not only did Tate arrive late, he at first had two hands on the ball…….disengaged one hand while descending….and re-engaged his hand as he hit the turf. That is NOT controlling the ball all the way through (your supposed catch.)

    “We rule in favor of the ex-Superbowl coach Holmgren…..your Honor.”

    —————————————————————

    If a pass is caught simultaneously by two players, and both players have the ball, the ball belongs to the offense.

    The rule doesn’t distinguish whoever has more control. Since they both had it the offense keeps it.

    So while it appeared that M.D. Jennings may have caught it “first”, Tate had control when he grabbed it as well. Tate also maintained constant control of the ball when he landed and never juggled it.

  15. trollsetter says:
    Aug 23, 2013 4:55 PM
    “With that defense the Packers are pretenders. It will show tonight.”
    ———————–
    That Defense got two sacks and two picks against the most all pro hall of fame superbowl 48 mvp Russell Wilson….

    that’s w/friggin Graham Harrell starting the 2nd qt.

  16. If I was the coach I would have refused to send my guys out for the PAT out of protest. Whats the worst that could happen? A fine from the league? The game becomes a forfeit?? I suppose it was the classy thing to do, but I woulda had my guys boarding the team bus while that joke of a referee was waiting with a thumb up his ass, mentally counting his payoff winnings.

  17. The season is past, over. The refs signing a day or so after was admission that the call was bogus.

    Any fan, whether it be a Seattle fan or a Packer hater should realize the Wong call was made. Many views, many still shots…no way it was a TD. Tate was out muscled.

    If the Packers would have one the NFC Championship would have been in GB rather than San Fran. The Packers still would have most likely lost, but lets pull heads out of asses here….that call was wrong.

  18. blacknole08 says:
    If a pass is caught simultaneously by two players, and both players have the ball, the ball belongs to the offense.

    The rule doesn’t distinguish whoever has more control. Since they both had it the offense keeps it.

    So while it appeared that M.D. Jennings may have caught it “first”, Tate had control when he grabbed it as well. Tate also maintained constant control of the ball when he landed and never juggled it.
    ———————————————————–
    Simultaneous Catch. If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control.

    M. D. Jennings Had control of the ball first. Therefore it cannot be a simultaneous catch. He never lost control of the ball. Ruling should have been interception, Packers win, just as the 2nd referee was calling it.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.