The 2014 franchise/transition tags

Getty Images

[Editor’s note:  The window has closed on the 2014 use of the franchise tag.  This year, only four players were tagged.  Two received the little-used transition tag.  Here’s the entire list, with a quick take on each guy.]

Saints tight end Jimmy Graham

While some are blaming the looming fight over whether Graham is a receiver for tag purposes on Graham and/or his agent, this fight has been brewing for a couple of years.  The Packers and Jermichael Finley worked out a deal before pulling the pin on a tag-and-grievance situation.  Last year, the Titans didn’t even risk it by opting not to tag tight end Jared Cook, due in large part to the inability of the Management Council to guarantee that the Titans wouldn’t eventually have to pay more than $4.5 million more under the receiver version of the tag.

The question of tight end versus receiver becomes moot if another team signs Graham to an offer sheet.  While highly unlikely, it wouldn’t be completely shocking if a team picking at the bottom of round one this year (and presumably next year) decides to make a run at Graham, in exchange for a pair of first-round picks if the Saints don’t match.

Jets kicker Nick Folk

Those who insist kickers aren’t franchise players forget that five kickers were tagged in 2012.  At $3.55 million for one year, it’s a bargain as franchise tags go.

It’s also less than the going rate of $4 million per year for a high-end kicker.

Panthers defensive end Greg Hardy

With a slew of young, talented players who either are or will soon be eligible for long-term deals, the Panthers have to be careful about their long-term commitments.  For now, they’ll commit $13.116 million to Hardy pending a long-term deal at a lower cap number — or possibly a trade to another team, if the Panthers just can’t find an acceptable middle ground.

Looming over the situation is the six-year, $76 million contract given to defensive end Charles Johnson in 2011.  It’ll be hard to give Hardy a deal with an annual rate of less than Johnson’s $12.67 million.

Redskins linebacker Brian Orakpo

They reportedly agonized over whether to tag Orakpo, who missed much of 2012 due to injury but rebounded with a Pro Bowl season in 2013. Orakpo could argue that he’s actually a defensive end and not a linebacker; the difference between the $11.455 million tag for linebackers and the $13.116 million tag for defensive ends is only $1.661 million.

Still, that’s $1.661 million.

Browns center Alex Mack

The transition tag became a little-used device after the 2006 labor deal made the transition tender fully guaranteed if accepted.  For Mack, a center, the prospect of making $10.03 million in 2014 should prompt him to sprint to his agent’s office to sign the tender.

With the franchise tag for offensive linemen only $1.654 million higher and the Browns having $57 million in cap space, they arguably should have just used the franchise tag.

While it’s possible that another team will sign Mack to a contract that more accurately reflects the center market, there’s no reason for Mack to do a long-term deal unless it pays him a lot more than $10.03 million guaranteed.  His best move could be to take the money for 2014 and hit the market next year.

Unless the Browns want to pay him $12 million under the franchise or transition tag in 2015.

Steelers linebacker Jason Worilds

Unlike Mack, Worilds should play this one out.  With the Steelers likely to be pressed up against the cap, another team could sign him to an offer sheet the Steelers can’t match.

They’ll possible be able to match it only if they cut LaMarr Woodley.

Using the transition tag on Worilds buys some time for the Steelers, and gives Worilds a chance to test the market.  If Worilds opts to sign the tender, the Steelers can live with $9.754 million in cap space for Worilds for one year, while negotiating a long-term deal.

9 responses to “The 2014 franchise/transition tags

  1. “They’ll possible be able to match it only if they cut LaMarr Woodley.”

    Worilds best position is LOLB. What does Woodley play (when he’s healthy 4 games a year)? LOLB.

    If the Steelers can retain Worilds, Woodley is gone. If somebody offers him a ridiculous contract, let him go and hope Woodley can finally stay healthy. Either way, one of the two is the starter there next season.

  2. The Browns use of the transition tag looks, to me, to be an indication that a long term deal is in the works. This is just a safety net maneuver to insure that Mack and his agent stay at the table and don’t get tempted to test the market.

  3. I could see NE at least checking in on Graham to see what kind of offer it would take to pry him from NO, but paying him huge money and giving up 2 firsts is a very steep price. Graham and Gronk together on the same team is borderline Madden like, and Gronk’s blocking abilities make Graham’s lack of blocking ability less problematic. All this being said, I don’t see Graham getting away from the Saints.

  4. Worilds, if retained, will be the starting LOLB.

    Woodley, if retained, will be the starting ROLB.

    Jarvis Jones is the wildcard. If they are comfortable with him going into next year, which they almost certainly are not, he would be the starting ROLB and Woodley would be cut. In reality, he’ll probably end up as the rotational LB for another year and won’t exceed 40% of the defensive snaps unless there’s an injury. For as many snaps as he played last year, he had ZERO impact. There’s always the chance he’s already been deemed incapable of playing outside and will transition to one of the MILB spots where he’s very effective as an inside rusher.

  5. Only Graham and Hardy are worth it. The rest only prove how inept those other teams’ front offices are.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.