Brady probable for Thursday night with ankle injury

AP

Tom Brady will play on Thursday night with an ankle injury.  And there will be no “unless he won’t” this time.

Via Lee Schechter of ESPNBoston.com, Brady is listed as probable, which means there’s a virtual certainty he’ll be available for normal duty.  Which also means that, if he doesn’t face the Jets, the Patriots will have some Spygate-level ‘splaining to do.

Brady was limited in practice on Tuesday and Wednesday, and he was limited on Monday in a practice that didn’t happen.  Often, a player who is limited all week gets the 50-50 “questionable” label.

But Brady is probable.  Which possibly means that someone from the league office asked just enough questions to persuade the Patriots to abandon the notion that the chance he’d not play equaled the chance he would.

Players falling into the “he’ll play unless he won’t” category include cornerback Brandon Browner, who has an ankle injury.  Per Schechter (who’ll need to change his name to something that isn’t so damn close to “Schefter” if he’s going to keep doing work for ESPN), Browner says he’s “good to go.”  Unless he isn’t.

Also questionable for the short-week turnaround game are linebacker Jamie Collins (thigh), offensive lineman Dan Connolly (concussion), defensive lineman Dominique Easley (shoulder/knee), linebacker Dont’a Hightower (knee), receiver Matthew Slater (concussion), and center Bryan Stork (concussion).

33 responses to “Brady probable for Thursday night with ankle injury

  1. The only way Brady might not play is if the Patriots add a QB. They can’t throw Garroppollo out there as the only QB in case he gets hurt during the game. If Brady is to be out, the Patriots need another (temporary?) QB.

    Since they haven’t signed one, Brady is playing.

  2. It was amusing though that people up here in Boston were actually worried Brady wouldn’t play Sunday. It’s like they never watched the Patriots or know how they run their business……

  3. I’m torn. On one hand, watching the Patriots blow out the Jets assures us all that there is order in the universe and that it can be understood by man. On the other, the Jets might really be serious about canning Rex Ryan this time. So if there’s a way to humiliate them but let Rex Ryan keep his job and also even bring back Mark Sanchez again, I think we should do that.

  4. Brady is to be out, the Patriots need another (temporary?) QB

    Edelman, former college QB, will throw darts to himself when called upon.

  5. c’mon now. you expect me to believe that the patriots will come out to play without Brady? #smh

  6. Meanwhile the entire Jets were listed as ‘Questionable’
    Not because of an injury in particular – but the Jets as a team, an organization, are Questionable in their ability to play a football game

  7. descendency says:
    Oct 15, 2014 4:31 PM
    The only way Brady might not play is if the Patriots add a QB. They can’t throw Garroppollo out there as the only QB in case he gets hurt during the game. If Brady is to be out, the Patriots need another (temporary?) QB.

    Since they haven’t signed one, Brady is playing.
    ———————————————————————–
    I am sure that Brady will be playing, but I bet if Jimmy G went down, Edelman could fill the emergency QB role. The dude rocks!

  8. “Which also means that, if he doesn’t face the Jets, the Patriots will have some Spygate-level ‘splaining to do.”

    If there was a monument for comment-begging troll-lines by PFT, this one would be on top. What is Florio talking about?

  9. I only care because Brady is my fantasy team QB. Not sure I want to start Big Ben vs Houston, because he will certainly throw at least 3 picks, one of which will be a pick-6 by JJ Watt.

    I will hope the Jets keep it close like they did last week, just to be entertained by watching everyone in the Twitter-verse hyperventilate…

  10. Will there ever be a year in this century that the Patriot’s actually play in a real division? This is getting ridiculous.

  11. So the division is The Patriots fault? And by the way, they play ten games a season outside the division. Here’s a thought. Buffalo, Miami and NY, why don’t you start fielding a competitive team? And yes, I realize NE was beaten by Miami in week one. Congrats.

  12. jchipwood says: Oct 15, 2014 5:17 PM

    Brady – gronk = average qb.
    Brady – cameras and knowing other team calls = ryan leaf but not as tough
    ——————————————–
    chippy you’re a jealous, bitter phins fan, who would welcome Brady on his miami debacle of a franchise with open arms with tears of joy that you finally have someone who can ball.

  13. bigbadbills you’re so funny. Every game this year the Pats have 3 times as many phantom calls against them as the teams they’ve been playing.

    But keep throwing that out there and pretending if it makes you feel better about the horrible Bills organization.

  14. patriotinvasion says:
    Oct 15, 2014 5:19 PM
    “Which also means that, if he doesn’t face the Jets, the Patriots will have some Spygate-level ‘splaining to do.”

    If there was a monument for comment-begging troll-lines by PFT, this one would be on top. What is Florio talking about?

    ____________________________________

    Spot on dude.

  15. Florio trolling for Patriots hater hits by mentioning Spygate or faulting Belichick for putting player safety ahead of the Mafia latest line is getting old fast

  16. Fake injury report, he looks stupid in that hat, hate the spoiled pampered poster boy for the Kraft/Goddell NFL

  17. When both Brady and Belichick were praising LaFell early in the year I was skeptical. After the last two weeks I apologize for being a “Doubting Thomas”. LaFell fills the Patriots need for a big receiver who can block, get open, fight through tackles, and score points. The team is taking shape on both sides of the ball and Brady looks like Brady when he has weapons like Gronk, Edelman, LaFell, Wright, Tyms and Vereen that force the defense to cover the whole field. If the offensive line holds up, Tom will keep putting up points and keep winning games. People forget that what really defeated the Patriots the last several years has been injuries to Gronk.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.