The financial side of the Percy Harvin trade

AP

After completely processing the shock of the Second Annual Percy Harvin Trade and while still sniffing around the reasons for it, let’s take a look at the financial ramifications of the move, for both teams.

Based on a breakdown of the contract obtained by PFT, the Seahawks paid Harvin $19.03 million for what amounted to eight games played (three last year, five this year). The money came from a $12 million signing bonus, a $2.5 million salary in 2013, and 7/17ths of an $11 million salary in 2014 ($4.53 million).

By trading Harvin after June 1, the Seahawks will carry $1.412 million in cap space this year from his $2.4 million annual signing bonus proration. Next year, they’ll have $7.2 million in dead money attributed to Harvin.

The Jets pick up the balance of his guaranteed base salary — 10/17ths of $11 million ($6.47 million) and the non-guaranteed four additional years of his deal, at $10.5 million in 2015, $9.9 million in 2016, $9.95 million in 2017, and $11.15 million in 2018. The $47.97 million deal actually is a year-to-year arrangement, with no triggers or other devices aimed at forcing the Jets to decide what to do with Harvin before Week One of the regular season.

The Jets inherit the ability to recover bonus money paid by the Seahawks from Harvin. If he decides to not show up or to go AWOL or to retire with that $19 million he had gotten from the Seahawks for nine games, they can get back some of the $12 million the Seahawks paid upon acquiring him from the Vikings. Which could be a useful piece of leverage for the Jets.

Still, the early reaction from multiple league insiders is that the Jets made a mistake by acquiring Harvin. One league source with knowledge of and experience with both the player and his new team already has expressed pessimism, explaining that the Jets are “not a stable place.” Another source said that the Jets have “pissed away $7 million of Woody Johnson’s cash and cap space.”

“Do you know how many good players that much space can get you?” the source said. (As some Jets fans would respond, “If you don’t use it, none.”)

We’ll have more throughout the weekend regarding the reaction to and aftermath of the trade. Whatever triggered the move, it was enough to prompt the Seahawks to pay Harvin what amounted to $2.375 million for every meaningful game in which he played.

48 responses to “The financial side of the Percy Harvin trade

  1. 2 Mil a game? Harvin won out in that deal. I was happy when Minnesota got rid of him. And as much as I dislike the Seahawks (fanbase) I’m glad they came to their senses and got rid of him too. Stupid good talent out of that guy, but wow is he a headache.

  2. Obviously it can’t happen and the Broncos wouldntve done it, but could you imaginecPercy harvin at running back in Peyton Manning’s offense? Knowshon Moreno looked like a pro bowler last year, Harvin would explode. If anyone could keep him in line it’d be Peyton.

    Not even a Broncos fan

  3. According to overthecap.com, The Jets are now 13 million under the cap and will be 43 million under the cap in 2015. This is after the Harvin trade. That’s the 2nd most available cap space after the raiders.

    The Jets are so devoid of game breaking talent that this is a move that is low risk and high reward. John Idzik and John Schneider are close friends. So this move makes sense financially and roster wise for both teams.

  4. They media makes the Seahawks look like a winner here when they got rid of him after paying 19m for 8 games……. A few years ago the Raiders were destroyed by the media for paying Deangelo Hall 8m for 8 games before getting rid of him

  5. FlashPatterson says:
    Oct 18, 2014 9:21 AM

    Obviously it can’t happen and the Broncos wouldntve done it, but could you imaginecPercy harvin at running back in Peyton Manning’s offense? Knowshon Moreno looked like a pro bowler last year, Harvin would explode. If anyone could keep him in line it’d be Peyton.
    ================================

    Harvin is too small to be an RB. Plus, why would anyone change his position?

  6. Fans do not give a hoot about the money. All we want is a good football team that has something to play for come December & January. The Seahawks won a super bowl and have been regular contenders over the last few years somebody is spending most of the cash intelligently. As a Dolphin fan starved of a consistently good football team for more years than i want to count i can only dream of the day my team can go into a game that i am confident they can win. Watching the Dolphins from behind the sofa for most of the game is not fun.

  7. “Do you know how many good players that much space can get you?”

    It should be obvious to everyone by now that no, the Jets apparently have no idea how many good players that much cap space can get them.

  8. ealitypolice says:
    Oct 18, 2014 9:55 AM
    “Do you know how many good players that much space can get you?”

    It should be obvious to everyone by now that no, the Jets apparently have no idea how many good players that much cap space can get them.

    VERY SELDOM….does bringing in 1 high priced player change a teams’ performance.

    jets could have gone FA market w/that money, and picked up 2-3 solid corners. OR could have gone and filled bottom 20 players on roster for depth.

    BUT…they are after all…the jets.

    There is a reason that franchise flounders year after year…I laugh, when people say that jets need to return to relevance….They have not been relevant in 45 years.

  9. Havin is the real winner here. He has a ring, an awesome super bowl highlight, and money in the back (for a few years, anyway).

  10. You forgot the part where the Seahawks now have $42 million in cap space next year, making them major players for Ndomakong Suh, among others.

  11. I think if Hawks knew the trade would result in a game clinching TD return for a TD in the Superbowl along with a 22.5 YPC leading rusher and a Lombardi.

    They’d have gladly done it.

  12. nes296 says:
    Oct 18, 2014 9:29 AM

    They media makes the Seahawks look like a winner here when they got rid of him after paying 19m for 8 games……. A few years ago the Raiders were destroyed by the media for paying Deangelo Hall 8m for 8 games before getting rid of him
    =====================

    One team used the player to win a Lombardi.

    One didn’t make the playoffs.

    HTH

  13. He’s on a 2 month tryout with the Jets. If they feel he’s not worth the money or headache they can waive him before the start of next year and it costs them nothing cap-wise as his 2015 salary isn’t guaranteed.

    Unless this guy is a complete moron (which he might very well be) he’ll be on his best behavior thru the end of the year and thru camp next year because if he gets waived he won’t sniff the $10 mil he’d get from the Jets from another team. Someone else will take a flier on him but it’ll be for in comparison.

  14. I love it. Could be a brawl in Jets locker room after his first practice. Only the Jets could do this.

  15. It’s classic that perennial Jets haters would jump at this move, once again proving they know so little about the Jets and football.

    This is a great move for New York and there is nothing anyone can argue otherwise. The Jets owe him zero guaranteed money down the road and worst case scenario they give up a fourth round pick for one of the league’s best playmakers? Considering what Seattle gave up to get him, it’s unbelievable.

    Attitude or not, it’s a low-risk, high reward move. They can cut him at any time without any backlash. And there’s always a chance he views this trade as an opportunity to start fresh as a player and a person.

    Get over it, haters

  16. “They media makes the Seahawks look like a winner here when they got rid of him after paying 19m for 8 games……. A few years ago the Raiders were destroyed by the media for paying Deangelo Hall 8m for 8 games before getting rid of him”

    The Seahawks won the Superbowl. The raiders won three games.

  17. osiris33 says:
    Oct 18, 2014 10:16 AM

    You forgot the part where the Seahawks now have $42 million in cap space next year, making them major players for Ndomakong Suh, among others.
    ________________________________

    Not a fan of expensive FA acquisitions, especially when there are guys like Wilson, Wagner, and Wright already on the team waiting get paid.

  18. The Jets wouldn’t pay Revis $12MM for a full year when they had playoff aspirations but they will pay Harvin, a local room cancer $7MM for 9 games withthe team at 1-6 and virtually no chance at the playoffs. That’s just bad ownership.

  19. Maybe Marty and Rex can come up with a new “I”-formation with Vick, Geno, and Harvin lined up behind center. Similar to the Vick and Geno I-formation they unveiled in the Patriots game.

  20. I’m sure the Jets will cut Harvin before the 2016 season. Not a Harvin fan & nowhere near it but he has something AD will likely never get even if he does go to Dallas & that’s a SB ring. Harvin should retire after the Jets cut him as long as he was smartw/his $. Plus the NFL retirement he’ll get. I’d be a pain in the butt for that much $$$$$$$$$

  21. What did the Vikes get with the Draft picks we got for Pervy? Ponder one? How about a breakdown of the whole mess Minn-Sea-Jets, who got what and what they paid, and acquired.

  22. “Traded from the great Minnesota Vikings to the classless joke shehawks and now the laughable clown show jets,his career went down the drain pretty quick.”

    Bear in mind that you sound like an idiot, here.

  23. “It’s classic that perennial Jets haters would jump at this move, once again proving they know so little about the Jets and football.”

    Sorry, there is nothing “classic” about the Jets. Haters don’t hate franchises that have not won a Super Bowl since 1968. You’re confusing ridicule with hate. Haters hate teams like the Patriots and Steelers that win year after year. That hate comes from envy, not ridicule.

  24. Percy is a fleet footed con man and the Jets are his latest victim. The good thing is that it won’t cost them what it has already cost everyone else up to this point.

    He’s never played a whole season anywhere and concussions are the con man’s best friend. He will retire with a medical pension from the NFL!!

  25. You know it was bad if they are willing to burn that much money to get rid of a guy. He didn’t produce much for the Seahawks but got a lot (money, ring, SB highlight reel). If he couldn’t be happy with that (i.e. be willing to get in games and produce) good riddance.

  26. When the truth is know, it always comes down to money in the NFL. The Seahawks haven’t been as dynamic this year and so it’s always nice to be able to find a scapegoat to turn into the sacrificial lamb; having the financial upside offers, at least, temporary euphoria…until it’s discovered that it’s a temporary high and the real problem hasn’t been addressed.
    One has to wonder why Harvin wasn’t fired before now if he was such a disruptive force? I was always of the impression that Pete Carroll had more control over his team but guess not?

  27. Since you Seattle Sounders….I mean new Seahawk fans aren’t good at math that means that you paid one year of top end QB money for a a receiver to play half a season.

    And you lost Golden Tate

    And Doug Baldwin is now your most accomplished receiver

    He would be the 49ers #5 WR

    HAHAHAHAAHHAHA

    Iron Sharpen Irons

  28. No one loves to mock the Jets more than me

    But I don’t get how anyone can’t view this as a good move for them.

    It’s a good move for the Seahawks too if he was that much of a bad chemistry guy – they’re eating a HUGE chunk of change for an 8 game rental but they get credit for realizing and minimizing a mistake.

    The Jets can only get better, regardless of whether Harvin is a bad chemistry guy – and by claiming only $6 million of their unused cap space that’s no concern.

    And they can renegotiate his future salaries if they choose to keep him.

    Once in awhile even a blind squirrel finds a nut and the Jets may have done just that.

  29. Wow paid 19 mil for 8 games and all those picks to boot. Where’s all the media pile on and jokes on the Seahawks u know like when Al Davis paid Hall 8 mil for 8 games. The media relentlessly joked on the Raiders for that deal but the Seahawks get a pass. Interesting, wonder why??????????

  30. I applaud the Seahawks for admitting they made a huge mistake and deciding to cut their loses by dumping him. He must be a complete jackass for a quality team like Seahawks willing to dump him. He is going to the perfect team. He will fit right in with the Jets franchise.

  31. Cost Seattle $2 million per game, a first, third and seventh pick, a huge bundle of dead money next year, a potential split in the locker room, and a national embarrassment all in return for crappy WR numbers and a conditional 4th-6th rounder next year.

    Epic.

  32. You forget the Lombardi Trophy, jack ass. Players go an entire career without the ring. I’d be willing to wager that ANY player or former player in the NFL (especially those in the HOF,) would take that. Harvin may have made only a few magnificent plays in the Super Bowl, but just by being available and on the field, that bad Denver defense had to account for him, freeing up our “pedestrian wide receivers,” to work their magic in the biggest game of ANY NFL player’s life!

  33. I agree. Stupid. He will not perform well. Waste of money. Should have spent money this year to help out the secondary or actually acquire a real, trouble-free #1 receiver, since the Jets’ WR acquired through the draft have all been busts under this regime.

    I think it’s possible the GM was pushing for Harvin because he may be hedging that his job is on the line, just not just Rexy.

    Or, acquiring Harving might be a publicity move. They fire Rex and have a built-in excuse to keep the GM:

    “The NY media has been complaining about all this cap room and no playmaker and it’s handicapping Rex’s effort to win games. Fine. We get him a #1 receiver, a playmaker, and the team hasn’t improved.”

    Then, the public perception is not that Rex doesn’t have personnel and shouldn’t be fired but that Rex deserves to go and the GM deserves to stay because the GM tried to help Rex’s team get better by picking up Harvin.

  34. Despite all the good moves that Schneider made like Wilson, Sherman, Chancelor, Thomas, Lynch…, I’d say the Harvin deal was his biggest and stupidest mistake. Glad he finally came to his senses.

  35. Great! the Jets have two Super bowl receivers on there team that has to account for something,right?Go JETS!

  36. Isn’t is sad that is is the only thing Vikings fans can glom onto these days? Certainly not their recent loss to Buffalo? AP is a child beater, the team blows, and has never won anything of substance.

    Grats on winning the Harvin trade.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.