Vikings look wise for trading Harvin when they did

AP

When the Vikings traded Percy Harvin to the Seahawks a year and a half ago, it was criticized by many as a foolish move by a team trading away one of the NFL’s most talented playmakers. Now it doesn’t look so foolish.

The Seahawks have now traded Harvin to the Jets for a conditional pick believed to be in the second, third or fourth round of next year’s draft, and that makes it look like the Vikings got a steal when they traded Harvin. Minnesota got a first-round pick and a seventh-round pick in the 2013 draft and a third-round pick in the 2014 draft.

With those picks, the Vikings drafted cornerback Xavier Rhodes in the first round last year, offensive lineman Travis Bond in the seventh round last year and running back Jerick McKinnon in the third round this year. Bond didn’t make the 53-man roster and is now out of the NFL, but Rhodes has started every game for the Vikings this year and McKinnon has shown a lot of promise as a rookie this year. That’s good value for the Vikings.

And it’s especially good value compared to what the Seahawks got out of it: A year and a half of Harvin’s services, most of which he missed with injuries, and now just a second-, third- or fourth-round pick from the Jets in a trade. It is true that Harvin played very well for the Seahawks in the Super Bowl, but the Seahawks’ defense played so well that they surely would have won that game without him. Harvin didn’t contribute much in Seattle.

Now we’ll see whether Harvin can contribute much in New York. He’s a great athlete with the talent to make plays as a runner, a receiver or a returner, and it’s possible that the Jets will end up with a bargain. But right now, the team that appears to have gained the most was the Vikings, by getting rid of Harvin when they did.

67 responses to “Vikings look wise for trading Harvin when they did

  1. Vikings I imagine benefited from a rumored at the time Seahawks and Niners bidding war for Harvin and got more than he was otherwise worth. It wasn’t quite the Carson Palmer to the Raiders trade return, but other than providing the Super Bowl TD dagger, it’s close. Seahawks could have instead drafted Cordarrelle Patterson or DeAndre Hopkins and had that $18 million in cap space to keep Golden Tate or re-signed guys they already have coming up like KJ Wright or Cliff Avril.

  2. The Minnesota Vikings getting props on PFT? What is happening?!?! The way things are going, the next thing we will see and hear on here is that Packer fans found some humility…….eh, probably not.

  3. Besides the fact that Super Bowl Ring trumphs everything…

    The Seahawks were the net loser (Championships aside), but didn’t lose much– as they still have high round picks waiting for an opportunity on the active roster (Paul Richardson, Christine Michael, Norwood, etc). Having more draft picks wouldn’t benefit.

    The Vikings didn’t gain much. Xavier Rhodes, woo hoo.

    The Jets have a cake-walk schedule and a sharp pointy weapon. Btw, the Jets schedule includes the Vikings. Cake walk.

  4. The Vikings haven’t done anything wise or come out ahead in anything in 3 decades. The real winner here is Percy Harvin. He has over $25 million guaranteed from a team that he played for in 6 games over 2 years. AND he continues to be a guy no one can stand to be around. I guess God can give you ability but it’s up to you to be a good person.

  5. The Jets have both Eric Deck and Percy Harvin now, which means there are TWO WR’s Geno can’t get the ball to instead of just 1. Maybe the Jets brass figures they’re increasing the odds that someone in green and white will come down with randomly-thrown passes. Probably true, but also true is they took a pot of lousy soup and threw in a beat-up tennis shoe. ENJOY YOUR MEAL!

  6. Really? Who cares at this point? Hawks have a ring and look Vikings currently are in last place in division. Hawks gm is a dice shooter. He craped out with Flynn and harvin, but hit the point with many. Lynch, Wilson, avril, Bennett, Sherman, Thomas.

    Eat it haters

  7. Yes… The Vikings look “wise” for this trade !!

    Which as we know is the most important aspect of a football team…

    Forget about the fact they are an awful football team, can’t win, and look rudderless…

    But thank god they won this trade !!!

  8. “Que packer trolls in 3-2-1”

    Wish the Packers had got him instead of the Jets for only a third round pick,he would be much happier in Green Bay returning kicks ,punts and catching rockets from Rodgers.TT missed another one.

  9. When the Seahawks acquired Harvin, I’m sure Pete Carroll figured he could get through to him. However, he apparently was unsuccessful. The Jets could be Harvin’s last chance in the league.
    .

  10. Yes…. I’d much rather have draft picks than a Super Bowl trophy…… Makes sense. Go vikes… You win.

  11. 76 votes for Seattle?
    I guess those are the people that say Harvin won them the Super Bowl.
    I guess it sucks that they traded him for a 4th-round pick then.
    Since he won them the Super Bowl and all.

  12. As a Gator, Harvin was a dynamic player, but he was always injury prone. A great player who never plays is worth less than a 4th round special teamer.

    I suspect his injury history was just too long for the Seahawks to endure.

  13. So…once the Seahawks dump him off the Vikings move was wise? Not before? Still sounds like a backhanded insult to me.

  14. Point is Harvin wasn’t needed for the super bowl win…so that argument doesn’t apply. It was a bad trade for Seattle. They have now given away a first, third, and seventh for a conditional second, third, or fourth round pick and gotten 8 games Harvin has played in.

    The jets will get the same headache seattle and minn had now but much worse since they are losing.

  15. I think people are overlooking the true value that both Seattle and Minnesota received…….they removed a major migraine from their organization. I’m a Vikes fan. I personally think Spielman waited a year or two too long to get rid of him. He could have got more for him…..

  16. The last time the Vikings went to the SB was in the 1970’s where they lost all 4. They have never been back. In the end Harvin didn’t work out but as a Hawks fan it was worth it just to see Percy open the 2nd half in SB48 like he did. That was the dagger and I will always cherish that moment. I was bouncing off the walls , people were going nuts it was great. I wish him all the best and thank him for that. GO HAWKS!

  17. Ok, lets be real here.

    Sure, draft wise, Vikings got the best of Seattle. But, what I never understood about the whole deal was, why?? Why did Seattle want Harvin. They didn’t need him to win. He played in one game last year. And then the superbowl. That’s it! He didn’t win the super bowl for them.

    Harvin is talented… But Migraines aren’t the only thing his head suffers from. It’s to bad each team has to trade him. I bet he would have been cut by more teams if they wouldn’t have to suffer cap penalties if they could just cut him. He’s got an attitude that’s as bad as we’ve seen.

    Seattle had a better team with Tate, than they do with harvin.

  18. This makes me think that Idzik, unless he’s going to be giving Harvin prozac milk shakes before games, overpaid for Harvin.

  19. “Wish the Packers had got him instead of the Jets for only a third round pick,he would be much happier in Green Bay returning kicks ,punts and catching rockets from Rodgers.TT missed another one.”

    The chemistry is way too important in the Packers’ locker room to bring in a malcontent like Harvin.

  20. The Seahawks did not need Percy to get to or win the Super Bowl.

    They gave up a 1, 4, and 7 in return for what will probably be a 4. Those kinds of deals don’t hurt you right Way. They hurt you in 3-4 years. Today, the hawks are benefitting from the drafts of 2011-2012, but you can’t ride that forever.

  21. I’m glad we have spielman. The problem has been coaching. A lot of packers and Seahawks fans talking tough on here. No Vikings fan is saying we’re a better team. But we got a good deal here, and it certainly will help us in the long run. Come on, ripping on the Vikings for being terrible? If Aaron Rodgers or Russel Wilson was indicted and suspended indefinitely after week 1, I’m pretty sure that would affect your teams negatively. that has nothing to do with this trade, which definitely helped our team.

  22. Feel bad for most Vikings fans. Fans of good teams get to celebrate wins on, you know, the football field.

    Fans of the Vikes get to celebrate winning a trade as the high point of their season.

    SMH

  23. On this point, the Vikings got the better of the Seahawks. Harvin is a headache to have around, a prima donna who thinks the world revolves around him.

    The real loser in this trade is Harvin. He griped about having to play with Christian Ponder at QB, and now after fussing his way out of Seattle, he gets sent to the Jets. After this season, he may be wishing that Christian Ponder was his QB again.

  24. filthymcfunny1 says:
    Oct 18, 2014 6:39 AM
    Que packer trolls in 3-2-1 —————————————————————————————————— be careful packers fans might have to give you the switch for your potty mouth…

  25. It’s great to hear the so-called ‘hawk fans chime in here since two weeks from now they will be on their new bandwagon.

  26. filthymcfunny1 says: Oct 18, 2014 6:39 AM

    Que packer trolls in 3-2-1
    ++++++++++

    First of all it’s ‘cue’ and second of all, why would Packer fans even be involved with this topic. We all know they really aren’t that smart and would probably just bring up the fact they have won as many Super Bowls as the Vikings have been in.

    Geez, leave the Packer fans alone. They have a lot on their mind with, you know, their run to the playoffs again (and probably falling short of their goal, another Super Bowl).

  27. Give me a break. The Seahawks got a win over the Vikings triggered by Harvins 2 big plays, an MVP-like performance from him in the Super Bowl, a Lombardi and a possibly a high 2nd round pick in a draft that’s likely to be much stronger than 2013. The Vikings got a bad corner, a backup running back and an OL who’s out of football. And the Vikings “won” the trade.

    Huh.

    You must have a Charlie Sheen definition of “winning.”

  28. As much as it hurts to give up that many picks for such minimal production in return, the hawks draft so well they are able to absorb this hit. This is nothing that’s going to hinder the hawks rule for years to come. Like it or not haters, the dynasty continues on.

  29. hazelmn says:
    Oct 18, 2014 8:38 AM

    The Seahawks did not need Percy to get to or win the Super Bowl
    =================

    Yes, what team would possibly need or even want a kickoff return for a TD and 22.5 YPC in the Superbowl?

    Didn’t help at all.

    Ask Denver.

    Lombardi.

  30. Yes the Vikings moved him at the right time, but what if they had listened to all Red flags. Who knows maybe they would have a guy that is helping thier team to this day.

    There is one goal in the NFL and it’s win Superbowls. I am sure any team would give up three picks to win the Sb. If Seattle lost that game.

  31. How could more than 8% possibly think the Seahawks got the best value from this trade? I know people are homers and all, but come on. They gave up a 1st and a 7th, at a minimum, for a guy that played less than 10 games for them.

    In no way, shape, or form, could they possibly be considered “winners” in that deal. I could see a homer jets fan thinking Harvin is finally going to get it together there (he isn’t), and they will eventually get the best value, But not possible for Seattle

  32. The SB is closer but still not in doubt without percy.

    Hawks made a huge mistake by trading for him. Fact. Hawks have no problem cutting bait admitting mistake, the jets on the other hand are still starting jeno smith and vikings didn’t bench AP till there was public outrage. So who is the wise team?

  33. The trade DOES apply to the Super Bowl. The ‘Hawks DID win.

    Every transaction regarding Seattle led to a SB victory.

    We will never know that outcome, minus the trade. But we do know the outcome, after the trade.

  34. Seattle brought Harvin in to take them over the top. He wasn’t the reason they won the Super Bowl, but he was the insurance. What price do you pay for that opportunity? I think the Seahawks will simply smile and move on. The Vikings will simply continue to decline in spite of all the first round picks.

  35. Hawks fan here, and I am sick of people acting like Harvin had anything to do with us winning the super bowl.

    We made it to the super bowl without him and we still win by 30+ points without him. The game was over before halftime. Scoring a TD in garbage time has no effect on the outcome.

    We never needed Harvin and we would’ve been much better off keeping tate and drafting more O line help.

    Harvin is garbage, always was and always will be.

  36. I remember the Vikings cut randy moss because they thought he was having a negative influence on Percy Harvin. The two apparently got along really well. Now, Harvin is taking himself out of games. Teams are cutting him…it’s very similar to that year with randy moss playing on three teams. I think moss just had a mental breakdown that year. Harvin seems to be like this all the time.

  37. The fact that Seattle doesn’t look as good this year as last says everything. Losing players like Tate and browner , $20 million, three draft picks including a first, third and seventh rounder for what amounts to a couple hundred yards and a kickoff return is the epitime of bust. Besides all that harvin was punching Seahawk wide receivers in the face and calling out the franchise quarterback.

    Kudos to the Seattle management for making the best out of a bad situation and cutting ties as soon as they did.

    The funny thing is a few months from now maybe even sooner they may look just as smart as the Vikings regarding Harvin.

  38. How can the Vikes look wise for trading him when they still look dumb for drafting him?

  39. In Teddy We Trust says: Oct 18, 2014 11:09 AM

    What do you think of Rick Spielman now?
    ————

    What do I think of Spielman now? Well, he’s the guy responsible for putting together the laughingstock that is the Vikings roster.

    But hey, he won one trade! Huzzah! Maybe the Vikings will win one more game this season, and give him another big victory!

  40. jcbadger34 says:
    Oct 18, 2014 3:23 PM
    In Teddy We Trust says: Oct 18, 2014 11:09 AM

    What do you think of Rick Spielman now?
    ————

    What do I think of Spielman now? Well, he’s the guy responsible for putting together the laughingstock that is the Vikings roster.

    But hey, he won one trade! Huzzah! Maybe the Vikings will win one more game this season, and give him another big victory!
    ………..
    Just cant resist…..troll on sir, troll on.

  41. today the vikings “won” this trade. tomorrow the Jets might “win” this trade. next week seattle might……….

  42. icewalker946 says:

    Geez, leave the Packer fans alone. They have a lot on their mind with, you know, their run to the playoffs again (and probably falling short of their goal, another Super Bowl).
    _________________________________________
    Vikings fans would kill (probably with a switch) just to get in the playoffs. Remember, the same QB in his prime who already has a SB win (1 more than Vikings franchise) still runs that championship caliber team. Meanwhile, turnover Teddy is the new savior (was Ponder 2 years ago). Bahahaha

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.