Union questions Harold Henderson’s neutrality

Getty Images

On Friday, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell appointed former NFL executive Harold Henderson to resolve the appeal filed by Vikings running back Adrian Peterson under the personal conduct policy.

The NFL Players Association does not believe that the action satisfies its request for a neutral third-party arbitrator.

“A long-time NFL Executive and current legal consultant cannot, by definition, be a neutral arbitrator,” the union said in a statement released to PFT.

The NFL appointed Henderson without addressing the union’s request for a neutral third-party arbitrator.  The league previously appointed former U.S. Judge Barbara Jones to handle the appeal of Ray Rice’s indefinite suspension.

Judge Jones ultimately required Goodell to testify at the Rice appeal hearing, over the strenuous objection of the NFL.  That ruling may or may not have influenced the NFL’s willingness to appoint a true outsider to handle Peterson’s case.

53 responses to “Union questions Harold Henderson’s neutrality

  1. Seems to me (and many) that the NFL and Goodell are tone deaf to the issues and how they’re addressing them.

    They’ve gotten so bad that it’s hard to think of anything they’re doing right other than making sure there are football games being played.

    I understand the NFL is a business but it’s not like other businesses. They depend on players, officials and fans. And their monopoly and continued government support should require them to be open and honest with the players, officials and fans.

    The NFL has a serious PR problem and that problem starts with Goodell and the decisions he continues to make.

  2. “In other news, fans question whether Peterson is really sorry or not.”

    In both cases…..you just never know.

  3. Exactly! Henderson won’t compel Goodell to testify and show what kind of welching buffoon he is.

  4. Sam Weinberg: “I strenuously object?” Is that how it’s done? Hm? “Objection, your Honor!” “Overruled” “No, no. I STRENUOUSLY object.” “Oh! You strenuously object. Then I’ll take some time and reconsider.”

  5. Gosh. Who do they want then? Someone biased towards Adrian Peterson, such as a Minnesota state judge? I’m tired of hearing the NFLPA complain about things like this.

    In fact, I’m tired of hearing DeMaurice Smith open his mouth. Not saying I’m a Goodell supporter. Just tired of both honestly.

  6. The NFL is railroading Peterson. Rice initially gets a small suspension, doesn’t favor the NFL so Peterson gets the hammer. Rice gets a neutral arbitrator, doesn’t go their way so Peterson does not.

    Everything that is happening to Peterson is a direct result of the NFL trying stuff with Rice, backfiring, so they “prove” themselves by treating Peterson more harshly.

  7. That is definatly a good move. If Godell refuses and calls Henderson neutral, then there is foundation work already laid for the NFLPA to file a complaint if they lose. It also doesn’t hurt to question his neutrality prior to the hearing because he might be afraid upholding the suspension would be viewed as bias.

    Good work NFLPA.

    FREE AP!
    LET THE MAN PLAY!!!

  8. I say just have an online poll. This is football when it all comes down to it. Gimme an up if you think a 10 game paid suspension plus 6 additional games with no pay seems like an ok punishment.

  9. salscobrakai says: Everyone is complaining but how many fans aren’t watching this weekend or forgetting to set their fantasy rosters out of protest?

    The fact that fans are watching the NFL just proves that the NFL and Goodell succeed in spite of their failures at running the league and treating the players as valuable contributors to the league’s runaway success.

    This league cannot afford to take what it has for granted. Most good things don’t last. The NFL has been on a roll since Pete Rozelle fixed it but this success may not continue under Goodell’s reign.

  10. This is crazy. Did he go alittle to hard on the kid? yes But in what business in the world do you get fired or suspended for spanking your child? Not to be this guy but the NFL and media would have you believe that it is better to get pulled over and arrested for DUI and a briefcase full of drugs (4 felonys) Fine: 6 games $500,000 then for spanking your child. Fine: 15 games $12,000,000+

  11. I don’t see anyone calling for Adrian Peterson’s friend, or a Minnesota state judge to be the arbitrator, where are you people getting that from?

    The article pretty clearly states the NFLPA is looking for a neutral 3rd party which none of those people or Harold Henderson would be.

  12. You know, deferring to a neutral 3rd party would be a chance for the NFL to recoup some badly needed credibility, regardless of the decision reached.

    But the one thing they absolutely can’t do is attempt to rig the ruling and have everybody see right through it.

    At this point it is abundantly clear Goodell is living in his own universe and either has no idea how bad he looks or simply doesn’t care.

    Either way, he’s unfit to hold his position any longer.

  13. When they signed the CBA the union agreed to let Goodell be the ultimate discipline decision maker. Why don’t the union members turn to their fearless union leader and ask him why he brokered such a terrible deal.

  14. At this point you have to start questioning the owners on why they insist this guy is doing a great job….it must be he knows where the bodies are buried….If this continues much longer the pressure needs to be put on the owners…..this is ridiculous…..if Goodell feels his decision is fair then why is he afraid to hire a neutral third party to hear the appeal….

  15. How hard is it to find someone to hear the appeal that doesn’t have any connection to the league? This is like Rooney and Mara overseeing that “independent” Rice investigation.

  16. evilgenetics said: Did he go alittle to hard on the kid? yes But in what business in the world do you get fired or suspended for spanking your child?

    He did not go “a little hard” on the kid. He beat him with a stick until he was bleeding. How about we let an NFL player beat you with a stick for a while and then tell me if it was only going a little hard on you?

  17. “At this point you have to start questioning the owners on why they insist this guy is doing a great job….”

    As long as the owners continue to make money hand over fist, then they will never – NEVER – say anything negative about their puppet, Goodell. The owners only care about one thing when all is said and done: the bottom line.

  18. evilgenetics–there’s a difference between “spanking your child” and inflicting welts on him with a switch. The kid is 4 years old. I was 15 when my father hit me with a switch and it was very painful.

    The NFLPA already lost a ruling on this when it was ruled by a “3rd party arbitrator” that the NFL did nothing wrong by not taking him off the exempt list.

  19. At this point even Russian president Vladimir Putin is like…”nobody is going to believe you Roger” but if you want a place to hang out you can bunk with Snowden….

  20. madmike66 says:
    Nov 21, 2014 4:18 PM
    The NFL is railroading Peterson. Rice initially gets a small suspension, doesn’t favor the NFL so Peterson gets the hammer. Rice gets a neutral arbitrator, doesn’t go their way so Peterson does not.

    Everything that is happening to Peterson is a direct result of the NFL trying stuff with Rice, backfiring, so they “prove” themselves by treating Peterson more harshly.

    —————————————————————————————

    Are you really that obtuse or just a viking fan?

    Everything that is happening to Peterson is because PETERSON beat a 4 year old child repeatably (on his back, his thighs and including in the scrotum, even the little childs hands hand defensive wounds) until he was bloody and welted. then when he was crying to much he shoved leaves down his throat to shut him up. Daddy peterson took that boy to the whippen room.

    Everything that is happening to Peterson is a direct result of the scum bag (Daddy Peterson) beating a defenseless four year old child bloody. The dirt bag should have been banned for life from the league on the spot the second he proudly admitted that is how he corrects his children.

  21. falstaff1962 says:
    Nov 21, 2014 4:54 PM
    evilgenetics said: Did he go alittle to hard on the kid? yes But in what business in the world do you get fired or suspended for spanking your child?

    He did not go “a little hard” on the kid. He beat him with a stick until he was bleeding. How about we let an NFL player beat you with a stick for a while and then tell me if it was only going a little hard on you?

    Would be like growing up. How many in here had parents who used switch’s when you got out of line ? crap I use to have to go out to the Willow tree and get my own for them to use and if it wasn’t a good enough one they would get one…. And looking back I dont blame them.. Made me UNDERSTAND the were consequences for BAD actions … not fooled into believing life was full of timeouts and stern talking to’s ..

  22. “stop watching then”…..

    I haven’t stopped watching altogether but I’m down to only watching my own team play and that’s only when its convenient for me. Goodell has made the NFL so unwatchable that I refuse to watch a 7 on 7 dome game or any game involving Peyton, Brady, Rodgers or Brees because those games are mostly one sided, pass happy snorefests (which basically eliminates every other game.

    The ratings may say one thing but amongst my group of friends…and we were all diehard season ticket holding, merchandise buying fans, we’ve all but stopped.

  23. For all of you that are saying that Goodell is wrong, remember this.

    He doesn’t need or have to assign someone else to be an arbiter. He IS SUPPOSED to do it himself as per the CBA. The fact that he listened to the PA and assigned someone else to do it is showing that he is listening.

    The problem is, the PA will complain with anything that he does as long as it is not what they want. They didn’t seem to mind a former NFL executive when Tags was overseeing the Bounty case. So if it was okay then, then why not now? Oh, that’s right the last time Henderson had one of those cases it didn’t work as well as they wanted.

  24. Everyone complaining on here doesn’t understand that under the CBA Goodell doesn’t have to appoint anyone at all. He is suppose to hear the appeal himself. This is a big deal to even let anyone else hear it. I still hope the appeal is denied and that more time is tacked on, but that is beside the point.

  25. I hope Goodell stomps on this and hears it himself like he’s suppose to under the CBA. DENIED CHILD BEATER! And since you complained you are now indefinitely suspended. Anyone defending AP should go outside grab a tree branch and hit your own leg. Just once and you’ll change your tune. We have no place for child abusers in our society!

  26. @jazz11001 Way off topic with your post. However Snowden is a true American Patriot and will go down as a hero for exposing the illegal unconstitutional spying on Americans!

  27. Goodell testified, so what? The NFL’s discipline of Rice was upheld. Game over.

    The NFL is not the government accusing Peterson of a crime. The due process clause of the U.S. Constitution, and virtually all of his constitutional rights, are irrelevant. Private employer and private employee. Don’t like how your employer treats you? Get another job.

    The inference from so many of the articles, and comments thereto, is that Goodell and the league owe Peterson, Rice, etc., the same type of treatment as the judicial system. Quite the opposite. In many respects, the owners and players are adversaries.

    You think most of the owners became titans in business by being swell guys? Please. You think they really care about how people think they should operate their business? Get over it.

  28. I’m getting tired of Adrian and his lackeys whining about how harsh his punishment is.
    Too many idiots like evgen saying “i had to choose my own switch” then in the very next sentence wah wahing about how excessive Petersons punishment is. Beyond stupid.

  29. As a career labor relations representative in management, I have to agree with the Union (which I rarely do). On the surface it appears fishy. An easy alternative is to request a list of 15 names from the American Arbitration Association and alternate strikes names until you have one.

  30. Shut up, NFLPA.

    You chose to negotiate for more money rather than having say in appeals. You agreed that Goodell would handle appeals.

    Pure greed.

    You wanted money more than a hand in appeals, De Maurice, so live with your choice.

    Goodell didn’t have to name anyone else to arbitrate. He has the legal right, agreed to by the NFLPA, to judge the appeal.

    The NFLPA was fine with Goodell being judge jury executioner. They agreed to it. Now they want a change? Are they going to give back the extra money they negotiated for instead of participating in the appeals process?

    I wish Goodell would just come out publicly and remind the NFLPA that they negotiated all their rights for a few more sheckels.

    I hope next CBA the NFL breaks the Union into tiny bits. Bilionaires can wait two-three years for their next paycheck. THe players can’t. 1700 of the 1800 NFL players are either getting veteran minimum or are on rookie deals. DeMaurice only cares about the top 100.

  31. @madmike66: You are on the wrong site with your liberal whining. The topic is Adrian Peterson and his (effective) 15 game suspension by the NFL for a judicial misdemeanor . Even the court is willing to expunge his conviction after 6 months of good behavior. Who is the NFL to ignore the judicial verdict?

  32. The Adrian Peterson case was at one time about a man who over disciplined his child. This has now turned into a major soap opera about how one man and his office can make complete embarrassments out of themselves. In any case where there is litigation, if one side is absolutely positive they are right and they have the law behind them then they shouldn’t care who is arbitrating the case. In fact, from a perception perspective the team that is confident actually wants a truly independent arbitrator. Based on the selection of Henderson the NFL is not confident that a truly independent arbitrator will side with them, hence, the selection of Henderson. Goodell is not an honest man. Any honest man would rise above the situation and realize Henderson in not independent. How Goodell or anyone with half a brain could think Henderson is independent is beyond me. Goodell’s ego and pride are what’s keeping him from doing the right thing. At the time Peterson opted for a plea deal Goodell could have taken the high road, worked out a compromised deal and restored faith with the fans, media, sponsors, and the NFLPA. Goodell took a different path, one that includes a wide ranging array of total screw-ups and total lack of thought or understanding. What a black eye for the NFL!

  33. Everyone complaining but the Union agreed to this protocol when they signed the agreement. Now that there is a consequence that the Union doesn’t agree with, all of a sudden the process is flawed?

    Buck up, you signed it, now live with it. A child abuser is not the poster child for fighting the arrangement, pick another victim.

  34. Josh Brent – Felony Intoxicated Manslaughter and Vehicular Homicide 10 Games

    Adrian Peterson – No Contest to Misdemeanor Assault 15 Games

    This doesn’t seem fair to me.

  35. Well, Duuuh…

    Anyone not appointed by the union will not be ‘neutral’ in their eyes…what a way to keep the other players attention of being “a good union” by declaring before the hearing that the person sitting in judgement is biased…

    And youngs79…no contest to a misdemeanor?? Give me a break…it was not just any misdemeanor and it was plea bargain…he’s still ‘guilty’… As to Brent, different time in the NFL…things changed with the Ray Rice incident. The only thing the league could have done is to set a policy going forward and move on… That’s not the league’s fault entirely…when does someone blame Ray Rice, AP, etc guilty for changing the court of public opinion on the severity of these types of crimes…don’t get me wrong, I don’t think any of them are treated fairly by the law or by the league for their crimes, but it had to start somewhere…Ray Rice was it…

  36. Ok let me get this right… Greedell ‘appointed’ the guy who will decide AP’s appeal? LMAO WOW.. I love how the NFL thinks people are this stupid….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.