Belichick scoffs at talk that four-lineman formation was cheating

AP

Patriots coach Bill Belichick thinks it’s ridiculous that anyone is complaining about his team tricking the Ravens on Saturday by using a formation with only four offensive linemen on the field.

Depending on whom you ask, Belichick is either a genius or a cheater for employing the four-lineman formation. But Belichick pointed out that players who are ordinarily eligible receivers line up in ineligible positions on punts all the time, and he sees no reason not to do it on offense.

I don’t know what you’re talking about,” Belichick said when pressed about whether the league should look into the way he lined up his players. “I mean, that happens all the time. You come in on a punt team, ineligible guys report as eligible. They line up as guards and tackles on the punt team. The center, the center’s numbers in the NFL are eligible players that report ineligible. Then they cover punts. We’ve seen it on offense. We see it particularly a lot on special teams, the kicking game, punting game — not so much on the field goals because you have your linemen protecting there. But I’d say it happens every game on the punt team. You’re allowed to do that. I don’t really understand what the question is. If you want to talk about the rules, you should talk to the NFL rules people about that. They’ll tell you about it.”

Belichick is right that it happens all the time on punts, but no one seems to remember ever seeing anything like it on offense. Part of Belichick’s genius is that he thinks of things that no NFL coach had ever thought of before. That’s not cheating, it’s good coaching.

168 responses to “Belichick scoffs at talk that four-lineman formation was cheating

  1. I hate the Pats.. ever since tuck rule and spygate. As a raider fan.. just hate them. However, this was a brilliant play by the pats. Caught the ravens and the refs by surprise.

  2. Funny you guys keep clamoring about “knowing the rule book” cause I found it, and here you go;

    Article 2 A player who has reported a change in his eligibility status to the Referee is permitted to return to a position indicated by the eligibility status of his number after:

    (a) a team time out;

    (b) the end of a quarter;

    (c) the two-minute warning;

    (d) a foul;

    (e) a replay challenge;

    (f) a touchdown;

    (g) a completed kick from scrimmage;

    (h) a change of possession; or

    (i) if the player has been withdrawn for one legal snap. A player withdrawn for one legal snap may re-enter at a position indicated by the eligibility status of his number, unless he again reports to the Referee that he is assuming a position other than that designated by the eligibility status of his number

    A.R. 5.1 Offensive tackle A1 is legally shifted to the backfield and is then withdrawn. He returns before the next snap to a tackle position.

    Ruling: Illegal. He must stay out one play, unless there is a team time out.

    funny how whenever there’s an accusation of cheating in the league it’s always directed at the team from New England. Now you may say the Ravens whine (and fair enough) but I’d rather whine about being cheated than be the ones cheating.

  3. Great play Bill. Outsmart the system. Seattle will drop into coverage and stop that mess. See ya in Arizona

  4. It’s on Harbaugh to recognize things and plan accordingly. He’s just salty because he got out-coached. The NFL says it was legal. End of story.
    GO PATS!

  5. I’m not a big Pats fan at all, but this was brilliant. They reported their guy was ineligible and that’s the end of it. The Ravens were caught napping and wasted bodies to cover a guy that couldn’t touch the ball.

  6. Cue the trolls looking to see how many thumbs downs they can get.

    He’s the greatest since Paul Brown. I can’t wait to see what he does this week. Innovater and a winner. By far the most interesting and intriguing coach of our time.

    Let your hate flow trolls.

  7. Would not be surprised if this loophole gets closed during the off season. But if there is a loophole, there’s no reason why you can’t use it.

    Great coaches find those loopholes and exploit them.

  8. Of course this was not cheating.

    Baltimore simply did not react as they should have – if the Patriots want to play close to the line of unethical conduct, then the Ravens should have exploited this lineup with an overwhelming pass rush trampling the fake lineman and then using speed in second and third waves of players to knock out Tomasina Brady.

    The rest of the NFL has to get this through their thick skull – New England will play as unprofessionally as possible and they will do it within the rules. You cannot whine when they do – you have to smash them in the mouth and start taking out key players to teach them a lesson.

    This is street ball. You match each trick with a punch in the mouth. Sooner or later there will be no mouth left to punch since it will be hamburger.

  9. The Ravens are only embarrassing themselves again with this nonsense. They’ve already caused the NFL enough embarrassment this season with the Ray Rice saga. So, I implore you; just stop….that’s all. Stop.

  10. It’s excellent coaching.
    People are just jealous of him and the Patriots (and i’m not a patriots fan or live anywhere near NE).
    my team is looking for a head coach and I want a coach that thinks way ahead of the curve instead of reacting to some other coach who thought ahead and prepared.
    The player reported as ineligable… what the problem?
    EVERY offense in all of football is based on decete or tricking the defense.

  11. Oh come on, I hate NE as much as the next guy, but that wasn’t cheating. Kubiak game the game away when the Ravens were marching down the field and in a 2 and 5 situation in NE territory with 1:43 left, he let Flacco threw a bomb, bad decision, game over.

  12. hakunamangata says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:09 PM

    Ruling: Illegal. He must stay out one play, unless there is a team time out.

    funny how whenever there’s an accusation of cheating in the league it’s always directed at the team from New England. Now you may say the Ravens whine (and fair enough) but I’d rather whine about being cheated than be the ones cheating.
    ________________________________________
    The league disagrees with your assesment.

  13. God forbid the defense be responsible for knowing the rules. You are professionals. You see more shady stuff than that in little league football. The ole “Hey Ref, this ball is flat trick.”

  14. It’s definitely not cheating as it’s completely legal.

    It’s a little too “cute” for my taste though, and I generally like trick plays. It will likely mean another tweak to a rule set (or things that a referee has to be aware of) that is already far too complicated. And I think the rule set already interferes with great games and great plays (as we’ve seen this year in several playoff games already).

  15. jmoney74 says:Jan 12, 2015 3:07 PM

    I hate the Pats.. ever since tuck rule and spygate. As a raider fan.. just hate them. However, this was a brilliant play by the pats. Caught the ravens and the refs by surprise.
    ————‘———–‘————————-
    Nope. The Refs saw it. The one official was pointing at the player that was ineligible. It happened really quick that the Ravens didn’t see it

     

     

     

  16. There were different players reporting ineligible each play, which is an important part of why it’s legal.

    And this goes way back before Saban. We had a similar play in the playbook at a D3 college in 1976.

    Harbaugh should have called time out. Simple thing to do. He can communicate with both his defense and the refs to figure things out. He panicked. End of story.

  17. It’s call coaching! No huddle of fence is also unfair to the Defense, poor guys, cannot get off field to rest. Poor defenders who do not know who to cover. I watch the Alabama vs LSU game on that one play, yeah, the Defenders were also confused! Guess what, that is what the rules allow! If the Ravens are crying foul, how about that non-call when the Gonk was dragging that poor defender while trying to catch a pass, what should you Ravens fan call that? Should it be Unsportsmanship like? Because the Gong refuses to stay still so his fellow defenders can try to catch the ball? Get over it, JH out coach us in two playoff games, and the Pats congratulate the Ravens. Each time you lose, it’s cheating! Grow up….

  18. The intent of that line-up was clearly to do his best to mislead the Ravens into thinking that a player lined up in a position in which noone would think that he was ineligible, was in fact ineligible.

    Waiting until the last possible moment to notify, and confuse the defense due to the late timing of it does not seem as if it should be within the rules. That’s all.

    For any teams, the defense should have more than a few seconds notice of such things. How is one to know in a mere matter of a few seconds whether it’s the RB or WR on the short end or the OT on the long end that’s ineligible.

    Either way, the Pats were outplayed. Their rushing game is suspect and their D is not very good. These are not the traits of a team that wins a Super Bowl.

    Flacco’s unforced bumbling was more responsible for the Pats win than anything.

  19. Loved it. As a fan of another team I’d call myself a Pats admirer more than a fan and Bill is the main reason. He does his job. He does it well. He doesn’t care what you or I think and I love that.

  20. It’s already been determined by every authority in football that it was legal. Legal plays can’t be cheating.

    If the refs didn’t give Harbaugh a chance to substitute, that’s their problem, not Belichick’s, although it looked like they had enough time and just weren’t ready for it at all. Makes it smart play.

  21. There was something illegal that happened. Bill Vinovich overstepped his authority when he added to his ineligibility announcement “You don’t have to cover 34.” It’s not his place to help the Ravens coaching staff cope with being out coached.

    Vereen was announced as ineligible and the Ravens were given AT LEAST 7 seconds to make the necessary adjustments. How about you take a time out and look at the pictures. Coach, don’t whine.

  22. No kidding.
    The word “cheat” isn’t even in his vocabulary.
    Everything’s fair game until somebody tells him to stop…

    There’s sportsmanship, and then there’s gamesmanship.

    /Hint: Bellichick isn’t much of a sport…

  23. Anyone who says this is cheating is just a patriot hater. There is no rule saying they can’t do that which by definition means he isn’t cheating, and anyone calling him a thief for “stealing” the play from Sabah is just as stupid. Did Saban copyright it? No it’s a footbal play, look at the read option or wildcat once something works it’s only natural that others will use it. That’s the sign of a good coach, being smart enough to think of new and unique plays but also having a good football knowledge to use other coaches techniques. If this was Harbaugh’s everyone would be calling him coach of the year, but just because it’s Bill Bellicheck and the New England Patriots everyone is gonna throw a fit because their team ended up behind us again.

    “They hate us. Cuz they ain’t us”

  24. If a coach can gain an advantage while following the rules then there is no reason not to. To go a step further, if he doesn’t then he is failing in his job as a coach. Lets be honest, a vast majority of us would LOVE to have the Hoodie as their coach.

  25. seatownballers says: Jan 12, 2015 3:09 PM

    Great play Bill. Outsmart the system. Seattle will drop into coverage and stop that mess. See ya in Arizona

    Yeah, it’ll be fulfilling watching Belicheat and the Pats lose yet another Super Bowl if in fact they even get by the Colts.

    That should be a fun game. What’s the O/U on the number of passes thrown, 140. LOL

  26. Why would he not scoff? It was totally legal, really smart, and had been used in a game before. Will the media now ask Harbaugh if it was cheating to run out and delay the game because he didn’t want to use a timeout? To me, that’s the cheating. He should have been charged a timeout in addition to the penalty.

  27. I’m a Steeler fan and wasn’t happy at all about pushing the ‘rules’ on filming and filming practice…

    BUT on this… hey… if its in the rules… I don’t have a problem…. matter of fact I think its great… anybody thinks outside the box..

    they want me to think outside the box but i work in a cubicle…

    and good ‘thinker’ would only allow it to happen ‘once’. lol shame on the defense if they remained confused… ‘twice’… lol

  28. My question: What would the Pats and there fans be saying if the roles were reversed? Guaranteed the Pats fans would be crying and sobbing and assuming the fetal position. LOL

    Pats fans? How about the Brady bump on the ref when he was throwing a tantrum that was not called? Would you have been certain to point it out if it had been Flacco?

    Waiting for your response to the latter.

  29. Just the fact that the guy who usually only answers questions with one word, or one sentence MAX, went to such lengths to “explain” himself, just shows that even he knows he needs to cover his tracks…

  30. It’s right in your rules listing…..(d) a foul. There was a penalty called on Baltimore after the play, so Vereen could stay in the game and not have to sit out a play after having changed his status on the prior play.

    hakunamangata says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:09 PM
    Funny you guys keep clamoring about “knowing the rule book” cause I found it, and here you go;

    Article 2 A player who has reported a change in his eligibility status to the Referee is permitted to return to a position indicated by the eligibility status of his number after:

    (a) a team time out;

    (b) the end of a quarter;

    (c) the two-minute warning;

    (d) a foul;

    (e) a replay challenge;

    (f) a touchdown;

    (g) a completed kick from scrimmage;

    (h) a change of possession; or

    (i) if the player has been withdrawn for one legal snap. A player withdrawn for one legal snap may re-enter at a position indicated by the eligibility status of his number, unless he again reports to the Referee that he is assuming a position other than that designated by the eligibility status of his number

    A.R. 5.1 Offensive tackle A1 is legally shifted to the backfield and is then withdrawn. He returns before the next snap to a tackle position.

    Ruling: Illegal. He must stay out one play, unless there is a team time out.

  31. Belichick is a student of the game and one of the true historians of football. This is not a new, never used formation. Jimmy Johnson was incredulous that there was ANY controversy over this. He stated on air that HE used this formation back when he was a high school coach.

    Get over you petty jealousies and appreciate a great coach while you can………

  32. artvan15 says: Jan 12, 2015 3:15 PM

    Belichick is smarter than the rest of you. What’s he going to do next???

    Lose either the AFCCG or the SB.

    Funny, he can’t seem to win one since having been disallowed doing what everyone outside NE said was cheating 8 years ago.

    Strange how that works.

    We’ll look forward to yet another meltdown followed by an in-depth conversation as to how many years Brady has left. Funny, Belicheat was only a good coach since Brady’s been around. Same team he was 5-13 with Bledsoe, who wasn’t even bad, just not Brady.

    Gee, I wonder who’s more responsible for their SB wins.

  33. Funny as hell how Belichick gets into opposing teams’ heads.

    Other coaches get all paranoid. Heck, how many times did Brady draw flags for opposing teams w/12 men on field??? Another Belichick move.

    Each season, he thinks of things no one else has…and then the competition committee tags it…Well, they cannot do so this time otherwise it affects many areas of football.

  34. It was legal – yes. Harbaugh should not have whined about it. It is what it is.

    However – it is a loophole and should be fixed. They way it went down was The Patriots waited until the late instant to notify the refs and the refs in turn notifying the Ravens “hey – #34 split wide is ineligible, HIKE!” I think the refs should have had better control of the game.

    Legal to the letter – yes, but I’d like to see the competition committee clarify the rule as the application seems kind of dumb in an instance like this.

    Not an excuse – The Patriots beat the Ravens straight up because on Saturday they were the better team.

  35. Didn’t the Ravens have a guy suspended for cheating that just came back? Shouldn’t they be more concerned with that? Or the curious disparity of PI calls in their favor over the last few seasons? There must be some cheating going on there.

  36. Football is just another game, and every game has a set of rules and it’s up to the participants to learn the rules and find a way to craft a strategy around the rules that beats the strategies of others. If somebody comes up with a legal idea that you haven’t thought of, then it’s time to adapt and put forth more effort to come up with something that they haven’t thought of. There are still more ideas for unique plays and types of plays waiting to be invented. Hey, I hear Larry David is still looking for a side job and he’s pretty, pretty clever.

  37. “I’m a Steeler fan and wasn’t happy at all about pushing the ‘rules’ on filming and filming practice…”

    – The practice filming never happened. It’s an urban legend that the Boston Herald printed before the 2008 Superbowl and then had to retract because they didn’t have a real source. The author of that piece had a to write a lengthy retraction and no longer covers the Patriots.

  38. I like how the strength of the Raven’s D is their defensive line and one of the ways the Pats countered it was with LESS offensive linemen.

  39. It’s aggravating that some of these great games are only talked about because of missed calls or penalties.

  40. Why would he not scoff? It was totally legal, really smart, and had been used in a game before. Will the media now ask Harbaugh if it was cheating to run out and delay the game because he didn’t want to use a timeout? To me, that’s the cheating. He should have been charged a timeout in addition to the penalty.
    =====
    This. Harbaugh admitted he did it on purpose. He should be fined and suspended for the first game next season. Can’t allow this nonesense to start. A head coach intentionally ran on to the field to draw a penalty and delay the game to buy time to adjust. No.

  41. The refs were apparently told about these plays in the production meeting prior to the game so no, they weren’t fooled or surprised.

    “How about the Brady bump on the ref when he was throwing a tantrum that was not called? ”

    What the bump on a ref he didn’t even see because he was screaming at the Raven’s d-lineman who had just kneed him in the head after the play was over ?

    Funny how you ignore the very dirty play by your team. Only a coward would knee a player who was down on the ground in the head.

    The Pats did nothing wrong, illegal, or outside the rule book on these plays. Every substitution was announced as ineligible over the stadium PA system at the appropriate time as it was supposed to be. In addition on at least one play the refs helped the Ravens by screaming “34 is ineligible, don’t cover 34 !!”

    This is just the normal mode of operation by the Ravens. They whine about every opponent in the week before the game. They whine constantly during the game. They whine after it for weeks if they lose, and even if they win they still whine for days. Doesn’t matter who the opponent is. Its the Harbaugh strategy of that if you cry foul long and loud enough people will start believing you.

  42. Belichick said it was not out of the ordinary, citing special teams examples, and added inspiration for the strategy came from watching another NFL team.

    “The origin of that play was from the NFL,” Belichick said Monday during a conference call with reporters. “What they did it sparked some ideas. We did what we did.

    “It’s a play that it’s a situation that I saw another team use, kind of, and then we talked about it and thought about ways to maybe put some pressure on the defense with that concept of having more receivers on the field than were eligible.

    “[Traditionally teams] make them ineligible instead of making ineligible guys eligible. We’d go the other way around. So we came up with a few ideas.”

  43. If Harbaugh hadn’t mentioned these tricks, most sportwriters would not have noticed a thing. They are being schooled by Belichick, so their only reaction is to call him a genius. I personally can’t wait to see him try and trick Pete Carroll. Tom Brady better have a sense of humor.

  44. I’m a Raider fan and generally hate the Pats, but I think he found something within the rules he could use for confusions. Wasn’t this similar to part of why the A-11 offense some high schools were using a few years back worked? It used a kicking formation rule and the players who declared as ineligible varied from play to play. Harbaugh should have noted something weird was going on and had his DC call some kind of zone until they figured it out.

  45. If Pats fans think us Ravens fan cry foul, how about whenever Brady is touched? Great player, one of the best QBs ever, but, his whining to the refs is highly uncalled for. It was a legal play, and the Ravens lost. But next year, watch out New England. With a healthy roster, and hopefully home field advantage in the playoffs, we are coming for you.

  46. Big Ravens fan- im happy with the ravens season……they lost 7 cbs and 2 safetys in that secondary. They lost there starting rb and te…..both were pro bowlers…had all that adversity all season…..with that being said, it took the patriots sketchy plays and trickery to beat a throw together team. History is repeating itself…ravens lost a heart breaker and the patriots will get beat in the super bowl….again….congrats! try that trickery against the legion of BOOM and see where it gets ya…..Seahawks crush them in the super bowl…pats lose again…just like they did against the giants. Patriots cant beat physical teams…the ravens were physical up front but that secondary was group of practice squad players….

  47. Ravens fan here, who says..

    We lost. No excuses.

    As soon as Joe let that pass sail I thought NOOOO!

    Even if it had been a TD, Brady would have had time to march right back down and score. They should have just kept feeding Forsett and taken time off the clock and scored. The Pats couldn’t stop the run and it would have been the smart coaching tactic but woulda, coulda, shoulda..

    We got out coached and lost.

    Still proud of this team. With all the injuries and BS, it took creative formations and trick plays to win it for the Patriots.

    If Ravens can stay healthy they’ll be back next year.

  48. Watch Oregon do the swinging gate tonight and come back and talk to me about “cheating”. We ran a play with ineligible “flankers but not really” in high school and college. The public doesn’t understand the game well because it’s been dumbed down to look like an arm wrestling match between two QB’s who never actually face each other.

  49. Over the past two weeks has any coach whined more than John Harbaugh. Last week be basically called one of the officials a cheater. The OFFICIAL. I think John Harbaugh is one of the best coaches in football today and thus should not have to resort to that sort of nonsense.

  50. The Patriots copied Alabama’s tactics against LSU in overtime. It’s possible that Alabama’s Offensive Coordinator, the great Lane Kiffin, is responsible for bringing this gimmick to mainstream football. Yes, that Lane Kiffin.

  51. Personally, I would have preferred an alternative choice of words from Belichick than “I don’t know what you’re talking about,” to me, that’s a bald faced lie. He knows exactly whats being talked about. If he didn’t, he wouldn’t have done it. I wouldn’t go so far as to call it genius but it is pretty clever, especially if you know you can frustrate the opposition and not get flagged for it. With a game as complicated as American football and a rule book exponentially so, certainly your coaching staff should know the rules and that’s part of their purpose with younger guys is imparting them. Was it against the rules, I don’t see how. There’s a fine line between, win at all costs, and desperation and being down 14 at two different times isn’t a particularly good strategy for winning. If your defense isn’t capable of reading a formation, you have bigger issues.

  52. willycents says: Jan 12, 2015 3:21 PM

    My question: What would the Pats and there fans be saying if the roles were reversed? Guaranteed the Pats fans would be crying and sobbing and assuming the fetal position. LOL

    Pats fans? How about the Brady bump on the ref when he was throwing a tantrum that was not called? Would you have been certain to point it out if it had been Flacco?

    Waiting for your response to the latter.
    ____________________________________

    First, the roles wouldn’t be reversed. Harbaugh’s not that smart, as shown by his reaction.

    But in the 2007 AFC Championship game, when the Patriots defense had been hit with the flu in the prior week, the Colts with Manning, Tom Moore and Tony Dungy spent the entire 2nd half in no huddle. Any time the Patriots tried to substitute, Manning would call for the snap, resulting in 12 men on defense. Frustrating? Yes. Maddening? Yes. Illegal, or cheating? Nope. Just smart, and emulated by the rest of the league.

    I guarantee other teams will do the same thing next year.

    As for the Brady penalty. The bump was inadvertent, but he got away with one there. Just as the Ravens defensive lineman (doing his best Suh imitation) who kneed Brady in the face leading up to it did.

  53. The practice filming never happened. It’s an urban legend that the Boston Herald printed before the 2008 Superbowl and then had to retract because they didn’t have a real source. The author of that piece had a to write a lengthy retraction and no longer covers the Patriots.

    yes, of course it’s an urban legend…according to a paper based in Boston…

  54. “The practice filming never happened. It’s an urban legend that the Boston Herald printed before the 2008 Superbowl and then had to retract because they didn’t have a real source.”

    The source was Matt Walsh, the video assistant who allegedly did the filming of the Rams walk-through while he was an employee of the Patriots. It’s a long story that can be researched elsewhere. Under heavy threats of lawsuits and criminal charges from the NFL and the Patriots, he went quietly into the night just like the tapes that Goodell destroyed. There was always the theory that he was paid off to drop the matter and disappear.

  55. It happened during Alabama-LSU just a few weeks ago. Not sure why “no one has ever seen it”.

    And I wonder if the “cheater” crowd believes every fake punt is also cheating? How about play action passes were the rb runs a pass route? Zone blitzs were a DL drops into coverage?

    The numbers of ineligible players was announced. The pkayers were numbers on their uniforms. Don’t cover the guy with the announced ineligible.

    It only works if the other team/coaching staff isn’t paying attention. The Pats figured the Raven’s woudn’t and were correct.

  56. I’m a Steeler fan and wasn’t happy at all about pushing the ‘rules’ on filming and filming practice…

    you are thinking of the Broncos. They are the only team in history to be caught and fined for taping other teams practices, they did it to the 49ers in London.

  57. purplereign52 says: Jan 12, 2015 3:30 PM

    Big Ravens fan-the ravens were physical up front but that secondary was group of practice squad players….

    ——————————————————

    Were Suggs and Dumervill even dressed for the game?

  58. ravens will be back 18 players on IR STILL DID VERY WELL .as usaul get used to ravens in playoffs.bank on it.PAT had very good game plan

  59. He’s a cheater!!! Just kidding, he definitely pulled one over on us and it was legit. Frustrating but what can you. The one thing I take solace in is that they had to pull every trick play out of the book to get that win. Can’t wait for next season…

  60. IMO, Harbaugh has embarrassed himself and the whole Ravens organization by whining about this after the game instead of just losing gracefully.
    Belichick would never stoop to such foolishness.

  61. My question: What would the Pats and there fans be saying if the roles were reversed? Guaranteed the Pats fans would be crying and sobbing and assuming the fetal position. LOL

    Pats fans? How about the Brady bump on the ref when he was throwing a tantrum that was not called? Would you have been certain to point it out if it had been Flacco?

    Waiting for your response to the latter.

    **************************************************willcents I’ll get back to ya after the AFC Championship Game

  62. billswillnevermove says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:11 PM
    And he didn’t think of it first anyways……..he stole it from Saban, not the genius you think he is. Anybody can steal.

    31 64
    Report comment

    Bill just admitted to the media that he got the play from another NFL team. Even if Saban used it first, it’s not Bill claiming to be a genius, it’s the media.

  63. muslimponder says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:23 PM
    What about illegal video surveillance of your opponents’ walk-through practices, did he scoff at that too?1

    _________________________

    Because that never happened. But it’s okay to make things up to justify your hatred and jealousy.

  64. It was neither cheating nor unethical. It is well within the rules. The defense had more than enough time to assess the situation and come up with a solution, such as a time out. I see no reason to make any change to this rule.

    I am not a fan of the Patriots as a team, but I like Brady as a QB and love Belichick as a coach. I wish I had someone as innovative and hard working as Belichick.

    Unethical is advocating for purposely injuring players on another team when your team was unable to figure it out in time. IMO Belichick is the consumate professional coach. I have never seen him do anything unethical during a game such as standing on the white stripe in a returners way while the play was going on and then pretend he had no idea while he was watching the whole thing on the big screen or anything like that.

  65. My favorite part of pulling plays from Alabama, and using trick plays from the early 2000s, means the Colts coaches have about 20 years worth of NFL and college games to film study this week. Better bring in a few more coffee machines.

  66. This idea that the ineligible players were announced over the Gillette PA is an urban legend. The Patriots did not notify the ref until the last possible moment before the ball was snapped. That is why Harbs was upset. It was legal. Cheap – but legal.

  67. restonraven says: Jan 12, 2015 3:25 PM

    However – it is a loophole and should be fixed. They way it went down was The Patriots waited until the late instant to notify the refs and the refs in turn notifying the Ravens “hey – #34 split wide is ineligible, HIKE!” I think the refs should have had better control of the game.
    ————————————————–
    Not true. Peter King in MMQB reviewed the 3 plays in question. That’s right, only 3 plays. For those plays the Patriots snapped the ball, 7 seconds, 10 seconds, and 7 seconds after the officials announced who was ineligible. In one case announcing that Ravens should not cover number 34.

    This site would probably crash if an official instructed the Patriots not to cover an ineligible player.

  68. rayburns says:Jan 12, 2015 3:13 PM

    Would not be surprised if this loophole gets closed during the off season. But if there is a loophole, there’s no reason why you can’t use it.

    Great coaches find those loopholes and exploit them.
    ===============================

    Yeah, just like the MLB steroid takers who exploited the loopholes to their advantage.

  69. It wasn’t illegal but it was sleazy. Of course NE had to resort to trickery in order to win. They couldn’t a man’s game.

  70. yes, of course it’s an urban legend…according to a paper based in Boston…

    —–

    Uuuummm, the paper in Boston was the one that made the story up without any facts.

  71. At least Brady is now admitting it was a trick play, and of course the whole point of trick plays is to gain advantage through deception. I still think he’s Eddie Haskel oily.

    Those who say Harbs should have called a TO are right. He probably did the same thing in heat of the moment that most other coaches would have done. And his complaining on-field was no different than what Belichick did a few years ago when he corralled a ref to complain about Tucker’s winning field goal. But now post-game, Harbs should be flattered the Pats knew it was necessary to resort to such devices to beat his team, and convey any thoughts to the League in private.

    Will the NFL modify the rules to prevent or limit the same thing happening in the future? Remains to be seen.

    What this also points out is that your team is unprepared if it doesn’t have a “Special Tricks” coach to go through the rule book to come up with these plays, or watch college games for ideas. Belichick didn’t think of the play, but he was smart enough to copy someone else who did.

  72. kelsey59 says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:51 PM
    It wasn’t illegal but it was sleazy. Of course NE had to resort to trickery in order to win.

    _______________________

    Dude, really? They were down 14 points…TWICE.

  73. restonraven says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:47 PM
    This idea that the ineligible players were announced over the Gillette PA is an urban legend. The Patriots did not notify the ref until the last possible moment before the ball was snapped.

    WRONG. not only did he announce it he also said ” do not cover 34″ he is not required to say that last part. Don’t be pissed because the Ravens players are to stupid to make the adjustment.

  74. @scot0084

    1-10-BAL 39 (8:23) (Shotgun) T.Brady pass short left to J.Edelman to BAL 28 for 11 yards (W.Hill).
    1-10-BAL 28 (8:23) (Shotgun) T.Brady pass short left to J.Edelman to BAL 24 for 4 yards (C.Mosley).
    2-6-BAL 24 (7:19) NE 34-Vereen ineligible. (Shotgun) T.Brady pass short middle to M.Hoomanawanui to BAL 10 for 14 yards (D.Stewart). PENALTY on BAL, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, 5 yards, enforced at BAL 10.

    Where is the penalty that allowed Vareen to change eligibility without leaving the game?

  75. Of course BB also thought illegally taping other team’s practices wasn’t cheating either.

  76. It’s a shame they had to use this against the Ravens, I think it would have been great to pull this out for the first time in the Superbowl. That said, having a week to prepare for the Pats, and having to get your team ready to defense against something like this could really mess with players heads when they line up. Hopefully they have something else sneaky to pull off next week.

  77. It’s cheating. With Belichick it always catches up with him in the form of a super bowl loss.

  78. Isn’t this pretty much exactly what defenses are trying to do every single play? Disguise who is going to do what and mask who needs to be covered. Offenses call time out all the time when they get a look they don’t know what to do with.

  79. I’m sympathetic to those who think this was “sleazy” or “dodgy”, but it’s also kind of brilliant, given the context. This was a high-stakes match between rivals, and the Ravens have been serious trouble for the Pats in the playoffs. That is exactly when you up the ante and give the familiar rival something they don’t expect. That’s when it goes from just playing a sport to a psychological contest between two coaches. Harbaugh thought he knew what he was up against, and for the most part he was correct. But that little bit makes a difference.

    Kudos to the Ravens for a terrific game. I didn’t want to see either team lose, they both kept coming up with such good stuff. I don’t see any conference championship game beating that one.

  80. .

    We have known for a while that Bill is a cheater.

    Now we know with certainty that he is also a liar.

    “I don’t know what you’re talking about” is obviously a lie. No way around it…

    .

  81. When Shane Vereen announced he was ineligible, that meant the Ravens had one less receiver to cover. I don’t understand why it caused so much confusion for the Ravens defense or why TE Hoomanawanui was left uncovered. As a TE (and wearing a TE number), Hooman was always eligible (unless stated otherwise to the referee), so he should have been covered regardless of what was happening elsewhere on the field.

  82. Hearing Harbaugh’s rationale for his whining…they didn’t allow time for us to adjust. The referee announces this over the stadium PA speaker…then you adjust. It is not the other coach’s job to give you time to adjust. Because he outsmarted you and the conventional thinking doesn’t make it cheating. This also tells the entire league your team isn’t smart enough to think on the fly…”hey I don’t need to cover him at all, he’s ineligible…the ref just said it.”

  83. People need to stop with the “He Cheated” nonsense. It isn’t cheating because you never heard of it. If anything, this should just prove exactly how smart he is for using it.

    And for the people saying it is a loophole, it is not. Players report as eligible, or ineligible in every game, even on offense. How many TD passes did JJ Watt catch this season? He had to report as eligible before he could go out in the pass pattern. And the officials have to make an announcement when the player is declared ineligible. So, if the Ravens were slow to react to a LEGAL formation, then shame on them.

    Has anyone ever seen the unbalanced formations, or the offset formations that some teams use on field goals? It’s the same thing. Try to confuse your opponent. I am really disappointed in Harbaugh that he thinks an opposing coach should have to give him time to react to something he wasn’t expecting.

  84. The notion of Bill Belicheck “cheating”, or even thinking about cheating in any capacity is completely absurd. Move along folks…nothing to see here.

  85. There was nothing about this that made him a genius. All the Ravens had to do was line up a pass rusher and knock that fullback over and get to the QB. This wasn’t cheating and it wasn’t a genius move.. Get over it folks.

  86. Belichick is playing dumb; That is not to say he was cheating, just that the ”punting team” analogy does not fit or appropriately reflect how clever the play was. Not a Pats fan, but Belichick is one of the best coaches and tacticians in football history.

  87. A genius does not get caught cheating, get an unprecedented fine and loss of a 1st rd draft pick. Those actions are reserved for cheaters.

  88. restonraven says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:47 PM
    This idea that the ineligible players were announced over the Gillette PA is an urban legend. The Patriots did not notify the ref until the last possible moment before the ball was snapped. That is why Harbs was upset. It was legal. Cheap – but legal.

    ————————–

    Restonraven, I invite you to come to my house and watch (most likely for the first time) a dvr of the game (you’ll have to take your shoes off though, house rules). You will see that the patriots were not in hurry mode. As a matter of fact the tape shows they were in a huddle. While in the huddle, Vereen leaves the huddle early and goes to the ref and signals his ineligibility to the ref. You then, clearly hear a ref get on the in stadium pa and announce that #34 is ineligible. At that point the Patriots are about done breaking their huddle and are slowly walking to the line. There were no substitutions, no hurry up and the ravens had plenty of time to id where #34 was and call a timeout or adjust their coverages.

    As Indiana Jones likes to say: “they chose……..poorly”

    Good luck next year.

  89. As a person who hates the Patriots I will say this, it’s not cheating and it’s good coaching. The only reason this is a topic is because John Harbaugh is a cry baby. A classless coach to go with a classless organization, talk about about a match made in heaven for the Ravens.

  90. @Azarkhan

    The ravens still had to cover a skill position player lined up as an ineligible receiver. Brady could have seen he was uncovered, rushed under center and thrown a lateral/backward pass to Vareen. Sending out 5 players with eligible numbers and picking which one is going to be ineligible only 7 seconds prior to the snap is a huge advantage.

  91. I did not hear or see the referee make the announcement that ” number ** reports as ineligible” as they do when when the referee states that “number ** is reporting as eligible”.
    That is the issue. Clarification and timing.

  92. “The origin of that play was from the NFL,” Belichick said

    Speculation is that the Patriots coaching staff got the idea from watching a play the Lions ran against the Vikings during the regular season. This makes sense because the Patriots played the Lions this year and so would have studied their games. Something else to note, when the Lions ran the play, Matthew Stafford got sacked.

  93. The real beauty of it to me was not that BB had the acumen to find something within the rules that might befuddle an opponent. Or that it hadn’t been tried in the NFL before. It’s the fact he had the nerve to pull it out in a playoff game he was losing, with the season on the line. And coach it up so they pulled it off, without an illegal formation penalty. Harbaug’s excuses, panic and basically not knowing what to do and then taking a 15 yrd penalty was ice cream.Haters indignation was the cherry on top. Kudos to the GOAT.

  94. The ironic thing is that Harbaugh’s background is as a special teams coordinator.

    He’s literally used the exact same tactic on every single fake punt or fake field goal play he’s ever designed and is probably the last head coach in the NFL who should have been caught off guard by this.

    Nearly every single play in the NFL….draws, traps, counters, flea-flickers, reverses, line stunts, zone blitzs, fake field goals, fake punts, onsides kicks, etc….they are all an attempt to confuse the opposition just long enough to gain an advantage.

    BB used a tactic that an old ST coach probably shouldn’t be unprepared for. Harbaugh is embarrassed that he got the pants coached off of him, hence the loud complaining of “cheating” to distract from the reality of the situation.

    If you are willing to burn a timeout to save 5 yards on a delay of game when it’s 2nd and 3 at the 40 you could certainly use one here. But you didn’t. You waited 3 downs and then took a penalty to give Brady & Co free yards in the red zone.

    Bottom line: You got outcoached. Stop complaining and move on.

  95. What happened to the ref announcing the player eligibility change like they do in all other games. The question isn’t wether he line up is cheating it’s the time Balt had to react is the problem. Pats put the change in then snapped the ball. That’s the problems

  96. to all the clowns saying the defense didnt have time….

    The ineligible player reports to the ref, who then announces it over the loudspeaker…. THE STADIUM LOUDSPEAKER… And it has been determined that all 3 of the plays that the patriots used this formation on, the snaps occurred between 7 and 10 seconds AFTER the announcement.

    Some of you people are acting like Vereen snuck on the field and whispered to the ref right before Brady snapped the ball…

  97. Restonraven:

    This idea that the ineligible players were announced over the Gillette PA is an urban legend. The Patriots did not notify the ref until the last possible moment before the ball was snapped. That is why Harbs was upset. It was legal. Cheap – but legal.
    ___________________________________

    From Peter King, who was ACTUALLY in the stadium:

    “I timed the three plays in question to see if Baltimore had been unfairly disadvantaged by the Patriot ploy, using NFL Game Rewind as my resource. Playing the NBC telecast back, I clocked the amount of time between referee Bill Vinovich’s in-stadium announcement of the “non-eligible player” (it sounded like that was what Vinovich called the spread-wide faux fifth lineman). By my count, seven, 10 and seven seconds elapsed between the announcements and the snap of the ball.”
    _______________________________________

    Boom. 7, 10 and 7 seconds between the announcement and the snap of the ball. So the urban legend is the one that that says they had no time.

  98. Again, Ravens didn’t think the formation was illegal. They didn’t think they were being given enough time to react.

    As a Ravens fan I am more upset our secondary was torched. That lost the game. Not these plays. The secondary we can’t blame on anyone. Spags did the best he could with the talent they could muster.

  99. I had my doubts about coach B…whiner, sore loser, etc…(as if any coach is happy after a loss) But after watching over the years… He’s just coach B.. I like him. Smart coach. Can’t deny that!!! GO HAWKS!!

  100. If Seattle gets past GB, and NE gets past Indy, I’d love nothing more than to see Seattle and the LOB bust Brady and Belichek a new one!

  101. “Where is the penalty that allowed Vareen to change eligibility without leaving the game?”

    The rule you’re citing has to deal with a player changing back to their normal eligibility from an altered one. You have to sit a play before resuming your natural eligibility unless one of that list of exceptions occurs. You do not have to sit a play before altering your eligibility from its natural state.

    The 4OL set was used three times. The first two times, the ineligible player (Vereen the first time and Hooman the second time) left the field after the play – thus complying with the rule you cited. The last time was the play immediately before the Harbaugh penalty, and that penalty allowed Vereen to stay on the field and revert back to his natural eligibility for the 1st and goal from BAL5.

    Basically, if a series of plays goes like this for #34: (eligible, ineligible, eligible), then there will be a flag at the snap of the third play. If it goes like this: (eligible, ineligible, out, eligible), then it’s legal. This: (eligible, ineligible,exception, eligible) is also legal. So maybe it’s not so basic…

  102. Can we just move on …this topic has been discussed ad nauseum; the league said it was legal; the rule book says its legal..it must be legal! ..Everyone should find something else to moan about concerning the Pats..

    Go Pats!!!!!!!

  103. If the competition committee looks at this in the off season I hope it is well after reviewing the definition of a catch. The gig is up on this one. Won’t work anymore.

    Not a Dallas fan but Dez caught the ball. The refs called it right. Its just a definition of a catch that needs updating. What exactly is a “move common to the game?” With athletic guys like Dez there were at least half a dozen moves common to the game after the catch was made.

  104. The Ravens played great. Tremendous team effort and individual effort by Flacco. But let’s stop the nonsense about the AFC North being so great and thde AFC East so weak. Three AFC North teams made the playoffs and they went 1-3, and their only win was against an AFC North team.

  105. ‘If it was legal to take a baseball bat to an opposing team players knee, Billacheat would say “Check the rule book it was a legal hit” ‘

    You mean “If it were…” because it’s not. Subbing an eligible player into an ineligible position is. CMAR.

  106. Didn’t see this happening. What I did see was the officials running in to help Tom Brady to his feet when he got hit during the game on Sunday. Now that bothers me…

  107. Harbaugh did not want to burn a timeout and did not want to go zone, two simple chess moves to counter Belichick’s move. He wanted to run on the field and complain, which he does more often than most coaches.

  108. geezohman says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:21 PM
    I’m a Steeler fan and wasn’t happy at all about pushing the ‘rules’ on filming and filming practice…

    —————————-

    The Pats did not film a practice or a walkthrough or whatever else you wanna call it. Stop perpetratin’ a lie.

  109. johnnybuc44 says:
    Jan 12, 2015 5:03 PM
    Didn’t see this happening. What I did see was the officials running in to help Tom Brady to his feet when he got hit during the game on Sunday. Now that bothers me…

    —————————-

    I’ve seen the refs help up every QB not just Brady. Happens all the time.

  110. Someone should go look at the Donald Penn TD against the 49ers. They pulled off a fast one on the other Harbro and he was PO’d.

    Seems neither of them pay attention.

  111. billswillnevermove says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:11 PM
    And he didn’t think of it first anyways……..he stole it from Saban, not the genius you think he is. Anybody can steal.

    ———————————————————-

    Hey Bill, you must not know that Belichick and Saban are very good friends and constantly talk to each other. BTW – This has been repeated constantly the past 24 hours. Listen, read and comprehend.

  112. Lots of misinformed commenters here. They didn’t declare their ineligible players and then immediately snap the ball. According to Peter King, he put a stopwatch on how long after the ref announced the ineligible players to when the ball was snapped. The fastest of the three plays was 7 seconds. 7 SECONDS!!! The longest was 10 SECONDS. So if you’re posting that it was unfair deception you simply don’t know the facts. Count off 7 seconds in your head and tell me if that’s enough time for a reasonably competent coach to decide calling timeout might be appropriate because you don’t know what your opponent is doing.

  113. As a Ravens fan I have no problem with BB strategy, it is the refs responsibility to allow ample substitution time after announcement of ineligible IF that was even necessary. No Bradying Here!! ie Whining Good Win NE>

  114. He’s right. Technically he wasn’t cheating because the referees allowed it to go on. Some view it as poor sportsmanship or a cheap way to win, but I think we all knew that about Bill anyway.

  115. Belichick will find loopholes in any poorly written rule

    In Spygate he took the phrase that taping “for the purposes of that game day” were prohibited

    Since he uses them for post game analysis he figured he was safe

    But he made Goodell look like a fool for outsmarting him and making Goodell look foolish carries a heavy penalty

  116. I wonder if people in Cleveland think he is a genius, you know a 36-44 record while at the helm. My prediction when Brady retires so will Belicheat.

  117. The New England Cheaters play fast and loose with the rules.

    The way to play them is to punch them in the face so hard, there is no harder punch to deliver.

    On that offensive alignment you go for broke as a defense – you go after Brady. Overload the offensive line’s weakest spot and dump the defense onto Brady where he is incapacitated, seeing birdies, or breaks something.

    The Patriots flaunt their superiority because they figure no one has the gonads to go after them. You must take the chance as a defense to make the Patriots never try their crap again. Whether it is running up the score, hurting one of their stars in the most legal and hardest hits possible, or decapitating the head of the fish, you do what you gotta do. The Patriots don’t play this game to play the game – they do it only to win regardless of what it takes.

    Return their serve with all due disrespect.

  118. hooterdawg says:
    Jan 12, 2015 3:39 PM

    “The practice filming never happened. It’s an urban legend that the Boston Herald printed before the 2008 Superbowl and then had to retract because they didn’t have a real source.”

    The source was Matt Walsh, the video assistant who allegedly did the filming of the Rams walk-through while he was an employee of the Patriots. It’s a long story that can be researched elsewhere. Under heavy threats of lawsuits and criminal charges from the NFL and the Patriots, he went quietly into the night just like the tapes that Goodell destroyed. There was always the theory that he was paid off to drop the matter and disappear.
    ———————————————————
    Actually, Matt Walsh was forced to shut up because he had not a SINGLE SHRED OF PROOF to back up his accusations.

    Not ONE.

    He hung the Boston Herald out to dry because he convinced John Tomase that he was telling the truth, and Tomase convinced his bone-headed editors to run the story the day before the Super Bowl WITHOUT VERIFYING THE ACCUSATIONS.

    Matt Walsh and the Boston Herald are lucky the Patriots didn’t sue their collective shorts off for printing something that was a LIE. Matt Walsh and the Boston Herald ADMITTED it was a lie.

    Why would the Patriots have paid him off AFTER he made the accusation? If they did, it failed, because SEVEN YEARS LATER, idiots like you STILL BELIEVE IT!!!!!

    The Patriots NEVER taped a practice or a walk-through. Matt Walsh and the Boston Herald ADMITTED that!!!!! But haters still gotta hate, hanging on to a lie seven years later.

  119. You Pats Haters are morons. Any owner in the NFL would give his Trophy Wife’s right arm to get Belichick to coach their team.
    Being smarter than you doesn’t mean they cheated.
    What about Flacco throwing the ball down the field in every meaningful situation hoping for a PI? This is a true stat: Since Flacco has been in the league, he has been the #1 beneficiary of Pass Interference calls in the NFL! When he whips that ball down field, he is not trying to hit his guy when his receiver beats the defender, he is trying to draw a 40 yard PI exactly like he did before the end of the first half! His receivers rarey beat anyone. Is that “cheating” or taking advantage of the rules?

    Since the start of the ’07 season, New England has gone 89-23 in the regular season. In the six seasons before the 2007, the Patriots are 70-26.
    We’ll see the Seahawks in their 6th SuperBowl in the BB/TB12 era. It’s going to take a lot to beat that defense.

  120. So many sour grapes. So many fans of lousy teams trying to make themselves feel better because they can’t beat the Pats. I really like the fans of of the other Afc teams who say ” well just wait until Seattle beats you” in the Super Bowl! Yeah ok , maybe they do but at least the Pats will be there yet again while you all suck on sour grapes.

  121. laserw says:
    Jan 12, 2015 9:21 PM
    The New England Cheaters play fast and loose with the rules.

    The way to play them is to punch them in the face so hard, there is no harder punch to deliver.

    On that offensive alignment you go for broke as a defense – you go after Brady. Overload the offensive line’s weakest spot and dump the defense onto Brady where he is incapacitated, seeing birdies, or breaks something.
    ———————————————————-
    Your coach couldn’t figure out what was going on so how is he going to figure out where the “line’s weakest spot” is. No one did any “cheating”; one coach couldn’t handle what was presented and he blew it; threw a hissy fit out on the field and was given a 15 yd penalty.

    The only cheater I saw on the field had served a 4 game suspension for a PED violation earlier this season. See how one can go with that?

  122. What makes the situation even more funny, the ref said he was ineligible and told the Defense not to cover him. LOL, I swear the ref said it, if you go back and listen to the audio of it.

    GO PATS!!

  123. LaserW– calm down. What you are saying is what your team did to the Pats most esp. to Brady. Brady’s eye is injured and is red. He was sacked and thrown around and that McPhee even kneed him when he was down. That was low and a big mistake. He just pi-sed Brady off. What you don’t want is mad dog Brady. See? You lost. Brady is like the old Timex watch. Take a lickin’. Keeps on tickin’. ( something like that). — your coach got embarrassed. BB scoffs. Scoffs. Scoffs. Love that word.

  124. Hahaha…There is something super sweet when you not only beat a significant opponent or rival in a big game but make them whine and cry while doing so. );p

    9 AFC Championship Games in 13 years baby!!!

    Laughing all the way!!! Happy New Year!!! The more things change…The more they stay the same.

  125. If Harbaugh was as good as coach as he says his is he wouldn’t have gotten fooled by that line up 3 times. It’s pretty simple actually, you just switch to a zone defense… done.

    There’s nothing wrong with the play at all and yes both players left the game for a play. Watch the film…

  126. There was something illegal that happened. Bill Vinovich overstepped his authority when he added to his ineligibility announcement “You don’t have to cover 34.”

    *laughing*
    yep, I heard that as well … so, let me get this straight, Harbaugh is complaining that it’s not fair play even though the official on the field told the Raven defense not to cover the ineligible receiver and the Raven defense could have opted to play zone?
    Well, John, you have a lot of spare time now … why don’t just go enjoy that and quit your bitchin’?

  127. I can only wish dolphin coaches were as brilliant as the pats coaches,philbum would never think of something on the same planet as the 4 lineman formation.

  128. Belichick said it was not out of the ordinary, citing special teams examples, and added inspiration for the strategy came from watching another NFL team.

    “The origin of that play was from the NFL,” Belichick said Monday during a conference call with reporters. “What they did it sparked some ideas. We did what we did.

    “It’s a play that it’s a situation that I saw another team use, kind of, and then we talked about it and thought about ways to maybe put some pressure on the defense with that concept of having more receivers on the field than were eligible.

    “[Traditionally teams] make them ineligible instead of making ineligible guys eligible. We’d go the other way around. So we came up with a few ideas.”

    —————————————————

    To add to this point, do you know what team and play he is talking about? This may surprise you….

    The Indianapolis Colts, who added TE Anthony Constanzo as an eligible receiver at the goal line of the Week 11 game against the Pats, a play which resulted in a Colts TD.

    Belichick not only looked to this as a mistake for his own staff for not being prepared (ie: Not blaming the Colts for the tactic), but then built upon it and used his own variation against the Ravens, adding to the confusion using it in a no-huddle situation.

    So, if you fans wanna blame someone, put it on Pagano for using this deception against the Pats.

    To put a nail in the coffin, having a great RB be placed outside of the line as ineligible is dangerous, since it essentially can make a 6-5 or even 6-4 matchup in favor of a DEFENSE! So not only is it barely an effective tool, but was used in the right situation, surprised a team, and we will probably never see it again.

    Where should I drop this mic?

  129. Harbaugh wasn’t complaining that Bellichick’s method was illegal. He was complaining because the refs were not announcing who the ineligible player was. Before every play, the refs are supposed to announce the ineligible player on the field — its the defense’s right to know that.
    The refs weren’t announcing the ineligible player on time, which is what Harbaugh is actually talking about in his interviews.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.