Competition Committee proposes rule change regarding ineligible receivers

Getty Images

During the AFC playoffs, the Patriots found success when they used formations featuring normally eligible receivers reporting as ineligible and normally ineligible players doing the opposite.

Ravens coach John Harbaugh wasn’t thrilled with New England’s use of what he called a “substitution type of a trick type of a thing” and said that he thought the league would be looking at it in the offseason. Harbaugh’s chief complaint was that the defense didn’t get a chance to ID the eligible players before the snap, something that might be easier if a proposed rule change is enacted.

The NFL Competition Committee released a list of changes proposed by individual teams and the committee itself on Wednesday. One of the latter proposals is one that would require players reporting into the game as ineligible receivers to line up inside the tackle box. A failure to do so would result in the five-yard illegal substitution penalty that teams currently face for not notifying officials of a change in their status.

Changes proposed by the committee tend to find more support in voting that team-generated proposals, so this change stands a good chance of being implemented for next season.

46 responses to “Competition Committee proposes rule change regarding ineligible receivers

  1. How many times have rules changed due to teams not being able to beat the Patriots?

    Pass interference rules were changed thanks to Peyton never winning against the Patriots too.

  2. This makes complete sense. If you allow ineligible receivers to be lining up where a wide receiver normally would, that would make a mockery of the game. Fans wouldn’t be able to keep up with who is eligible and who isn’t, which is a bigger issue than the other team keeping up.

  3. The problem with the substitutions were the way the refs handled it. The Pats broke the huddle, THEN the receivers reported themselves as ineligible. At that point the ref made the announcement a few seconds before the ball was snapped and there wasn’t an opportunity for the defense to adjust. When the refs fixed their mistake in the Colts game, it was no longer an issue. Of course, by then, the Pats had already gamed the system by taking advantage of the refs’ incompetence against Baltimore.

  4. So then would a tackle on a tackle eligible play have to line up outside the tackle box?

    How about they make all the players wear different flags on top of their helmets. Different colors for eligible and ineligible…they can
    call them Harbaugh flags.

  5. I can’t believe this is an issue. When the official tells the opposing team “34 is ineligible” and follows that up with “don’t cover 34”, teams are still too stupid to figure it out. So let’s change the rules AGAIN because teams get frustrated by the Patriots.

  6. What happened to just lining up yours against theirs and playing football like men, without resorting to nerdy little tricks and fumblerooski plays?

  7. “We need new rules to limit innovation in the game because Belichick is so much smarter than the rest of us it is not fair”

    The rules about eligible / ineligible receivers are not new.

    Vereen reported ineligible and it was very clearly announced. The refs even went as far as saying “you do not need to cover 34”

    The guy who ended up catching the pass was a TE anyway. Ho-man.

    Where is the line? Do we actually expect the refs to tell the defense who they have to cover?

  8. “Pass interference rules were changed thanks to Peyton never winning against the Patriots too.”

    Typical Pats whiner who doesn’t understand the rules of football. The rules were never changed for PI – the enforcement of the existing 2002 rules was emphasized. It had as much to do with how the Pats mugged the Rams receivers during that 2002 Superbowl as it did with any complaints by Bill Polian.

  9. Not sure why the defense needs to be told anything. The offense must put 7 men on the line and only the last man on each end of the line is eligible, anybody lining up off of the line of scrimmage is also eligible…and that total, at max, is 4……what’s so tough to keep track of?

  10. Brian Urlacher made a good comment about this on Mike&Mike. If you don’t recognize the formation, check out, and play zone. That is football.

  11. Dumb down the game for the slow folks.— No… Haters BB did not break the rule. Repeat… BB did not break the rule… Still did not get that, do you?

  12. I think the CFL with its multiple motions before the snap may break Harbough’s mind.

    The NFL is getting too rote, too afraid of taking chances (and the mistakes that often follow). This is an extension of that. The D does not have time to figure things out? So? It’s not like the other team is supposed to be helping you do that. Trickery and misdirection are fine on flea-flickers and option plays, but not with moving personnel around? Huh?

  13. That’s because the Patriots are the only team smart enough to understand it. The other teams are too stupid. So they
    need to dumb it down.

    Belichick won’t whine. He’ll just crack open the rule book
    and figure out another way to exploit stupidity.

  14. hooterdawg says: Mar 18, 2015 3:41 PM

    “Pass interference rules were changed thanks to Peyton never winning against the Patriots too.”

    Typical Pats whiner who doesn’t understand the rules of football. The rules were never changed for PI – the enforcement of the existing 2002 rules was emphasized. It had as much to do with how the Pats mugged the Rams receivers during that 2002 Superbowl as it did with any complaints by Bill Polian.

    —–

    Colts lost the AFC championship and Bill Polian yelled and yelled until they put an emphasis on PI, which dramatically changed how the rule was enforced. It allowed Peyton Manning to put up huge numbers and a crazy good passer rating. It also allowed him to get his one ring.

    It was pretty much a rule change given how much it changed how things were enforced.

    Anyone who complains about PI or defenses having to play soft can partially blame the Colts and Peyton Manning

  15. I continue to see misinformed people comment on this issue. According to Peter King, who put a stop watch to it, there were 7 seconds between the time when the normally eligible receiver was announced by the official as ineligible and when the ball was snapped on one play; there were 10 seconds that elapsed on the other two. This myth that New England broke the huddle, announced the ineligible, then rushed to the line to snap the ball before Baltimore could react is not factual, and in most cases is just willful ignorance on the part of those who wish to perpetuate the Patriots-as-cheaters meme.

  16. [i] pleazenufalready: Not sure why the defense needs to be told anything. [b]The offense must put 7 men on the line and only the last man on each end of the line is eligible[/b], anybody lining up off of the line of scrimmage is also eligible…and that total, at max, is 4……what’s so tough to keep track of? [/i]

    You’re wrong. Check the rules again.

  17. hooterdawg says:
    Mar 18, 2015 3:41 PM
    “Pass interference rules were changed thanks to Peyton never winning against the Patriots too.”

    Typical Pats whiner who doesn’t understand the rules of football. The rules were never changed for PI – the enforcement of the existing 2002 rules was emphasized. It had as much to do with how the Pats mugged the Rams receivers during that 2002 Superbowl as it did with any complaints by Bill Polian.
    ======================================
    There is no doubt that the Patriots got very physical with the Rams in the Super Bowl. The played the game to the officiating and they would have been stupid not to. However, the key to the game was the beat down they did on Marshall Faulk at the line of scrimmage. They took him out of the game. It was absolutely brilliant. It’s funny how Faulk is now the biggest complainer about that game, considering how ineffective he was.

    However, what Polian did with the rules or interpretation of the rules did change how the game is played to this day. The Patriots getting physical with receivers was certainly not unique. Passer ratings have gone through the roof because the league understood that people pay to see Manning light it up as opposed to people smacking around Faulk.

  18. NFL-“Ok Mr. Belichick, since you exploited the actual rules, we’ll just change them” Na-Naaa-Na-Na-Naaaa…..

  19. This is the same coach many hail as genius. Pulling pop warren shenanigans just to stay relevant a decade later.

    Just turn in your clipboard and call it a carrier along with Brady. This low life stuff is just sicking to most fans who love a game that should have some form of integrity left intact.

  20. “One of the latter proposals is one that would require players reporting into the game as ineligible receivers to line up inside the tackle box.”

    ====================
    Orrrrrr. The NFL could require coaching applicants to take written tests to prove they know and understand the rule book so they don’t cost their team a chance at a playoff victory.

  21. Funny how it is directly mentioned that the Patriots suggested the multiple fixed camera rule change and the supposed irony of that. (Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, ahem – spygate- cough, cough.)

    But the irony of a clearly confused and outsmarted head coach, embarrased to the point of (allegedly) kicking off the biggest witch hunt in the NFL with deflate-gate, suggesting a change to the rules to make illegal a plainly legal, in-game maneuver is lost in this article. It is just “One of the latter proposals” by some anonymous team.

    Was it proposed by the Ravens? If not, then who?

  22. Lost all respect for Harbaugh as a coach. He’s now no better than that worm Mangini, in my book. If you can’t beat ’em under existing rules, whine to whatever committee that will listen to your baby friggin rants, like, Tony Dungy, and have the rules changed to dumb down the league for you. NFL and characters like Harbaugh are piece by miserable piece taking the tactition and sportsman leadership of a professional team game. Oh well.

  23. I love that my team not only won one out of every four Superbowls played in this millennium, but also is so heads and shoulders ahead of the competition intellectually that the NFL feels the need to change rules in order to level the playing field.

    It must be because they’re a bunch of cheaters.

  24. I can understand the rules committee wanting to address this issue. It’s not a matter of the Patriots running this scheme 3 times per game. It’s a matter of 32 teams running this scheme 20 times per game. The reality is that it in the heat of the battle, it is confusing to the defenses, which is why offenses would choose to run it in the first place. I can understand the league not wanting both teams scoring in the 50’s and getting a substantial amount of those points in this fashion. In the long term, I don’t think that would be good for the game.

  25. cadlow says: How about they make all the players wear different flags on top of their helmets. Different colors for eligible and ineligible…they can
    call them Harbaugh flags.

    now that…is comedy. well done.

  26. Hm… two choices: Coach up my players to recognize this formation or at least have a plan if they don’t recognize what an opposing team is doing (hint: call a time out), OR lobby to have the rules changed so I don’t have to deal with it.

    Hm… Wonder which one I’ll choose.

  27. I think Harbaugh will still complain… Didn’t the Pats line up a whole bunch of guys to the right of the center? TB almost got killed in that play. I think JH would like a penalty on that play also.

    Ravens coaches are not a bright lot. Look at the 16-0 season. By rights it should have been 15-1 except someone on the Ravens bench saw that the Pats were going to fail on that play so one of the Ravens coach called a timeout.

    Ravens, get a smarter coaching staff!

  28. Why do people keep giving credit/blame to Belichick for the noticing the loophole in the rule book? Belichick is not and never has been an offensive coach. Josh McDaniels runs the offense.

  29. To the Peyton Manning cult following trying to get ANY cheat comment, rule reinforced comment or whatever…I’m pretty sure Brady’s record vs Choker Peyton Manning speaks for itself…this coming from an EAGLES fan who does NOT hate the Pats because of spyware. Brady beat my Iggles fair and square….Raven and Manning fans…move on.

  30. The concern is that it creates too much ability for Belichick to outsmart them.

    With all the new wrinkles in the game they focus on one of the more interesting because it actually requires the coaches and players on both sides of the ball to think.

  31. If you can’t out-play New England, change the rules to handcuff them ….. is that how your team thinks they have to beat the Patriots???

    How about you know the rule book and out-coach them????

  32. First, a competent coach would have seen this in proir game films, namely Detroit films. Secondly, Harbaugh’s teams seem to concentrate on injuring the opposition, rather obeying rules. Why should he worry about thus rule.

  33. In that case they should get rid of wildcat and that run-option stuff, since they’re confusing and hard to defend. Same logic,

  34. I am glad this has been proposed. If anyone who wasnt too busy complimenting Belichick or the Pats would actually read the rule book, its pretty obvious that deception through substitution is against the rules. Belichik came up with an way to do it that the refs didnt catch, which was in violation of the spirit of the rules.

    Its hard to repect Belichik, who cant win without finding someway to twist, bend or break the rules.

  35. Couldn’t beat those dirty black birds straight up so they went into their “bag O, tricks”. If you can’t beat em’, cheat. It’s the New Englang way.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.