Database error leads to revision of three compensatory selections

AP

The NFL has revised three compensatory selections after a “database error” led to a need to correct a few of the picks that were awarded to teams earlier this week.

The NFL Management Council revised three compensatory selections belonging to the Carolina Panthers, Denver Broncos and Pittsburgh Steelers.

The changes add an additional compensatory pick to the fifth round with one less pick in the sixth round.

Carolina’s sixth-round selection (6-38-213) is now a fifth-round pick (5-38-174).

Denver’s sixth-round selection (6-33-208) is now a seventh-round pick (7-33-250).

Pittsburgh’s seventh-round pick (7-35-252) is now a sixth-round (6-36-212).

Exactly what the error was is unknown. Since the league doesn’t publicize the formula that goes into the awarding of compensatory picks, it’s impossible to figure out what exactly led to the database error. The general formula is based on how many free agents a team lost in the previous offseason with a value assigned based on the size of the contract, performance and awards of the players that left.

The full NFL Draft order has been updated here.

23 responses to “Database error leads to revision of three compensatory selections

  1. The only league official who understood the compensatory pick formula was the same guy caught stealing the footballs in the AFC championship game.

  2. Database error, hmmm. Unless the formula was tweaked somewhere, the results should have been correct. If not tweaked then one must ponder if the same error has been present in the past. Sounds more like a data entry error but then the NFL never makes errors…

  3. I run databases. This sounds like an entry error by someone rather than a problem with the formula or code

  4. dluxxx says:
    Mar 25, 2015 5:54 PM
    Uhh, the teams they want to win more games get more picks. Seems simple to me…

    ———————————————————

    yup NE has the 1st compensatory pick

    wonder when old Bob k. starts lobbying for comp picks that can be awarded in the 1st round

  5. Here’s a rule change: don’t award compensatory picks to playoff teams or to teams with 10 or more wins. Award them instead to the bottom teams, the ones with 4 or less wins.

    It’s a ridiculous system that give the Super Bowl Champions an extra 3rd round pick. Give it to Tampa Bay instead, then follow the draft order.

  6. Something smells rotten…

    Unless that wasn’t an established formula already programmed why would it be needing to be tweeked?

    Were past draft selections processed with an erroneous program?

    Something smells rotten….

  7. razzlejag says:
    Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM
    Here’s a rule change: don’t award compensatory picks to playoff teams or to teams with 10 or more wins. Award them instead to the bottom teams, the ones with 4 or less wins.

    It’s a ridiculous system that give the Super Bowl Champions an extra 3rd round pick. Give it to Tampa Bay instead, then follow the draft order.
    **********************
    The compensatory picks are for teams that built up a player through the draft and lost them through free agency… Why on Earth should they award them to teams that didn’t develop talent?
    If you need somebody to explain the process I’d be glad to help out.

  8. @razzlejag

    Comp picks are based on FA gains/losses from LAST offseason & adjusted slightly due to certain performance parameters during the recently-completed 2o14 regular season & before the playoffs ever even began to determine the current Superbowl champs

    Why should after the fact regular season standings/postseason results have anything to do with the competitive personnel management decisions from the previous offseason that net these comp picks for those teams?

    You’d be rewarding teams like Tampa Bay for basically screwing the pooch & not having a clue … is that what you want?

  9. Not a fan of compensatory picks. Although I do believe they should be expanded for retirements. I feel like the 49ers deserve to get something from wasting a third on Boreland.

  10. Steelers can start earlier on drafting a player who will be on IR all year.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.