Prater thinks NFL will eventually take kicking out of the game

Getty Images

At least one NFL kicker believe the National Football League in time will take the foot out of football.

“I feel eventually that they’re just going to take kicking out of the game completely, which is fine with me as long as I’m done playing,” Lions kicker Matt Prater said, via Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press.

Prater understands why the NFL is doing it.

“They want to make a more exciting play and give the defense an opportunity to score and
everything,” Prater said. “So I see where they’re going with it. But I’m not a huge fan.”

Prater thinks kickers who do their jobs well are being penalized for doing their jobs well.

“Guys have success with such a high percentage on the extra points you almost get punished for it for having success,” Prater said. “There’s other plays that are almost guaranteed, too, and they’re not messing with that.”

In recent years, the NFL has minimized the kicking game by making it easier to kick the ball out of the end zone, pushing the kickoff point from the 30 back to the 35. This time around, however, the NFL is making the kicking game more relevant by making the one-point PAT more difficult. While it may cause some teams to go for two more frequently, the new rule places a premium on kickers who can kick accurately from a longer distance.

So the latest rule change isn’t about taking kicking out of the game. It’s about making kicking more important to the game, by making it harder to convert on one-point tries.

51 responses to “Prater thinks NFL will eventually take kicking out of the game

  1. Will it be “foot” ball anymore then when it happens? I doubt it’ll be completely taken out of the game. Kickoffs, field goals, and punting will still be there.

  2. Kicking is like the cheerleaders: senseless and pointless.

    Field goals make no logical sense. Uprights and kicking the ball through them comes completely out of nowhere and make no sense to ever have even existed. The run or pass option of PAT makes sense, bc you run and pass and defend those two all game long as the actual function of the game.

    Kicking field goals is as senseless as if on 4th down you can go for the first, punt, or out of nowhere just bring in a pitcher and try to hit a home run.

  3. Or Prater could quit whining and adapt to to the new extra point rules, which are a minor-to-moderate level change.

    A first step in a slippery slope to eliminating kicking? Come on.

  4. ariani1985 says:
    Jun 6, 2015 12:27 PM
    A lion kicker should be seen, not heard!

    That’s not funny and it’s not a good insult. Try harder

  5. In a sport called “football” too.

    At least there are man-made lakes in Los Angeles to justify the team nickname the Lakers.

  6. Prater’s full of baloney. Kicking has always been part of football, and always will be.

  7. Kicking has always been a key part of the game. The 3 points for a field goal versus 7 points for a TD+PAT are what causes intrigue and affects both teams’ game strategies in the 4th quarter. Two point conversions are gimmicks and are only attempted in desperate situations.

    The NFL is just trying to keep the kicking game relevant by increasing the level of difficulty of the PAT. Kickers should realize that any time difficulty is increased, a higher premium is placed on players that can perform.

    As a result, skilled kickers will be more relevant and they will earn more money.

  8. Name that movie!

    “Did you happen to see the football match last Sunday? The Giants of New York triumphed in overtime by kicking an oblong ball made of pigskin through a big H”.

    “Son, I’m only going to tell you this once. If you like working here, stay off the drugs.”

  9. Put a camera in the center of the goal posts. If a kicker can hit the camera award double points.

  10. I’m hardly one of those people that fear change and predict demise as a result.

    But in the case of this new rule pushing back the PAT, I personally don’t like it. It will change the way the entire game is played and game planned.

    In bad weather games, particularly windy ones, some teams will go for 2 and not make it, and others will miss the 1 point PAT altogether.

    If a team is on a long and sustained 7-8 minute hard drive and gets into the end zone … do we really want to see that effort potentially punished? If you think the 1 point PAT is stupid anyways, do you really want to see it under a microscope now?

    The game is about running, passing, blocking and tackling. The new PAT rules are completely XFL esque.

  11. If weather influences a team to go for 2 and not get in, or if they kick the 1 and miss … this new rule change will undo every great thing that led up to the touchdown. And those things that led up to the touchdown are the reason we watch the games.

    The rule change is a big mistake.

  12. Yes, Goodell is trying to eliminate kicking. He’s not trying to make extra points more challenging so much as he’s trying to make going for it more attractive. This mentality will continue until FG kicking is an afterthought, eventually disappearing from the game.

  13. Take punting out of the game. Then when mr MVP QB has 4th and 20from his own 10, lets see how great he really is.

  14. Name that movie!

    “Did you happen to see the football match last Sunday? The Giants of New York triumphed in overtime by kicking an oblong ball made of pigskin through a big H”.

    “Son, I’m only going to tell you this once. If you like working here, stay off the drugs.”

    ——————————————-

    The Movie is Coming to America.

    Starring Eddie Murphy. Classic stuff.

  15. Chip Kelly and the smart NFL fans are pissed at the NFL for again ruining the game. So now there will be no surprises on fake extra points for 2.

    Goodell and the NFL League Office are mentally handicapped.

  16. This would end the one aspect of the game that means more than anything. How many greaT games would be gone how about the SB between the Jets and Colts. This would destroy the game

  17. The only difference the rule change will make is that instead of 99.5% of extra points being converted, only 97% will be.

  18. Prater thinks kickers who do their jobs well are being penalized for doing their jobs well.

    Mr. Prater, when it comes to PATs, it’s not unusual for high school kids to go a full season without missing. You get paid for field goals and kick-offs. There are a dozen guys on your team who could kick extra points with a few weeks’ instruction and practice.

  19. They are not taking kicking out of the game. They just want to make the PAT a little more challenging. The PAT is like a 1 foot putt in golf for Pro Golfers. They will not get rid of kickers.

  20. I’m liking all these changes… I hear Goodell is also thinking about changing the shape of the football

    It’s kindof pointy and takes all these funny bounces sometimes, so it makes a lot more sense just to make it round

    Like with field goals it’s really a minor change

  21. o’reilly19 wrote
    Jun 6, 2015 12:14 PM

    Will it be “foot” ball anymore then when it happens? I doubt it’ll be completely taken out of the game. Kickoffs, field goals, and punting will still be there.

    ————————————————-

    Actually, the name football had nothing to do with kicking. It was invented before they came up with the forward pass and like it’s cousin rugby, it meant you toted the ball with your feet.

    Sadly, the real football is soccer.

  22. Prater should be happy to know the NFL will never take drinking out of the game!

  23. Jun 6, 2015 4:29 PM – steves11 says: The only difference the rule change will make is that instead of 99.5% of extra points being converted, only 97% will be.

    With so many reps from that exact spot, accuracy will probably go up to 98%+.

  24. Ratings are a all time high because of Fantasy and gambling. The 200 fans that don’t like the NFL will not tune in because of kicking. Idiots. Leave it the way it is.

  25. The word “football” does not derive from the fact that both foot and ball meet, but rather that the sport is played on foot. If you research the etymology of “football”, you’ll see that the word dates back to a time where sports were either played on horseback, or played on foot. Hence, several different sports which comprise of players on foot moving a ball on a pitch, came to be called football, as opposed to horse ball.

    That being said, I love the kicking aspects in the NFL, but to suggest that the kicking game is responsible for the name, is false.

  26. Don’t need to take kick-ING out of the game, they need to take kick-ERS out of the game.
    No one allowed on the roster who ONLY kicks. Have the kicking done by real football players. Like the game was intended to be.
    No need to move the PAT line, much more apt to see 2-pt conversions, and the FG still part of the game, but not a foregone conclusion.
    Kick-ing, yes. Kick-ers, no. Simple.

  27. They couldn’t make FGs any easier for these guys either. The ball is lined with with the upright, at least you have to angle the kick in college.

  28. Boris writes:

    “the NFL will never take drinking out of the game!”

    Agreed. Can you imagine all those players cramping up during play?

  29. Matt Prater is “Idiot Kicker 2.0”.
    On another note, this rule change guarantees that Alex Henery will stay unemployed.

  30. This is pretty dumb. Marching down the field to try for a 50 yard field goal is 2 minutes is a lot more exciting (because it’s more likely to happen) than throwing up a series of hail marys

  31. kingpel wrote: “I see a bunch of games being decided by missed extra points. Fans are going to be irate. I can’t wait.”

    ———————-

    EXACTLY

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.