PFT’s Week Four Power Rankings

AP

1. Patriots (3-0; last week No. 1): The Tom Brady Eff You Tour is in midseason form.

2. Packers (3-0; No. 2): Yes, Aaron Rodgers is Michael Jordan. If each of those five touchdown passes from Monday night count as Super Bowl wins.

3. Broncos (3-0; No. 3): With the Minnesota defense coming to town, maybe Peyton Manning should move from shotgun formation to punt formation.

4. Cardinals (3-0; No. 5): Arizona’s defensive backs have become Colin Kaepernick’s favorite receivers.

5. Bengals (3-0; No. 6): Maybe the best way to win a playoff game is to avoid one with a bye.

6. Falcons (3-0; No. 11): Dan Quinn and company made great halftime adjustments. Or the Cowboys didn’t. Or both.

7. Bills (2-1; No. 7): The Dolphins may regret not trying to hire Rex Ryan this year.

8. Cowboys (2-1; No. 4): On Sunday night, The Walking Dead returns to prime time. Next week, that zombie show will be back on AMC.

9. Seahawks (1-2; No. 10): It doesn’t matter if the offense is struggling when the defense is giving up no points.

10. Panthers (3-0; No. 13): Is Jared Allen too old to draw roughing the passer penalties?

11. Steelers (2-1; No. 12): Can Mike Vick stay healthy for 4-6 weeks?

12. Chiefs (1-2; No. 8): They’re on to Cincinnati. Where they’ll also be on to 1-3.

13. Vikings (2-1; No. 19): Three weeks after a stinker against the 49ers, the Vikings can make a statement against the Broncos.

14. Jets (2-1; No. 14): The New York Jets, finding new and innovative ways to create dysfunction since 1999. If not much earlier than that.

15. Ravens (0-3; No. 9): Never before has one team been so unable to cover one receiver.

16. Dolphins (1-2; No. 15): Could the guy who replaced Tony Sparano get the same post-London treatment as the guy Sparano replaced last year?

17. Rams (1-2; No. 16): Based on Sunday’s crowd, Stan Kroenke possibly thought he’d built a new stadium in Pennsylvania.

18. Raiders (2-1; No. 25): Latavius Murray says the goal is to win the division, and that may not be all that far-fetched.

19. Chargers (1-2; No. 17): “At least we didn’t give up 300 yards to Adrian.”

20. Colts (1-2; No. 21): “Yeah! We came back from a double-digit deficit we deserved to be in to beat a team that won two games last year!”

21. Browns (1-2; No. 20): Glass half full assessment? They didn’t give up when they were down by 17.

22. Eagles (1-2; No. 30): Glass half empty assessment? They nearly gave up when they were up 24.

23. Texans (1-2; No. 22): Glass exactly at midpoint analysis? Folks hated the old field, and they hate the new one, too.

24. Titans (1-2; No. 23): Glass slipper shatters early.

25. Giants (1-2; No. 26): Victor Cruz’s return can make them better. If he’s going to play defense.

26. Jaguars (1-2; No. 24): A one-point loss counts the same in the standings as a blowout. And that’s the best thing that can be said about the Foxboro experience.

27. 49ers (1-2; No. 18): Which happens first — 49ers fans clamor for Blaine Gabbert or they become Raiders fans?

28. Lions (0-3; No. 27): “The best 0-3 team in NFL history” will soon be “the best 0-4 team in NFL history.”

29. Washington (1-2; No. 28): Crazy as it sounds, this team could still win the division.

29. Buccaneers (1-2; No. 29): Last year, a 1-2 start would have been promising in the NFC South. This year, with two of the teams at 3-0, the Bucs already are playing for third place.

31. Saints (0-3; No. 31): The reports and counter-reports regarding whether Drew Brees has a torn rotator cuff is almost as exciting as the team’s games.

32. Bears (0-3; No. 32): If the reward for stinking is being traded to a contender, count on a lot more stink in Chicago.

201 responses to “PFT’s Week Four Power Rankings

  1. The San Francisco 49ers have been demoted to a minor league team, and will now be known as the Santa Clara 39ers.

  2. Aren’t power ranking supposed to measure a teams ability vs the whole league right now? So injuries must be considered right? So why would the Cowboys be ranked so high?

  3. Giants are third against the run and have Eli. Ranked too low but thrive as underdog anyway. Go Giants

  4. Ravens still listed in the top half at 0-3 huh? Better than a 2-1 team that beat the Ravens 2 weeks ago. previously ranked better than the Bengals who had beaten them 3 in a row.
    Maybe this ranking is based on potential?

  5. Bills will get better and embarrass many more this year, it was very special thumping when watching it live.

  6. Nice to see Florio give my Bills some respect even though he continually picks them to lose every week….

  7. The walking dead? Dallas fell apart in the second half. I have them over the lowly Saints on Sunday night

  8. You can put the Ravens anywhere you want on the list, I don’t care. Isn’t going to change their 0-3 status

  9. I want to object a 1-2 team being ranked ahead of my 3-0 Panthers. But I won’t. We have 5 games against teams ranked higher than us. We’ll soon see how good we are. Looking forward to watching the schooling of the rookie QB this week.

  10. I can’t believe the Fins are at 16. Can’t imagine a team could have possibly played worse than them the 1st 3 weeks.

  11. Ravens should be at least #25. Giants and up are all better teams than they are currently.

    -Raven’s fan

  12. On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

  13. On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

  14. good to see the new regime is no waiting around and are starting to make the changes needed to to turn this team around. it will not happen over night but when they are finished this will be a team to reckon with for a long time. if they can stay away from over hyped dame players like the qb they are forced to go with right now it will go allot quicker.

  15. The Chargers are a complete mess. I still think you have them ranked way too high.

    They have a coach that is far too conservative, and a GM who moves up in the first round, trading away multiple picks to draft a runningback, when that team has huge offensive line, defensive line, and secondary needs.

    This is the same GM who traded away multiple picks a few years back to draft Te’o. Te’o has been a predictable major disappointment.

    Time for the Chargers to clean house and start over.

  16. We will shock the world this week. Everyone knows Kap owns 51% REAL stock in Green Bay. #GoNiners #NobodycanpossiblyhaveitbetterthanUS

  17. It will take a year for Todd Bowles to remove dysfunction from NY Jets. Having lived thru Joe Walton, Bruce Coslet and Rich Kotite…I for one am willing to see this thru.

  18. I’m a loyal Bronco fan, but from my perspective the Cards are playing much better and should be above Denver – at least at this point in the season.

  19. Really, a win over the hapless Bears is enough to keep the Seahawks in the top 10? Way too high. Panthers are 3-0 and does anyone know their receivers other then the TE Olsen? They deserve that spot over the Seahawks.

  20. How the Chiefs are ahead of the Vikings, Jets and Raiders baffles me.

    And why are the Ravens 15? Until you win, you don’t belong in the Top 20.

  21. Cowboys and Jets are too high.

    Without Romo and Dez, the Cowboys are average at best.

    The Jets at 14 is funny, after losing to a team ranked #30 last week. Their “amazing defense” looked rather pedestrian against a struggling porous Eagles OLine. And the Jets offense looks bland. Fitzpatrick scares less people than Bradford does.

  22. The Eagles’ defense played solidly in the 2d half and intercepted Fitzpatrick twice. And their poor offensive showing in the 2nd half couldn’t have anything to do with the fact that they were playing the NFL’s top D going into the week, could it? Nah…they “gave up.”

  23. The Eagles’ defense played solidly in the 2d half and intercepted Fitzpatrick twice. And their poor offensive showing in the 2nd half couldn’t have anything to do with the fact that they were playing the NFL’s top D going into the week, could it? Nah…they “gave up.”

  24. Amazing that the Chiefs are still ranked ahead of the Raiders. I mean c’mon. I get that this is subjective to a certain degree but I think they deserve to be above them.

  25. Could this season be playing out any better for the Atlanta Falcons? The next 7 games for the Falcons are against the teams ranked 23, 29, 31, 24, 30, 27, 20. They actually have to fall victim to an upset to not make it to 10-0.

  26. Oh look at that semi zinger on Rodgers and the teammate who dared to mention his holiness Jordan when talking about someone being dominant!

    So now comparing athletes of different sports amounts to comparing how many titles they won. Makes sense, especially with football, the only sport where people don’t play both offense and defense during the game. Or maybe they do and Rodgers has just faltered on the defensive side and held his team back. That must be it.

    So since championships are the way to compare players of different sports, I guess then Wayne Gretzky is inferior to Jordan since Wayne only had 4 Stanley Cups. I mean there I was thinking Wayne was the most dominant athlete ever in team sports (screw stats and reality that backs that up) but hey, only 4 rings so he sucks compared to others like Jordan.

    Oh and why do Jordan’s six rings trump Bill Russell’s 11? And does Trent Dilfer’s 1 ring trump Marino’s zero? What about Eli’s or Jim Plunkett’s two? Seems then Eli should be seen as the second best qb in the league right now and one of the top 10 all time as well as Plunkett. Wait, you mean rings aren’t the criteria there? Weird.

    Weird how the whole rings criteria thing changes all the time. Someone needs to make a manual on it all so one can look up when the rings criteria matters and when it doesn’t.

    It’s also good to know Rodgers is playing with a couple hall of famers (actually using the basketball equivalent of 5 starters to football’s 22, it’d be more like Rodgers playing with 8 or 9 other hall of famers) and a hall of fame coach like Jordan did during his championship years. Also nice to see the Packers still do well when Rodgers got injured (2-5-1 is doing well) just like the Bulls barely missing out on the Conf finals in the season Jordan retired.

    Clearly Rodgers shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath as his holiness, MJ. MJ did it all himself while Rodgers has greatness around him and keeps holding the team back from titles.

  27. 15. Ravens (0-3; No. 9): Never before has one team been so unable to cover one receiver.

    So true….so true….

    Ravens fan

  28. An 0-3 team should never be in the top 15, especially when there atop of several 2-1 teams and they lost to one of those teams below them. Yes, I’m talking about the Ravens and Raiders. OAK’s defense sucks, but they’re 2-1 and they beat the Ravens. Somehow they’re 6 spots below them….. BS!

  29. As a Bears fan I will own being everyone’s #32. We have lost our first 3 games including 2 at home and looked bad doing it. That being said, I would point out that the combined record of our first three opponents is 7-2 and that two of them hung 48 and 38 points on their most recent opponents respectively.

    I would also remind folks of the pre-Schneider/Carroll Seahawks. While not quite the dumpster fire the Bears are, that team was a mess. IIRC they made something like 200 roster moves were made their first year after taking over. The Bears are still about 180 moves shy but what’s encouraging to me is that they are being more aggressive in personnel matters than I’ve ever seen. Fox and the coaches are benching and playing guys based on performance – not tenure or draft position – and Pace is clearing the roster of players who aren’t a fit. For a franchise whose mantra has been status quo and defer to the veterans at all costs, this is refreshing to see.

  30. Florio, your comments about the Bengals are getting very old. These are 2015 weekly power rankings, discuss the accomplishments of the teams performances this year, not dragging up past performances.

  31. Rodgers is the new Manning. Pad the stats during regular season, blow it in the postseason more often than not. In 7 seasons, Rodgers won 1 SB (big whoop, that puts him in the class of Dilfer, Hostetler, P. Manning, and a host of others). In the other 6 seasons combined he’s won 2 postseason games. In three of those 6 seasons he’s been one and done (one season, no playoffs). Think about it. 2 postseason wins in 6 seasons. That’s pathetic.

  32. emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM

    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.
    ————————————————————
    In GB last year it was a tight game. On a neutral field it’s a pick ’em.

  33. As a Viking fan, I’m happy with the top half ranking, but I don’t think it’s accurate yet. Defense is great, Peterson is back, but without solid quarterback play they won’t get to where they want to go. Teddy needs to show something. Granted his stat line could’ve looked a lot better last week had Rudy not dropped an easy TD, but still.

  34. thelogicalsportsfan says: Sep 29, 2015 7:49 AM

    Think at this juncture 15 and 18 should switch, and then this would be the most accurate to date power rankings.
    ======================

    Put the team name, who the hell wants to have to scroll all the way back up to the list in order to know what the hell you are talking about. Not like we all have it memorized…

  35. fatsolio says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:55 AM
    Oh look at that semi zinger on Rodgers and the teammate who dared to mention his holiness Jordan when talking about someone being dominant!
    ———
    Nothing “semi” about that zinger. He flat out called out Rodgers for not winning more in the playoffs. Well deserved too. If you’re going to compare him to somebody, stop short of comparing him to one of the best, and winningest of all time. Rodgers isn’t even the best or most prolific player at his position right now!

  36. bassplucker says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:07 AM
    As a Bears fan I will own being everyone’s #32. We have lost our first 3 games including 2 at home and looked bad doing it. That being said, I would point out that the combined record of our first three opponents is 7-2 and that two of them hung 48 and 38 points on their most recent opponents respectively.
    ——–
    Your team is the reason their records are 7-2! If not for you, their record could be 4-5. Your team may go 2-14. Except, I don’t know where the 2 wins comes from.

  37. fatsolio says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:55 AM
    Oh look at that semi zinger on Rodgers and the teammate who dared to mention his holiness Jordan when talking about someone being dominant!
    ————————————————–

    A shorter way of saying it is, in basketball the coach only has so much impact on the result, meanwhile Rodgers is saddled with Portly Schottenheimer as the coach of the Packers – you know, they guy who had his job duties rehashed in the offseason.

    While Rodgers is only half way through a career, he IS an equivalent of Jordan, assuming Jordan is indeed the best player of his sport, all time. Still has 5-7 more years to go to grab a hold of that firmly, but someone hinting at it at the half way point isn’t out of line.

  38. How do the Steelers lose Ben and move up in the power rankings in the same week.
    Florio must think much more of Vick than I do.

  39. As a Dolphins fan, I quickly scolled to the bottom of the list expecting to find them at #32. Then surprised I had to scroll as high as #16 to find them.

  40. Love the Pats and Brady, but have to admit in all honesty Rodgers is THE stud. I think the Pats coach gives them the edge over the Pack.

  41. Ravens should be 32. And with each coming loss the whining coming out of Baltimore will become a cacophony of tears

  42. “emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.”

    I wouldn’t take any team to win 9/10 over any team. New to this NFL thing, eh?

  43. People sure do hate the Ravens on here. There’s a good reason they are still higher than many 1-3 teams. That can easily change with another L.

  44. Obviously the recency effect puts Kaep in a bad light, but we spent 9 years watching the likes of Tim Rattay, Ken Dorsey, Alex Smith, Shaun Hill, JT O’Sullivan and Troy Smith. We know what bad quarterback play looks like. This last week aside, Kaep is the best QB we’ve had since Jeff Garcia’s heyday. There’s no reason to not give him the whole year. Partially because our backup is Blaine Gabbert, but mostly because he has the talent and will figure it out.

  45. Rodgers is the new Manning. Pad the stats during regular season, blow it in the postseason more often than not. In 7 seasons, Rodgers won 1 SB (big whoop, that puts him in the class of Dilfer, Hostetler, P. Manning, and a host of others). In the other 6 seasons combined he’s won 2 postseason games. In three of those 6 seasons he’s been one and done (one season, no playoffs). Think about it. 2 postseason wins in 6 seasons. That’s pathetic.
    ———————————————————-

    Wow, New England fans are reaching new lows these days.

  46. Looking at the 3-0 teams, the Patriots have played the most challenging schedule to date.

    Teams the Pats have played are 5-1 against the rest of the league. Falcons faced a collective 4-2 record. Bengals 3-3, Panthers and the Packers 2-4 and the Broncos and Cards have only faced teams who are collectively 1-5 against the rest of the league.

  47. tajuara says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:15 AM
    Seahawks over the Panthers? Yeah righ, I have a bridge for sell too
    ———————–
    The Panthers are a fraud team playing in the worst division in football, that includes the AFC south. 3-0 is a mirage and they couldn’t hold the Seahawks jocks, let’s be real.

    -Pats fan

  48. “What happens to the Ravens if they fall to 0-4?”

    They will plummet all the way to #16.

  49. The constant debate over who is better between Rodgers or Brady is not necessary. It’s like arguing about great works of art….each has their own incredible merits and best just to appreciate both of them for their greatness. No need to try and run down either one of them.

  50. I would rank the Cardinals ahead of the Broncos…
    The Packers ahead of the Patriots…
    The Raiders at #9 and the Panthers at #8.

    Buffalo will have a test this week with the Giants Receivers… Manning can pick you apart if he gets time in the pocket. The whole game will ride on whether the Bills front 4 can get pressure on Manning and cap off their receiving core.

  51. “The Tom Brady Eff You Tour is in midseason form.”

    When Sunday’s game was just starting, it hit me as I watched Brady getting ready to play: Brady has become the perfect WWE-type villain, i.e., remember the wrestlers who were “good” guys and then went “bad”? Bob Backlund comes to mind. Brady was considered so good and honest and clean, but now he is looked at with scorn by many NFL fans and non-fans alike.

    The NFLWWE is really taking hold of all the angles now.

  52. Packers have beat three teams that have a combined record of 2-7.

    51 19
    Report comment

    You realize three of those losses are because the packers beat them not the other way around right? Take those away and add them to wins and that record is above 500

  53. tajuara says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:40 AM
    Rodgers is the new Manning. Pad the stats during regular season, blow it in the postseason more often than not. In 7 seasons, Rodgers won 1 SB (big whoop, that puts him in the class of Dilfer, Hostetler, P. Manning, and a host of others). In the other 6 seasons combined he’s won 2 postseason games. In three of those 6 seasons he’s been one and done (one season, no playoffs). Think about it. 2 postseason wins in 6 seasons. That’s pathetic.
    ———————————————————-

    Wow, New England fans are reaching new lows these days.
    ———————————
    Sorry, what I posted is a fact. It’s undeniable. Nothing you can do about it.

  54. unclebluck says: Sep 29, 2015 7:59 AM

    Nice to see Florio give my Bills some respect even though he continually picks them to lose every week….
    ………….
    Actually, he’s picked them to win the 2 games they won. MDS has picked against them each week.

  55. Rogers is better than Brady, but Belichick is waaaaay better than McCarthy.

    Seriously – did you watch him turn a W into an L against the Seahawks last year in the NFC title game?

  56. kev86 says: Sep 29, 2015 7:52 AM

    Giants are third against the run and have Eli. Ranked too low but thrive as underdog anyway. Go Giants
    ………………
    Giants are 3rd against the run because they give up way too much in the air. Kirk Cousins threw for over 300 yards against them. And if wasn’t Kirk Couins, but actually a good QB, he would have thrown for 200 more.

    While they may be better than this ranking justifies, their defense is still terrible.

  57. Washington Redskins
    Number 2 in total defense
    Washington Redskins
    Number 12 offense
    Washington Redskins
    Number 22 on NFL power ranking
    Washington Redskins
    Will never get a fair shake around here

  58. 2liveted says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:59 AM
    Packers have beat three teams that have a combined record of 2-7.

    51 19
    Report comment

    You realize three of those losses are because the packers beat them not the other way around right? Take those away and add them to wins and that record is above 500
    —————————————-
    No, it wouldn’t, it would make them 2-4

  59. On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

    ============================================

    And they say Patriots’ fans are delusional? 9 out of 10? The Packers are an excellent team, but they and Rodgers faced the SeaHawks 2 weeks before the Patriots did in last year’s playoffs. One of the 2 QBs led their team to the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history, against the top NFL defense for three years running.

    Rodgers is great, I’m not taking anything away from him, but nobody would outperform Brady over and over. Nobody.

  60. About 15 minutes to put this together, right? As for the Giants, they are two self-destructive plays away from being 3-0. Not exactly #25 material. They are also the 2nd best run defense so far this season. You keep that same narrative going all season, though…

  61. Baltimore’s games have all come down to the wire. They’re competitive. The 3 losses were by 6, 4, and 4 points.

    That doesn’t mean they’re good. The O-line is hot garbage. No protection for Flacco, no push for any sort of ground attack. On the other side, pass rush is poor and the secondary covers like a bunch of college flag football players who walked in off the street.

    One of the talking heads predicted they would start the season 4-4 and finish 7-1. I’d be surprised if they won more than 6 or 7 games this year. Haven’t had a losing season since 2007, the year before Harbaugh and Flacco arrived. It was a good run.

  62. rollotomasi14 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 10:15 AM
    2liveted says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:59 AM
    Packers have beat three teams that have a combined record of 2-7.

    51 19
    Report comment

    You realize three of those losses are because the packers beat them not the other way around right? Take those away and add them to wins and that record is above 500
    —————————-
    Why would you add them to wins? That makes no sense. Unless you add them to wins because they beat the Packers but then that would make the Packers 0-3.

  63. My take:

    Tier 1) Patriots, Packers, Cardinals. (No particular order.)
    Tier 2) Broncos, Bengals.
    Tier 3) Vikings, Raiders, Bills, Falcons. (Not sure what to think so far. Could be a breakout year or early season flukes.)

    Could be tier 1 or 2 if not for early QB injuries:
    Steelers, Cowboys.

    Laughing stocks:
    Bears (10 possessions, 10 punts of which 6 were 3 and outs. WOW.)

    Dolphins (I thought that by adding Suh, they were supposed to seriously challenge the Patriots for the division. Fun to dream, isn’t it?)

    Pleasant surprises: Ravens, Colts, Seahawks. (All professional excuse makers. How bout spend less time crying how it’s not fair, and more time on working on getting better.)

  64. The Cowboys didn’t beat the Giants so much as the Giants beat themselves.

    And as pathetic as the Eagles looked against them in week 2, the Cowboys let them hang around well into the 4th quarter.

    Then they jumped out to a 3 TD lead vs. the Falcons, and *gave up.*

    But they’re number 8.

    S
    M
    H

  65. nbptma1 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 7:44 AM
    Packers have beat three teams that have a combined record of 2-7.
    ————–
    So what does that have to do with anything? If the Packers had lost all three of those games, the combined record of those teams would be 5-4, with two of those teams now having winning records. It’s too early in the season to be playing that game, junior.

  66. “When Sunday’s game was just starting, it hit me as I watched Brady getting ready to play: Brady has become the perfect WWE-type villain, i.e., remember the wrestlers who were “good” guys and then went “bad”? Bob Backlund comes to mind. Brady was considered so good and honest and clean, but now he is looked at with scorn by many NFL fans and non-fans alike.”

    It’s called “turning heel”; when you’re a good guy in wrestling, you’re called a “face”. I don’t know how I remember that – haven’t watched wrestling since I was 12, but there you go.

  67. You realize three of those losses are because the packers beat them not the other way around right? Take those away and add them to wins and that record is above 500
    —————————————-
    No, it wouldn’t, it would make them 2-4

    Technically the guy was right, though his point was strange. He was saying that, had the Packers lost to those three teams instead of winning, their combined record (5-4) would be above .500. Your way is better: just look at their record against the rest of the league.

  68. EJ says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:54 AM

    I would rank the Cardinals ahead of the Broncos…
    The Packers ahead of the Patriots…
    The Raiders at #9 and the Panthers at #8.

    Buffalo will have a test this week with the Giants Receivers… Manning can pick you apart if he gets time in the pocket. The whole game will ride on whether the Bills front 4 can get pressure on Manning and cap off their receiving core.

    But Manning wont have much time in the pocket and we all know he is mediocre at best under pressure and the Giants will not be able to run against the bills D. The Bills are #3 in scoring & #1 in rushing conversely the Giants are #9 & #22……Giants are going down!!!

  69. At least the Bears are acknowledging how horrible they are and are having an early fire sale. I wish the Lions were smart enough to follow suit on their way to a likely 6-10 season. Instead of giving the ball to Abdullah and firing Lombardi they’ll keep talking about “sticking to the game plan and getting better”. God I hate this franchise.

  70. The amount of hate on philly is comical. You guys pitched your tent waaayyyy tooooo early on the negative with this team. Haterzzzz gonna hate hate hate….

  71. blamatina says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:28 AM

    As a Dolphins fan, I quickly scolled to the bottom of the list expecting to find them at #32. Then surprised I had to scroll as high as #16 to find them.
    ============================

    Ditto.

  72. Real excited for the Vikings upcoming game against the Broncos. Time to see which Vikings team is for real–the one against the niners, or the last two against the Lions and Chargers…

  73. The Panthers are a fraud team playing in the worst division in football, that includes the AFC south. 3-0 is a mirage and they couldn’t hold the Seahawks jocks, let’s be real.
    ———————————————

    Ok, let’s be real. NFC South was bad…last year. It was LAST YEAR. new players, new coaches, new schemes, that’s how seasons change. So, last year awful, make the changes, this year the only division with two 3-0 teams. That’s real enough.

  74. “Your team is the reason their records are 7-2! If not for you, their record could be 4-5. Your team may go 2-14. Except, I don’t know where the 2 wins comes from.”

    Could be, but probably not, unless they all played the Patriots.

    Either way, I hope they (Bears) lose all their games, and they get start from scratch.

    Cardinals were good before Palmer was hurt, and the Packers are the Packers. Seattle’s been to the last two Super Bowls. I’m sure that’s a tougher first three games than 95% of the league so far.

    That being said, they’re still a horrible team.

  75. “The Bears are still about 180 moves shy but what’s encouraging to me is that they are being more aggressive in personnel matters than I’ve ever seen. Fox and the coaches are benching and playing guys based on performance – not tenure or draft position – and Pace is clearing the roster of players who aren’t a fit.”

    If Lovie only learned that, perhaps he would have won a SB, and been to another. Far too much loyalty during his tenure. Loyalty can be a good thing, but it’s not as though these guys are making minimum wage.

    This is a business, not friendship.

  76. captainwhodat says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:08 AM
    Bills (2-1; No. 7): The Dolphins may regret not trying to hire Rex Ryan this year…this, of course, was written in jest…wasn’t it?
    ———————————————–
    Rex is a bit of a blow hard but there’s no denying he can coach and motivate when given the talent. No one in their right mind would take Philbin over Ryan in this universe or alternate. He’s been given a team with talent, a GM with vision and an owner committed to putting the best product on the field.

  77. baddegg says:
    Sep 29, 2015 7:56 AM
    I’m not a Raiders fan but why are they ranked below the 0-3 Ravens when they are 2-1 and beat the Ravens straight up?
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – —

    what else would you expect from a bunch of raider haters?

    it is almost acting surprised when the refs call offensive pass interference when a raider catches the ball downfield, defensive holding on the raiders after an incomplete pass on a 3rd and long play, or offensive holding after the raiders running breaks onefor a long run. There is not a raider fan i know of after every great play , who does not look for a flag. Just for a “fact” the raiders once again led the league in penalties, and on the majority of them the TV commentators say they saw nothing.

  78. I’m pretty sure the Packers are 3-0 not because of a weak schedule, but because of Aaron Rodgers.

  79. The Cardinals are averaging 42 points a game with 40% of the starting offensive line not playing and Ellington out. There’s room for improvement on offense.

    They’re defense still needs some tweaking they’re giving up to many yards rushing. So as the weeks pass there is room for improvement.

    Palmer is 15-2 over his last 17 starts. Our old guy Larry Fitzgerald has been reincarnated by moving inside. Smoke and Fire are putting on a show, David Johnson and John Brown.

    This week against the Rams will be a better indicator if we can keep this steamroller going… Against a better opponent.

    Go Cards!

  80. emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM

    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

    ——

    Except it hasn’t played out that way. Brady was driving for the winning score in GB and it was a close game. It would be close on a neutral field and I think in a Super Bowl I would give the edge to Belichick to find a way to stop Rodgers for a while at least.

    The Green Bay defense isn’t so great and Brady could move the ball on them.

    Green Bay lost at Buffalo last year and it cost their season. If they had Home Field they would have made the Super Bowl. The Patriots don’t really have to worry about Green Bay unless both teams make it to the last game of the year, so we’ll see.

  81. Uh oh, I better redo my rankings as they are very similar. One difference is I have the Redskins listed at 29 not Washington. Huskies couldn’t compete at this level, even against da Bears.

  82. the NFL season so far is pretty weak. Lots of bad teams. However, 4 teams stand out: AZ, GB, NE, and CIN. Good luck trusting AZ and CIN, we all know big red will shrink comes playoffs, and Carson is made of glass, he is due to get hurt. I would like to see a PATS vs GB SB; but I doubt GB will make it. They have a tougher challenge to get out of the NFC.

  83. “I’m not a Raiders fan but why are they ranked below the 0-3 Ravens when they are 2-1 and beat the Ravens straight up?”

    C’mon Florio.

    You’re a bigger Raider hater than those kooks who follow the bolts.

  84. “Vikings (2-1; No. 19): Three weeks after a stinker against the 49ers, the Vikings can make a statement against the Broncos.”
    ____
    This is the game where Peyton Manning looks old and slow. Viking don’t care about Peytons legacy. Vikings don’t care about respect for Peyton. This may be Mannings last game of 2015 if they can’t protect him. Things could get real ugly real fast for Denver. Duck, Duck, lame duck.

  85. tajuara says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:40 AM
    Rodgers is the new Manning. Pad the stats during regular season, blow it in the postseason more often than not. In 7 seasons, Rodgers won 1 SB (big whoop, that puts him in the class of Dilfer, Hostetler, P. Manning, and a host of others). In the other 6 seasons combined he’s won 2 postseason games. In three of those 6 seasons he’s been one and done (one season, no playoffs). Think about it. 2 postseason wins in 6 seasons. That’s pathetic.

    ===========================================

    Terrible comparison. Rodgers has 23 TDs and 7 Ints in the post season. I can’t think of a playoff game the Packers lost where I was left thinking that Rodgers blew it, or under-performed and cost his team the game.

  86. haterade999 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:38 AM
    People sure do hate the Ravens on here. There’s a good reason they are still higher than many 1-3 teams. That can easily change with another L
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    should they be higher than a 2-1 team whose only loss is to a 3-0 team, and also beat a Ravens team…..almost as funny as reading on PFT the Raiders were 300-1 odds to win the super bowl…I live in Nevada, and the best I could ever find was 100-1…Love the hate.

  87. Dolphins at 16??? It looks like you ranked the Fins by how they look on paper talent-wise, not by how they’ve actually been playing.

    They suck. They’re one fluke special teams play away from being 0-3. And this was the easy part of their schedule.

  88. emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM

    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.
    —————————————————
    And nine out of ten times you’d lose. What’s your point?.

  89. wartface says:
    Sep 29, 2015 11:13 AM
    ****
    This week against the Rams will be a better indicator if we can keep this steamroller going… Against a better opponent.

    I happen to like the Cardinals, but I would never refer to any Jeff Fisher coached team as a “better opponent”. You never know what you will see out of a Fisher coached team from one week to the next, but you know that at the end of the season a Fisher coached team will have a mediocre record at best (if 8-8 is even mediocre). Rams might compete this weekend, or they might lost 56-3 – neither would surprise me.

    Why Fisher has had such a long tenure as an NFL Head Coach, albeit with 2 teams, is an NFL mystery. A Head Coach for 21 seasons with only 6 winning seasons and no winning seasons since 2008. Yet he does not even appear to be on any hot seat.

  90. Pats do look like they will run the table on the AFC (not as in 16-0 but barring injury should be odds on favorites to win the conference).

    I am a 40 year Pats fan and I know the national narrative is to knock Manning and say he is getting too old. Don’t. He now has a team that is not going to depend on him to win the game. He has a great defense and while he may no longer be in the Brady / Rogers conversation he is still a lot better than most QB’s in the league.

    Denver is for real and will be one of the last teams standing.

  91. marvsleezy says:
    Sep 29, 2015 7:49 AM

    Aren’t power ranking supposed to measure a teams ability vs the whole league right now? So injuries must be considered right? So why would the Cowboys be ranked so high?

    ———————————————————

    They always are. There some weird love affair with the Cowboys even with other power rankings. That is until the end of the season when they eventually bottom out (as always), wherein they are actually amongst the “also ran’s.”

  92. bullcharger says:
    Sep 29, 2015 11:14 AM
    emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM

    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

    ——

    Except it hasn’t played out that way. Brady was driving for the winning score in GB and it was a close game. It would be close on a neutral field and I think in a Super Bowl I would give the edge to Belichick to find a way to stop Rodgers for a while at least.

    The Green Bay defense isn’t so great and Brady could move the ball on them.

    Green Bay lost at Buffalo last year and it cost their season. If they had Home Field they would have made the Super Bowl. The Patriots don’t really have to worry about Green Bay unless both teams make it to the last game of the year, so we’ll see.
    ______________
    Asinine statement. The Pats never came close to finishing that drive. However more importantly the score was 26-14 until a garbage time TD by Brady got the Pats within 5. Calling that game close is a massive stretch of the imagination. Worst yet is comparing Brady to Rodgers it is insulting to Rodgers. Maybe back in the day you could get away with that but this year Rodgers is way better than Brady. Rodgers is playing at a level not seen before. How did that last game in Green Bay go again? Oh yeah Brady sealed it with another classic Brady int. Seriously pull your heads out. You are embarrassing yourselves.

  93. If only the Packers could play at home in front of their home town refs every week, they’d be a clear number 1.

    Wait until they play on the road, especially in the playoffs, they’ll solidify that they are actually number 2. Pun intended.

  94. minneanderthals says:
    Sep 29, 2015 11:45 AM

    Andy Dalton is currently a better rated passer than Tom Brady.

    Facts don’t lie.
    ========================================

    Neither do playoff records.

  95. Isn’t it sweet that the conversation is now who’s better, Roger’s or Brady? No more P Manning is the GOAT. I take that back, in playoff games Manning WAS the goat more often than not. Roger’s is superb, awesome, I’d want him on my team. After Tom Brady retires. I’ll take 6 Super Bowl appearances and 4 wins thank you very much. Playing the if this or if that game is what makes being a fan fun. Let’s be real. We all would love to see Roger’s and Brady in SB 50.

  96. leatherface2012isloosebutthole says:
    Sep 29, 2015 11:55 AM

    Asinine statement. The Pats never came close to finishing that drive. However more importantly the score was 26-14 until a garbage time TD by Brady got the Pats within 5. Calling that game close is a massive stretch of the imagination. Worst yet is comparing Brady to Rodgers it is insulting to Rodgers. Maybe back in the day you could get away with that but this year Rodgers is way better than Brady. Rodgers is playing at a level not seen before. How did that last game in Green Bay go again? Oh yeah Brady sealed it with another classic Brady int. Seriously pull your heads out. You are embarrassing yourselves.

    ====================================

    “Rodgers is playing at a level not seen before.” I disagree, we saw it last year. How did that playoff game go again? The one that would set up the Super Bowl between the Patriots and Packers?

    What’s embarrassing is acting like a home regular season game was the Super Bowl. Your unbeatable team had the chance to settle it on a neutral field in Arizona, but, well, you know what happened….

  97. Miami is dead last or at the least 29th in the league. They are pathetic. Meanwhile RT will still be a top 10 rated QB behind that joke of a line and our Defense is dead last. Giving up 170 yards rushing and 300 plus yards passing.. haha. I mean this is a joke. Onto London to get our asses beat by the Jets and a HC who use to be in Miami.

  98. While I am not getting into the dumb brady/rodgers debate, the guy that claimed the pats/packers game wasn’t close last year is truly asinine.

    The pats had the ball first and 10 with on the green bay 21 yard line with over 4 minutes to go only down by 5 points and the TD the pats scored was with over 13 minutes to go in the 4th.

    I think the packers would probably win against the pats in GB just like the pats would likely win in foxboro. Next time you want to explain what happened in a game, actually watch rather than making stuff up.

  99. matiberio says:
    Sep 29, 2015 9:31 AM
    Love the Pats and Brady, but have to admit in all honesty Rodgers is THE stud. I think the Pats coach gives them the edge over the Pack.

    ————–

    He wasn’t so much of a stud in last year’s NFCCG….you know….when it counted.

  100. 3. Broncos (3-0; No. 3): With the Minnesota defense coming to town, maybe Peyton Manning should move from shotgun formation to punt formation. – Mike Florio

    ——————————————–

    … and Bridgewater and Peterson will be spending most of the game flat on their backs in the Vikings backfield.

  101. Hmm…. Rodgers with a calf injury or Brady (which was the case last year)?

    I guess I’d still take Rodgers every time.

    Because he’s better.

    This year, so far, so is Andy Dalton.

  102. emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.
    ————————————–
    Thats funny cause I recall Brady spanking the #1 Defense in last years SB victory…you remember, that team that Rodge and the Pack were NOT good enough to put away. You have to earn your boasting boy, and 1 ring is just not good enough for comparison.

  103. I’m not in denial about how bad the Bears are, that they’re in “talent evaluation” mode, and that they’re in a serious need of an influx of new young talent all over the place.

    I also don’t debate that they deserve the #32 spot with Jimmy Pickles starting. Ugh.

    But let’s put some perspective on this, too: they just opened probably the single most difficult schedule in the whole league, against what is very likely THE top 3 teams in their entire conference (all 3 of which were playoff teams last year, and 2 of which were in the NFC Championship game).

    In those games, they led the Packers at the half, and kept it competitive – within a score – down to the end. Held their own (defensively) with the Hawks, down only 0-6 at half – and who knows what may have happened had they not been robbed on that horribly blown call on the muffed punt, which would’ve given Bears offense the ball inside the redzone just before half.

    With Cutler and Jeffrey on offense, and Ratliffe on defense (arguably their BEST defensive player), this is a completely different team. They can actually move the chains, and score points. And other than the 2 picks, Cutler has been playing absolutely lights out in Gase’s more conservative game plans – check out his 3rd down stats.

    So when you take all that into consideration – along with the new OC, DC, head coach, and a new system, I think the Bears are actually MUCH better than #32, and I think (barring continued injuries/absence of Cutler), that the season will eventually “bear” this out, and I expect them to finish much closer to 8-8 than 0-16.

    For all you Bears fans throwing in the towel, clamoring for a tanked season and Goff – the QB position (Cutler, specifically) has HARDLY been the biggest reason this team needs a rebuild, nor would it be some miraculous antidote. If the complete lack of offense during the past 1.5 games doesn’t teach you that Cutler is more of benefit to the Bears than a liability at this point, there’s just no hope in getting you past your own bias to see reason.

    The Bears will be back – and sooner than anyone seems to think. Mark my words!

  104. The Seahawks will have to beat a hot Bengals team on the road to move up on this list at all.

    Demolishing the Lions on MNF won’t carry any weight whatsoever.

    Go Hawks!

  105. I won’t complain about the Eagles being a little lower. In my book it may only be a couple spots too low. Maybe 3. But I think u guys still dwell in the past too much. If it’s supposed to be a weekly power ranking based on this week why is an 0-3 Ravens team still that high? At what point are you what your record says you are? A bottom third team not a top half.

  106. packattack1967 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:23 AM
    If you don’t think the Pack would beat the Pats this week, you’re stoned.
    ===========================
    I’ll have some of what you’re having if you think the Pack could beat the reigning world champions on a neutral field. Pats are a far more complete and well balanced team, Rodgers is just stat padding against mostly weaker teams in possibly the weakest division is not impressive to me at all. You don’t think Brady could have thrown 5 TDs or more on the Jaguars this past Sunday? The Pats reverted to running the ball once the game was well in hand, while stat padders like Rodgers and big brother Manning will throw 9 times out of 10 even if it hurts their team in the end. Guarantee Pats will crash the party once again in SB 50.

  107. What a bunch of idiots make this list. The Raiders 2-1 beat the Ravens, who are 0-3 and the Raiders are #7 team in the NFL in Passing and in Overall yards and let up only 1 sack but you have the 0-3, lol, Ravens above them. You guys are nuts.

  108. Eagles win and move up 8.
    Texans win and drop a spot.
    Jets lose and stay where they were.

    Either last week’s rankings were crap or this week’s are crap.

    I’ll go with both.

  109. emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

    —————————————————————
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Patriots over Packers 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. GB homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Brady would out perform Rogers over and over.

  110. The Patriots coaches and players would be the first to tell everyone, it’s too early to crown anyone….that’s why you play out all the games. I believe they’ve got a great chance to go to and win the Super Bowl….but let’s not put unnecessary pressure on them! You have to see what toll the season takes against any team! That being said, Drive for Five!!!!!

  111. rocksoup342 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 1:51 PM
    emoney826 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 8:16 AM
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Packers over Patriots 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. NE homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Rodgers would outperform Brady over and over.

    —————————————————————
    On a neutral field, I’ll take the Patriots over Packers 9 out of 10 times. They’re simply better. GB homers will never admit that because they think they’re the greatest team ever, but Brady would out perform Rogers over and over.
    ————————-
    Huge Pats fan here…..Packers-Patriots super bowl would be awesome and pretty much a toss up…..with a slight edge for NE! But you don’t get much better than Rodgers and company!

  112. “The Patriots coaches and players would be the first to tell everyone, it’s too early to crown anyone…”

    Belichick was shown on Comcast Sports NE today saying “3 wins don’t get you anything in this league we have a long way to go”

  113. minneanderthals says:
    Sep 29, 2015 1:05 PM
    Hmm…. Rodgers with a calf injury or Brady (which was the case last year)?

    I guess I’d still take Rodgers every time.

    Because he’s better.

    This year, so far, so is Andy Dalton.

    —————-

    Brady: 1112 yards passing, 9 TDs, 0 Int 72.2% completion rate

    Dalton: 866 yards passing, 8 TDs, 1 Int, 66.3% completion rate

    So tell us, why exactly is Andy Dalton better than Brady this season? You see son, you make such statements and it merely shows you have no credibility in future posts.

  114. Oddly, the title of this article on the NBC site is about stopping the Patriots….

    And yes, you can top the Patriots and you can do so following how ethically (or not) the Patriots run their organization.

    First, you play to hit Tom Brady EVERY time he drops back – you don’t bother to defend passes in the first quarter.

    Second, who cares if you do so late or not? Penalties might happen, but this is how the Patriots play. They defy you to punish them. And Tom Brady should be punished. Draw a couple of personal fouls and fines.

    Third, the Patriots play by the creed of “it is not our job to stop scoring.” And that creed should be answered by the defense saying “it is not our job to protect your QB”. As long as Brady is comfortable int he pocket, he will tear you up. So serve him a dish of Patriot ethics and do everything you can do to win and then take your medicine.

    Brady should be knocked out of games. If the Patriots dare to put him on the field, he is fair game. And he is the only reason they win. Remove him and this team becomes another gutless loser.

  115. As a Cards fan, I would ask the folks who put this power ranking together to lower the status of the Cardinals… In the words of our coach, “we ain’t $hit”.

    We have no egoist need to be ranked higher then anyone else, and instead would like to honor and recognize the accomplishments of the Pats, Hawks, Pack, etc. Their fans should be proud.

    You will find that the Cards team members also indicate that we have not accomplished anything in our three wins. All we really care about is preparing for St. Louis…

    We find our inspiration from an amazing QB who is living his dream, a seasoned slot receiver who is gift to mankind, a coach who continues to speak the “TRUTH” in his own unique way, and a team of individuals all playing their HEARTS out for a common cause….

    The Cardinals story transcends any rankings… Just sit back and “watch” how this all unfolds.

    PS – Thank you Dr. Jen for your participation!

  116. The Cardinals are the best team in the NFL right now. IF they stay healthy they will likely win the SB. The challenge is that they have injury prone players, especially Carson Palmer, and play very physical opponents. Recall that the Bengals were on the verge of a SB when the Steelers took out Palmer and ended up grabbing a SB as a Wild Card.

  117. If you have to pull out a team statistic to say who the better individual player is, you know you’ve already lost the argument.

    Aaron Rodgers = The greatest of all time

  118. Trent Dilfer doesn’t magically get better than Dan Marino just because he has more rings.

    It requires a great team to win the Super Bowl, not a great QB.

    When you have to pull out a team statistic to say who the better individual player is, you know you’ve already lost the argument.

  119. And he is the only reason they win

    That, and the fact that Belichick has fielded a competitive team for 15 straight years.

    Name the last coach to do that in this league.

  120. Just over 3 weeks ago, everybody was lining up to take a shot of the Bills, the city, the no Qb’s, Rex Ryan…etc etc.
    My, my, my…how quiet things have become….

  121. revelation123 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 5:40 PM
    Trent Dilfer doesn’t magically get better than Dan Marino just because he has more rings.

    It requires a great team to win the Super Bowl, not a great QB.

    When you have to pull out a team statistic to say who the better individual player is, you know you’ve already lost the argument.
    =========================
    Seriously? I agree that Dilfer is nowhere close to Marino’s level, but do you think Marino is better than say Joe Montana? I hope for your sake the answer is no, otherwise you lose all credibility.

  122. LOL a Patriots fan talking about padding numbers…. What a joke. Green Bay never pads numbers. They run the clock out every 4th quarter and give up garbage time/points, and even sometimes the game.

    Patriots on the other hand will just keep padding away.

  123. revelation123 says:
    Sep 29, 2015 5:25 PM
    If you have to pull out a team statistic to say who the better individual player is, you know you’ve already lost the argument.

    Aaron Rodgers = The greatest of all time

    ____________________________

    LOL – Team statistics are pretty relevant in a team game – take your stat ponies and give me a team player any day. I’ll take Bart Starr over Fran Tarkington, Joe Montana over Dan Marino and Tom Brady over Peyton Manning and many would agree with me, but no one could make the argument relying only on individual stats. Anyone who actually watched the prime time performances of these greats would agree with me.

  124. Carolina has played the Jags, Texans, and Saints. Lets pump the breaks on Cam for MVP and top ten team until they actually play a good team.

  125. laserw says:
    Sep 29, 2015 3:05 PM

    First, you play to hit Tom Brady EVERY time he drops back – you don’t bother to defend passes in the first quarter.

    Brady should be knocked out of games. If the Patriots dare to put him on the field, he is fair game. And he is the only reason they win. Remove him and this team becomes another gutless loser.
    ————————————————————-
    You don’t think teams have tried to do that? I guess it’s not as easy as your brilliant plan suggests.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.