Last September, on the heels of the initial court ruling that scrapped quarterback Tom Brady’s suspension, the Patriots separately secured the reinstatement of John Jastremski and Jim McNally, the equipment employees whose Beavis-and-Butthead text messages became the only real evidence of consequence in the #Deflategate investigation.
It’s possible that, not long after Jastremski returned, he left again.
Ben Volin of the Boston Globe delves into the question of whether the Patriots fired Jastremski last season, starting with an offhand comment from (who else?) comedian Jim Breuer and ending with the team declining to respond to a pair of inquiries from Volin as to Jastremski’s status.
Breuer says he met Jastremski in Cancun during the 2015 season. The meeting apparently happened on November 9, one day after the Patriots hosted Washington. With no bye the following weekend, Jastremski whereabouts on an in-season Monday raise obvious questions as to whether he was indeed still employed.
By not answering the simple question of whether Jastremski still works for the team, the Patriots necessarily have fueled speculation about the status of the guy who was primarily responsible for preparing footballs — and who along with McNally was accused by the league of running the deflation racket. If Jastremski is gone, that in turn fuels speculation as to whether the Patriots privately have concluded that he was indeed guilty.
It makes sense for the Patriots to keep things quiet with Brady’s federal litigation still pending. Then again, it would have made sense to keep Jastremski employed until the lawsuit and all appeals conclude.
The answer could be (emphasis on could) that Jastremski technically hasn’t been let go but that the Patriots have put him on paid leave pending the outcome of Brady’s case. If Breuer hadn’t blown Jastemski’s cover, no one would have ever known the difference.
Does any of it matter to Brady’s suspension? Perhaps. Like the brief submitted by 21 professor to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit harping on the Ideal Gas Law (a principle technically irrelevant to the case at this point in the process), it’s the kind of collateral fact that could get the attention of the black-robed individuals who will be making a nuanced application of convoluted legal principles to a hotly-contested factual pattern.
In English, it means that the Patriots probably wish Breuer had communicated in goat when asked about Jastremski.