Raiders meet with Ronnie Lott’s group on Oakland stadium

Getty Images

The Raiders aren’t being as dismissive as they’ve previously been about the proposal to build a stadium in Oakland.

Indeed, the Raiders met Monday with the group behind the effort to keep the team in town by building a stadium with $500 million from the team and the league. Hall of Famer Ronnie Lott serves as the primary name and face for Fortress Investment Group; the money primarily comes from Wesley Edens, the co-owner of the Milwaukee Bucks.

So why would the team take a meeting over a project owner Mark Davis already has pooh-poohed? Either Davis hopes to not be accused of failing to do his due diligence on the idea or, as suggested here on Monday, he’s looking for leverage due to lingering struggles to finalize a deal to move the team to Las Vegas. Sands casino owner Sheldon Adelson continues to drive a hard bargain; a viable plan for the Raiders to remain in Oakland could soften Adelson’s stance.

The County of Alameda and City of Oakland are scheduled to apply expedited approval to the project on Tuesday, one day before NFL owners meet in Dallas. At that point, it’s believed the league office will unfurl an effort to sell Oakland as a viable market (and Las Vegas as a not-so-viable market) in the hopes of keeping the team where it currently is.

21 responses to “Raiders meet with Ronnie Lott’s group on Oakland stadium

  1. if they’re going to do it, this is the year to discuss… otherwise, it’ll be like the chargers trying to negotiate stadium deal right now with a losing record…
    imagine the Browns try to get a stadium?!!!!

  2. The area around the Coliseum is depressed and ripe for development (ie., cheap). The right development plan could see shops and restaurants to help revitalize the area. The location is ideal it’s right next to a freeway and has a BART train stop right there.

  3. This is an opportunity for the Oakland Raiders to take firm control of the Bay Area.

    The 49ers really messed up on building Levi’s Stadium, which is two full counties south from actual San Francisco and it is a disaster of a stadium. Access/traffic there is a cautionary tale.

    Then of course there is the ownership of the 49ers. The mother actually needs to take away the toy from her son (Jed York) because he broke it. It will take years to put it back together.

  4. This is a bad situation getting worse. NFL will not approve Vegas unless M. Davis retains majority control and 100% ownership. Vegas won’t give up tax payer money unless move is approved by NFL and no relocation law suits. Adelson won’t throw in until he receives the Raiders cookie jar, majority ownership and team control of personel and ancillary revenue streams.

    Hey Mark. Consider the Raiders global brand. You would make a mint in Mexico and have the baddest home field advantage ever. Do it. The league will back you!

  5. granadafan says:
    Dec 13, 2016 4:30 PM
    The area around the Coliseum is depressed and ripe for development (ie., cheap). The right development plan could see shops and restaurants to help revitalize the area. The location is ideal it’s right next to a freeway and has a BART train stop right there.

    _______________________________________

    True. I would add the airport being 2 miles away, major freeway access, no bridge constraints to inland/majority attendees, the league has put a $100M in contingent on OAK, and we have an existing and rabid fan here already. Not to mention it is home.

    Its the best spot in the state of CA for a sports stadium based on access and location.

  6. The Donko’s wouldn’t even be considered for Vegas because they’re merely a regional brand, no one outside of Colorado follows them.

  7. Mark Davis isn’t going to bail out on Adelson. He bought the trademark of “Las Vegas Raiders.” The economic potential of a Vegas stadium is out if this world. The NFL lost their minds if they say no to $750 million in public funding.

    Where was this Lott group 5 years ago? If they do stay in Oakland, the stadium should be bigger than 55,000. 55,000 is too small for an NFL stadium, especially a new one.

  8. mdintino1420 is right! Lambeau Field (publicly owned) has a seating capacity of 80,735! Jerry Jone’s palace has 80,000 seats! The NFL owners want to see revenue from seats; especially, luxury boxes.

  9. P.S. 55,000 seats is 1,750 more than the Oakland Coliseum and 6,500 less than Soldier Field (the next smallest stadium). Seems like a bad deal for the Raiders!

  10. Mark Davis isn’t going to bail out on Adelson. He bought the trademark of “Las Vegas Raiders.”
    _________________________________________

    He filed an intent-to-use federal trademark application for a governmental fee of $375. Wow. Committment to Committment!

  11. The Donko’s wouldn’t even be considered for Vegas because they’re merely a regional brand, no one outside of Colorado follows them.
    ________________________________________Laughable. Denver is one of the top 6 watched national tv game teams. Their mountain time zone share is tops. Their market territory includes Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada, Kansas, Nebraska, Japan and upper Europe. They have sold out their 76,000 seat stadium since 1969.

    Meanwhile, the “international global Raiders” slink from city to city looking for a new free home like homeless dogs. In Oakland, they couldn’t sell out their tiny crib and had to tarp most of it off to avoid forfeited ticket revenues. The Global Raiders cant keep raw sewage off their field and seats.

    Golbal brand, no. Global laughter yes. Universal irrevelance, absolutely!

  12. bighairbingopro says:
    Dec 13, 2016 5:30 PM
    Mark Davis isn’t going to bail out on Adelson. He bought the trademark of “Las Vegas Raiders.”
    _________________________________________

    He filed an intent-to-use federal trademark application for a governmental fee of $375. Wow. Committment to Committment!

    Everyone does that ahead of time now…Internet domain names taught them all a lesson on domains, trademarks and copyrights . The moment I heard Las Vegas I checked to see if the domain was taken for LasVegas Raiders…was already gone

  13. Adelson has already said that if the deal is not on his terms, he’ll walk away. He said he can take it or leave it. He’s good either way.
    Doesn’t seem like manufactured leverage is going to change that stance.
    From his point of view, without the end-game he has in mind, the deal isn’t worth doing.
    His end game is to own the Raiders.
    Be careful when you’re feeding crocodiles, Mark. They bite.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.