No traction to change rule regarding the hiring of assistant coaches

Getty Images

Every year, promising assistant coaches become head-coaching candidates. Every year, one or more of them end up not getting a head-coaching job because their current teams do too well in the postseason.

Earlier this week, former Giants offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride explained on PFT Live that, while his team was celebrating a Super Bowl berth following an NFC title-game win over the 49ers five years ago, Gilbride got a call from a team with a vacancy that decided it could no longer wait for him. (The team apparently was the Buccaneers, who hired Greg Schiano instead.)

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the possibility of changing the “thou shalt wait” rule comes up virtually every year. Every time, it’s quickly shot down without ever getting any traction.

But why shouldn’t a team be permitted to hire as its head coach an assistant coach with another team, with the understanding that no work will begin until the assistant coach’s current team ends its season? Two years ago, it was an open secret that the Falcons would hire Seahawks defensive coordinator Dan Quinn after Super Bowl XLIX, and no one said anything about it. Last year, it was reported that the Eagles would be hiring Chiefs offensive coordinator Doug Pederson once the Chiefs’ playoff run ended.

Maybe the message is that teams can do it, if they’re discreet about it. (And, apparently, they don’t have to be all that discreet.) The only problem is that the team may want to announce the hire for fan and media purposes, ending the speculation and uncertainty about who the next coach will be.

Some teams wouldn’t take advantage of a rule change even if it were to happen. Some teams want their new coaching staff in place quickly, and no later than the launch of the Senior Bowl week, which begins the day after the completion of the conference title games. Given the offseason calendar, which unfolds rapidly, time is of the essence when it comes to hiring a coach.

Still, other teams would be inclined to make a hire even with the understanding that they have to wait a little while to have the coach show up for his first day of work. It’s a no-brainer tweak that prevents assistant coaches from being punished for the success of their teams, and no one would be hurt if the change were made.

19 responses to “No traction to change rule regarding the hiring of assistant coaches

  1. Every good business or organization should allow its employees to leave for promotions. Otherwise, it’ll kill moral and unhappy employees are unproductive employees. Strong leaders look out for their employees even when it’s not within their own best interest.

  2. I have never understood this rule — Back at the end of the 2004, it was well known that Romeo Crennel and Charlie Weiss would be leaving the Patriots after the Playoffs to coach the Browns and Notre Dame respectively. There are photos of Belichick, Crennel and Weiss hugging after Super Bowl XXXIX because they knew it would be the last time the three would coach together again. It was a great moment for the team and the fans of the team.

    A coach should be able to accept a promotion with a start date after the Super Bowl if necessary.

  3. Let the teams interview and hire who they want when they want. That includes not having to give racial preferences in the selection process.

  4. The reason for the hiring rules,,
    It but be twice in Superbowl era…Once when the Pats looked really good to win AFC championship, night before game, chuck Fairbanks, it gets leaked he is taking another coaching position. Then the year parcels is coaching be in Superbowl, it leaks pregame that he was leaving NE, for the Jets.
    It completely ruins the chemistry of the team. If your team sucks so bad they can wait until after the Superbowl..

  5. The reason for the hiring rules,,
    It bit NE twice in Superbowl era…Once when the Pats looked really good to win AFC championship, night before game, chuck Fairbanks, it gets leaked he is taking another coaching position. Then the year parcels is coaching be in Superbowl, it leaks pregame that he was leaving NE, for the Jets.
    It completely ruins the chemistry of the team. If your team sucks so bad they can wait until after the Superbowl..

  6. No teams should be able to interview anyone for next season until this season is over. The day after the SB is complete. This puts all teams in the same position.

  7. The rule should require all prospective HCs to spend one day as HC of the NYJ before resigning in a terse press conference. This will inoculate them against future Jets related illnesses on their new team.

  8. “But why shouldn’t a team be permitted to hire as its head coach an assistant coach with another team, with the understanding that no work will begin until the assistant coach’s current team ends its season?”

    Because human nature says that the moment that person is hired their brain is going to start churning away at their new job and take some energy away from trying to get to and win a Super Bowl.

    That’s very obvious and it should be a no brainer to leave things the way they are.

    I don’t even like they can interview those coaches during the post season and would prefer they have to wait.

  9. Any promotion should be allowed, only lateral moves should be blocked. If a QB coach wants to run an offense they should let him, thats the path to HC anyways.

  10. If I’m a junior coach on a team – I want the chance to interview whenever I can – even if I don’t want to leave for that position. (becoming a coach on a team with toxic ownership for instance – not naming names)

    I want the interview experience so when a spot opens up I REALLY do want – I can go nail that interview because I’ve done it 6-8 times already.

  11. There are no bad jobs in the NFL, most coaches get paid for 4-5 years to be a head coach and only make it two or three. That means they can sit on their couch eating Cheetos for a few years pocketing 5-7 mill a year. Anyone else got that deal at work?

  12. Agreed, this is a bad rule based on a non-issue. In the past there were plenty examples of assistants agreeing to become head coaches before the end of the playoffs and still getting the job done with their existing teams: Charlie Weiss and Romeo Crennel were mentioned earlier in the comments, also Dave Wannstedt (leaving the Cowboys to coach the Bears) and Buddy Ryan (leaving the Bears for the Eagles). If anything, the promotion of these coaches seemed to fire up their players, not distract them, and all ended up winning Superbowls.

    Now, the situation with Parcells bailing on the Patriots is different since he was the head coach. In that situation of course the players are going to see it as a betrayal and not something to rally around and celebrate.

  13. No team that is participating in the playoffs wants the distraction of assistant coaches being interviewed, never mind taking offers or making commitments.

    Same rules that apply to players should apply to coaches. You can talk to them when the season is over. Not their season, the whole season.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.