Broncos may be interested in Tony Romo, if he’s a free agent

Getty Images

It’s believed Tony Romo will ask the Cowboys to release him in lieu of trying to trade him. Romo has another reason to push for the termination of his contract.

The Denver Broncos, previously believed to be not interested in Romo, reportedly could be interested if Romo can be obtained free and clear on the open market. Mike Klis of 9news.com reports that “a source in the Broncos’ football department did not dismiss the possibility” of signing Romo, if a trade isn’t needed.

Although the Cowboys may prefer to get value for Romo, cutting him would actually have a benefit, since the salary cap hit could be divided over two years. The team nevertheless has been very coy about its plans for the franchise quarterback who has been supplanted by Dak Prescott, prompting speculation that the Cowboys prefer to finagle a trade.

Romo’s interest in the Broncos would depend on the role the team envisions for him. Would he be installed as the starter? Would he have to compete with Paxton Lynch and Trevor Siemian?

The financial package the Broncos offer to Romo would say plenty about how they plan to use him. Even then, it’s possible that some other team would offer Romo much more than Denver would.

None of it matters unless and until the Cowboys release Romo’s rights. The question of whether they will soon will become one of the biggest issues in the NFL.

103 responses to “Broncos may be interested in Tony Romo, if he’s a free agent

  1. Duh. Why else do you think Romo gave that beautiful speech a couple months ago. He knew this day would come. He was buttering up Jerry.

  2. The Tony Romo History: Broken right pinky finger, broken left collar bone, ruptured disk, two transverse fractures, broken left collar bone twice, vertebra compression fracture….

    It doesn’t matter who Romo plays for next year, the biggest question is can they get him through pre season?

  3. He’s a broken down 37 YO QB. If that is going to be the biggest offseason story, then it’ll be a boring few months until the draft.

  4. It would be irresponsible to just outright release Romo if the Cowboys can get reasonable value for him. I’m a big fan of Romo, but it’s not like he delivered the Cowboys a championship or even close…get what you can for him, but more importantly, a trade will ease the financial burden of his contract

  5. Of course they would be. If they can get something for nothing why wouldn’t they be interested? Beyond that, and more importantly, trading for Romo means trading for his current contract and the substantial cap hit that comes with it. A team signing him as a FA can negotiate a new incentive based contract that would allow the cap flexibility of moving the hit forward, if he can stay on the field and earn the incentives and if not the risk is minimized. It’s just good business. Say what you want about Elway, he isn’t careless with cap space.

  6. The estimations on what Romo would bring in a trade have been ridiculous (probably a 4th rounder at best). The Cowboys will probably release him as a post June 1st cut and spread the cap hit over two years. If he’s released, he gets to keep all of the bonus money in his contract (tens of millions). Jerry will try to do right by Romo, and releasing him so he can go where he wants would be the right thing to do, for both Romo and the Cowboys.

  7. Yes, get him out of the NFC East, so when Dak pulls an RG3, they will have no contingency. But the Cowboys best interest is to hold on to him as an insurance. And the proof is in the pudding, not even Dak and Zeke could avert the Cowboys one and done tradition.

  8. Of course they’re interested.

    Elway has a team that can win right now with even competent quarterbacking, and he wasted the last year with a 7th round pick who will be selling insurance next year.

  9. Not at all a Cowboy fan (in fact, quite the “hater”) but imo they should cut him and let him do what’s best for himself. He’s laid it all out there for Dallas over the years. Say what you want about playoff or critical game short comings, he’s busted his ass for the Cowboys over the years. He shouldn’t be strung along in a game of “maybe we’ll do this or maybe we’ll do that.”

  10. Interestingly, I read on a Bronco blog some suggestion that Denver could trade Siemian for a “2nd or 3rd round pick”. Have you ever heard of anything less likely in your entire life?

  11. While I would welcome Romo to Denver they would first need to address that horid O-Line. If he couldn’t stay healthy behind that line in Dallas then Denvers O-Line will get him killed

  12. As a fan of an AFCW rival, I wouldn’t mind at all if Denver acquired Romo. Romo is not at all comparable to Peyton Manning. And with the Cowboys the QB he was most comparable to was Danny White who had nice stats but choked in big games and threw picks a the worst moments (but at least White got Dallas to the NFC Championship game which Romo never did).

  13. He’s still considered an upper tier QB in a league where below average (is it really below average though?) is getting overpaid because otherwise you have to use worse.

    There’s several teams out there that are clearly looking for QBs and would otherwise overdraft one. Now, they could just use that same draft pick to get a proven (if injury plagued) QB for at least a couple more years.

    He’ll make a lot of teams playoff possibles that otherwise wouldn’t be in contention…

    If he stays healthy.

  14. That previous nonsense of Elway being happy to have Pax and Trev compete for starter was, as I and I’m sure many others saw, his opening BS to Jerrah that the Broncos weren’t desperate. But they are. Why do you think Elway was prepared to offer $30M to Oswiler if Trev and Pax were such sure things?

    Now they’re saying “maybe, if Romo’s free”. LOL. Ultimately, Romo costs Boys’ cap something like $20M if Jerrah lets him go and $30M to keep. Jerrah might share half that financial burden with Elway plus a couple of sweet picks. And Elway has another 18-month dynasty in the making.

  15. This Bronco fan perceives Romo as an over the hill average QB.

    We already have average guys, so what’s the point?

    I say use the money for a better line.

  16. If I were Romo, I’d be looking for a different situation. With all his injuries and at his age, playing in the cold behind that swiss cheese O-line does not seem like a recipe for success.

  17. If healthy, Romo is a good QB. If the Broncos can get him for a reasonable price then it’s a great fit. Romo gets a chance at a ring.

    Something like 10MM base, +2 MM if they win the divisional round, +4MM if they win the AFC championship, +4MM if they win the Super Bowl.

  18. The Cowboys should keep him for another year. It’s going to cost them the same, and Dak is making chump change. Keep one more year as an insurance policy if Dak gets hurt. And he knows the offense.

  19. “The Tony Romo History: Broken right pinky finger, broken left collar bone, ruptured disk, two transverse fractures, broken left collar bone twice, vertebra compression fracture….”

    That’s quite a list. Romo should hang it up if he want’s to be able to walk and function anywhere near normally 20 years from now. He’s made his money, time to get out before he gets hurt even worse.

  20. intrafinesse says:
    Jan 29, 2017 10:55 AM

    If healthy, Romo is a good QB. If the Broncos can get him for a reasonable price then it’s a great fit. Romo gets a chance at a ring.

    Something like 10MM base, +2 MM if they win the divisional round, +4MM if they win the AFC championship, +4MM if they win the Super Bowl.
    ————————————————————
    Good luck with that.

  21. The way its going with the SF brain trust they will trade the second overall pick for him. Then fall back on Kaep after Romo gets injured. Meanwhile Jerruh trades down that pick for a handful and gets those defensive pieces he needs.

  22. or, ya know… How about Sam Bradford for a second and fourth round pick?? think it over…

  23. intrafinesse says:
    Jan 29, 2017 10:55 AM
    If healthy, Romo is a good QB. If the Broncos can get him for a reasonable price then it’s a great fit. Romo gets a chance at a ring.

    Something like 10MM base, +2 MM if they win the divisional round, +4MM if they win the AFC championship, +4MM if they win the Super Bowl.
    ————————————-
    So you’re saying the Donkos should pay him 10 million for 2-3 preseason games before he goes on IR?
    I’m down with that!!! Lol

  24. Couple of things that seems to get overlooked.

    1. Romo may be prone to getting hurt, but he now is effectively coming off 2 years of rest. A lot of his injuries and re injuries are from coming back way too soon.

    2. Simian looked okay sometimes under the Kubiak offense, which relies heavily on a run game. Broncos have entirely new coaching, which will rely (most likely with those coaching choices) on the pass more. No evidence Simiean can do this, and a lot of his issues were decision making in the pass game, which was heightened with the bad offensive line play. How likely is it a first year starter is going to learn an entirely new offense? Romo gives you this right from the start and might be a good bridge for 2 years or so.

  25. denverdave3 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 10:53 AM
    This Bronco fan perceives Romo as an over the hill average QB.

    We already have average guys, so what’s the point?

    I say use the money for a better line
    _____________________

    If you think Siemien and Lynch etc are on the same level as Romo, your perception is faulty.

  26. @ dtroxallday

    “Not at all a Cowboy fan (in fact, quite the “hater”) but imo they should cut him and let him do what’s best for himself. He’s laid it all out there for Dallas over the years. Say what you want about playoff or critical game short comings, he’s busted his ass for the Cowboys over the years. He shouldn’t be strung along in a game of “maybe we’ll do this or maybe we’ll do that.”

    You are entitled to your opinion. With that said, the level of ineptitude you have in regards to how an NFL franchise is run is quite high. Nobody is saying Romo didn’t bust his rump for the team. He is a fierce competitor , and he was always determined to play the game, even when injured. He just unfortunately had a propensity to get injured. Romo is also a great person off the field, a good family man, and a very smart football player who likely has a bright future in coaching.

    When it comes to his future, the Cowboys obviously still have him under contract, and for a pretty lucrative amount – they have always taken care of him on that front. With that said, the Cowboys will do what is best for the team going forward, which is what it is all about in the NFL. What transpires won’t be anything personal, nor should it be. If the Cowboys cannot trade him, they will obviously release him, which ultimately will be best for both the team AND Romo. The Cowboys won’t go out of their way to drag it out and keep him in limbo, but they will explore all of their options, as they should. If that takes longer than what people think, so be it. Believe me, they won’t be interested in what admitted haters think. Their focus will be on how to make the team better via FA and the draft. Haters such as yourself won’t acknowledge anything positive when it comes to what the Cowboys do anyway.

    Stick to your own teams shortcomings, as it is likely your team doesn’t have more than the Cowboys’ 5 Lombardis, nor did your team make the playoffs this year.

    But thanks for your participation?

  27. Whomever Tony signs with, I will be cheering on 2 teams. If they meet, I WILL be cheering on Tony Romo!!!!! He got royally screwed and Dak did nothing Tony could not have done with the same TEAM! When we were down 18 against GB, Tony should have gone in! JJ & JG made their own bed….

  28. Frazier28/7 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 11:40 AM

    or, ya know… How about Sam Bradford for a second and fourth round pick?? think it over…
    ——————————————————–
    After he took a 1st place Vikings team to 3rd in the division???

  29. greenlargo says:
    Jan 29, 2017 11:33 AM

    The way its going with the SF brain trust they will trade the second overall pick for him. Then fall back on Kaep after Romo gets injured. Meanwhile Jerruh trades down that pick for a handful and gets those defensive pieces he needs.
    ————————————————————-
    Even if all that happened, the Cowboys would STILL get bounced in the 1st round.

  30. jsrdc says:
    Jan 29, 2017 12:03 PM

    Stick to your own teams shortcomings, as it is likely your team doesn’t have more than the Cowboys’ 5 Lombardis, nor did your team make the playoffs this year.
    ————————————————————–
    It’s great to to support your team, but the Cowboys haven’t sniffed a title in decades now, and in recent years when they’ve actually had the teams to do it they’ve found new and exciting ways to spit the bit.

  31. harrisonhits2 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 10:02 AM
    If the Donks pick up Romo its a strong indication they whiffed on Lynch
    ___________________________________
    Or, perhaps, Lynch isn’t ready.

  32. Get him, Denver!
    1. Do you really think Siemian (or however you spell it) and whoever else will get you guys back into playoffs?
    2. How else will you guys take care of Chiefs and Raiders?
    3. You play Dolphins in 2017–in Miami–and didn’t Miami take your playoff spot in 2016? And Romo knows how to beat Miami (Fins have never beaten Romo—the problem is I am sure Gase can handle that one, and Miami’ll have three good corners in 2017, not just one on ol’ Dez…Maxwell, Howard, and Lippett, plus Jones’ll be back and Quddus and maybe Earl Thomas???)
    4. At some point Romo will be playing Cowboys, right?
    5. Romo vs. Brady? Cool!
    6. If ol’ Peyton can revive the Horses, certainly ol’ Tony can!
    7. Neither the Browns, Jets, Niners, nor Bears are worthy of Romo

    And if not Denver, the Texans maybe?

  33. Better chance he will end up in Houston.same state tax wise and a 3 hr drive from dallas and his family and friends.Denver peaked with manning Houston is just a decent QB away from being a top afc team with jj watt coming back next year to pair with clowney.

  34. @brendafortheboyz,

    I usually agree with you on most posts, but not this one. Dak is the present AND the future, and can escape and utilize his feet to extend plays. Unfortunately, Romo couldn’t do that anymore, and Dak has proven he can make the plays.

    Romo is certainly a better downfield passer, but Dak improved in that capacity as the year went on, as he should have. Dak also had a GREAT game (as a rookie, mind you) against GB – he went 24 of 38, 302 yds with 3 Td’s and 1 Interception. His QB rating was 103.2 in that game (and 104.9 rating for the year, which is the best rookie passer rating all-time). Dez also had 132 yards, and 2 TD’s against GB. If someone told you that the Cowboys would put up those same exact stats with Romo at QB (but not knowing the final score, of course) quite a few Cowboy fans would have taken that in a heartbeat.

    I admire Romo, have always been a fan, but his time in Dallas is complete. I, too, will cheer him on with whatever team he plays for. He is too good of a player AND person not to pull for the guy.

  35. jjb0811 says:

    He’s a broken down 37 YO QB.
    ===============================

    Heard the same thing about Peyton when he want to Denver.

  36. panagos91 says:

    Yes, get him out of the NFC East, so when Dak pulls an RG3
    =====================================

    Weak comparison. RG3 was the media glory boy because he ran around to make highlight plays. Unlike Dak, he didn’t show he could be a pocket passer, read defenses and call proper audibles.

  37. vinzclorth0 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 9:10 AM
    Cowboys and Broncos: sitting at home next Sunday. Ha ha

    You say that as if 28 other teams won’t be doing the same

  38. cboys4life2014 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 1:04 PM

    You say that as if 28 other teams won’t be doing the same
    ————————————————————
    Some teams knew they did not have the players to compete this year.

    Some teams had some untimely injuries to key guys.

    Some teams played up to and over their capabilities, but eventually played someone better.

    And then there were the Cowboys. Who drafted some studs, played great, earned home field and then, just when they were in position to win, their coach turtled, played for the tie and watched the whole thing evaporate. It’s very sad, really.

  39. rohlo71 says:
    Jan 29, 2017 12:22 PM

    Better chance he will end up in Houston.same state tax wise and a 3 hr drive from dallas and his family and friends.Denver peaked with manning Houston is just a decent QB away from being a top afc team with jj watt coming back next year to pair with clowney.
    ———————————————————–
    No way Houston can fit Osweiler and Romo under the cap – at least not without leaving some other gaping holes in the roster.

  40. yeah bring injury prone Romo to a division where he has to play 4 of his games vs beast like Mack and Houston, with that crappy O-line in Denver

  41. tylawspick6 says:

    horseteeth is a flaming moron
    ————————-
    The Pats have a stupid Elvis logo

    That “flaming moron” is 2-0 in AFCCG against your Pats… can’t exactly be that much of a “flaming moron”… now if you said something about the Browns, then your comment would have validity.

    Seeing as how we’re stating adolescent opinions that no one else cares about, I figured why not state something as well?

  42. Denver is a serious bind. The 2 QB’s they have are mediocre at best. Kansas City also has a mediocre QB who is on the way out. If KC wants to troll Denver, they can merely show interest in Romo and get them to over pay/give up picks to Dallas.

    KC & Denver will be in the running, and a 3rd party team can royally complicate matters for them if they choose to.

    If anything, Romo has proven this year that he won’t be a cancer and can help groom a young QB and not divide a locker room. This will go a long way to make him a reasonable reach for the donkeys and chefs.

    You’ll see the true potential of the WR, TE & RB’s unleashed in the 6-9 games that Romo starts.

  43. go get him and give your team a chance for a championship, because watching trevor simien reminds me of how when brian griese replaced john elway we passed on aaron rodgers in the draft, good enough to be a game manager and not a game winner, i’ve seen enough to know we are not gonna win with him

  44. not going to happen. Cowboys are already 10 million over the cap, even if they wait until after June 1, which then they still would have to put 10 million in dead space. With or without Romo Cowboys have huge cap problems as they have guys like Claiborne, Terrell McClain, Crawford, Barry Church, etc…to resign, and no money to do so…

  45. aqibhasmorepick6sthantylaw says:
    Jan 29, 2017 2:12 PM
    tylawspick6 says:

    horseteeth is a flaming moron
    ————————-
    The Pats have a stupid Elvis logo

    ———————

    Haha, he called the leader of your team stupid and you wanted to say it back but you couldn’t. So instead you picked on the king of rock and roll.

  46. Off topic, but could you guys move the report button a little further away from the like button ? I have reported about five posts I meant to like.

  47. In my notsohumbleopinion, Romo wouldn’t last more than a few games againt the defenses Denver has to face in the AFCWest, so why spend any $ or draft picks on him? Frankly, spend the $ or draft picks to fix the front line and pick up another running back to compete.

    I thought Sieman played well for a rookie with no front line to speak of (yes, I know it was his second year. Put him behind a decent front line and get a running game and I bet they’re back in the playoffs!

    Let Romo retire with his health or play for someone else.

  48. Houston Texans, Minnnesota Vikings, New York Jets, Washngton Redskins, and the Broncos are most likely the teams that think Romo can help them get to the Super Bowl. The other teams around the league either are too weak to make the playoffs or they already have a franchise quarterback.

  49. Yeah, the Pat’s may have a ” stupid Elvis logo ” but they are in their record breaking 7 th Super Bowl! Jealous much!

  50. radrntn says:
    Jan 29, 2017 3:14 PM
    not going to happen. Cowboys are already 10 million over the cap, even if they wait until after June 1, which then they still would have to put 10 million in dead space. With or without Romo Cowboys have huge cap problems as they have guys like Claiborne, Terrell McClain, Crawford, Barry Church, etc…to resign, and no money to do so…
    ——————————————————
    Hey look at me everybody….I have no idea how the salary cap works!

  51. @ carloswlassiter

    “And then there were the Cowboys. Who drafted some studs, played great, earned home field and then, just when they were in position to win, their coach turtled, played for the tie and watched the whole thing evaporate. It’s very sad, really.”

    Really? From what I remember, they were absolutely going for the win before they ended up kicking the FG to tie it (before Rodgers threw that unbelievable pass to Cook, of course). It was 3rd and 3 with 44 secs to go, and the Cowboys attempted a pass – they didn’t get it and ultimately kicked the FG. Going for a pass there isn’t “turtling” at all. An incomplete pass stops the clock and leaves more time on the clock for GB (which is more risky than rushing it), but the Cowboys still decided to pass it (they had 18 first downs passing vs 6 first downs rushing in that game, so they decided to do what had been working). Had they ran for it unsuccessfully, what would have been any different for you and the rest of the haters?

    What really hamstrung the Cowboys were the horrible refs and their terrible calls, including incorrect placing of the ball on more than one occasion, and non-calls for both sides. There were several examples where non-calls and bad calls either created having to kick a FG, took Cowboys out of FG position, or put GB INTO FG position )like the PI call where Brown held Montgomery BEFORE the pass was in the air. A 10 yard penalty instead of a 5 due to the poor call, and on 4th down, GB attempted a 53 yard FG .

    Go back and look at the game. Several holds were missed against both teams, but the two blatant holds on Adams that weren’t called didn’t result in a punt – both times GB scored a TD, so the non-calls didn’t hurt them. It wasn’t the same for Dallas, and the refs were horrible the entire game (starting with the ridiculous call on Butler, which set the tone for how they would call that game).

    So, as a hater, of course you will second guess and become the holier-than-thou Monday morning QB. We have heard it all before, yet it doesn’t change what happened, nor convince anybody who saw the game otherwise. So go away and give whatever team you root for attention on their threads.

  52. He would have to be a free agent, and be cheap or free. In long run they would be better off enticing Rivers to Denver. The Broncos would go from 7th most likely to win LII to somewhere in the top 3 most likely.

  53. Correction – Crosby kicked a 56 yard FG after the Brown PI call.

    Had they called it correctly, on 4th down it would have been a 61 yard FG attempt, which of course they would have punted it there. That right there is 3 pts in favor of GB due to a bad call, which was the margin of victory.

  54. aqibhasmorepick6sthantylaw says:
    Jan 29, 2017 2:12 PM

    That “flaming moron” is 2-0 in AFCCG against your Pats…
    ————————————————————
    I loved that first one. Broncos crow about winning the AFC title game, strut into the SB and then get humiliated by the Seahawks in epic fashion.

    All due credit for the 1 year dynasty through.

  55. Put Romo in New England and they are a shoo-in AFC winners and legitimate SB contenders. Put Romo in Denver behind that porous line, defense with no Wade Phillips and they will be lucky to finish 3rd in their division. That’s the difference between the GOAT manager, Belichick and a pretender Elway.

  56. jsrdc says:
    Jan 29, 2017 5:14 PM

    @ carloswlassiter

    Really? From what I remember, they were absolutely going for the win before they ended up kicking the FG to tie it

    What really hamstrung the Cowboys were the horrible refs and their terrible calls, including incorrect placing of the ball on more than one occasion
    ————————————————————-
    Spiking the ball on first down on that final Cowboy drive was the worst “turtle” call I’ve ever seen and is the direct reason they failed to get the 1st down on that series and had to kick the FG to tie.

    As for bad calls against Dallas? Give me a frickin’ break. The calls blown in that game were clear as a bell and they were Deavante Adams having his shoulder pads yanked out while running pass patterns in the 1st half.

  57. @ carloswlassiter

    “Spiking the ball on first down on that final Cowboy drive was the worst “turtle” call I’ve ever seen and is the direct reason they failed to get the 1st down on that series and had to kick the FG to tie.”
    _______________________________________

    Einstein, it is no wonder you are not an NFL coach. They did that to preserve their last T.O. Most coaches would have made the same call. They didn’t get a first down because they didn’t complete the 3rd and 3 pass. Had you argued they should have run it, that would be fine, but as was said before, they completed 16 first downs with passing, and only 6 with rushing. It makes sense to pass it there from that perspective.

    “As for bad calls against Dallas? Give me a frickin’ break. The calls blown in that game were clear as a bell and they were Deavante Adams having his shoulder pads yanked out while running pass patterns in the 1st half.”

    ________________________________________

    That was already discussed, swifty – did you not read the entire post? Specifically, I stated: “Go back and look at the game. Several holds were missed against both teams, but the two blatant holds on Adams that weren’t called didn’t result in a punt – both times GB scored a TD, so the non-calls didn’t hurt them.”

    Don’t act as though I am being partisan by not mentioning the obvious. Did you happen to see the two holds in a row on Witten late in the 2nd quarter (the second of which was so obvious where he was pretty much tackled before the pass and they explained it away as “feet tangling”. That would have put Dallas at 1st and goal, but no call. Dallas had to settle for a FG – a 4 point swing in favor of GB.

    And there was also the blatant hold on David Irving by TJ Lang on the play where Rodgers made that unbelievable throw for the winning FG. Lang had Irving in a choke hold – go back and look at the play. It was obvious, and the ref was looking his way, but no call.

    I don’t know what is more pathetic – your response or the officiating in that game.

  58. It seems like yesterday. What a fool old horse was for bringing in Manning. He lasted 4 years, 2 Super Bowls, 1 Lombardi, 4 AFC West crowns………so how does that taste, punk!

  59. @ nhpats says:

    “Jsrdc – so it was the refs fault?”

    The refs don’t score the points – that is the offense’s job. With that said, the calls they made/missed took points off the board for the Cowboys, but didn’t influence any of GB’s drives negatively with the blatant missed calls against Adams (who went nuts after the 2nd hold was missed, and rightly so).

    The call on Butler (unsportsmanlike) which was a terrible call (Butler never entered the huddle, and was looking at the sidelines pretty much the whole time) that took the Cowboys out of FG range after a 22 yard completion that would have put Dallas in the red zone. So do the refs decisions at least play a part of the final score? Absolutely, in this game it did anyway. Go have a look for yourself regarding all the bad calls or non-calls. Many news outlets reported the same thing for this game.

    We will all see how the refs call the Super Bowl – we all know Rodgers and Brady whine incessantly if the Refs miss calls on them. I never want to believe that bad calls or missed calls influence the outcome of games, but there has been too many examples (especially this year) where their calls have impacted the outcome of games. The refs were absolutely horrendous this year as a whole, and should be held accountable for their terrible performance (or at least the bad calls should be reviewable as an alternative).

  60. Phew. I’m glad jsrdc is here to set us straight. I thought Dallas choked away another playoff game, but now I see that it was all a vast conspiracy of bad officiating.

    Let me guess – you’re still apoplectic about that Dez Bryant non catch in Green Bay and blame the refs for that one too?

  61. mlhigh says:
    Jan 29, 2017 7:38 PM

    It seems like yesterday. What a fool old horse was for bringing in Manning. He lasted 4 years, 2 Super Bowls, 1 Lombardi, 4 AFC West crowns………so how does that taste, punk!
    ————————————————————-
    It tasted great this year when the salary cap excesses blew up in their face, they had to start an insurance agent at QB and, despite a fantastic D, missed the playoffs altogether.

  62. carloswlassiter says:

    Phew. I’m glad jsrdc is here to set us straight. I thought Dallas choked away another playoff game, but now I see that it was all a vast conspiracy of bad officiating.

    Conspiracy? Stevie Wonder could have seen how bad the officiating was for both teams, so yes, there are those who need to be set straight for various reasons, including anyone who believes the officiating was even adequate in that game. All the calls I mentioned are right there on the game film, so you don’t have to take my word for it. Watch it for yourself, but curiously when you are a hater, missed calls and bad calls don’t seem to matter. Just so predictable, bro!

    A 3 pt difference in a game is “choking” away a game? The Cowboys were down 21-3 at one point, and fell short in the end 34-31. Hardly choking, but I digress. GB is who choked against Atlanta – GB was absolutely blown out by a far superior team, and GB didn’t look qualified to be on the same field. I see that you had nothing further to say about the holding calls , nor the “turtle” comment. Your NFL coaching experience from that armchair doesn’t cut it when

    “Let me guess – you’re still apoplectic about that Dez Bryant non catch in Green Bay and blame the refs for that one too?”

    Ahhhh, and now you are guessing. The catch/non-catch debate may continue to be discussed for years to come regarding Dez until the rule is further clarified. The problem is that the refs are not consistent on calling that one either, because the rule, as it currently stands, is a joke. It is still open to interpretation by the officials. See the TD catch by Cole Beasley against Cleveland this year that was very similar to Dez’s catch, yet Beasley’s was called a TD.

  63. Romo back, looking, looking, here comes the pass rush, OMG, Romo is decapitated. His head is rolling around in his helmet on the field of Mile High. Folks, this is just terrible. And now, a break for our sponsors.

  64. If released , Romo would be signed in a minute by Denver. His base salary for Dallas this year is $14 mil. For a starting QKB in the NFL that is a bargain , add in an incentive laden contract where he can earn close to $20 mil ( if he lasts all season) and they immediately become a SB contender. I didn’t think their oline was that bad? Just crappy QB play.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.