Paul Tagliabue regrets downplaying concussions in 1994

Getty Images

As former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue prepares for his latest — and perhaps best and last — shot at enshrinement in the Hall of Fame, he has addressed directly and candidly one of the issues that could be the hardest for the selectors to overcome: Tagliabue’s attitude toward concussions.

In an interview with Ron Borges, Clark Judge, and Rick Gosselin of the Talk of Fame Sports Network, Tagliabue was confronted with his decision to describe concussions as “one of those pack-journalism issues” in 1994, adding that “there is no increase in concussions, the number is relatively small, the problem is the journalist issue.”

“Obviously, I do regret those remarks,” Tagliabue told Borges, Judge, and Gosselin. “Looking back, it was not sensible language to use to express my thoughts at the time. My language was intemperate, and it led to a serious misunderstanding. I overreacted on issues which we were already working on, but that doesn’t excuse the overreaction and intemperate language. Bottom line, it sounded like I was shooting the messenger, instead of dealing with the message which was the concussion issue.”

Tagliabue opted not to admit to a similar error in appointing Dr. Elliott Pellman to chair the Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee in 1994. Pressed to explain why Tagliabue would put Dr. Pellman, a rheumatologist, in charge of such an important committee, Tagliabue provided a long-winded answer that ultimately justified the decision by explaining that “the chairman of  committee needs to be able to work with people, needs to be able to recruit people, he needs to identify the special knowledge . . . that’s being addressed, but does not necessarily have to be a specialist in that particular area if he has other qualities and other skills that are supportive of what you’re trying to accomplish.”

To have real credibility within the committee and with those who will be asked to accept the committee’s work, it’s vital that the chairman be a specialist in the field in question. And if that’s the best argument Tagliabue can muster for putting a non-specialist in charge of such an important area of research, it’s going to be hard to convince at least 80 percent of the selectors to put Tagliabue in the Hall of Fame.

Notwithstanding his willingness to admit to an error when discussing concussions in 1994, Tagalibue’s candor underscores the chronic failure of the league to take the issue seriously at any point in his tenure, with the apparent strategy being to downplay and dismiss the issue and to denigrate those who were proving via the application of scientific principles and painstaking study that chronic brain trauma leads to potentially serious health consequences. With the league not taking the issue seriously until more than three years after Tagliabue’s tenure ended, it’s going to be even hard to convince at least 80 percent of the selectors to put Tagliabue in the Hall of Fame.

16 responses to “Paul Tagliabue regrets downplaying concussions in 1994

  1. Times change and science changes. People used to smoke offices, in restaurants, inside cars with small children present. We didn’t used to wear seatbelts. Are all of our parents evil for not making us wear seatbelts 40 years ago?

  2. There’s just no excuse for lying about it. Nobody likes Goodell, but the biggest rotten tomatoes for Goodell are the ones Tagliabue left on the table when Goodell took over. They’re both garbage human beings.

  3. Being from Baltimore, I dislike Tagliabue by default. That said, he’s about as ethical as any other CEO that runs a large corporation. If this issue keeps him out, then they need to remove all Commissioners from consideration from this point forward. They do what’s in the best interest of the company at that point in time, and don’t always think about the aftermath. Just the way it is.

  4. It’s not an insignificant issue. And I suppose the voters will have to decide whether he didn’t know then what he knows now. If he knew and went ahead with the cover-up, well, people died and that should be sufficient for not getting in.

    And if this happens to be the reason for him to get voted down, then it applies to Jerry Jones even more. Jones is still in denial. And Jones has a lot of other reasons for not getting voted in to the NFL HoF.

  5. and that is how you take accountability

    the classy tagliabue needs to return to the nfl and rid
    the nfl of the decade-long plague of sheriff goebbels

  6. I wonder if he also regrets giving Jacksonville an expansion team instead of Baltimore and announcing that Baltimore had no shot through expansion, which of course set in motion the luring away of the Browns which then forced the decision to give Cleveland an unplanned and much worse expansion team?

    Because that too could have been handled better by Mr. Tagliabue.

  7. Apology accepted. We get it more than ever with the current commissioner. What is best for the league slash you, is all that matters.Just get rich, let the future worry about it.

  8. Where are all those Anti-Goodell hypocrites? Shouldn’t they be pouncing on the guy who oversaw the cover-up?

  9. Contrition – there’s a novel thought. Something this commissioner could learn a lot from.

    Tagliabue deserves the criticism but he also deserves the praise for owning up to it. Even if it is of limited capacity. Makes Goodell look like the bigger fool than he already is.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.