Leonard Fournette only rookie to avoid offsets, so far

Getty Images

The numbers are trickling in regarding the contracts signed by the players selected three weeks ago in the draft. In the top 10, half have signed their deals. Only one has avoided the oft-contentious offset language.

The Jaguars gave running back Leonard Fournette, the fourth pick in round one, a fully-guaranteed contract with no offset language. At this point, it’s no longer about the selection slot; whether offset language will appear in the contract depends on the team. The Jaguars, even with new-boss-old-boss Tom Coughlin running the show, are one of the few to not worry about how the worst-case scenario of a top-10 picking being cut within the first four years will be cleaned up financially. If it all goes to hell in a handwarmer, the player gets his money from the Jaguars, along with whatever someone else will pay him.

The Browns do worry about the worst case; the deal signed by defensive end Myles Garrett, the first overall pick, includes offset language. Ditto for the other top-10 picks who have signed: Chargers receiver Mike Williams (No. 7); Panthers running back Christian McCaffrey (No. 8); and Bengals receiver John Ross (No. 9).

For Williams, who is represented by the same firm (CAA) that held out Chargers defensive end Joey Bosa last year in part due to the offset issue, the compromise came from guaranteed roster bonuses due on the fifth day of training camp in 2018, 2019, and 2020. (The Texans applied the same approach to quarterback DeShaun Watson, the twelfth overall pick, paying fifth-day-of-camp roster bonuses in lieu of removing offset language.)

This approach gives the player a sliver of protection by paying out a significant chunk of cash roughly a month before final roster cuts. Offsets aren’t an issue as to money that already has been paid; by pushing compensation from base salary into an early-camp roster bonus, the player can essentially double dip.

The only risk from this technique arises from the potential voiding of the guarantee by a suspension coupled with the possible placement of the player on the Non-Football Injury/Illness list to start training camp. While in theory a rare combination of events, it happened last year to former Dolphins defensive end Dion Jordan, wiping out $1.7 million.

UPDATE 12:05 p.m. ET: Per a source with knowledge of the various contracts, the Bosa and Williams deals include language guaranteeing payment of the training-camp roster bonuses even if the players are on active/NFI. Watson’s deal does not contain that same language.

15 responses to “Leonard Fournette only rookie to avoid offsets, so far

  1. WORST Player Union in any professional sport which is especially bad because the players have the shortest careers with the most long-term health consequences.

  2. TheBrownswillstinkagain says:
    May 21, 2017 10:28 AM

    NFL contracts border on scam
    *******************
    They really don’t, IMO, b/c the players, through their union’s contract, agreed to how they are structured. It was all negotiated and agreed to in 2011. The players are getting what they wanted.

  3. NFL contracts border on scam
    *******************
    They really don’t, IMO, b/c the players, through their union’s contract, agreed to how they are structured. It was all negotiated and agreed to in 2011. The players are getting what they wanted.

    ******************

    That means no one is getting what they wanted.

  4. “The Browns do worry about the worst case…”

    So they HAVE been paying attention. I wasn’t sure.

  5. curious: I wonder how many people posting get fully guaranteed contracts with a defined time span with their employers? Thumbs up: no…Thumbs down: yes

  6. curious: I wonder how many people posting have guaranteed contracts for a defined time span with their employers?
    Thumbs up: no…Thumbs down: yes…

  7. The Chargers will long regret the treating of Bosa, reading between the lines I get the feeling he is gone from that organization when he gets the chance…if it happens, they are the only one’s to blame….you reap what you sow.

  8. The owners have it right with demanding offset language.

    Players shouldn’t be able to “double dip” if they were so bad that the team that drafted them is willing to cut them and their guaranteed salary.

    And what happens when a player on a rookie deal decides he doesn’t want to play for that team any more? He could purposely tank, get cut, and then would be free to sign a new deal with the team of his choosing on top of the 4-year guaranteed salary he was already collecting.

  9. “I wonder how many posting get fully guaranteed contracts for a defined time span with their employers?”

    What does this even mean? Why do people continually attempt to equate a pro athlete’s compensation situation to that of the “common man”? There are about 2,000 people on the planet with the talent to play a sport that generates billions annually. Of course they are going to be compensated differently than the common man.

  10. The Jaguars will regret the contract when Fournette turns out to be a bust.

  11. Sounds like the roster bonuses are a good enough compromise on the offset language. Either way, these players should know the really big money comes after their 4th or 5th season when the second contract is signed. You won’t worry about any potential losses on the first contract if the second contract is large enough.

  12. Sounds like a non-issue to me. I think even the top ten picks only get about 1% of a teams cap anyway. I could see this being an issue if they were still signing the pre-2011 draft pick contracts.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.