Mark Murphy: Packers will never give up a home date for an international game

.

The Packers accept the fact that the NFL won’t host a Super Bowl at Lambeau Field. And since the Packers won’t host a Super Bowl at Lambeau Field, they won’t have to automatically sacrifice a home game to the league’s ongoing overseas obsession.

Thus, via SportsBusiness Daily, Packers CEO Mark Murphy told shareholders on Monday that the team will “never” make that swap.

The league office eventually could disagree. Even if the usual suspects continue to be the ones who give up home games for games in Europe, Mexico, or elsewhere, the league’s ongoing expansion of the international games could make a squeezing of the Packers and other teams supposedly immune from the obligation vulnerable.

Or maybe the league will offer the Packers some other sort of deal in exchange for a home game. Without knowing what the offer would be, it’s impossible to know that the Packers would refuse it.

So while “never” may draw cheers from the shareholders/fans who were at Lambeau Field on Monday (it did), “never” is the kind of commitment that it will be hard for Murphy to honor.

Of course, he only has to honor it for as long as he’s the CEO.

28 responses to “Mark Murphy: Packers will never give up a home date for an international game

  1. every team should be forced to give up 1 home game over a period of time. keep things equal between all teams , no one should be exempt

  2. How is it that a team can dictate this to the NFL? Fans of other teams also want all home games at their home grounds. If the NFL is committed to playing some overseas games, then all 32 teams should share in this over the long term.

  3. I think a fair deal for the league to offer them would be: Here’s the deal, you go ahead and play a home game abroad and we’ll let you stay in the league.

  4. Wait until the day that the league expands the schedule to 17 games with EVERY team playing 8 home games, 8 opposition home games and 1 neutral game for EVERY TEAM……it’s gonna happen.

  5. If I remember correctly, the super bowl mandate was recent. Teams were forced to give up a game for the London thing and could only protect a few games from being chosen. That is how Miami had to give up a division “home” game in London. Later they had to give up another game for the SB bid.

  6. And if Jerry said the same thing, he’d be getting raves for standing up to the league

  7. “every team should be forced to give up 1 home game over a period of time. keep things equal between all teams , no one should be exempt”

    That’s how it was sold when this thing was started 10 years ago. Funny, but I’ve yet to see Patriots, Cowboys, Steelers, Giants give up home game. I could live 100 years longer and die before I’d see any of those league pets give up a home game.

  8. Excuse me…the Packers are a community-owned franchise. They exist for the sake of their home town, unlike literally every other NFL franchise, which is run at the whims of an owner. To take a home game from the Packers is to take away directly from ownership. No, the Packers are NOT like other NFL franchises, and so yes, they should be given differing treatment in this regard.

  9. The NFL owns the packers so they won’t force the packers to play in Europe. Ever. That is why Murphy can say “never”. You would think the NFL would want to showcase a star QB like Rodgers before his decline.

  10. “Thus, via SportsBusiness Daily, Packers CEO Mark Murphy told shareholders on Monday that the team will “never” make that swap.”

    ________________________________

    Well, bad news for SportsBusiness Daily … I was at the Packers Shareholders meeting and guess what … the two concepts were never linked. Mark Murphy never said that because Green Bay would never host a Super Bowl, that the Packers would never WILLINGLY give up a home game to play an international game.

    He outlined all of the reasons why Green Bay would not host a Super Bowl and they’re all legitimate, adding that the Packers would do their best to host NFC Championship games instead.

    What also isn’t addressed here is that teams scheduled to play the Packers in THEIR stadium also do not want to sacrifice those home games because Packers’ fans travel so well that the host team doesn’t want to give up THAT home game against the Packers due to the revenues generated by having the Packers in town.

  11. Drunk Off Cheese says:

    Teams that have no chance of ever hosting a superbowl or a draft should be able to decline int’l games.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    I was going to say that GB can host a SB as soon as they put a domed stadium up.

    But then I remembered that Green Bay doesn’t have the infrastructure to host a SB.

    Mark Murphy suffers from the same disease that most Packer fans do – headuptheirasseritis.

    He doesn’t dictate game locations to the NFL. The NFL dictates game locations.

    If Mark doesn’t like it, he can join another league.

  12. I don’t think any bottom-half team would want the Packers to play in London. When the Packers come to town it’s a sold-out game.

  13. It is hilarious to see that vikings trolls have nothing better to do than to comment on Packer’s stories. It is called the Master-Slave Paradigm. If you went to college you may have learned about it. With so many years of feeling inferior to the Pack the vikings fans have become conditioned to just attack anything regarding Green Bay. They even have make believe fantasies that they feel are real such as really believing the ref’s aid them in any way.

    It’s not healthy, seek help boys!

  14. The Cheese Packers are getting very arrogant.

    It is time to force them to act like they belong in this league or they can go pound sand in their own home sandbox for eternity.

  15. Doesn’t mean the Packers won’t play in Europe.. they could play as a “visiting” team.

    “Green Bay @ Jacksonville” could be played in Europe.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.