NFLPA gathering info about Lucky Whitehead’s release

Getty Images

The Cowboys used a fire-ready-aim approach to the termination of Lucky Whitehead. The NFL Players Association will use a more deliberate approach in responding to the situation.

Then again, anything would be more deliberate than what the Cowboys did.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the NFLPA have begun the process of exploring the situation, reaching out to Whitehead and his agent, David Rich, for more information.

That doesn’t mean anything will happen. Indeed, there may be nothing that can be done when a team exercises its prerogative to waive a player for off-field reasons that may be factually inaccurate.

The best argument possibly comes from paragraph 11 of the Standard Player Contract, which authorizes termination “if Player has engaged in personal conduct reasonably judged by Club to adversely affect or reflect on Club.” If Whitehead actually didn’t engage in the conduct that the team deemed him guilty of engaging in, the termination could be challenged.

But then what? To have any potential recovery, he’d likely have to prove he would have made it to the team’s 53-man roster come September. And that seems speculative at best.

Either way, look for nothing to happen until the waiver period expires on Wednesday, since it’s a no-harm, no-foul situation if another team claims his contract.

Also, look for Rich to join PFT Live on Wednesday to discuss one or the more bizarre NFL sets of facts in recent history.

31 responses to “NFLPA gathering info about Lucky Whitehead’s release

  1. They decided to give Lucky an opportunity to pursue his career elsewhere. What’s so complicated about that?

    “Kids, we took ‘Lucky’ to the pound today so he can be well taken care of by the nice people there until he finds a better home than we could give him….”

  2. Fact: Lucky Whitehead’s roster spot was already firmly in jeopardy due to his on-field failures. He wasn’t providing enough of a return-game boost, had fumbling issues, and wasn’t making an impact as a receiver. Meanwhile, Dallas drafted a would-be replacement, and the numbers game almost certainly necessitated Whitehead not making the roster. Meanwhile, Whitehead had rubbed the team the wrong way in the locker room/off the field at times in the past, which for a player of such questionable contributions was pushing the envelope. When the news of his would-be arrest broke, Dallas simply accelerated the given future outcome, figuring it wasn’t worth another player in the headlines and more roster uncertainty for a player who was only currently on the roster by default due to its extended state.

    In other words, the latest non-incident was only the straw that broke the camel’s back, not the primary “weight” that did the breaking. It doesn’t change the fact that it was still only a straw. Meanwhile, Dallas has been patient and supportive of low-roster players (Josh Brent) in the past, further proving that Whitehead’s release was already inevitable.

  3. Based upon the articles I’ve read about “Lucky” and his trials/tribulations, it reads that he’s on the path of one bone-headed move/shady person affiliation after another. It “seems” that he’s a clueless person.

    But, shoplifting charge? Ok, Dallas. You’ve dealt with that before. Ok, Ok. I get it. You have more info than any of us could imagine. Huge info.

    What I truly find ironic is: this didn’t happen until after PFT’s post about, “gulp”, the Cowboys’ inactivity on holding players accountable for their behavior.

    Irony, Part 2: If “Lucky” was a valid superstar on their roster? He would’ve skated…. something PFT touts time and time again.

    Hmmm… I’m thinking “Lucky” colluded with the Ruskies.

  4. Has it ever crossed your mind that Lucky Whitehead isn’t that good of a player? Dallas drafted a player at HIS position and that player is TAKING his job. Younger, faster, stays out of trouble. Typical Dallas article. Haters always bashing America’s team. No one ever cared about Whitehead while he wore the star but now that he is gone, everyone comes to his defense. Pathetic.

  5. Cowboy fans are a disgrace. Lucky was on the team until being falsely accused and cut in a blink of an eye. There was no “opportunity” given to him he was tossed aside like a piece of garbage while the criminal element who are stars remain unscathed. Those guys are “supported” by the biggest criminal of them all, Jerry Jones.

  6. 20 Cowboys got arrested this off season and they are all still on the team. This guy wasn’t even in Virginia and is cut without anyone from the organization even doing basic research which would have shown he was in Texas at the time.

  7. The Cowboys screwed this up by not investigating the issue thoroughly. They bring all this crap on themselves — seeking the spotlight, touting the America’s Team mantra, taking risks on players of questionable character to win, and treating the behavior of stars differently than fringe players (admittedly treating stars differently is like 90% of all teams). Cowboy fans bask in all this largely undeserved attention and then get mad when other fans poke at their team with sharp sticks for that stuff? All that attention comes at a cost folks. . . . .

  8. officialgame says:
    Jul 25, 2017 5:31 PM
    20 Cowboys got arrested this off season and they are all still on the team. This guy wasn’t even in Virginia and is cut without anyone from the organization even doing basic research which would have shown he was in Texas at the time.

    —————————-

    Yeah, the Cowboys police blotter/substance abuse cases were getting out of control. It would look like they got sick of the constant nonsense, decided to make an example for sending a message, and now have had the most unfortunate and awkward turns of events.

    But if they do have any legal exposure over the contract wording what they should do is let him back on the team so they are in accordance with the contract, bring him into camp, and let nature take its course.

  9. Oh Lord, here we go. The union and that bumbling idiot D Smith are stepping in.
    The only thing that makes me more sick to my stomach than Jerry Jones’ screechy southern drawl is that little fedora wearing hobbit D Smith.
    If you listened closely NFLPA the Cowboys said this was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Translation: he wasn’t going to make the 53 man anyway.
    Leave this one alone and go focus your energies on much more pressing and morally pressing issues like getting Greg Hardy and Ray Rice back in the league.

  10. officialgame says:

    Jul 25, 2017 5:31 PM
    20 Cowboys got arrested this offseaon….

    So you just make stuff up at this point? 2 Cowboy players, TWO, have been arrested in all of 2017. One in May, one in July. That’s a far cry from 20.

  11. This is the downside to fans clamoring to criticize the NFL about everything.

    If you want swift action before the legal system runs its course this is a potential side effect.

  12. take a few draft picks and some cap space away . . . and pay the man a settlement far more than he should have been paid for his skill and contract . . . see right to me

  13. So the same fans who want Zeke punished, suspended and/or released for something he’s not guilty of are bashing Dallas for releasing a player for something he’s not guilty of? Do you trolls see how quickly your attitudes change depending on what move Dallas makes? Pathetic really. Perhaps y’all should get lives

  14. Really a shame they defamed him when they released him. They were going to cut him anyway but couldn’t stop themselves from climbing on their soapbox to distract people from their lack of action on Elliott.

  15. thegreatgabbert says:
    Jul 25, 2017 4:59 PM

    They decided to give Lucky an opportunity to pursue his career elsewhere. What’s so complicated about that?

    ———————-

    dis·in·gen·u·ous
    ˌdisənˈjenyo͞oəs

    adj.

    pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.

  16. SO I am confused here. Was he arrested in a case of mistaken identity?
    or
    was someone else arrested who looked similar to him and was his name just tossed out there?

    This whole thing is just weird… and frankly, I am shocked Jerry would cut this guy without facts. I get that his roster spot was in jeopardy but still…

  17. For the Cowboys to pull the trigger that quick, he was gonna be gone anyway.
    He’s probably just not good enough to waste time on. And it sounds like they were already sick of him.
    Bro, when the Cowboys cut you for character, you’re pretty much done.
    I hope you’ve figured out another way to make a living. I’m guessing the NFL ain’t gonna be it.

  18. redsoxu571 says:
    Jul 25, 2017 5:06 PM
    Fact: Lucky Whitehead’s roster spot was already firmly in jeopardy due to his on-field failures. He wasn’t providing enough of a return-game boost, had fumbling issues, and wasn’t making an impact as a receiver.
    =====

    Fact: Garrett mentioned none of those things when talking to the press about why they cut him but focused only on his off field problems making the player look bad and the team look good.

  19. Dallas Cowboys and Prince William County Police are both poorly run organizations that think they are much better than they are; but, PW Police admitted a mistake

  20. Posted by Blitz:
    “Lost dog—brown fur, some missing due to mange, blind in one eye, deaf, lame leg due to recent traffic accident, slightly arthritic. Goes by the name of ‘Lucky.’”

  21. Lifelong Cowboys fan here…… Whether Lucky would have made the roster or not, this is terrible treatment to a member of your organization! Hope Lucky gets his full contract paid by the Cowboys and gets an opportunity elsewhere.

  22. The NFLPA has decided to become involved only to substantiate their ability to demand dues from their player members. After all, impedidy dimp maurice smith needs to maintain his hat collection. Lucky Whitehead was going to lose his job no matter the circumstances.

  23. As a lawyer, you must know how absurd that position is. The guy could have been released the day prior with absolutely nobody crying foul. They do not need a reason to release someone nor do they need to provide one. They could say they released him because they thought he talked to aliens and it wouldn’t matter. What is the NFLPA’s argument? “We know they didn’t need a reason to release Lucky but they did it as soon as he was falsely accused of petty theft and that looks bad? There is no legal recourse unless it was discriminatory or some form of retaliation like in a whistleblower case or similar situations carved out in employment/contract laws. This situation is not one of those so this is all just a dog and pony show of union chest thumping.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.