Cyrus Mehri hopes to change league’s discipline policy by 2018 if elected NFLPA leader

Getty Images

Cyrus Mehri has a website, a platform and now a campaign to unseat DeMaurice Smith as the NFLPA’s executive director. But the civil rights attorney won’t know until mid-October whether he gets to challenge Smith for the job.

A 14-member selection committee and, if necessary, the 32-member board of player representatives gets to decide whether to sign Smith to a contract extension without a March election.

Thus, Mehri, who announced his candidacy last month, stopped in Dallas on Tuesday night for the first of a series of town hall meetings in NFL cities. Although no current players attended, Mike Singletary, Daryl Johnston and Mike Scooter McGruder were among a handful of former players who listened, took notes and asked questions of Mehri.

Mehri laid out his campaign promises.

“I have three major critiques,” Mehri said. “1. De forfeited hundreds of millions of dollars per year; 2. He gave the commissioner a blank check on discipline. The consequences of that is having a process that doesn’t have independence, doesn’t have checks and balances, that lacks credibility; 3. It was horrible for the players that he agreed to this deal for 10 years, which is pretty much unprecedented in labor agreements. A lousy deal for 10 years. It’s great for the owners, which is their franchises have more than doubled in value, while players are still being put down.”

Mehri said revamping the league’s discipline policy is among the initial items on his to-do list.

“If I’m elected, in the first hundred days, I’m going to sit down with the commissioner and top brass and reform this discipline system, so we’ll have checks and balances for when the 2018 season starts up,” said Mehri, who was instrumental in the league adopting the Rooney Rule. “My guiding light is this: What’s best for the game? . . . I’ve taken the word ‘concessions’ out of the dialogue, and all we’re going to be talking about is what’s best for the game. What’s best for the game is to reform that system. What’s also best for the game is to dramatically improve the resources particularly at the club level to deal with and minimize and prevent from happening some of these off-the-field issues. Issues of DUIs. Issues of drug abuse. Issues of domestic violence that have kept players from playing, and they’re also human tragedies. So if we really redouble or triple the effort on that, to me, that’s something labor and management should be on the same page on, which is prevention of problems.

“That’s the difference between me and the incumbent, because the incumbent’s relationship is so poisonous and so contentious [with the NFL] that they can’t be problem-solving, but problem-solving is focusing on prevention of these issues.”

Mehri proposes a “Talking Tuesday” session for players once a month, where they can discuss issues of importance to them. He proposes 60-man rosters, shortening the waiting period for a second contract and reducing the preseason to three games as well as the obvious of negotiating a new Collective Bargaining Agreement.

“There’s such a gap on the issue of guaranteed money between NFL players who have the highest risk and other sports leagues in this country,” Mehri said. “In our platform is a series of reforms that create pathways to get players into more guaranteed money. So item one is that right now you have to get to the second contract in years four or five. Well, we know there are superstars in this league that you don’t need to wait five years to know they’re superstars. Like Odell Beckham. Do we need to wait five years for that? So when the average NFL player career is three years I’m going to be trying to accelerate the second contract to be aligned with the average player career. Second, there’s a series of loopholes in the salary cap that prevent players from getting to the guaranteed money, so we’re going to try to address that. So there’s a whole series of economic changes. But No. 1, De Smith is going to keep this current agreement into 2021, and he’s saying there’s a virtual certainty there will be a work stoppage. What I’m saying is we’re going to negotiate in the spring of 2018, and we’re going to start tackling issues one at a time until we have a whole new CBA. But there might be some issues we can resolve and announce while we’re still negotiating the economics.”

10 responses to “Cyrus Mehri hopes to change league’s discipline policy by 2018 if elected NFLPA leader

  1. Mehri promises to get a player friendly discipline system, bigger contracts for stars, increased roster sizes, and one less revenue producing game, all without giving the NFL owners anything in return. Good look with that, but don’t be surprised when the players fall for it. Eventually the owners will slice them another fraction of a percentage point of overall revenue and the players will hand over even more concessions for it.

  2. I’m always amused at how much the media plays up the discipline issue and Goodell’s power over it. That effects like 1% of players. And of that small percentage only a fraction have legitimate issues with how suspensions are handed out. The majority of players are not going to go to the mat for Brady and Elliot.

  3. While I will be the first person to say that I don’t think that De Smith is good at his job, I think this guy might be worse.

    What’s also best for the game is to dramatically improve the resources particularly at the club level to deal with and minimize and prevent from happening some of these off-the-field issues. Issues of DUIs. Issues of drug abuse. Issues of domestic violence that have kept players from playing, and they’re also human tragedies.

    Right, not punishing players for these things is better for the game. It will kill it, for whatever people want to say – the suspensions of Adrian Peterson, Greg Hardy, Ray Rice, Ray McDonald, and then Ezekiel Elliot, they were and are needed. Their innocence or guilt is for the justice department, and frankly it doesn’t matter. They put themselves in a bad situation and the public wants their pound of flesh, so these issues cost the league and the players alot of money, so that conduct (innocent or guilty) is detrimental to the league and more people that advocate for no repercussions is very very bad for the league.

  4. And the incentive for the NFL to change anything before they have to is what? Sounds like a great plan but if I’m the NFL why do I agree to give up my ability to punish as I see fit? Why do I want to give up more money to the players before I have to?

    I get that it would be best for the game, but welcome to labor relations. There is a contract, so the person that has favorable conditions in that contract has no incentive to redo them. Unless Mehri is going to give up something to get Roger to the table.

  5. I agree with 2-3 year rookie deal, But it will really only reward the rookies that blow up-mid level Guys that are on the bubble and are serving as backups will have less of a chance to prove themselves and if they never really got their shot on the field might find themselves out of a job.

    As far as discipline goes- Look I hate Goodell, but I honestly somewhat agree with his heavy handed approach to discipline. I agree that he is over the top at times, but before the personal conduct issue the NFL was literally out of control, the hammer had to be brought down. And everyone knows that in the vast majority of the cases where there is smoke there is fire- AKA Zeke prob did beat that lady, and there is no way that Brady didn’t know the balls were being deflated.

    There are 1,696 players on 53 man rosters, in 2016 a total of 66 of them were suspended for at least one game, or 3.8% of the active players. Like another poster said, while publicly most players will stick together, you have to wonder in private how many of them that DON’T do stupid stuff that gets them suspended really take issue with how the discipline for the ones that do commit infractions is handed down.

  6. I think the Players’ union should have a Player as president. This guy is in the realm of rainbows and unicorns. A beloved veteran player who has been victimized by the current CBA has a lot more ground to stand on than the guy that brought us the Rooney Rule. Of course the LAWYER won’t mind negotiating for 3 years. He gets to spend the player pension fund to hire all his buddies from law school at a few hundred bucks an hour to do it.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!