Jeremy Lane: I blew 0.03, why was I arrested for DUI?

Getty Images

Seahawks cornerback Jeremy Lane took to Twitter today in response to his driving under the influence arrest yesterday, and he suggested that he didn’t deserve to be arrested.

Lane wrote on Twitter that his blood-alcohol level was below the legal limit in the state of Washington.

“A fail DUI is 0.08 right ? I blew 0.03 why was still arrest,” Lane wrote, “I’ll just leave it at that.”

[tweet https://twitter.com/StayingInMyLane/status/952978177709694976%5D

However, the law does not leave it at that. Although a driver who blows a 0.08 will be arrested, Washington law makes clear that a driver can be arrested for DUI if “He or she is found to be driving a vehicle under the influence or affected by alcohol, any drug, or a combination of alcohol and drugs, regardless of the concentration of alcohol in their breath or blood.”

What other factors led the officer to make the arrest are unknown, but the mere fact that he blew a 0.03 won’t be enough to get Lane off the hook, either with the law or with the league office, which could issue a suspension, or with the Seahawks, who may not want Lane on their team in 2018.

94 responses to “Jeremy Lane: I blew 0.03, why was I arrested for DUI?

  1. Maybe whilst he was driving he neglected to……. wait for it……. “stay in his Lane?”
    Too soon?

  2. When he said he had two drinks, he wasn’t lying. Must be more to this than appears. Otherwise, seems like he is right in publically asking “why?”

  3. Evidently you didn’t ” stay in your Lane “…or you wouldn’t have been arrested….word to the wise…u shouldn’t have hit send on that Twitter feed!!! Next it will be my account was hacked !!!!

  4. On the fact of just the .03 an arrest here seems like bad judgement on officers
    part.Seems like reckless driving ticket where you still have to see a judge is more along the lines of what should have happened.Now this kid will be put through the ringer.

  5. Mr. Lane,

    There is a difference between DUI and DWI. Know the difference. While both are bad, one is technically worse than the other. You were arrested for the lesser of the two evils.

  6. mantastic54 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:47 pm

    What’s the point of using a breathalyzer if you can just arrest someone even if they pass the breathalyzer test?
    ___________________________________________________________________________________

    I’m guessing they’d get a blood sample at some point too which will be far more accurate. That said, even if he’s under the limit, if he’s all over the place or can’t stand up straight, it can be said that’s he’s unable to drive. Also, you be as high as a kite and pass a breathalyzer, that doesn’t mean you aren’t under the influence.

  7. realityonetwo says:

    January 15, 2018 at 2:55 pm

    His lawyer will have him off in time for happy hour.
    __________________________________________________________

    It still sucks to have to pay a lawyer to get you out of a DUI when you blow a .03

  8. We’re still in prehistoric times when it comes to this stuff. Eventually, they’ll have a driving simulator, and the driver will have to reach a certain score that shows reactions, judgement, and decision making ability. Some people would fail the test even if they didn’t have anything to drink. Others could pass the test even if they had a .08 reading. If the goal is really to remove the at risk drivers, alcohol is only part of the problem.

  9. My guess is Lane was uncooperative or rude with the officer. Technically that shouldn’t make a difference, but officers are human and subject to emotion as well. Alternatively, It could be marijuana related as well.

    I had a friend who got a DUI in Washington at 0.05 a few years back. He probably had 5-7 beers over a 5 hour period, which for many adult males definitely keeps you below 0.08 and perfectly capable of driving. The problem is the law isn’t black and white, DUI’s are big money makers for departments and we all know how things work when dollars are involved.

  10. Just because he was .03 for alcohol doesn’t mean he wasn’t under the influence of something else that’s legal in the state of Washington. It has to be taken into consideration now more than ever with the ease of purchasing it.

  11. Yeah, the “I was only arrested because I am a black man” excuse. That’s the ticket. What were the rest of the circumstances involved? Alcohol was .03 but that doesn’t test for prescription/illicit drugs or any combination effects thereof. It must be because he is black like he said in his tweet. I’m sure there was no weaving, falling asleep, not paying attention to petty things like traffic signals, road signs, curbs, medians, turn lanes, one-way travel or other such things that can be routinely ignored. I’m not sure what the requirements are for a blood sample there but that could go a long way to eliminating any substance issues and removing the DUI charge.

  12. Ps

    Even if Lane was a tool the absolute key to police work is to take nothing personal. It’s amazing how much easier it is when you remove that equation. Think of many of the bad things we’ve read recently. A good portion of them are the wrong people being police officers or someone taking something personal. Some people hate the uniform and it’s irrelevant who is wearing it. So if it’s irrelevant, why take it personal?

  13. Just because you blow below the legal limit doesn’t mean you can’t charged with a DUI. There is all kinds of flaws in the DUI cash cow laws in this country. There have been people charged with DUI that blew 0.00. Stop putting yourself in situations that can effect your team, career and life and be responsible…..how about that kid?

  14. I’m a cop and I can tell you the only people who get charged after they blow under the limit are those who acted like imbeciles. He probably ran his mouth.

  15. ratsfoiledagain says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:56 pm
    Mr. Lane,

    There is a difference between DUI and DWI. Know the difference. While both are bad, one is technically worse than the other. You were arrested for the lesser of the two evils.

    No there isn’t, at least not in Washington State. The crime is DUI, the penalties are pretty straightforward. In most states the only distinction between DUI and DWI is what they choose to call it. It’s the same crime. Not sure where you are getting your information from. Read Washington law. You can Google it.

  16. There is arguably another reason the officer could arrest Lane. If an expert
    can testify that based upon his or her experience and training Lane
    was incapable of operating the vehicle…in a safe manner.
    Cops receive extensive training to make this evaluation so
    therefore they are in the eyes of a court an expert.
    Many times the alcohol level is low but perhaps other drugs
    like pain pills or marijuana are suspected.
    I’m not sure what the state of Washington’s laws
    are, as to legal marijuana levels, but have seen some
    bad luck, where a driver had only two drinks but smoked
    weed ..not even that day ..but the combo ..and levels were
    problematic.

  17. Probably going to be knocked down to a careless driving or similar offense. Virtually no way a DUI arrest holds up with a .03 BAC

  18. FinFan68 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 3:02 pm
    Yeah, the “I was only arrested because I am a black man” excuse. That’s the ticket. What were the rest of the circumstances involved? Alcohol was .03 but that doesn’t test for prescription/illicit drugs or any combination effects thereof. It must be because he is black like he said in his tweet. I’m sure there was no weaving, falling asleep, not paying attention to petty things like traffic signals, road signs, curbs, medians, turn lanes, one-way travel or other such things that can be routinely ignored. I’m not sure what the requirements are for a blood sample there but that could go a long way to eliminating any substance issues and removing the DUI charge.
    ——————————————————-

    You get mad if we bring up the “black man” excuse, so you bring it up. WTF

  19. Reading through these comments blows my mind how little the average person knows about drinking and driving, maybe many of them are under 21 or don’t have licenses. The 0.08 limit is just one tool officers use to judge someone under the influence. An alcoholic could be twice that and show zero signs of being impaired while someone who never drinks could be at 0.04 and barely walk straight, both would be arrested. That’s what a field sobriety test is for.
    Who knows what will happen with Lane, he very well may get off but please people, if you have a license, learn the laws you are under!

  20. Sounds a lot like the idiot rule in Europe that states if your passport expires within 6 months then by their rule, it’s already expired and you cant even board a plane. Why 6 months? Why not a year, or 5. So stupid.

  21. charger383 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:53 pm
    They arrested him because they could, DUI is all about money, not safety

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    I know someone who had a family member killed by someone who was driving under the influence. I’d like to see you tell them it’s not about safety.

  22. Anybody who even loosely follows Lane’s tweet history knows….there’s more to this story than just a measly .03 blow test involved with this arrest for DUI.

  23. If he was also under the influence of drugs, it will not register as alcohol content. You can be charged with DUI ( DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE). Does NOT have to be alcohol related, they probably gave him the breathalyzer just to see if he was also drunk.
    Geez, feel like i am teaching toddlers in here

  24. If you can’t pass the field sobriety test, the blood alcohol level is irrelevant. Can’t walk toe to heel? Can’t track with your eyes? Fail.

  25. if he really blew 0.03 and there was no evidence of drug use, then a DUI won’t stick. There’s either more to it, or he will definitely beat this in court.

  26. DUI isn’t just for alcohol. Police are trained to look for signs of other causes of erratic driving like pot or narcotics. Request a blood test if you think you’re innocent.
    Chances are he was driving like an idiot as so many of these arrogant athletes do, and got pulled over.

  27. Maybe he is just a lightweight and was weaving around while driving. Unless he was pulled over for DWB, they had to have a reason to think he was impaired.

  28. A lot of the DUI out there is to make money for people, the government and the industries which manufacture ignition interlock devices, etc.

  29. As someone who has prosecuted and defended DWI’s during different times of my career, the one thing I can say is that any case like this depends on the specific facts of the case (of which we know very little), and the law of the State of Washington (of which most people, including myself, know almost nothing, because DWI laws, and the proofs necessary to convict, vary widely from state to state). In many states, an officer will still arrest you at below 0.08 if he believes the alcohol impaired your ability to drive, or if he believes that you were under the influence of a drug that that also impaired that ability. The blood alcohol level is important, and Lane may have a great defense. But it’s just too soon to tell at this point.

  30. If this were weed there’d be numerous people on here whining about Lane’s predicament because it’s legal. Well, alcohol is legal too last time I checked.

  31. Meanwhile the cop has probably been to 10 wedding receptions and who knows how many police banquets in the last year and left drunk from each and every one of them and hopped right behind the wheel. I’m not defending drinking and driving but I wonder how much we all drive buzzed every time we go to an event or hit the bar on the weekend yet we yell and scream when these stories come up.

  32. What the hell happened to America??? These are the people who vote. Let that sink in

    DUI=Driving Under the Influence

    Anything more than 0.00 is driving under the influence. Arguing that he was drinking and driving but not drunk, isn’t really a good argument. Maybe, he shouldn’t have been driving

  33. He failed the field sobriety testand was probably acting a fool. That is why he was arrested for suspicion of DUI. He is even dumber for blabbering on social media about it. An ambitious DA will so use that against him.

  34. jm91rs says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:56 pm

    mantastic54 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:47 pm

    What’s the point of using a breathalyzer if you can just arrest someone even if they pass the breathalyzer test?
    ___________________________________________________________________________________

    I’m guessing they’d get a blood sample at some point too which will be far more accurate. That said, even if he’s under the limit, if he’s all over the place or can’t stand up straight, it can be said that’s he’s unable to drive. Also, you be as high as a kite and pass a breathalyzer, that doesn’t mean you aren’t under the influence.
    ——
    I can’t believe what I’m reading. This is America. No judge is granting a warrant for a blood draw without probable cause a crime has been committed. The only time you’re going to see a warrant for a blood drive is when a driver is involved in a traffic accident whereby extremely serious bodily injury or death has occurred. So you’re escalating a .003 breathalyzer to allow the government to draw your blood, simply because it wants to? Lane isn’t volunteering a blood draw, so it’s not happening. That is against the law.

  35. .08 % BAC is only the presumptive level for guilt. An impaired driver could be convicted for a lower blood alcohol content if it was proven that the driver was impaired. .08% is just a number. It’s conceivable that a driver could be a .07% or even lower and appear very intoxicated. It’s also conceivable that an over a .08% driver could appear to look fine. Remember, .08% a driver is drunk, even if they don’t show it, end of story. Under .08% a driver may or may not be under the influence it all depends on the officers observation or other evidence. It is however usually pretty difficult to get a conviction for DWI if a driver is under .08% but occasionally it does happen.

  36. maverick2560 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 3:12 pm

    There is arguably another reason the officer could arrest Lane. If an expert
    can testify that based upon his or her experience and training Lane
    was incapable of operating the vehicle…in a safe manner.
    Cops receive extensive training to make this evaluation so
    therefore they are in the eyes of a court an expert.
    Many times the alcohol level is low but perhaps other drugs
    like pain pills or marijuana are suspected.
    I’m not sure what the state of Washington’s laws
    are, as to legal marijuana levels, but have seen some
    bad luck, where a driver had only two drinks but smoked
    weed ..not even that day ..but the combo ..and levels were
    problematic.
    ——–
    No, cops aren’t not considered by the court to be expert witnesses. It’s only when a witness qualifies as expert through a judicial Voir Dire process is a witness qualified as an “expert.” But don’t take my word for it, ask a cop.

  37. spielman54moore84 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 4:25 pm
    Tiger Woods ring a bell? He wasn’t drinking, but had 5 prescription drugs, mostly pain killers, in him when he was pulled over and charged with DUI.

    —-

    A blood test that Lane is not mentioning could easily be the other shoe to drop, which would make his point about 0.03 moot.

  38. In general police officers are lay/fact witnesses in a trial. A few are identified as an expert witness if so declared in the field of narcotics, handguns, chemical testing , forensics, etc. If a beat officer/patrolman made the arrest, he is probably a fact witness.

    Basing an arrest on a field sobriety qualifies an officer as a fact witness. The cop simply testifies to his officer notes regarding the traffic stop. That cop is then challenged in court by a competent defense attorney.

    Those suggesting a blood draw would prove this or that don’t know the law. A blood draw after the fact is useless, and no blood draw happens at the time of arrest without a warrant. Obviously a warrant wasn’t issued for there was no probable cause for one. Neg or reckless driving, without the occurrence of a death or serious bodily injury resulting from a traffic accident, i.e. a traffic crime, has no probable cause of a crime, therefore no judge will issue a warrant for a blood draw.

  39. Ppl saying he is gonna get off, lmao not a chance he gets off. And he shouldent, the man I was swerving all over, thats why he was pulled over.

  40. Breathalyzer is only a tool. Alcohol effects everyone differently and even the same person differently from obe tome to the next. Other substances may be at play as well.

    If he failed the field sobriety test, it doesn’t matter what the breathalyzer reading is.

    That said, a jury is unlikely to convict on .03 unless there’s some other kind of evidence. And Mr. Lane can afford to push this to trial.

  41. The Guy can’t handle his alcohol it’s that easy. If he was weaving or slurred his speech, that’s all it takes.I’d like to see what the cop said in the arrest report. That should explain why. The guy could have had a lamp shade on for we know.

  42. It’s safe to assume his speech is as terrible as his writing and cover skills. Slurring your words and not having any command of your own native language certainly can make you seem intoxicated. Just let the ignorant and intellectually lazy continue to play the victim card because it’s much easier.

  43. seahawkboymike says:
    January 15, 2018 at 2:48 pm
    Doesn’t matter. $6 million in cap savings and he wasn’t in their plans anyway

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    Delicious watching the “dynasty” crumble one loser at a time…lol

  44. Well if we assume he was correctly pulled over for impaired driving, and only blew a 0.03 – Mr Lane is clearly a light-weight who cannot handle his drink – and has just let us all know. Good work Sir!

  45. “My grandpa can hardly walk a straight line sober. Plus he takes like 34 pills per day. ARREST HIM.”

    Yeah

    Your grandpa shouldn’t be driving either.

  46. I was once told by a cop, in reference to people acting an ass when they interact with him, “you might beat the case,but you won’t beat the ride.” Wrong as it maybe, if you are an ass to a cop, they can find SOMETHING to bring you downtown for. Just be nice and swallow tour attitude and you will be surprised how far that will get you with the cops.

  47. Washington state law indicates regardless of the amount of an intoxicant if you commit an offense and have anything in your system you can be charged.the level of .08 means nothing..

  48. Driving while drunk is certainly dangerous, but the DUI industry is downright fascist.

    But I bet none of you crackers have ever driven with a .03, right?

  49. cjb5671 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 3:11 pm
    I’m a cop and I can tell you the only people who get charged after they blow under the limit are those who acted like imbeciles. He probably ran his mouth.

    ———————————————————————————————————

    Whew!! Thank god. It’s good to know there’s no such thing as a cop who’s just an a**hole. Here I was thinking either person could be wrong in this. How foolish though. Of course the only possible conclusion would be that the driver was acting like an “imbecile”. Cops are truly the only perfect people in the world.

  50. I have many friends in law enforcement and they all tell me that if you are polite and cooperative, they are less likely to issue you a ticket. If you act like a jerk, they are more likely to punish you for your behavior, like issue you a ticket that requires you to hire a lawyer and make an appearance in court.

  51. iwpalmer81 says:
    January 15, 2018 at 3:16 pm
    Reading through these comments blows my mind how little the average person knows about drinking and driving, maybe many of them are under 21 or don’t have licenses. The 0.08 limit is just one tool officers use to judge someone under the influence. An alcoholic could be twice that and show zero signs of being impaired while someone who never drinks could be at 0.04 and barely walk straight, both would be arrested. That’s what a field sobriety test is for.
    Who knows what will happen with Lane, he very well may get off but please people, if you have a license, learn the laws you are under!

    11 6 Rate This

    6 people have yet to be injured, injured someone or have someone they know or love injured or lost due to DUI.

  52. johnthorpe says:
    January 15, 2018 at 3:09 pm
    You can’t trust cops. Ever.
    /////////////////////////////////////////

    Sure………if you’re a lawbreaker. They’ll gIt ya every time.

  53. skawh says:
    January 15, 2018 at 4:52 pm
    He was obviously arrested because he is black. Newsflash, this happens all the time to black men.

    WHOOP, there it is. Low hanging fruit.

    What obvious is that what got him arrested was not his black skin but his black mouth.
    Black men get stopped all the time. The polite go home, the mouthy go to jail.

    There is no hope for racial harmony if so many will primarily and consistently draw the card each and every time black meets white. It’s almost like you don’t want improvement.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.