ABC, Turner are out of the running for Thursday Night Football

Getty Images

And then there were three three-letter networks.

John Ourand of SportsBusiness Journal reports that only FOX, CBS, and NBC submitted bids for the Thursday Night Football package.

Per Ourand, ABC was expected to make a proposal, but the network decided at the final minute not to make a bid. Apparently, the network believed it would not be able to turn the product into a profit.

Turner also didn’t submit a bid, even though it had made a bid every other time the league had requested proposals for the midweek slate of games. The league was never going to sell the Thursday broadcasts to a cable channel, and Turner reportedly didn’t want to once again provide a false boost to what the winning network(s) will pay.

CBS and NBC reportedly want to pay less than they did under the deal that covered 2016 and 2017, when they paid a combined $450 million per year to simulcast games also televised by NFL Network. With Ourand reporting that FOX offered a deal that would increase the fee, FOX could end up securing the entire 10-game package.

14 responses to “ABC, Turner are out of the running for Thursday Night Football

  1. “CBS and NBC reportedly want to pay less than they did under the deal that covered 2016 and 2017”

    First signs of a crack in the shield?

  2. Taking any opinions (good or bad) regarding broadcast talent out of issue, FOX has the most visually pleasing broadcast. Their technical aspects, picture, and sound just seem to be better. NBC throws a lot of resources into Sunday night, making that game not bad from an aesthetics point of view, but it is still not quite as good as FOX.

  3. Networks realize its a terrible subpar product and don’t want to overpay for it. I can only imagine what the league is asking.

  4. I would imagine CBS does much better with Big Bang Theory than the garbage TNF games? Why do they bother paying for this nonsense nobody has ever asked for?

  5. I’ve never understood why any broadcast network would pay a dime to broadcast a game that’s available to most people who care on cable and now streaming.

  6. Rumor is, ABC wanted to call the games Roger-ish. Title didn’t excite their focus groups.

  7. @cardinealsfan20 – I would disagree. NBC’s Sunday broadcasts are the gold standard for NFL telecasts. I have noticed this year that the CBS feature game on Sundays is better technically than what Fox is providing, in terms of number of cameras, replays, angles, etc. Just look at the AFC Championship yesterday and the number of different replays they had of the Lewis fumble/Jack recovery as an example. I think those two networks have surpassed Fox.

  8. Always amusing to read the TNF haters talk about how everybody feels the way they do, while the games get the highest ratings in the time slot. The games aren’t going anywhere so get used to it and go cry in a corner.

  9. Was never a great fan of Phil Sims in the booth, and at the beginning of the season, enjoyed Romo’s quirky color commentary and insider tidbits. But Romo has deteriorated to the point that I wanted to mute him last night. It’s not necessary to cackle nonstop like a drunk watching in a sports bar. Never thought anyone would be worse than Chucky (thank you, Raiders!). Switching to Buck and Aikman was an unexpected relief. Michaels/Tirico and Collinsworth are the best. Hope the league sticks with NBC. Ratings would improve across the board if they’d get rid of Goodell, simplify the rule book, and strive for better matchups in nationally televised games.

  10. Was never a great fan of Phil Sims in the booth, and at the beginning of the season, enjoyed Romo’s quirky color commentary and insider tidbits. But Romo has deteriorated to the point that I wanted to mute him last night.
    ———————————————————————————————————
    Thank you. Glad I’m not the only one.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.