NFL “looking into” Michael Bennett matter

Getty Images

Eagles defensive end Michael Bennett has been indicted for allegedly shoving an elderly woman at Super Bowl LI. The charges obviously subject Bennett to NFL discipline, regardless of whether he’s found legally responsible for the behavior.

“We are looking into the matter,” NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told PFT via email on Friday.

The Eagles separately issued a statement regarding the indictment: “We are aware of the situation involving Michael Bennett and are in the process of gathering more information. Because this is an ongoing legal matter, we will have no further comment at this time.”

It’s unclear whether the NFL knew about the situation before the indictment or, more importantly, whether Bennett was aware of the situation and failed to report it to his former team (the Seahawks) or the league. It’s also unclear whether the Seahawks were aware of the situation before trading Bennett to the Eagles, and whether the Eagles made the trade with awareness of the Bennett situation.

Regardless, any indictment on a felony is a serious matter. The NFL has some time to decide whether to place Bennett on paid leave, given that the offseason program doesn’t commence until next month. Still, a decision will need to be made sooner than later on whether he’ll be permitted to show up for work throughout the offseason and/or pending the outcome of the criminal action.

91 responses to “NFL “looking into” Michael Bennett matter

  1. Guilty! I wonder if there is video, maybe he shouldn’t comment this time
    until he see’s the video.

  2. A year off without pay seems appropriate, especially if Giants super-fan Lisa Friel has anything to say about it.

    Welcome to the NFC East!

  3. The Houston PD has already said there’s no video of the allged incident. It’s the Super Bowl, they’re guarding against the possibility of a terrorist event, but there’s no camera stationed at an access point to the field? And the police officer witnessed what is alleged but made no arrest at the time? The Houston DA is wasting the taxpayer’s money pursuing this.

  4. “Michael Bennett represents the best of the NFL — a leader on his team and in his community,” Goodell said. “Our foremost concern is the welfare of Michael and his family. 

    Wonder if Roger feels as stupid as his statement.

  5. Possible statement from Howie Roseman, “this matter will be looked into during the course of the season and there is no time frame on how long this can take. The players union stands by this matter and Michael, being the outstanding NFL represenative he is, will be allowed to play until further notice”.

  6. He’s likely guilty of doing something stupid, but Id still like to know the extent of this person’s injuries.

  7. Don’t worry about this its nothing…. Police force against resisting criminals is a tragedy and needs to be brought to light!

  8. If he did this its quite ironic. He wants justice for African Americans for abusive violence they’ve suffered, yet commits abusive violence to a disabled person.

    That’s called a double standard Michael just in case you weren’t aware.

  9. Maybe bennett can sue somebody for collusion. It’s always collusion when a protester doesn’t get their way, right?

  10. good trade She-gles, you are now stuck with this P.O.S……LOL!!!!!!

    I have posted for years that he and his brother are the biggest turds in the NFL who always accuse people of being racist against them…….stay classy Michael!

  11. This guy was never classy, its why it so easy to believe this story. After watching him try to injure jag players at the end of the games and throw a fit all the way off the field, I have no doubt he would act this way if he thought he could get away with it. Complete joke that he was nominated for Walter Payton Man of the Year.

  12. Look, not a huge fan of this guy by any means. In fact from everything I’ve read in the media (ugh. The media), he sounds like not a guy of the highest character, but before everyone cruififies him, let’s get some more info. There are many things that could have actually happened. Time will tell. Just because a grand jury indicts against someone, doesn’t mean that they are automatically found guilty. Grand juries indict all the time on charges against people when they aren’t necessarily guilty of anything. There may be witnesses, there may be video. Video I trust, witnesses…eh, not so much. This has as much possibility of the first step toward a civil case with a goal of monetary damages as it does being a legitimate charge. So please don’t jump to conclusions. Let discovery take place and let’s get some acutal facts.

  13. Seahawks totally owned the Eagles on this trade, just like they owned Wentz and Co. at the Clink without Avril, Sherman and Chancellor. He’ll never play a down for the Eagles and hopefully is out of football forever.

  14. He’s gonna show up to camp and then find out that Wentz is not ready to start; He’ll immediately disclose that he injured his shoulder pushing an elderly woman down and quit on the Eagles.

  15. DrSteveBrule says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:13 pm
    Somebody somewhere has to have a cell phone video of this and sleezy TMZ will have it in a matter of hours.

    1 0 Rate This

    ——————-

    pro sports venues keep security footage on site for 10 days before a data dump offsite for liability reasons such as this

    it is how i knew deflategate was a framejob like spygate

    if mcnally and the pats were guilty,
    the security footage would have shown him using the same bathroom the week before vs baltimore

    there is reason this was not covered in the wells report

  16. I’m not sure anybody involved is telling the whole truth except for possibly the injured lady. Bennett is not a nice guy so I don’t doubt he did this but hard to fathom how it could take 13 months for charges to be filed if it went down like the authorities claim. A cop supposedly witnessed the whole thing but walked away and did nothing? How do they plan to explain that at trial? Either somebody tried to keep it quiet but the last check never cleared or the sheriff from the press conference is coming up for reelection and wanted to make a splash.

  17. i don’t know. the mental image of an elderly paraplegic woman trying to block an nfl defensive lineman just seems too good for some dirtbag personal injury lawyer to pass up. maybe bennett is a genuine lowlife, but come on, i doubt he really plowed under an old crippled woman. maybe he was a jerk, shot his mouth off and went past her, but a forearm to the throat and stomping her in a bull rush? shades of andy kaufman! gotta be exaggerated for the law suit. two lawyers fo sho get paid on this one.

  18. If the 28yr old and 66yr old paraplegic security guard couldn’t stop him. That’s proof that the Giants offensive line wouldn’t either

  19. Why do people point out this could lead to a civil suit as some sort of exoneration of Bennett? Still doesn’t change what happened.

  20. “Stop it, he is innocent!”

    – Jemele Hill
    ======

    You owe me a Pepsi, and a screen and keyboard cleaning.

    Post of the day!

  21. The Seattle GM used to play Sargent Schultz on Hogan’s Heros. Can’t win ’em all Howie.

  22. this story is so NFL 2018….my guess….Bennett try’s to make himself to victim….

  23. So, ironic this guy protesting because police brutality….then, he’s get indicted for “assaulting” a paraplegic ? Bennett, you have now lost all credibility to say anything about social injustice. Piece of trash.

  24. stucats says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:02 pm
    good trade She-gles, you are now stuck with this P.O.S……LOL!!!!!!

    I have posted for years that he and his brother are the biggest turds in the NFL who always accuse people of being racist against them…….stay classy Michael!
    —————————————–

    That’s Super Bowl Chanpion She-gles to you!!!

  25. Honestly, people, let’s not wish for something to happen in someone’s life one way or the other based on some perceived loyalty to a brand. This football thing isn’t all that important to be curses someone’s life.

  26. My prediction? The judge will let Bennett off scot-free in exchange for a good, long, whiff of his jock strap. Unfortunately it happens time after time after time after time. This is your NFL you want to export to China. Seems about right.

  27. The more i read about this, the more concocted and bogus this sounds. These charges aren’t levied by a victim. There are randomly being brought upon by an officers “recollection” of what he “saw but did nothing about at the time”. Concedes that nobody was remotely harmed in any way whatsoever. Bennett also had credentials to get on the field after the game, therefore no reason to even be stopped in the first place.

    If he actually did something that egregious and offensive and low down, why is it just randomly coming out now? Why is there no victim account of the events, but rather charges only being based on what “some cop saw” and did nothing about, and somehow didn’t remember until now? If there was a cop there who saw a 280 lb actually assault a paraplegic in a wheelchair, why would he do nothing on the spot and say nothing for 13 months? Doesn’t add up.

    And hey, i almost bought it too. Now i say, let’s see where this actually goes and if any truth actually comes out like when Bennett lied himself. Although i know he’s already guilty to 99% of you because hey, that righteousness is a warm and fuzzy feeling, isn’t it?

  28. The long and short of it is if they’re going to try to proceed with prosecution without video (which seems likely… if there was any it would have leaked in the last 14 months) it’s a non-issue. If Bennett has any kind of lawyer at all this is over and done with if the only thing they have is testimony, wether he did it or not.

  29. Keep Michael Bennett far away from Sister Jean of Loyola-Chicago. She’s old and in a wheelchair too.

  30. Seems more like these charges are drummed up after the fact, based on nothing but a cops random memory of something he “saw” and “did nothing about” but 13 months later suddenly realized how despicable it was? Seems more like this old lady in a wheelchair is being used as a tool to outrage the masses and get them to sympathize with a victim who the cop who allegedly saw this happen wasn’t actually assaulted or harmed in any way.

    It makes no sense. It’s an anti-establishment figure with random members of the establishment randomly remembering things that cannot be proven. If a 66 year old paraplegic was assaulted, don’t you think she would have said something? To the cop who was “allegedly” right there “witnessing” this (while doing nothing), or to her family who would then create a storm of media outrage looking to get justice for their paraplegic elderly relative? Come on.

    Something about this stinks as bad as Bennett’s LVPD story. It doesn’t add up. But the masses love outrage which is probably exactly what they’re banking on.

  31. A 66 year old parapalegic elderly woman He is charged with assualt causing bodily harm, a felony in Texas….bye bye career pos

  32. Not that Bennett is a model citizen, but this smacks of grandstanding for political reasons when you listen to the Houston DA. Charges were brought very late. No video of the incident at the Super Bowl? With that level of security? Who convenes a grand jury for an indictment like this? What, 20 or 35 people need to be inconvenienced to issue this charge? This doesn’t pass the smell test. I’m sure Florio will have something to say about all of this.

  33. Reminds me of the time BoSox OF Manny Ramirez shoved a 64 year old team official to the ground over a ticket request.

  34. Could you imagine living in a country that allows you to continue to use your platform to speak out against police brutality after you fabricate a story that wasted tax money and time investigating? The investigation could have resulted in termination of innocent hard working people doing their job protecting this country making less than %10 of what you make to support their family. Who would do something like that? Probably someone that wouldn’t listen to a elderly handicapped woman resulting in causing her serious injury. If his leg’s shatter on the field, I’ll laugh. Until then, this will do.

  35. seahawkboymike says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:12 pm
    Seahawks totally owned the Eagles on this trade, just like they owned Wentz and Co. at the Clink without Avril, Sherman and Chancellor. He’ll never play a down for the Eagles and hopefully is out of football forever.

    38 22 Rate This

    You can say the Seahawks owned the Eagles all you want but at least the Eagles didn’t get punked by the Cardinals. LoL. Seahawk fans will say anything lol. You guys worshiped Bennett all they way up until he was traded. So get off your high horse. Also you guys didn’t get crap in the trade I bet you Bennett gets a sack before Johnson gets a Touchdown pass……

  36. doggz109 says:
    March 23, 2018 at 5:29 pm
    13 months later? Come on now…

    ————————
    What would have been suspicious would have been had they identified him right away. That could have meant they had their target picked out from the start. Instead they had to sift through all the video from all the cameras that day to first work out what had happened, then who did it. And finding out who did it would have started with a face, and probably not a clean angle to start so people arent going to go ‘oh thats michael bennett’. They would have been running recognition routines for a long time getting their match. Then once they do find out who it was that they had been hunting (and his past history of behavior is well known) you dont think they are going to take some extra time making sure everything is tight and bullettproof before saying a word to anyone?

  37. The NFL has some time to decide whether to place Bennett on paid leave, given that the offseason program doesn’t commence until next month. Still, a decision will need to be made sooner than later on whether he’ll be permitted to show up for work throughout the offseason and/or pending the outcome of the criminal action.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    This isn’t some he said/she said allegation; it is a criminal felony indictment. Isn’t that precisely what that process was made for? They should do it immediately. If the situation resolves then the league can proceed with discipline or reinstatement at that point. Their investigation should be fairly simple. If there is a video of the incident (highly likely) and it can be reasonably concluded that it is Bennett doing that action (less likely without unique clothing or a close-up but still possible) they can determine the appropriate action before the legal process concludes.

  38. ROSMITH51 says:
    The long and short of it is if they’re going to try to proceed with prosecution without video

    vusnu says:
    No video of the incident at the Super Bowl? With that level of security?
    ===

    I don’t know whether to laugh my rear end off or weep for Millennials who grew up in the cell phone age and think something didn’t happen unless there’s “video” of it.
    Newsflash, Flash: Crimes have been prosecuted and criminals have been convicted for the entire history of the world without “video” evidence.
    I don’t pretend to know exactly what happened here, and am willing to wait for all the available facts to come to light before making a judgement. But please, enough with the ignorant “no video” comments.

  39. Now Bennett’s sister says she has a video of the incident, with the implication that this will exonerate him. This is about to get very interesting.

  40. Best case scenario for the Eagles is that it gets settled like the Nigel Bradham case did and effectively “goes away”. The Eagles shouldn’t be penalized if they had no knowledge of any of this before making the trade. If anything, the trade should be voided and the Eagles get their player and draft choice back.

  41. Suspend him, then charge the Eagles $2.5 million in legal fees related to his suspension (they will need around 400 lawyers for the legal review), and take away a 2nd round pick for good measure. Seems about right.

  42. Irish Hoodlum says:
    March 23, 2018 at 7:49 pm
    seahawkboymike says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:12 pm
    Seahawks totally owned the Eagles on this trade, just like they owned Wentz and Co. at the Clink without Avril, Sherman and Chancellor. He’ll never play a down for the Eagles and hopefully is out of football forever.

    38 22 Rate This

    You can say the Seahawks owned the Eagles all you want but at least the Eagles didn’t get punked by the Cardinals. LoL. Seahawk fans will say anything lol. You guys worshiped Bennett all they way up until he was traded. So get off your high horse. Also you guys didn’t get crap in the trade I bet you Bennett gets a sack before Johnson gets a Touchdown pass

    ////////////////////////////////

    Funny, but the one SB win seahawks fan and the one SB win eagles fan sound identical.

  43. Irish Hoodlum says:
    March 23, 2018 at 7:50 pm
    As an Eagles fan I never liked him or his brother anyways.
    //////////////////////
    But you will cheer for him anyway

  44. tylawspick6 says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:24 pm

    it is how i knew deflategate was a legit like spygate
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    FTFY. Now, on to the current situation. This dude is classless. Tried to lie about police brutality, assaulting an elderly woman, the prime example of what’s wrong with their culture.

  45. johngaltwho says:
    March 23, 2018 at 6:22 pm

    He’s gonna show up to camp and then find out that Wentz is not ready to start; He’ll immediately disclose that he injured his shoulder pushing an elderly woman down and quit on the Eagles.

    —————————-
    Yeah, the Eagles don’t have a chance with their backup QB. Pound sand, moron.

  46. “If there is a video of the incident (highly likely)”

    Yeah. There’s none. This is a non-stater wether he’s guilty or not. A decent defense lawyer will eat this up.

  47. dregonspengler says:

    I don’t pretend to know exactly what happened here, and am willing to wait for all the available facts to come to light before making a judgement. But please, enough with the ignorant “no video” comments.

    ———————————–

    You obviously haven’t paid attention to any high profile cases in the last ten years have you?

  48. So I’m reading one of the numerous articles on this. The 66 year old paraplegic woman, who is bound to a 800 pound motorized wheel chair was working security. I had to let that sink in for a minute. Bennett then apparently pushed her and others out of the way in order to get to the field, bruising her shoulder. The authorities didn’t get to this because they had more pressing matters for 13 months, now the police chief is outraged. The confluence of events leading up to this is 100% American. The charge of assaulting the elderly woman, who was hired to perform security because of what I’m sure is part of anti-discriminatory practice, was put in this bizarre situation why? For God’s sake, she’s 66, paraplegic and wheel chair bound so you make her security? The drunken louts and goons which Mr. Bennett seems to have been one of don’t care. Common sense people.

  49. ROSMITH51 says:
    You obviously haven’t paid attention to any high profile cases in the last ten years have you?
    ==

    I’m a retired journalist who does nothing but pay attention to high-profile cases.
    Go try to bluff somebody else, little boy.

  50. Hey gloating Seahawks fans , you do realize that in the blink of an eye you went from next dynasty to biggest SB choke ( now second) to a rebuild , right?

    Never liked Bennett but this case sounds mighty fishy to me . Seems like his police brutality claims had repercussions . I’ll reserve my judgement til some type of evidence comes out .

  51. Ok, so it was a TEXAS judge that ruled in favor of Ezekiel elliot last season to allow him to continue to play. Now, it’s a TEXAS judge that is indicting Bennett about a week after he signs with cowboys rival Philadelphia eagles, even though this happened about 13 or 14 months ago. Ok. . . .

  52. Felony? Indictment for “shoving?” Sounds more like a prosecutor running for governor. None of you know the facts, yet you’re happy to convict him before trial? Wow, what a surprise.

  53. It’s a little suspicious how late this came out, but I can’t say that I’m surprised. Martellus is at worst annoying, but Michael is at worst a scumbag who tries to injure those he doesn’t like. See that Jags game for example, or in the SB against the Patriots after the Seahawks blew it with the interception. The guy just has no standards. Even if he is innocent completely, I don’t like anything about him, and the league has not punished him for various incidents on the field, let alone off the field (while, at the same time, jumping to punish guys like Ezekiel Elliot or the Saints or Matt Prater or what have you with absolutely no evidence of any actual wrongdoing).

    And that’s Michael Bennett’s problem. Even if he is innocent, he is such an unlikable character that no one is going to believe it. At best, they’re like me-don’t care, because my mind is made up. He was overrated already as a player, and contributes nothing positive to the game or society by his actions. That’s why, in several weeks when he is out on bond or facing charges from the Houston DA and grandstands over how he is being discriminated against, no one will listen to what he says. If you do so many things of that nature and don’t acknowledge it, no one will listen to your crusading.

  54. This PROVEN liar when it comes to interactions with police/security has lost the benefit of the doubt — and he, his lawyer, and agent know it too.

  55. So a police officer witnessed this “assault” yet it took 14 months to file felony charges? Now the sister says she has video of Michael and her running onto the field. There’s definitely more to this.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.