Belichick skillfully evades OTA questions

AP

The Patriots launched their mandatory minicamp on Tuesday. Coach Bill Belichick made himself available to reporters, who wanted to talk more about the non-mandatory workouts that players like Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski had skipped.

The questions were creative, aimed at getting something more than the usual nothing that Belichick offers. He still managed to say nothing, or close to it.

Question: “Did the absence of Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski slow down your progress at all? How did that affect what you’ve been trying to do?”

Answer: “The OTA system is voluntary.”

Question: “Did it affect the progress of what you’re trying to do at all? Did it have any effect at all?”

Answer: “It’s a voluntary program.”

Follow-up: “That’s not what I asked.”

Bellichick: “Well, that’s the answer.”

As it relates to Brady, Belichick eventually said that the quarterback had missed OTAs in past years.

“If you go back a few years,” Belichick said, “there was times when he wasn’t — I mean look, again, it’s a voluntary program. So that’s what it is. You’ll have to ask him about it.”

Oh, Belichick almost came close to actually saying something. But, once again, nothing. Which still says something about his overall irritation level when it comes to this topic.

54 responses to “Belichick skillfully evades OTA questions

  1. More will be said (reported) on what Belechick didn’t say than many newsworthy stories. I’ll bet when Bill is out of the reporters’ line of sight he has a huge smile on his face.

  2. LOL…. it’s not the topic that has his irritation level up, it’s the MEDIA’s attempt to get him to say something negative about a player or the TEAM…..now they have NOTHING again so all they can do is try and twist it to create the drama agenda it hoped to fuel….

  3. LOL

    The press will never learn.

    He is not going to verbally get in the middle of anything.

    He is on to mandatory camp. LOL

  4. ‘Oh, Belichick almost came close to actually saying something. But, once again, nothing. Which still says something about his overall irritation level when it comes to this topic.’

    He’s irritated with pretty much every topic brought up by media, excluding Bon Jovi, lacrosse, and punting. I wouldn’t say his evasiveness means he’s particularly irritated, considering he’s evasive about pretty much everything.

  5. I think the “irritation level” stems directly from the irritating media making it about them.

    Nothing more, nothing less. The arrogance of the media creating stories, lying and recycling.

  6. Skillfully? No…he just made the wannabe reporter look stupid…like everyone else that covers football 😏

  7. BB could design the next new innovative defensive scheme, and the reporters would still be spending their time trying to figure out the perfect way to ask questions about Brady and Gronk missing OTAs.

  8. “Oh, Belichick almost came close to actually saying something. But, once again, nothing. Which still says something about his overall irritation level when it comes to this topic.“

    He said nothing yet folks are still trying to put words in his mouth in place of words he didnt say. Im pretty sure any itrritation, IF there is any irritation (disdain and irritation are two different things) is based on that behavior and not on any given topuc.

  9. So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this? Cheaters lie about what they do. Over and over. Until there is concrete evidence and they are caught once and for all. He could have admitted what he did, apologize and did all he could to make amends. But instead he stuck to his lies, let others take the blame, tried to convince people he was railroaded and this upstanding guy who would never. He has no remorse which is why respect is difficult for so many to hold for the talent he does really have. It’s why he’s never going to live it down. Playing stupid would have even been a better choice. He has no idea how many people would have been upset but respected him for being honest and trying to somehow fix what he did. He continued to try to beat the system and fight a battle he had no business in fighting because of what he did. There ended up being more damage to him because of the continued lies and lack of any remorse. He could be the greatest guy in the world but the second he committed a wrong he had to own it when caught. He didn’t. He still hasn’t. He never will. He blew his own reputation and list a lot because of it. He doesn’t have to care so he doesn’t. That’s the arrogance. I get standing by your team but not when they do things they have been clearly caught doing and is wrong on so many levels

  10. nizzeldizzel says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:31 pm
    BB could design the next new innovative defensive scheme, and the reporters would still be spending their time trying to figure out the perfect way to ask questions about Brady and Gronk missing OTAs.

    —————————–

    That could literally happen this year.

  11. You’d think some of these reporters would learn the art of Chess if they are going to continue to hang out with Master Bill. Belichick is the NFL Version of Sun Tzu and the media is going to have to learn how to deal with it.

  12. waldoampere says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:32 pm
    It was a legitimate question by the reporter. Didn’t seem like grand standing at all.

    2 7 Rate This

    ————————

    False.

    Brady is entering his what, 19th year? He’s missed OTAs before.

    Try again.

    The media is being told to recycle the same story over and over and over because they’ve been pumping half truths about this team for years, because it gets them revenue to do so.

    Why?

    Because moron troll NFL fans from other fanbases, feed into it. That’s why.

  13. waldoampere says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:32 pm
    It was a legitimate question by the reporter. Didn’t seem like grand standing at all.

    Waldo – it was intended to be grandstanding. All the media, who cover the Pats, know his answer before the question is even asked.

  14. So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this?
    ======

    Yes.

    That is their Bible. Their Dalai Lama. Their kama sutra.

  15. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:56 pm
    So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this?

    ———-

    The NFL admitted in open court that they did not even have any evidence that actual deflation occurred. But let’s say it did, then why did they not also punish the Colts as their balls were also deflated???

  16. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:56 pm
    So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this? Cheaters lie about what they do. Over and over. Until there is concrete evidence and they are caught once and for all. He could have admitted what he did, apologize and did all he could to make amends. But instead he stuck to his lies, let others take the blame, tried to convince people he was railroaded and this upstanding guy who would never. He has no remorse which is why respect is difficult for so many to hold for the talent he does really have. It’s why he’s never going to live it down. Playing stupid would have even been a better choice. He has no idea how many people would have been upset but respected him for being honest and trying to somehow fix what he did. He continued to try to beat the system and fight a battle he had no business in fighting because of what he did. There ended up being more damage to him because of the continued lies and lack of any remorse. He could be the greatest guy in the world but the second he committed a wrong he had to own it when caught. He didn’t. He still hasn’t. He never will. He blew his own reputation and list a lot because of it. He doesn’t have to care so he doesn’t. That’s the arrogance. I get standing by your team but not when they do things they have been clearly caught doing and is wrong on so many levels

    ————–

    That’s so 2016.

  17. Head Coach stats:
    Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    Bill Belichik with Brady: 200-62
    Tom Brady made Belichick – the math is there

  18. Reporter: “That’s not what I asked.”

    Belichick: “Well, that’s the answer.”

    Best Response Ever.

  19. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 2:34 pm
    Head Coach stats:
    Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    Bill Belichik with Brady: 200-62
    Tom Brady made Belichick – the math is there

    Bill Walsh pre Montana: 8-24

    11-5 season playoff win. I believe the last coach to win a playoff game in Cleveland
    Then starts next season 3-0 before losing his starting QB
    And a lot more was going on in Cleveland that you left out

    Then Ozzie Newsom credits BB for “laying the foundation” of what became the Ravens(former Browns team) first SB win

    But yeah, “the math is there”

  20. Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    Bill Belichik with Brady: 200-62
    Tom Brady made Belichick – the math is there
    ======

    .700 win % without Brady since he became the starter back in 2001..

    But hey, I’m not going to pretend to understand the new math kids are doing these days.

  21. I listened to the actual event and to characterize Belichick as irritated is a huge stretch. This was an absolutely typical event, with reporters repeatedly asking the same question that they know he’s not going to answer. So he just sticks to his non-answer.

    I’ve seen and heard Belichick irritated on occasion in these situations, but I sure wouldn’t say this was one of them.

  22. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 2:34 pm
    Head Coach stats:
    Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    Bill Belichik with Brady: 200-62
    Tom Brady made Belichick – the math is there
    ————-
    We can all agree the Browns have been one of the worst, if not the worst NFL team in this modern era, yet they did go to the playoffs under B.B.

    Is it possible that Brady is one of the best QBs ever and B.B. one of the greatest coaches/GMs ever? No one seems to degrade Montana cause he had Walsh and I suspect 15-20 years from now the same will be said for Brady and BB

  23. Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    ======

    Watch Cleveland ’95?

    Belichick is credited for what the Ravens organization is. Ozzie Newsome stuck to his model to the day he retired. A few of Belichicks core players won a Super Bowl in ’99. A driving factor in that was Ray Lewis, a draft choice from a Belichick trade.

    He was fired in Cleveland. But that was in large part to the move to Baltimore and the complete undoing of the franchise, which was a direct result of the moves made by Art Modell.

  24. .700 win % without Brady since he became the starter back in 2001

    Lame

    You left out the fact that it’s a very small sample size over the 18 seasons

  25. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:56 pm
    So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this?
    ——
    The appeal was not about whether there was any cheating. In fact, in court the commissioner’s office admitted they had no hard evidence. The appeal was about upholding the Commissioners interpretation of the player agreement in regards to Goodell’s right to administer justice as he sees fit. The deflated football issue was the vehicle that took that to court.

  26. Bill Belichick recent quote per Mike Reiss:

    “I think that’s what I’ve learned for myself, and also to transfer to other players I coach, is that hard work is great but working smarter is even better. At times, you have to take a break, back off, and use your time efficiently.”

    Sound like anything two Patriots did recently? Belichick loves the diversionary controversies, and trolls the media as good as Trump.

    Translation for lefties: Belichick had no problem with Brady and Gronkowski taking time off to recharge, probably even encouraged it. What he also likes are non-issue-issues being harped on by the media, especially when it helps create an us-against-the-world facade. He also realizes that the less he discusses these non-issue-issues, the more the media will want to discuss them. Ipso facto, “That’s my answer.”

    Brilliant.

  27. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 1:56 pm
    So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this?

    ———————-
    Do you read transcripts? Because you would know thats exactly what they did and that the NFLs final suit was to uphold that the commisioner did have the power to do exactly that despite the court having found that no tampering had even happened in the first place. And the CBA does grant those powers to the commisioner, that wording is in there plain as day. In fact, the commissioner has used (abused) that authority on other players since then. They too wanted to fight it but their lawyers explain that the CBA wording means they will lose regardless of any guilt or innocence.

    And as a couple guys have pointed out already…its 2018.

  28. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 2:34 pm
    Head Coach stats:
    Bill Belichik Pre Brady: 41-55 – fired for losing
    Bill Belichik with Brady: 200-62
    Tom Brady made Belichick – the math is there

    ——————
    Yah yah, until its time to talk about Brady. Then the mantra is system qb.

  29. Lame

    You left out the fact that it’s a very small sample size over the 18 seasons
    =====

    14-6 overall

    11-5 in the full season without him in 2008.. which is a .688%.. Coincidence? Not in my opinion.

    .. I think they equally great. Together, 8 Super Bowls, unprecedented success.

    But make no mistake, Belichick would win, and did win, without Brady. Just not at the same historical clip.

    There is no, ‘Brady made Belichick’ argument.

  30. dynastypolice says: So you believe that they suspended Brady and upheld the appeal when they knew for a fact he did nothing wrong? You seriously believe this?

    @dynastypolice-
    First, the NFL suspended Brady, a Federal Court denied his appeal.

    Second and most importantly to your point, Judy Battista wrote a story on 5/11/15 titled: “TOM BRADY, PATRIOTS PUNISHED BY NFL FOR LACK OF COOPERATION”. It doesn’t say “for deflated footballs”, it says “FOR LACK OF COOPERATION”.

    Guess where I found this story?: NFL.COM. Yes, the same NFL that suspended Brady released a story stating that Brady was “PUNISHED FOR LACK OF COOPERATION”.

    I know I keep repeating myself, but haters like you just don’t seem to get it: THE FOOTBALLS WERE NOT INTENTIONALLY DEFLATED BY TOM BRADY OR THE PATRIOTS.

    Self educate, brother. It’s not too late.

  31. Bill is playing chess and the media is playing checkers. Just isn’t fair.

  32. @TJ52:
    and then there’s this: The exchange in which McNally literally refers to himself as “the deflator.”
    McNally: You working
    Jastremski: Yup
    McNally: Nice dude….jimmy needs some kicks….lets make a deal…..come on help the deflator

  33. No one seems to degrade Montana cause he had Walsh and I suspect 15-20 years from now the same will be said for Brady and BB
    ===========================
    Montana played in a time when QB’s/WRs weren’t nearly as protected, yet his margin of dominance was 139-63 in his 4 consecutive SB wins = GOAT. After going to KC, still made the playoffs, so likely would have won a fifth consecutive SB with the niners (Walsh system was still in place) who were much better than KC at that point. But Young was ready to take over – and the choice had to be made based on a longer term.

  34. aarons444 says:There is no, ‘Brady made Belichick’ argument.??
    ========================
    Incorrect – The math speaks for itself – but either way, win or lose, nothing under either of them is legit __ Brady won but didn’t dominate, and his wins were about as legit as Lance Armstrong’s 7 titles.

  35. Brady completed 21 of 25 passes in team drills, took the first reps in all but one period and threw his first pass of the day to Gronk in the walkthrough period. Brady completed 14 of 15 to close practice and the incompletion was a McCarron drop.

    Looks like he’s gonna be ok, folks

  36. aarons444 says:
    June 5, 2018 at 3:40 pm
    Lame

    You left out the fact that it’s a very small sample size over the 18 seasons
    =====

    14-6 overall

    11-5 in the full season without him in 2008.. which is a .688%.. Coincidence? Not in my opinion.

    .. I think they equally great. Together, 8 Super Bowls, unprecedented success.

    But make no mistake, Belichick would win, and did win, without Brady. Just not at the same historical clip.

    There is no, ‘Brady made Belichick’ argument.

    =======

    More disasterous cherry picked logic. B.B. is 18-19 without Brady starting…full stop. You can’t take out 2000 and early 2001 which were stocked with players who would contribute to the 3 titles in 4 years run but only went 5-13 with a multi ProBowl 100mil QB leading them….. hmmm If there was only a factor one could look to that could’ve made the difference.

  37. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 6:24 pm
    No one seems to degrade Montana cause he had Walsh and I suspect 15-20 years from now the same will be said for Brady and BB
    ===========================
    Montana played in a time when QB’s/WRs weren’t nearly as protected, yet his margin of dominance was 139-63 in his 4 consecutive SB wins = GOAT. After going to KC, still made the playoffs, so likely would have won a fifth consecutive SB with the niners (Walsh system was still in place) who were much better than KC at that point. But Young was ready to take over – and the choice had to be made based on a longer term.

    ===========

    Also no salary cap which makes it much easier once you have top players….and don’t forget the admitted stickum, silicon spray on jerseys and PED use.

  38. dynastypolice says:
    June 5, 2018 at 6:20 pm
    @TJ52:
    and then there’s this: The exchange in which McNally literally refers to himself as “the deflator.”
    McNally: You working
    Jastremski: Yup
    McNally: Nice dude….jimmy needs some kicks….lets make a deal…..come on help the deflator

    =========

    Where again in the rule book is it illegal to deflate footballs before refs get them? I’ll wait. I’ll enjoy this physics book in the mean time, it’s quite interesting, you should borrow it sometime.

  39. @dynastypolice:

    Then there were the scientists, the labs, the professors…There are videos all over the internet that can be checked out for FREE!

  40. Patriots’ fans love Belicheat because he wins. Plain and simple. As soon as the team starts imploding, which is what’s happening now, he’ll be persona non grata. Honesty and fair play has no value in NE. Belicheat is a cheater. Brady is a cheater. Who knows who else was involved in each of these dubious SB “wins.” We only know what was involved in the losses — the principle that cheaters never prosper. History will show that the Patriots were the NFL’s biggest embarrassment. The truth is out there.

  41. If it does not help his team win, he will not say anything….That is EXACTLY how I want my Coach to act in EVERY aspect of the game, including talking to the press. He is a mastermind of information and collecting information… He knows the damage and advantages that can be made from press conferences. If you don’t like it, too bad. Tell your Head Coach to be smarter and give loyalty to the team and not mug it up for the cameras…VII Rings and counting!!!

  42. Also no salary cap which makes it much easier once you have top players….and don’t forget the admitted stickum, silicon spray on jerseys and PED use.
    ======

    Parcells, Gibbs, Walsh, Ditka.. all had the same advantages.

    The field was as level then as it is now.

  43. You can’t take out 2000 and early 2001 which were stocked with players who would contribute to the 3 titles in 4 years run but only went 5-13 with a multi ProBowl 100mil QB leading them…..
    =====

    A transition from one coach to another isn’t seamless. Even for an all-timer like Belichick.

    Brady wasn’t the only key difference in 2001;

    Vrabel, Light, Seymore, Phifer.. do you win without any one of those guys? Or role players like T-Buck, Patten..

    2000 wasn’t a finished product, by a long shot.

  44. aarons444 says:
    June 6, 2018 at 11:12 am
    Also no salary cap which makes it much easier once you have top players….and don’t forget the admitted stickum, silicon spray on jerseys and PED use.
    ======

    Parcells, Gibbs, Walsh, Ditka.. all had the same advantages.

    The field was as level then as it is now.

    ==========================
    Correct

  45. aarons444 says:

    June 6, 2018 at 11:12 am

    Also no salary cap which makes it much easier once you have top players….and don’t forget the admitted stickum, silicon spray on jerseys and PED use.
    ======

    Parcells, Gibbs, Walsh, Ditka.. all had the same advantages.

    The field was as level then as it is now.

    ======================================

    So every team in the 80’s used stickum, silicon spray and PEDs? proof? It doesn’t really work without it.

  46. aarons444 says:

    June 6, 2018 at 11:57 am

    You can’t take out 2000 and early 2001 which were stocked with players who would contribute to the 3 titles in 4 years run but only went 5-13 with a multi ProBowl 100mil QB leading them…..
    =====

    A transition from one coach to another isn’t seamless. Even for an all-timer like Belichick.

    Brady wasn’t the only key difference in 2001;

    Vrabel, Light, Seymore, Phifer.. do you win without any one of those guys? Or role players like T-Buck, Patten..

    2000 wasn’t a finished product, by a long shot.

    ================================================================

    What do you think Tom Brady’s learning curve was? BB was a seasoned veteran of the NFL. Brady’s curve was much steeper than BB’s, and they went on to win the title. Not disputable.

    And you forget the Pats LOST their #1 wideout from ’00 (and from prior years) in ’01. Patten was fine, but he was no where near the talent Glenn was, who flaked out in ’01. And Belichick was already familiar with many of the stalwarts of the Pats team who carried over from his coaching on the ’96 Super Bowl team.

    The 2000 team had the likes of Milloy, Bruschi, K.Faulk, Law, Troy Brown, Otis Smith, McGinest, T.Johnson, Vinatieri, all very important parts of the ’01 run and some who were part of the ’96 run.

    And ’01 Vrabel and Seymour weren’t the fully developed Vrabel and Seymour until later their Pats careers.

    And Tebucky Jones started with the Pats in 1999, not 2001.

    And most fans would say 2001 was not a “finished product” by a long shot. Pats improved quite a bit going forward from that run.

    That is why its nonsense to not include 2000-01.

  47. @brwmstr
    VII Rings and counting!!!
    ============================
    Nice! But he has V rings as a HC, none of which are legit, and would be 0 rings without Brady just like BB was as a losing HC pre-Brady.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.