For the new helmet rules, ejections aren’t the biggest concern

Getty Images

In the first edition of Peter King’s Football Morning in America, NFL senior V.P. of officiating Al Riveron attempts to address concerns about the new helmet rules (and, yes, there are two of them, not one) by explaining that the new rule that prohibits players from lowering their helmets and initiating contact will not lead to an “ejection-fest.”

That’s fine. That’s nice. But that’s hardly the primary reason to believe that potentially revolutionary changes to the game of football will happen as these two new helmet rules took root.

Ejections will indeed be rare. The real question is whether there will be a flag-fest (or a fine-fest) arising from violations of the new rule regarding lowering the helmet or the much broader (and much less noticed) expansion of the unnecessary roughness rule to prohibit any and all ramming, butting, or spearing with any portion of the helmet, without regard to whether the helmet was lowered or whether contact was initiated.

If these two new rules result in a flurry of flags, coaches will adjust. And the game will change, up to and including minimal or no use of the three-point stance. If these two new rules result in a flurry of fines, the game probably won’t change much? The coaches don’t pay the fines, the coaches want to win, and the coaches will continue to expect the game to be played a certain way, even if it hits the players in their bank accounts.

“We have had zero resistance from the coaches,” Riveron told King. That’s possibly happening because the coaches still don’t fully appreciate how aggressively these new rules will be enforced, and because they’re simply choosing to believe those who privately claim it won’t be a big deal.

Given the breadth of the new rules and the clear motivation to take the head out of the pro game so that mom and dad will let Jimmy play football at the youth level, I won’t believe it won’t be a big deal until it’s not a big deal.

And I have a nagging feeling it will indeed be a big deal.

5 responses to “For the new helmet rules, ejections aren’t the biggest concern

  1. Jack Lambert said they should just put the QB in a dress, looks like it applies to all 22 on the field now. NFL is becoming worse than watered-down whisky

  2. It’s really very simple. Adopt the rugby rule that there must be a genuine attempt to wrap on every tackle. No shoulder charges, headshots, throwing your body at knees. 15 yards everytime and ejection on the second violation.

  3. Let’s see, no hitting, no kick-off, no harsh language, just a bunch of idiotic dancing in the end-zone.
    Yup, football is getting better and better…

  4. Im more concerned with the integrity of calls…certain teams already get the benefit of favorable calls and this opens up a massive oppurtunity for refs to further impact the game through poor calls and calls that benefit the nfl over the teams (perhaps skewing a game to a team with a larger fanbase that buys more gear or a team with a better storyline)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.