NFLPA: Kaepernick summary judgment effort “is in the hands of the arbitrator”

Getty Images

The NFL has filed a motion for summary judgment in the collusion case filed by Colin Kaepernick, with the goal of getting the claim thrown out in lieu of a full-blown trial. A hearing on the motion occurred last Thursday, and NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith has confirmed that the arbitrator, Stephen Burbank, has taken the matter under advisement.

“We’ve gone through hearings,” Smith told Jason Reid of TheUndefeated.com regarding Kaepernick’s claim. “There was recently a motion for a summary judgment. That matter is in the hands of the arbitrator, but I don’t think there is a legitimate reason for why they’re not playing.”

It’s unclear when Burbank will issue a ruling, but with only 23 days until the start of the 2018 regular season, the NFL should be bracing for the possibility that the motion will be denied as the season is about to begin. Depending on the specific language of a possible ruling denying the motion, a sense could emerge that there’s plenty of smoke regarding collusion — and quite possibly fire. And that won’t be an ideal way for the NFL to launch its 99th season.

“Colin and Eric [Reid] . . . should be in the National Football League,” Smith told Jason Reid. “One hundred percent. Do I believe that they are being unfairly targeted by the league? Yes. And that’s not only what we believe. That’s why we support them and why we’ve been working closely with their lawyers. They should be playing football. Without a doubt.”

The union’s strong position regarding Kaepernick and Reid, articulated at a time when the league and the NFLPA are negotiating a possible resolution to the grievance filed regarding the NFL’s Anthem Policy 2.0, could help explain the reluctance to do a deal on the league’s timeline. As Dolphins receiver Kenny Stills recently suggested, it’s hard to resolve the issue over the anthem with Kaepernick and Reid still shunned for their unique roles as leaders of the movement that made players aware of their right to protest during the anthem.

Thus, the league needs to be very concerned that a denial of its effort to defeat Kaepernick’s collusion case could embolden more players to take a stand, just in time for Week One. It also could cause otherwise neutral observers (if there are any) to think that the league is in the wrong on this one.

23 responses to “NFLPA: Kaepernick summary judgment effort “is in the hands of the arbitrator”

  1. “Kaepernick and Reid still shunned for their unique roles as leaders of the movement that made players aware of their right to protest during the anthem.”

    ————————

    You’re being deliberately dense. For the last time, it’s not about the right to protest. It’s about what they’re protesting against – the United States of America. That’s what the flag and Anthem represent.

  2. Yawn.

    Eric Reid could have been signed by the Titans but he apparently did not want to go out in the rain.

    Kaep et al will lose their case and fade into history.

  3. 2016 Kaep could be a legit starter on at least half a dozen 2018 teams. But each day away from the game makes a comeback less and less likely; for actual football reasons.

  4. Sooooo…. if the NFLPA is backing up Kaep and Reid to be in the league, shouldn’t they have backed up Tebow and Michael Sam? I mean a big reason that teams shunned these players is because they’re not good enough to deal with the media attention they bring. So if that’s what they’re calling collusion nowadays, then I guess being Gay or a Christian isn’t popular enough for the NFLPA to support.

  5. Just sign the bums already. Let Reid get suspended for helmet to helmet hits and let Colin throw 10 picks and get benched in favor of Hackenburg. Then, we can collectively say “we told you so” and continue going about our lives. The thing is though, I want the teams that sign them to force them to play. Make sure EVERYBODY knows they weren’t worth a roster spot to begin with. If they’re that good, they can beat our players at their positions on teams without solidified incumbents.

  6. As an owner or a coach I wouldn’t want them on my team and no one could force me either.. take your drama elsewhere.

  7. Kaepernick has no case.
    Reid can’t get a flight for a tryout.
    These losers will soon fade.

  8. So if a player wears green socks during a game to bring awareness to their cause… that’s a fine. If a player writes something on the sole of his cleats to protest a cause, that’s a fine. But if you protest during the National Anthem , that is their right? C’mon man!

  9. both players had teams interested. they deliberately stalled and didn’t engage so they could pursue a lawsuit and go after a windfall versus get paid what they are worth. these guys are pathetic con artists not football players.

  10. You’re being deliberately dense. For the last time, it’s not about the right to protest. It’s about what they’re protesting against – the United States of America. That’s what the flag and Anthem represent.

    —————————-

    To you……that’s what it represents to you

    Not that anyone gives a crap

  11. Colin Kaepernick was basically a 1 year wonder because of the craze of running QBs. Kinda like Terrelle Pryor was for the Raiders. Kaep happened to play on a stacked team that could mask his deficiencies as a QB. Once Harbaugh was rubbed out cause Jed York is a man child. There was a mass talent exodus and real team leaders retired. (Justin Smith, Patrick Willis). Kaepernick was exposed as a one dimensional running QB who when you forced to beat you with his arm.. couldn’t.

  12. Liberalsruineverything says:
    August 14, 2018 at 8:55 pm
    Mike, you’re a lawyer, please explain to me how collusion is a crime. I am not a lawyer and last time I checked it’s not a crime. Only in certain cases involving anti trust law.
    ———————————-

    It’s not a crime. But collusion is a violation of the collective bargaining agreement and anyone who hits thumbs down is just being ignorant of facts. The language is in the contract.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.