Frank Reich defends choice to go for late fourth down

Getty Images

Frank Reich is clearly playing the long game with his young Colts team.

Because the decision he made near the end of overtime definitely cost them a chance for at least a tie in the short term.

“I’ll just address it now,” Reich said, via Zak Keefer of the Indianapolis Star. “We’re not playing to tie. We’re going for it 10 times out of 10.”

With 27 seconds left in overtime, Reich appeared to go back and forth on what to do with a fourth-and-4 from their own 43 yard line.

He initially sent quarterback Andrew Luck to the line to try to hard-count the Texans into a cheap first down, but they weren’t going for it. Then after both teams called timeouts, they decided to go for the conversion.

It didn’t work, giving the Texans easy field position for a game-winning field goal, which snapped their nine-game losing streak.

It certainly wasn’t the prudent call for the Colts, because a punt would have easily pinned the Texans back, at least at their own 20, with no timeouts and most of the field to go with 24 seconds left.

And while Reich’s 1-3 because of it, he at least has the attention of his locker room. It was a hugely popular call among the players, and Luck was particularly enthused.

“Love it,” the quarterback said. “Everybody in that locker room liked that — no, LOVED that. Loved that. We can get behind that.”

If the Colts go onto greater success under Reich’s leadership, even if it’s not this year, it could be the kind of moment that unifies a team behind its leader. If they don’t, it’s just another loss, for a team which has had too many lately.

24 responses to “Frank Reich defends choice to go for late fourth down

  1. It was a dumb decision to go for it there, no need to try and defend it. I hate ties just like everyone else but from the Colts, and more specifically the hc’s standpoint, the risk far outweighed the potential benefit from that call. Headscratcher.

  2. Reich understands that the NFL is ultimately in the entertaiment business, and that we all love a good laugh.

  3. I’m good with the call, the titans. Jaguars also won so what is there to lose? This is a rebuilding year regardless so go all out

  4. If he’s so sure he’s going for it why waste a timeout trying to draw them offsides? That meant even if they converted the 4th down they were unlikely to go on and win anyway.

  5. If the WR caught the ball, he was inbounds with 24 seconds left and still not in FG range. Even If they made it, there was no guarantee they would win. So the choice wasn’t “get a tie or win”, it really was “maybe win the game or maybe lose the game”. It was a bad call. If they were closer to FG range, I could understand it.

  6. This was a move for the future. Everyone knows the colts aren’t going to Super Bowl this year, it’s doubtful their fate will be sealed by a half a game this season.

    He is trying to instill a winning culture in a down organization. Not saying he’ll be successful but I understand and agree with the intent.

  7. Hey, coach! A tie against a division rival is better than a loss. Losing 4 SB’s in a row will affect your thinking though.

  8. Scottishvike, hilarious, go focus on your own ringlets wonder viqueen squad instead of worrying about us. We clowned you in your own building 2 years ago which eliminated you from the playoffs, guess you are still bitter hahahahaha

  9. thermanmerman99 says:
    September 30, 2018 at 6:55 pm
    Scottishvike, hilarious, go focus on your own ringlets wonder viqueen squad instead of worrying about us. We clowned you in your own building 2 years ago which eliminated you from the playoffs, guess you are still bitter hahahahaha

    ___________________________

    Not at all, I just find it strange when a coach makes a call that hands the game to the opposition.

  10. thefiesty1 says:
    September 30, 2018 at 6:40 pm
    Hey, coach! A tie against a division rival is better than a loss. Losing 4 SB’s in a row will affect your thinking though.
    ——
    More likely he was affected by the Super Bowl he WON last season when he worked for a coach who wasn’t afraid to play to win.

  11. He coach, icing the Houston kicker and then he misses was classic. Then he comes back and wins the game. You aren’t on “the lucky Eagles” team anymore.

  12. carloswlassiter says:
    September 30, 2018 at 6:18 pm
    Same Colts fans applauding this “gutsy” call thought Belichick was an idiot for going for it on 4th and 2 on his own 26.

    Right, i was puzzled, coach what is u doing lol.. and promptly he realized how dumb that decision was. Did u see his face when he iced the kicker and he the kicker missed lol.

  13. “Love it,” the quarterback said. “Everybody in that locker room liked that — no, LOVED that. Loved that. We can get behind that.”
    ——-
    Well good because everyone in that locker room is 1-3.

  14. At least Luck played like a boss and nobody is talking about him throwing Nerf balls anymore.

  15. If you are down 3 on the goal line at the end of the game and go for the winning TD instead of the tying FG you can talk about being aggressive.

    But this call was loony. Even if the Colts got the 1st down (and they had something like a 3/10 chance statistically), they would still have been at midfield with no guarantee of anything. But if they fail to get it, Houston needs just 1 first down to have a legit FG attempt.

    If Reich can’t understand that the risk was far greater than the reward he really is a dunce.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.