NFL needs to revise its Commissioner Exempt list procedures

Getty Images

Four years ago, the NFL devised the Commissioner Exempt list as a tool for keeping players in the early days of serious off-field trouble away from the field. The NFL now needs to come up with a tool for keeping these players away from the headlines, too.

It’s an idea Mike Tirico of NBC’s Football Night in America suggested on Sunday. A pause button of sorts that would keep a player like former Chiefs running back Kareem Hunt from being released and in turn being exposed to waivers only a handful of days after his placement on the Commissioner Exempt list. And in tuen being claimed on waivers, kicking up multiple days of needless dust.

Setting aside for now the very real concerns about how the NFL got to the point where it didn’t get the surveillance video showing Hunt shoving and kicking a woman in the hallway of a Cleveland hotel and/or hadn’t even interviewed Hunt about the situation while waiting for more information to emerge from a pipeline that had gone dry, the league needs to consider how it handles these issues moving forward from the moment that a paid suspension begins.

Basically, and as Tirico suggested, everything needs to be frozen in place. The player can’t be released or, at a minimum, the player can’t be claimed on waivers in the immediate aftermath of a release.

The current procedure forces the player into multiple news cycles at a time when the NFL would prefer that the player disappear, at least for now. Last week’s Reuben Foster debacle showed what happens when a team (and it was only one team) tries to secure dibs on a player who likely will be cleared at some point in the future to play. Today, someone may give in to the temptation to take a flier on the former Toledo Rocket who became the NFL’s rushing champion as a rookie.

The fact that the Browns won’t rule it out shows that teams will make football decisions regardless of P.R. complications. Yes, the Foster situation played out poorly, but other teams may believe that they can handle the situation much better (or at least not as badly) as Washington did. In the end, the goal is to win football games, and the sudden availability of a player like Kareem Hunt will help win football games, even if not until a year from now.

So here’s where the league needs to implement a freeze that applies whenever a formal review as to whether a player should be placed on the Commissioner Exempt list commences. (Foster was actually cut after his latest incident but before he was placed on the paid leave.) For the team that is forced to pay a player who isn’t available to play, that’s the price of employing a player with the propensity to get in trouble and/or failing to keep him out of trouble.

Regardless, the greater good of the league will be promoted by not trusting other teams to do the right thing in the face of a strong temptation to acquire a talented player. Last week’s example proved that all teams can’t be trusted. So the better course would be to not tempt them.

43 responses to “NFL needs to revise its Commissioner Exempt list procedures

  1. This is a good idea. Plus if you can cut a guy on the exempt list it takes away the point of it, namely giving a guy a paid leave of absence.

  2. It’s over-thinking like this that gets the league in trouble in the first place. Do you honestly think the media frenzy around this would be affected by a rule change?

    And why should a team be allowed to just squat on a player like that who hasn’t been accused of a crime or is still awaiting discipline from the league? It’s like putting someone in jail without bail. There is a reason the justice system only does that for accused murderers.

    If you want to impose discipline, impose discipline. If you want to kick a guy off your team, kick him off your team. But don’t just put him in some kind of bizarre frozen limbo until you get around to making up your mind.

  3. Hmm. Don’t forget, the NFL stepped in and told the Chiefs to back off, we got this. Then the NFL muffed it, leaving the team to deal with the fallout. This proposal would only aggravate the situation. It’s clear the central control of Rodger’s office isn’t necessarily the best thing for an individual team. The more power and control Rodger’s office garners, the worse things get.

  4. Seems logical, so it’s doubtful that the league will adopt the guidelines, since the NFL appears to prefer knee-jerk/make-it-up-as-we-go reactions.

  5. The problem here is that there may be a time lag between the time the team cuts them, which makes them available immediately, and the time the League decides they need to be on the exempt list. If someone wants to take the PR chance, they can snap them up and wait it out at no cost.
    Might there be a way to say that all players put on waivers must first get approval from the League? It would be a rubber stamp move for 99.99% of them, and shouldn’t take any time at all. But, when an issue like this arises, the League can immediately block the release, put them on the Exempt list, and make the team that took the risk in the first place maintain responsibility. Just a thought.

  6. I guess I don’t understand why you think it should be revised. It’s rarely used, and actually seems to be used in the right circumstances by the commissioner. Where the NFL failed is not interviewing Hunt, and not actually investigating the incident. This is particularly alarming since they like to give the perception that their laws and investigation resources are superior to that of the US, when (for example), they suspend Ezekiel Elliott for 6 games, although he was never charged for any crime, and the accuser sent texts indicating she was attempting to hurt his career by the accusations. That process was a total sham. So the folks with the Cowboys and Patriots really appear to be targeted relative to the effort the NFL has put into the other players with far worse incidents that actually did happen.

  7. NFL needs to revise its Commissioner Exempt list procedures:

    NFL needs to revise its Commissioner: There fixed it for you.

  8. I honestly don’t understand – “…the greater good of the league will be promoted by not trusting other teams to do the right thing in the face of a strong temptation to acquire a talented player.”

    Isn’t that collusion?

    Regardless of the merits of any side here in the debate, I think it is unfair to vilify the league for collusion when the alleged issue is disagreed with (ala Colin K) but then say that the greater good is served when teams listen to what the NFL tells them to do relative to a player (ala Hunt).

    Now, if the league is guilty of discrimination in its directives, that is one thing, and then that should be the claim. But if the league is allowed to tell teams what to do, then collusion claims should not be enforceable.

  9. If the league starts getting all these tapes, do you think they’ll handle it like the spygate films???
    They see it. Hand out punishment but no one really knows exactly what was on them. Only speculation & the word of the Commish.
    (Also, hilarious hearing Pats fans cry about “cheating” Goodell)

  10. Why? The commissioner’s exempt list is just another article 46 boondoggle. They make it up as they go along. That’s not going to change until the commish changes.

  11. If a player is on the exempt list you still have to pay him. Why should a team have to pay a guy they want no part of under any circumstances because they’re not allowed to cut him. In Hunt’s case, he’s still on his rookie contract so his money is guaranteed, but that may not always be the case.

  12. “Changing procedures” implies there are actual defined procedures to change. The whole problem is just like every other discipline matter Goodell has ever implemented it’s all fluid and prone to changing on the fly based on however the NFL thinks the winds are blowing that particular moment.

    Nobody could be 100% certain they’d put Hunt on the exempt list to begin with and there’s nothing written down to suggest how long he’ll remain suspended. Goodell is going to see how mad people are on Twitter before he does anything and that’s a lousy way to run your disciplinary system.

  13. “Yes, the Foster situation played out poorly, but other teams may believe that they can handle the situation much better (or at least not as badly) as Washington did.”

    Beside waiting until due process to sign Foster…and risk losing him to another team…what could Washington have to done to “handle the situation much better”…?

    See this is exactly why claiming Foster made so much sense…the media has it in for the Redskins no matter what…so there is nothing to gain by appeasing them…the worst that can happen to the team is he never suits up…the best thing is he is cleared of said charges and takes the field as a Redskin!

  14. jdphx says:
    December 3, 2018 at 10:56 am
    You seem to forget….

    The NFL is reactive, not proactive.

    25 1 Rate This

    ——————–

    Au contraire! Not when framing the Pats (or Dallas) they aren’t.

  15. I’m not going to have the most popular opinion but I believe the pendulum has swung so far we have people wanting to completely end a person’s career for these incidents. Just as the 1 or 2 games the league was leveling before was insufficient the permanent ban for a first offense is entirely too much. Automatic 6 game suspension with a review of the case to determine if the player has been compliant during the suspension. Anger management, possible restitution to the victim, etc. 2nd offense 1 year automatic suspension. 3rd Indefinite suspension or life time ban.

  16. The NFL does have such a tool….it’s called suspending a player. The Hunt situation is the NFL’s doing. They had over 9 months to investigate and discipline this player. The NFL has the resources to get a copy of the video that they knew existed. They could have dealt with the issue months ago and it would be a non-issue today. I don’t like the idea of the commissioner having more tools and power to keep a player in limbo to cover up the leagues incompetence in handling these matters (the tack record speaks for itself).

  17. Basically you are saying that a player who is in very serious trouble should continue to get paid, potentially for months.

    Yea, I am going to say that is not something I want to see. Hunt should not receive another dime from an NFL team. Kansas City did the right thing by releasing him, even if it means the chances of getting an AFC championship goes down the drain.

  18. So here’s where the league needs to implement a freeze that applies whenever a formal review as to whether a player should be placed on the Commissioner Exempt list commences.

    ——-

    And then what would be the procedure AFTER that player has “rehabbed” or gone through the “appropriate counseling,” etc.?

    Seems as if it would be an even bigger dog-n-pony show at that point.

  19. Honest answer is I don’t think that is even the biggest problem here. Or even somewhere in the middle. Look at the video. THAT is the problem.

  20. wizahdry says: “The Hunt situation is the NFL’s doing. They had over 9 months to investigate and discipline this player. The NFL has the resources to get a copy of the video that they knew existed. They could have dealt with the issue months ago and it would be a non-issue today”
    ================================

    You seriously think it would be a “non-issued” today? Same holier-than-thou crowd would be just as loud…

  21. He was put on the exempt list kc didn’t have to release him they wanted too now he’s on waivers. nothing needs to be changed unless you just want a way to keep the player without ppl complaining about morals of keeping said player!

  22. I thought you were going to argue that there needs to be limits on how long a player can be on the Com Exempt List. If you recall A.P. was on it for several months. At least in that instance there was a pending legal case. What is the Commissioner’s excuse keeping Hunt on it now? There is no legal case pending. Hunt is not being paid, and being on the list is a de facto message to all teams to stay away. It seems like they can leave him on there as long as they want…say the rest of the season…perhaps even into the start of next season, prior to announcing what will probably be a 6 game suspension. I would think that the NFLPA would have a big problem with that.

  23. 6thsense10 says:
    December 3, 2018 at 11:45 am

    I’m not going to have the most popular opinion but I believe the pendulum has swung so far we have people wanting to completely end a person’s career for these incidents. Just as the 1 or 2 games the league was leveling before was insufficient the permanent ban for a first offense is entirely too much. Automatic 6 game suspension with a review of the case to determine if the player has been compliant during the suspension. Anger management, possible restitution to the victim, etc. 2nd offense 1 year automatic suspension. 3rd Indefinite suspension or life time ban.

    ===============

    You’re exactly right. This is the kind of thing that needs to happen. Everything that’s going on now is just a band-aid, or worse. Nothing’s really getting solved and no one’s being helped.

  24. Perhaps if the NFL had a competent leader, I would be all for making a change. But if it is Goodell making changes, we all know that he will only make things worse.

  25. It’s a good idea if there were no video of an alleged incident. But in Hunts case, there’s video. I don’t want a woman beater on my team.

  26. Am I wrong Hunt had a similar issue while at Toledo? Agree with the port 6thsense10 made. With the addition of fining the team for offenses #2 and #3. I believe in second chances, but repeated assaults on women shows some idiots just dont get it. If a team has liability for keeping idiots, then maybe some of them will employ players that deserve the privilege to play in the NFL and make the absurd amounts of money being offered today.

  27. Just to remind everyone: Goodell was given the power of discipline by the NFLPA in the last CBA negotiation. The players cared more about extra money and less practice, so they traded Goodell the power to be judge, jury, and executioner. They have nobody to blame but themselves when Goodell is inconsistent doling out punishments.

  28. You B. Crazy says: “They have nobody to blame but themselves when Goodell is inconsistent doling out punishments.”
    ———————-

    Other than the player themselves, why would I care as a fan? Someone else will just fill the void and take his place. As for fines, it doesn’t affect my pocketbook, and I certainly not crying about a millionaire losing $26,503…

  29. Godell is a heavy-handed dictator. he has no concern whether or not his rulings are fair, he just wants everyone to know that HE’S THE BOSS, and as long as he has the owners in his back pocket, UP YOURS……

  30. Their solution is simple. Tell the hotels they must sign and agreement to part with any videos of players behaving badly or YOU will not let the teams stay at those faciliies. Easy problem solved. They want the money you want the tapes, what an easy deal.

  31. Just curious … does anyone remember the NFL and its players being embroiled in so much drama and negative press during the Rozelle and Tagliabue eras? This isn’t rocket science. Players shouldn’t lose their jobs because of an unproven accusation anymore than we should lose ours in those circumstances. If a damning video surfaces, respond. Otherwise, investigate (or let law enforcement investigate) then act accordingly. Giving this commissioner more power is not the answer to anything.

  32. Does anyone remember the league having all these controversies when Rozelle and Tagliabue were commissioner? Goodell isn’t and never has been good for the NFL, and broadening his powers isn’t the answer. The answer is to conduct timely investigations–preferably in conjunction with law enforcement–then to act on real evidence rather than unsubstantiated accusations. It would also be helpful if one team wouldn’t jump in to pick up a player that another team has cut due to inappropriate conduct. Every team should be operating under the same standard when it comes to sexual assault and domestic abuse.

  33. Goodell has brought in huge revenue.

    The owners apparently don’t care about anything else he does, as long as the Brink’s Truck arrives weekly.

  34. Have to admit that suspending someone for criminal activity or rule breaking that will keep them off the field. It seems kind of strange to make the team PAY them while sitting in league limbo, often for a long time.
    Player should not be rewarded with $$ for bad behavior. (And the team penalized…)

  35. Here is an idea. How about they let the legal system do their job. No other Job in America are scrutinized for the personal conduct of their employees. People work with criminals everyday. If I’m involved in a domestic dispute my job isn’t launching an investigation. As long as I make it to work. She isn’t a victim. She is just as much at fault as he was. Guarantee she wasn’t dismissed from her job. Women want equal rights then they should be held to the same standard as a man. If this was an altercation between 2 men then we would look the other way. People want fairness on their terms.

  36. bpurd says:

    If this was an altercation between 2 men then we would look the other way. People want fairness on their terms.
    ——————————————–
    That’s not necessarily true. Boxers are held accountable if they get into a fight with another man who has lesser skills. If an NFL player physically attacked some waiter in a restaurant, I’m pretty sure it would make headlines. The average man has significantly greater upper-body strength than the average woman. And those advantages are off the charts when you’re talking about a professional athlete. Yes, there have been instances when women have attacked men. But the data on this is clear. Women are victimized by violence and sexual assault at an alarming rate. It’s really easy to set the rules for fairness: Don’t beat up on people who are physically smaller and weaker than you are.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.