Dean Blandino: AAF’s Sky Judge provides template for NFL

AP

The NFL’s Competition Committee is studying the idea of adding a video official to each officiating crew. To see how it would work in action, all the NFL has to do is look to the Alliance of American Football.

On an incompletion during the third quarter of Sunday’s game between the San Antonio Commanders and the Birmingham Iron, Commanders defensive back Duke Thomas’ shoulder connected with Birmingham receiver Tobias Palmer’s head. Officials didn’t throw a flag, but the Sky Judge intervened, ordering a penalty on Thomas for hitting a defenseless receiver.

“The theory is a person who has access to the video feed can run the plays back and forth and if they see something safety-related or something late in the game that could be critical to the outcome to the game, and it’s a clear mistake on the field, then the Sky Judge can correct it,” AAF rules analyst and officiating consultant Dean Blandino told PFT. “That’s what happened in the game yesterday in Birmingham. In that instance, it worked as intended. We were able to communicate directly to the referee, and it was seamless. There wasn’t a lot of discussion.”

The NFL, prompted by the missed pass interference and hit on a defenseless receiver calls late in the NFC Championship Game, received seven rules change proposals from teams related to expanding instant replay. Adding a video official to each crew was the idea that received the “most interest” from the Competition Committee during their meetings in Indianapolis.

It would take 24 of 32 NFL owners to pass any new rule.

“It’s definitely something they’re talking about, and obviously what happened in the NFC Championship Game was really a driver for this conversation, but this had been discussed before,” said Blandino, the NFL’s former head of officiating. “I think it’s an opportunity for the NFL to look and see what the Alliance is doing and take from it. I know they’re going to have a lot conversations coming up with their Competition Committee meetings and their league meetings, and I know this will be a part of it.”

Troy Vincent, the NFL’s executive vice president of football operations, said last week that the Competition Committee will have to answer several questions before presenting the idea to ownership. Among them are: How do you find competent Sky Judges, and what penalties is the Sky Judge limited to correcting or at what point in the game?

Blandino agreed finding that many qualified officials with a technical background is “not easy” and one of the “biggest challenges” of implementing the idea.

The AAF’s Sky Judge can implement a penalty for anything safety-related at any point during the game. But for obvious pass interference or any other rules violation that impacts the game, the video official is limited to ordering a penalty or overturning a penalty only in the final five minutes.

“I think in order to not negatively impact the flow of the game, I think it has to be limited,” said Blandino, “whether that’s limited by what the Sky Judge can review or when they can review it. I think those are things you have to make sure it’s narrow in scope.”

Blandino has consulted with The Alliance since last summer, and contrary to recent rumors, he said he has no plans to take on a similar consulting role with other spring leagues.

43 responses to “Dean Blandino: AAF’s Sky Judge provides template for NFL

  1. great another way for the games to last longer because of more penalties. how about we get rid of some of these ticky tack rules and let defenses play again.

  2. The biggest difference I notice between the league’s is the amount of flags thrown. The NFL is flag happy
    because they try to influence the outcomes of the games.

  3. The NFL has had a similar template for years: a replay official traveled with each crew and watched the game up in the box
    That’s who the referee communicated with during a replay. The only change would be allowing that replay official to assist in real time as well

  4. Just go back to the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s. The games were quick and legit, because the penalties never played a huge factor, it was all physical…

  5. Reminds me of an old sardonic New Yorker cartoon: “There are no great men, only great committees.”

  6. It would give the NFL and officials more ways to manipulate the outcome of the game.

  7. Keep the focus narrow so they can still get the outcome they want.
    I laugh when fans think the refs do it on their own; if a ref makes a bad call and the Bills or Lions win, that ref is toast.

  8. The NFL will never fix calls that are open to interpretation. It allows them to sway a game in the direction they want it to go.

  9. ridiculous!!!! all the commish has had to do for the last 10 years is log into these forums and read the comments from the fans who pay for his product.

  10. How long has the AAF been around? And yet, many NFL analysts I’ve read elsewhere are acting like this “sky judge” concept is the discovery of the ages in the football officiating world. Maybe the NFL should give this proposal a bit more time to be assessed before swallowing it hook, line and sinker. If field judges, line judges, back judges, side judges, etc.—each of whom are physically right on top of the action in their limited area of responsibility in the field of play—can be mistaken, are we to believe that a “sky judge” sitting up in the press box making real-time calls on the entire field of play—often without the benefit of instant replay—can’t likewise make a mistake? And what of all the other potentially game-changing calls in the NFL that currently still aren’t reviewable? This may not be the panacea some seem to think it is. “The Hoodie’s” proposal still makes the most sense to me.

  11. Seriously? The challenge would be to find someone to be the “sky” judge? The qualifications are being able to read a rule book and watch a TV screen. Only the NFL can make something so ridiculously simple, difficult beyond comprehension.

  12. “The theory is a person who has access to the video feed can run the plays back and forth and if they see something safety-related or something late in the game that could be critical to the outcome to the game, and it’s a clear mistake on the field, then the Sky Judge can correct it,” AAF rules analyst and officiating consultant Dean Blandino told PFT

    ….. He needs to remove “late in the game” from that quote above …..
    .

  13. Next what? Lasers measuring every movement down to microns?where will this end?

    In fact cut down the number of zebras and penalties, put some padding on the helmet exteriors and let the players play.

  14. The NFL needs lots of improvement. Not surprised it’s from an upstart league that knows better. After all, they got a lot of their stuff from the USFL, remember?

  15. Go all in with complete transparency or scrap replay all together.

    For the NFL, it’s not a $$$ thing, it’s a “want to” thing.

  16. vaphinfan says:
    March 4, 2019 at 8:54 pm
    The biggest difference I notice between the league’s is the amount of flags thrown. The NFL is flag happy
    because they try to influence the outcomes of the games.
    _______________________________________________________
    That’s true. Just look at the refs giving Brady high fives and fist bumps before games. They’re supposed to be impartial to the outcome of the game. So much for that! And those of you who give a thumbs down, shame on you! Y’all sold out.

  17. “The AAF’s Sky Judge can implement a penalty for anything safety-related at any point during the game. But for obvious pass interference or any other rules violation that impacts the game, the video official is limited to ordering a penalty or overturning a penalty only in the final five minutes.”

    Sounds like there already is a template & a few competent people with technical skills implementing it.
    NCAA has similar assistance so there are even more “refs” to draw from.

  18. I really am starting to wonder about the AAF vs XFL. It’s beginning to look like the NFL has accepted that the landscape is changing. That they finally realized they had better back a horse before it became fast enough and strong enough to pose a threat, and that league is the AAF.

    The first iteration of the XFL was more fun to watch than the AAF yet still failed and the NFL never dared give them credit for their innovations. I suspect in a similar vain the XFL 2.0 will be a superior product to the AAF but get buried by the powers that be because for whatever reason they don’t want McMahon in their club. If they did he’d own a team. He has the money to buy one and it’s a much more surefire investment than a start up league so the only thing that makes sense is he’s just not welcome…

  19. There were several critical penalties during the game that affected the Rams as well. More replay will mean more game delays.

  20. So the eye in the sky can get it wrong too? These refs go with the home team more often than not regardless of the call. Unless it involves one of the 3 favorite teams.

  21. Even if the NFL put the Sky Judge into practice, they’d probably hire Stevie Wonder to be their Sky Judge. The NFL can’t get out of its own way when it comes to making rules or improving the game.

  22. This will be the NFLs adaptation of “1984.”. Big Brother is watching. Lol.

    I’m for some version of this system. However, if they are only going to use it to call more ticky-tack stuff, then no. If implemented, I think they should also use it to reverse bad calls.

  23. I agree with the person above…the games I’ve watched so far they don’t throw a flag on EVERY play….they let them play old fashion football. Yes, I’ve seen some plays where in the NFL they would have called a ticky-tack flag , but in this league if it’s not a blatant foul, they let them play ball. It’s refreshing.

  24. im sorry if its a call that could change the outcome in a game, it should be able to be called from the first play on, not just late in the game..

  25. Any and all credibility you had was left on the Dallas Cowboys Party Bus. Most fans detest you; that a network chose to pay you changes nothing. You are the worst. #appearanceofimporiety

  26. Imagine that. The BIG BOY on the lot, The Shield, The MAN, 99 years of playing Professional Football. The BIG BAD NFL is so SAD they are following The AAF, a League that has been in existence less than 2 years, to follow THEIR LEAD by looking at their “Sky Judge” position and how it works. SAD, SAD, SAD, but then again, Roger and his Cronies are the definitions of SAD.

  27. Amazing how smart Blandino has become since he left the NFL because I don’t remember him saying or doing much to improve officiating when he was in charge .

  28. Sky Judge might be great but why do I suspect the NFL’s interpretation of it will be a confusing mess? I can already imagine announcers explaining why an obvious call was missed because subsection C of paragraph 84 in the NFL’s rules kept the video official from calling it.

  29. LOL, all of you NFL haters love to whine about the “good old days”, hate change and progress, hate the stance the NFL has taken against social injustices such as racism. You want the days when headhunting was legal, you didn’t care that players were left broken, concussed, or killing themselves. Yet, you’re still watching the NFL and taking the time to comment on a talkboard. You threatened boycotts but it didn’t last more than one game.

  30. A lot of whining here. Calls go wrong sometimes. Happens to my team, happens to your team. It HAPPENS. If you think the outcome is rigged, you are utterly stupid for watching.
    The only thing I have an issue with is the officials admitting they call playoff games differently. Call them all exactly the same. That’s fair.

  31. It will never happen. The NFL has control of the outcomes of games when they get to the “money” portion of the season. Taking away a legit control point, regardless of logic, would eliminate the NFL’s control.

    The Rams, fresh into their new stadium next year, will be a .500 team. The Chargers, on the other hand, will go deep into the playoffs and might be in the SB. It’s all about revenue generation – both of those teams have/had lackluster local support, but the league needs to fill that new stadium and nobody wants to watch a loser.

    Follow the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

  32. Reading these comments, I had no idea so many people were so paranoid and conspiratorial.

    The refs want the Pats to win? Is that why they let them lose 3 Super Bowls and a bunch of playoff games?

    I’m not saying everything is good and pure, but the level of paranoia here is pretty high.

  33. I want a league where they just let them go out there and do whatever they want to each other just like they did in the days of gladiators.
    If there are no rules, then no one gets penalized, right? Just like if there are no laws, no one gets arrested right?
    I wanted to sound as absurd as many of the posters in here have become. I think I succeeded.

  34. while they’re at it, why not allow the offensive line to hold between the tackles. They allow players to get a way with it anyways, and sometimes it seems they call it only at the absolute worst time. maybe unless its a flagrant play, like using it to take a defender down. it would probably eliminate half the penalties in a game, between marginal holding calls and some late/unsafe hits on the QB.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.