Rich McKay: If we’re going to replay judgment calls, let’s start with biggest one

Getty Images

NFL teams voted 31-1 in favor of a one-year trial expansion of replay to include challenges for pass interference penalties whether they were called on the field or if coaches think they should have been called.

That change came after the end of last year’s NFC Championship Game spurred calls for the league to have a mechanism in place to address a blatant missed call. There was much discussion about how to do that and Falcons CEO/Competition Committee chairman Rich McKay said on SiriusXM NFL Radio that the league’s coaches wanted to go further, but he thinks that pass interference is an appropriate way to start looking at expanded replay for judgment calls on the field.

“We spent a lot of time on replay,” McKay said. “We came to the conclusion that the place to start, if you’re going to get into the business of judgment calls, meaning penalties and replay, let’s start with the biggest play there is. Because that’s what the purpose of replay is. It’s to deal with big plays. It’s not to just try to get every call right or we’d be there all day. So we thought OPI, DPI, meaning offensive pass interference and defensive pass interference was the place to start. But to get to 24 votes, that is never easy. So that took us a couple days.”

Since the league voted to adopt the change, discussion has shifted to what the game will look like with the new rule implemented and that conversation will continue through the 2019 season. Should it prove to be a net positive for the game, there will likely be even more of a push to include replay reviews for other penalties at next year’s league meetings.

43 responses to “Rich McKay: If we’re going to replay judgment calls, let’s start with biggest one

  1. The problem with replay is that it always takes so damn long. The officials should be able to look at the replay from various angles and make the call within 15-30 seconds. Anything else is just stalling.

  2. NFL games have become like legal proceedings.

    Take me back to the games of the ’70s & ’80s with all of their flaws. It was a lot more fun to watch. … which is largely why I watched maybe only 6 or 8 games all of last season, including playoffs.

  3. Too late to rectify one of the biggest blunders in NFL history. The wrong team went to the Super Bowl because two officials suddenly went blind.

  4. After sending the wrong team to the Super Bowl, the NFL had to do SOMETHING – if not for sincere reasons, then certainly for window dressing after that debacle.

    Besides, everyone realizes this is 2019, right, and therefore prudent for a business to leverage technology to achieve higher levels of accuracy and performance?

  5. My biggest gripe is the seeming lack of consistency. A review of one play will result in a penalty, a review of another that looks to be in the same vein if not nearly identical will result in no flag. Sorta like the home plate umpire calling balls and strikes, just be consistent even if you’re always wrong.

  6. Cue up all the whining about prolonging the game and fixing results. Even though the same challenge system will be in play and if it were their intent there are far more subtle ways to control results. “Let’s go back to 1974” doesn’t fly either, not when we are all getting the mistakes sent to our homes in 4k from 16 different angles.

  7. Why not just play the games without replays over the standard 3-3 1/2 hours, then let the indoors referees review the tape and announce the winners on Tuesday?

  8. nyneal says:
    April 7, 2019 at 10:00 am
    Too late to rectify one of the biggest blunders in NFL history. The wrong team went to the Super Bowl because two officials suddenly went blind.

    ———————-
    Actually its unknown what team would gave wone that game. If rectifying calls one cant cherry pick, and there were many more than that one. If you rectified every incorrect call in that or any game you get a totally different outcome. In this alternate universe of only correct calls one team or the other might be so far ahead that it was all moot anyhow. You just dont know. Really all we can say is that one of the bad calls was amazing they missed it. But there were many others less amazing they missed it, but they did still get missed. Noted that even on the OPI call they have found on the same play a hands to the face penalty agaibst the Saints that did not get called, it would be neccesary to rectify that too so even if they give the completion its coming back.

  9. Let’s make this whole process simple. The NFL already reviews all scoring plays. Simply allow each team to challenge 3 plays a game on any play. A team can challenge ANY non-call or penalty it chooses. Each team will have to choose wisely. Let’s face it a lot of these incorrect calls are due to the position of the official and the angle they see the play. Officials get almost all the penalties correct. I think there is more of a problem with what is NOT called. This would solve a lot of problems. The attitude of the NFL and fans should be people make mistakes. This rule would force teams to gameplan these challanges.

  10. As bad as it may be NFL officiating is WAY better than NCAA Tournament officiating.

  11. Everybody hates how long the review process takes until it’s their team on the wrong end of a call. Sure, it needs to be sped up and a full time booth/ review ref should be better to turn it around quickly but I’d rather have a slow(ish) correct call than fast wrong one.

  12. How many passes are there in any given game? 70? 80? And you’re going to review every one of them?

    Games literally are going to last 6 to 7 hours long. Good luck with that strategy.

  13. Another horrible NFL decision. Once again swayed by emotion caused by a play that had at least two Saints penalties….holding and hands to the face. Now more stoppage of play. Can’t wait. Life is not fair people!

  14. The problem with Replay is that it was supposed to overturn OBVIOUS errors. If you have to slow mo, zoom, stitch various angles together, then the error was not obvious.

  15. Its not “whether to use” replay thats the problem. Someday people will look back at our current METHOD of trying to use replay that’ll be laughed at as RIDICULOUS. Watching some referee running to the sideline then sticking his head under a cloth then TRYING to WAIT for all the angles and squinting/re-watching again and again — is going to be like us watching a guy trying to crank start a Model-T Ford in a black & white silent movie.

    Techies RIGHT NOW could invent a way that…
    ALL angles of ALL cameras are brought into ONE screen IMMEDIATELY for INSTANT pinpointing of all views – and a DESIGNATED specialist (or artificially intelligent computer – ie Tennis replay of the line call) will determine the call in less than 5 seconds.

  16. Now fix the replay system itself. There’s no need to have the on-field official go in the little booth on the sideline. Replays should take 30 seconds with a dedicated booth official watching instantly. Fans get them at home instantly. Refs should too!

  17. I’ll take real football with its ocassional flaws but real game flow than the new and not improved constipated NFL which is so concerned about getting it “right” to avoid pitchfork nation than actually putting a watchable product on the field.

  18. Have 3 officials make all post snap calls from the booth. The on field officials make pre snap calls and manage spots and the clock.

  19. There is little concern for speeding up the game with quick replay reviews. The NFL will not give back the the ad revenue generated with the current system.

  20. What about offensive line holding, the ultimate judgment call. Or how about all the grabbing on Hail Mary plays. This may get out of hand.

  21. Also realize that if you review pass interference on every pass, you’ll see a touch or a grab on almost every play. So the defense won’t have a chance. You think it’s bad now? Just wait, this year and all the replays are going to destroy the NFL.

  22. i think we all need to accept the fact that the game we love is fixed…lol sad but true

  23. With all the possible replay scenarios, it will make baseball seen like a fast moving sport.

  24. veetan says:
    April 7, 2019 at 10:05 am
    After sending the wrong team to the Super Bowl,

    ——————
    Lets keep correct perspective here. That call neither won nor lost a game. You cant just assume the rest of the events in a game from any point. Once you start playing shoulda woulda anything is possible to pretend. But its still only pretend.

  25. True enough but 24 seconds left in the game moves the % way over 90. What is true is that had the play not been so outrageous, as opposed to routine line play, it would not have gotten this attention. It was a deliberate and flagrant foul. That’s the difference from line holding or a inadvertent face mask or even the uncalled head shot that knocked out the Saints TE.

  26. While they are at it, can Sean Payton sign up for the Bruce Pearl class on class? A missed double dribble call that would have put the ball in the hands of his team, and they would be playing tomorrow night. No whining/crying/pouting….

  27. Funny how the NFL waited over a decade to make an extremely minor, obscure rule change that was incorrectly applied to screw the Raiders out of an AFC Championship game, but they’re willing to radically change a core part of the game weeks later to appease Saints fans.

  28. I will not watch a 4 hour long regular season game. Replay slows everything down.

  29. So officials will slow down the footage to look for the slightest penalty, and call foul/no foul. So ticky tac, basic hand fighting will be called. Yet, not the push off by receivers just because the arm isn’t extended. Yet, it disrupts the defender in his coverage.

    They need to look at it from the refs perspective, which is real time. However, that won’t happen.

    Hail Mary’s will be replayed for 15 minutes due to offset penalties.

  30. Who cares how long replay takes. There’s already a commercial after the TD, then after the XP, Then after the kickoff. What’s another 5 mins of commercials.

  31. A quick and simple internet will explain to you that you are wrong.
    Something tells me you’ve declined to look at that at any point in time since the game you’re questioning was originally played.

    ____________________________________
    autumnwind999 says:
    April 7, 2019 at 5:07 pm
    Funny how the NFL waited over a decade to make an extremely minor, obscure rule change that was incorrectly applied to screw the Raiders out of an AFC Championship game, but they’re willing to radically change a core part of the game weeks later to appease Saints fans.

  32. Simple solution. Each team gets 4 challenges per game for everything. You want to challenge out of bounds? Use a challenge. You want to challenge PI? Use a challenge. You want to challenge a fumble call? Use a challenge. It would keep the game moving, each side gets the same number of chances to challenge and if they don’t save one for “late in game” its on them. Games will last forever this season with these current changes.

  33. The only thing I really hope for with this new implementation, is that ticky tack PI plays aren’t now given to offenses. I hate when a team has 3rd and 23, and they get a first down on ticky tack touching a receiver during a route.

    If it does, and if youre losing with 4:00 left in the game, throw the ball up, and do whatever you can to draw a PI. Don’t get it? Challenge it. I don’t want to see that stuff happening.

  34. The biggest problem is the zebras think they are infallible, and refused to review, despite objections. Their job is to get as much right as possible? Replay will solve the tough ones. New Orleans got robbed, on national TV?

  35. 31-1 is pretty significant and shows that basically every club in the NFL is scared to death that the NOLA-No Call could happen to them.

    Problem is that the NOLA No-Call was an intentional no call…

  36. There’s contact on just about every pass defending. I predict disaster during reviews. Now, facemasking. That’s more obvious, especially when you see the player’s head suddenly get wrenched to the side. That should be an obvious review such as in the NFC Championship game.

  37. With all of this hand wringing over how long a replay will take, which calls are being replayed, I have a simple solution for the NFL:

    Hire better refs who make better calls – there’s nothing to replay if they make the call correctly the first time.

    Thanks, I’m glad I could help – please DM me for info on where to send my payment for fixing this.

  38. The Analytical Kid says:
    April 7, 2019 at 9:55 am
    NFL games have become like legal proceedings.

    Take me back to the games of the ’70s & ’80s with all of their flaws. It was a lot more fun to watch. … which is largely why I watched maybe only 6 or 8 games all of last season, including playoffs.

    Those halcyon days of yore are exactly the reason we now have these rules. Ben Dreith comes to mind. The many tainted championships of that era demanded a better system. Don’t pretend it was all tickety boo back then. Far from it.

  39. Let each state make its own decision on NFL gambling. Play the games without all of this endless boring discussion during replay. Each state should have a gambling commissioner who looks at all the games, and if in that person’s opinion the outcome of the game was influenced by bad officiating, then all bets for that game are off.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.