Yannick Ngakoue skips minicamp in contract dispute

Getty Images

Jaguars defensive end Yannick Ngakoue is not happy with his contract, and he’s using the only leverage he has: Refusing to show up to work.

Ngakoue gave a statement to Adam Schefter of ESPN saying that he will hold out of mandatory minicamp because the Jaguars have not given him the contract extension he wants.

“I will not be attending minicamp as my contract has not been resolved. I remain committed to Jacksonville, the fans and my teammates. My hope is to be with Jacksonville for years to come,” he said.

A third-round draft pick in 2016, Ngakoue has 29.5 sacks through his first three NFL seasons. Ngakoue is heading into the fourth and final year of his rookie contract and is slated to make a salary of $2.025 million this season.

35 responses to “Yannick Ngakoue skips minicamp in contract dispute

  1. He isnt happy with the contract he signed so he will skip out on showing up to work.

    How would that play out in the real world?

  2. contra74 says:
    June 10, 2019 at 2:07 pm
    He isnt happy with the contract he signed so he will skip out on showing up to work.

    How would that play out in the real world?
    ————————————————–

    You mean the contract he signed that his employers feel free to cancel when it’s too pricey for them?

  3. Got to love the standard “how does this work in the real world” dialogue. we get it, it doesn’t . This is an entertainment industry where players constantly renegotiate contracts and do whatever they can to get it. The team and player have a choice, pay him he shows up, don’t pay him and shows up eventually and probably isn’t productive.

  4. The guy has literally outperformed every aspect of his slotted rookie deal in which he had almost zero room to negotiate anything. Outperformed might be an understatement. The Jags have been looking for a edge rusher seemingly forever. Now that they have a good one they want to get cheap? Being cheap rarely works and it really sets a bad example for all of the other players on the roster that if you work hard and outperform your contract we will still not pay you what you are worth.

  5. contra74 says:

    June 10, 2019 at 2:07 pm

    He isnt happy with the contract he signed so he will skip out on showing up to work.

    How would that play out in the real world?
    ————
    Comments like these are so stupid. How would if play out if you were asked to take a pay cut at your job? Do you accept a lower salary at your job so your company can hire more people or more qualified people? Are people at your job traded to another company at any time the company wants whether or not you want to move? Are you thought of as over the hill at your company once you hit 30?

  6. Gotta pay the dude. Him and Josh Allen for at least 4 years with Ramsey locking down one side of the field is a good recipe for success…

  7. He gets paid next year. If he wants to nuke as much of that 2 million this year and limit his options next year then it is within his rights.

    The smart move would be to play out this season and get some insurance in case of injury.

    3.48 million over 4 years plus playoff money plus endorsements… how can he feed his family?

    The system allows him to negotiate with 32 teams next year or worst case get a 1-year 17 million dollar deal. Veterans get much more than young players according to the CBA of the union he joined.

  8. He has well out performed his rookie contract. Its sad when a rookie (Josh Allen), hasnt even played a down in the NFL and has made more money than Ngakoue

  9. Sure, the owners can cut a guy and not pay him or they can re-structure his contract to more favorable terms but here’s the deal, the facts: THE PLAYERS, THROUGH THEIR UNION AND THE CBA, HAVE AGREED TO IT.

    The owners act completely within the boundaries of the CBA. If the players don’t like it, they should negotiate something else. Show up, Yannick, you’re under contract.

  10. There’s a term for it when you compare your blue collar job to the contracts of NFL players, it’s called a false equivalency. If you were one of a handful of people on the planet who could do your job at as high a level as a pro athlete you could set your price too.

  11. If you haven’t heard of him, that’s kind of sad. He has had almost 10 sacks a season for 3 seasons straight and made the Pro Bowl in 2017. He probably should have been in the Pro Bowl at least 1 more season and was considered one of the biggest snubs. He also led the league in forced fumbles the year he made the Pro Bowl. He’s had 10 forced fumbles since entering the league 3 years ago and is consistently one of the top players in QB hits and hurries. He is among the top pass rushers in the league and has a very unique name. I feel like he would stick out to anyone who follows the sport of football as opposed to just 1 team.

  12. footballpat says:
    June 10, 2019 at 2:11 pm

    You mean the contract he signed that his employers feel free to cancel when it’s too pricey for them?

    ————–

    Go shorter guaranteed contract between 1 and 3 years. No holding out and no franchising.

  13. @razzlejag

    Your scenario goes both ways. The players agreed to a deal that also allows them to skip mandatory camps and training camp and they can fined per day missed. So if it’s ok for the owners to use their leverage why is it not ok for the player?

  14. Lol at all of this play the contract you signed BS. It’s his rookie contract! He was basically forced to sign it or never play football again, rookies have no say so in how much they will get paid and have very few “rights” that they can actually negotiate. Intelligence isn’t running to deep in the comments section today. I can see them doing this when they had that bust Fowler but this guy not only made that guy expendable but has performed at the level that Fowler was expected to play at. Pay the man.

  15. Ok, Ngakoue has a great name so now he thinks he’s a tough guy?
    If I were Jax brass, this dude would not see another dime.
    Thinks he’s irreplaceable?
    Sit for a year and see how that works out for ya.

  16. He isnt happy with the contract he signed so he will skip out on showing up to work.

    How would that play out in the real world?
    ———–

    NFL owners don’t guarantee the vast majority of their contracts, so this is par for the course in the real world.

  17. RussianBreadMaker says:
    June 10, 2019 at 3:09 pm
    Anyone else never heard of this guy?

    17 47 Rate This

    ———————

    yes, but he is overrated. they should have dealt him off already to avoid this

    lots of players do sack collecting thinking it is a way to a huge deal and some teams are dumb enough to overpay them

  18. I really don’t understand the hate for players that seek market value for their performance. You guys act like it’s somehow affecting your life. Guess what – IT DOESN’T.

  19. “You mean the contract he signed that his employers feel free to cancel when it’s too pricey for them?”

    —————————————–

    Yes, but this is his rookie deal. If he’s mad at someone, it should be the NFLPA, not the Jags.

    Skipping out on a contract you negotiated is one thing, skipping out because you’re not happy with your rookie contract is an entirely different thing.

  20. You don’t like your deal, talk to your union, LOL.

    How much of the money in a rookie deal for a third rounder is guaranteed?

  21. Will be interesting to see if Jags fine him. Would almost expect it from Coughlin.

  22. He’s underpaid due to the rookie scale system. Teams love it because they get these guys in their prime for way below what they would get on the open market if they perform well. If they don’t, they get cut and the contract vanishes into thin air. I don’t blame the player. The NFLPA needs to drive for shorter rookie contracts in the next CBA.

  23. “Lol at all of this play the contract you signed BS. It’s his rookie contract! He was basically forced to sign it or never play football again, rookies have no say so in how much they will get paid and have very few “rights” that they can actually negotiate. Intelligence isn’t running to deep in the comments section today. I can see them doing this when they had that bust Fowler but this guy not only made that guy expendable but has performed at the level that Fowler was expected to play at. Pay the man.”

    ————————-

    And when exactly do they “pay the man”? After what year of his deal? Does he get to decide when it is the proper time to “pay the man” or do the Jags? Or is it the NFLPA’s responsibility, since they’re the ones who negotiated the set contracts years ago? How are the Jags supposed to magically know when Yannick is unhappy with his deal (or any other player with any other deal)? They did this to protect all players evenly when they got drafted. If you want to go back to the days of negotiating individual rookie deals and getting your Brian Bosworth mega-contracts you’re going to be sorely disappointed (unless you think Bosworth was worth a ten year deal, then you’ll be happy).

    The pre-set contracts not only save both the teams and players a lot of headache, it reduces pressure on the players. If Nick Bosa has eighteen sacks in three years on a standard rookie deal, that’s acceptable, with room for improvement. If he has eighteen sacks in three years on a six year, seventy-eight million dollar contract (Sam Bradford’s from 2010), people see that way differently. These contracts protect the players. Not to mention that the rookie deals are mostly guaranteed, unlike freely negotiated deals. This is important. Rookie deals are mostly guaranteed. So it’s less likely that a team will “back out”, as some have said, because they owe the money anyway. Only if a pick is really bad (in which case he won’t be getting an extension anyway) does a team back out of a rookie contract.

    He’s only played three years. He’ll get his deal. The only way that he does not if he plays terribly (and I mean TERRIBLY) because his sack production and pressure has been outstanding, and far beyond what was expected from him. Now, if Jacksonville refuses to pay and he has a great year, then we can call them idiots. But there’s little possibility that the Jags let him after four productive years. If they do, Yannick will get a better deal elsewhere.

  24. Look for a minute at Trey Flowers who played out his contract with the Patriots. Nice player, lots of production but the Pats just didn’t want to “pay da man” and let him go. The Lions ponied up a ton of money, the Patriots backfilled with aging Michael Bennett and a draft pick, Chase Winovich.

    They do this all the time and they are the most successful franchise.

  25. contra74 says:
    June 10, 2019 at 2:07 pm
    He isnt happy with the contract he signed so he will skip out on showing up to work.

    How would that play out in the real world?
    ——————————————————————
    It’s not the real world so stop comparing the two. What is 1-3% of the world can play professional sports ? Plus if that was you out there you would do the same thing I know I would it’s leverage. It’s not like Khan can’t afford it if he can’t he needs to sell the team to someone who can and they will move the team. Does that work better for you ?

  26. “It’s not the real world so stop comparing the two. What is 1-3% of the world can play professional sports ”

    ——————

    They’re athletes, not gods. Their word counts just as much as your’s or mine should. They don’t get to be free from moral standards just because they’re really good at one thing. And that same statement goes for applies to the teams as well.

  27. He’s probably going to want a truckload of money and I’m not sure the Jags are going to be willing to do that. They are already over the cap for next year thanks to the $22.5M cap charge for Marcell Dareus. They could take that money and give it to him. The problem is how much exactly does he want? Don’t be surprised if he’s looking for a $80M+ contract with an average over $16M/yr.

  28. All the people like “play out the contract”

    That isn’t exactly good for the Jags. He’s averaging 10 sacks a year now. If he hits 15 and becomes a free agent Jags are forced to tag or end up paying even more.

    It does both sides good to get a deal done during the last year of rookie contracts.
    Free agent contracts, however, I would agree to the whole “play what you signed” because as a free agent you had plenty of control of how it paid and ‘outs’.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.