Robert Quinn’s excuse failed before an independent arbitrator

Getty Images

Ordinarily, the NFL can’t say much about a player’s PED violation. The ordinary procedure goes out the window, however, when the player or his agent take liberties with reality.

“[T]he Management Council may publicly disclose information relating to the discipline of a Player to correct inaccurate public claims made by that Player or his representatives about the discipline,” the PED policy states.

In this case, the excuse provided by Quinn’s agent may result in the league exercising its right to push back.

Consider the basic facts. Quinn tested positive for a masking agent. He appealed. As of 2013, all appeals of positive PED tests go to an independent arbitrator, hired by the NFL and NFL Players Association. Quinn had a chance to make a case against the standard two-game suspension arising from a positive test for a masking agent. The independent arbitrator upheld the suspension, rejecting all factual and legal arguments presented by Quinn.

It’s not surprising that, having lost in the NFL’s court of law, Quinn now hopes to win in the court of public opinion. Indeed, when has a player who failed a PED test ever said, “You caught me”? Most if not all players have an explanation that sounds plausible. If they’re all telling the truth, the truth is that the PED policy rarely if ever actually catches a cheater.

Here, Quinn contends that his seizure pills were contaminated by the pharmacy where the prescription was filled, and that his expert witness made a compelling case to that end. It wasn’t compelling enough to get the independent arbitrator to agree, however.

The broader question is whether anything said by Quinn’s agent was inaccurate enough to get the league to take advantage of its power under the PED policy to publicly call BS. If the league can show that the argument isn’t accurate, it should.

4 responses to “Robert Quinn’s excuse failed before an independent arbitrator

  1. There are 4 major sports leagues in this country. NFL, MLB, NHL, and NBA. Out of all the players in those leagues, it’s unlikely that Quinn is the only one taking these seizure pills. So, why is he the only one who’s tested positive? Kinda like Duane Brown, who claimed it was the steroids in his Mexican steak. Although, as ridiculous an excuse as that was, he got away with it. Even though he was the only one who tested positive…

  2. Keep in mind, the person who read the test claims he had never seen this particular chemical in a player’s blood in his 30 years of drug testing. The amount found in his blood was something like 0.001% the amount that would be needed to be used as an effective masking agent for PEDs. Further, the pharmacy he picked up his medication from filled a prescription for the banned substance (for a different person — the substance is also used to treat gout) immediately prior to filling Quinn’s prescription based on pharmacy records that were shared. The NFL even admitted they have no evidence that Quinn is doping, but basically wanted to uphold the suspension anyway.

    Unless his agent us outright lying, this does indeed seem to be the rare instance where a retest should have been done or it should have been deemed a false positive due to the minuscule amount of this chemical was in the blood.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.