Shaquil Barrett truly bets on self, wins big

Getty Images

There’s been plenty of talk lately about players betting on themselves. Signing a multi-year deal that doesn’t give the player an early out or doesn’t ensure that, if he performs like the very best in the league at his position in the sport, his pay will be adjusted accordingly isn’t really an instance of a player betting on himself.

A player truly bets on himself when he signs a one-year deal that gives the team no ability to squat on a bargain for another year or two but that lets the player follow a great year with a trip to the market. That’s exactly how Buccaneers defensive end Shaquil Barrett, the 2019 PFT defensive player of the year, wagered on himself.

“[T]hat’s why we did a one-year contract,” Barrett’s agent, Drew Rosenhaus, told on Monday. “I knew he had it in him.”

What Barrett had in him was a league-leading 19.5 sacks. Next surely will be the franchise tag or the transition tag. (If there’s no CBA by the start of the new league year, the Bucs will have one of each, to possibly be used on Barrett and quarterback Jameis Winston. If a new CBA is finalized by then, the Bucs will be able to use only the franchise tag or the transition tag on one of them.) After that, the tag for Barrett could become a long-term deal.

However it plays out, Barrett placed an all-in wager on himself, and it’s now going to pay off, with a true and legitimate upside for his performance that will reward him not just fairly but also fully for his accomplishments in 2019.

3 responses to “Shaquil Barrett truly bets on self, wins big

  1. >>“[T]hat’s why we did a one-year contract,” Barrett’s agent, Drew Rosenhaus, told on Monday. “I knew he had it in him.”

    If you REALLY knew he had it in him you would have structured it like the Revis contract with the Patriots. 1 year at the agreed upon rate, and the next year at a crazy number, so teh team would either negotiate or cut him.
    Or you could have negotiated that the team can’t tag him.

    He’ll get paid, but he’d do better if he was completely free.

  2. I love the kid, and I hope we retain him, but he’s not some Lawrence Taylor/Khalil Mack dominant force. He benefited greatly from a deep and talented front seven. He’ll never see 19.5 sacks again.

    I do think he can be a reliable 10 sack a year guy, though, if the Bucs can retain most of the defensive line, most importantly, Ndamukong Suh. I just hope he doesn’t completely blow up the cap. I’d rather we retained Jason Pierre Paul.

  3. The one year contract was done to get away from Winston as soon as possible with no strings attached!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.