Analytics have an important role in football, but certain factors complicate things

Getty Images

Tuesday’s rare public appearance from Browns chiefs strategy office Paul DePodesta has sparked renewed discussion about the role of analytics in football. The Browns claim that they use analytics no more than any other team; people with other teams who have gotten some exposure to how the Browns use analytics through the recently-completed interview process, as Simms said on Wednesday’s PFT Live, disagree.

Regardless, every team uses analytics in some way or other. It’s important to know their limitations in football, however.

“I think people have a really warped view of what analytics is,” DePodesta said at the Tuesday press conference introducing new Browns coach Kevin Stefanski. “I think I may have a very different conception of what everybody else has. When I think of analytics, I just think of having certain frameworks to make decisions under uncertainty. I mean, look, everything we do in these jobs, is really built around uncertainty. What players are we going to take in the draft. What we are going to call on third-and-eight. It is all about uncertainty. So what frameworks can you create that at least stack the odds in your favor? Give you a better chance of being successful and whether that is drafting a player, hiring a coach or calling a play? It is not necessarily about numbers and spreadsheets.”

But it is an objective process, aimed at trying to minimize uncertainty through the manner in which similar decisions made under similar circumstances have worked out in the past. That’s really what analytics is — an assessment of how past events predict future outcomes.

The problem comes from the potential dissimilarities between past situations and current ones.

“I think what’s most important [is] what ones you don’t want to pay attention to,” Saints coach Sean Payton said during a November appearance on PFT Live. “In other words, you have a lot of information, but what is it that you look at that means something substantial? Because different than baseball, in our game, you might have an injury or your left tackle is having trouble blocking the defensive end so the numbers compute to say, ‘Hey you need to go for it here,’ but those aren’t accounting for the injury at left tackle, or the pressure your quarterback is having.

“There’s so many other factors other than an at-bat versus a pitcher, left handed, right handed. However, there are some things that are extremely important and Ryan Herman in our [football research] department here each week will do several reports. We’ll do a ‘keys to victory’ analytics report, separate from our regular keys to victory. In other words, outside the box thinking, here’s what he would say relative to what he’s seen from the opponent. So I think more importantly than anything, what specifically do we want to pay attention to and which ones do we want to ignore?”

That’s the key. On Sunday, for example, the odds were low that the Seahawks would convert on fourth and 11 from their own 36 while down by five points with roughly three minutes left. The analytics surely said the chances of victory were greater if the Seahawks punted and tried to stop the Packers and get the ball back than if the Seahawks failed to convert and gave the Packers a short field with a chance to extend their lead to eight or, possibly, to 13 or 14.

But any numbers relevant to those circumstances were generated from scenarios that didn’t include: (1) Russell Wilson having a vintage day for Seattle; and (2) Aaron Rodgers having a vintage day for Green Bay. That’s where a football team needs to be willing to ignore the analytics and say, “We’d rather trust our guy versus their defense than our defense versus their guy.” Because Seattle’s guy and Green Bay’s guy were both playing great.

And that’s why the head coach gets paid so much money, and why he’s always a bad season or two away from being fired. He’s the one who should be charged with knowing when to embrace the analytics and when to disregard them.

It’s also why Bill Belichick has six Super Bowl victories in 20 years with the Patriots. He processes all relevant information, both objective and subjective, and he makes the best decision under each situation he faces, factoring in the odds of a certain approach working, the specific realities of the game unfolding in front of him, and his own sixth sense from a lifetime spent around football as to how he can best bend the outcome in his favor.

That’s how Josh McDaniels has learned the game during his time with Belichick, and it’s probably one of the reasons why McDaniels didn’t get the job. He has a handful of rings that prove the very real limitations of relying too much on formulas and equations generated by past events.

7 responses to “Analytics have an important role in football, but certain factors complicate things

  1. Analytics in sports should be used like analytics in business is used…

    As a TOOL for the leadership in decision-making. Nothing more.

  2. It seems to me that analytics would be most useful during the week as part of game planning. And maybe during halftime as part of the assessment of what happened during the first two quarters. But during the game, on the fly, more data is possibly intrusive. Experience, intuition, hunches – the mental part of coaching the game.

  3. Every team will try to use data to it’s best advantage, combined with football knowledge and experience. Some will be better at it than others, some have better players, better coaches, and sometimes a little bit of luck. I don’t see what there is to debate.

  4. People rag on analytics but in the end a man is making the decision. Don’t blame analytics for a human mistake.

  5. Analytics is treated as top secret by the good teams that use it, and they won’t even tell you how they use it, so we can only speculate.
    Brian Burke has some nice pieces on football analytics

  6. The real question, for the Cleveland Browns is, what is the influence of the analytics folks on the owner who has been described as an “over-caffeinated humming bird.” He has no patience whatsoever, as he’s demonstrated time and again since 2012. Unfortunately, he’s opted to go the route of HC and GM and DePodesta all reporting directly to him. This is a recipe for the kind of back-stabbing palace intrigue which has decimated the coaching staffs and front offices of the Browns since 2012. Until and unless this owner finally learns what Mr. Rooney learned in Pittsburgh in 1968 (when he hired Chuck Noll and gave him the keys to the car), this hire-fire cycle will continue and the Browns will continue to spin their wheels, regardless of how talented, hard working and dedicated the coaches are.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.