New CBA could push cap as high as $205 million for 2020

Getty Images

The NFL and NFLPA have added specificity to the range that was first identified in December, selecting an even $200 million as the 2020 salary cap. And there will be even more specificity eventually added if the proposed CBA is ratified before the start of the new league year.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the new CBA currently is expected instantly increase the $200 million cap for 2020 by anywhere from $3 million to $5 million per team. That’s an estimate for now, with the final amount being negotiable — as the salary cap always is.

Again, these are estimates for now. The minimum, however, will be $200 million. The only question is the extent to which that number will go up, if the players ratify a new labor deal before March 18. That answer will be resolved, as it always is, via talks between the league and the union.

15 responses to “New CBA could push cap as high as $205 million for 2020

  1. With the expected $12 to $17 million cap space increase for 2020, how will the haters explain how Dallas can sign Prescott and STILL not be in cap hell?

    Standing by……

  2. Not a hater of Cowboys, but a guy going from $600k to $30 mil plus doesn’t fit into an $11-12 mil increase. Can only pay so much in up front money to buffer 2020 hit. And throw in Amari Cooper.

  3. Are Dallas fans really so invested in Dak? That’s your guy, all-in? Personally I wouldn’t want him even at a steep discount, but maybe I am missing something

  4. With the expected $12 to $17 million cap space increase for 2020, how will the haters explain how Dallas can sign Prescott and STILL not be in cap hell?
    _____________________________________________________

    The real question is explaining why the Cowboys would want to. Dak is a good player but not elite. When you’re a better leader than actual football player that is a problem. Teams shouldn’t pay top dollar for that. But of course JJ and his merry band of family followers will.

  5. Of course the cap is just an artificial limit set by the owners. I’m trying to think of an analogous cap in any other profession, including the other professional sports.

  6. They have to raise the cap at higher increments per year if they want their stars to stay with one team. This would be good for the game and good for business.

  7. I’ve said this before but Dak and his squad looked legit. Against the Giants defense, which did not. No quarterback of his stature should be making 600k, obviously. Maybe they should just pay him. Why can’t they just do a 3 year contract instead of 5? Because he’s demanding 5 years? I am on the fence on this one.

  8. let’s see… 200 million cap divided by 17 weekly checks comes out to be 11.76 million. it appears that if they add a 17th game this year, the cap should be 211.76 million, not 205. which leads to 6.76 million (in less cap money) times 32 teams = 216.32 million savings for the NFL owners. nice CBA scam they got going there.

  9. “I’ve said this before but Dak and his squad looked legit. Against the Giants defense, which did not. No quarterback of his stature should be making 600k, obviously. Maybe they should just pay him. Why can’t they just do a 3 year contract instead of 5? Because he’s demanding 5 years? I am on the fence on this one.”

    All NFL deals that are 5 years are really 3 years with voidable years or low cap hit years that make it possible to cut the player with a minimal cap hit. You don’t have to be on the fence, because you are right either way.

  10. let’s see… 200 million cap divided by 17 weekly checks comes out to be 11.76 million. it appears that if they add a 17th game this year, the cap should be 211.76 million, not 205. which leads to 6.76 million (in less cap money) times 32 teams = 216.32 million savings for the NFL owners. nice CBA scam they got going there.

    Math is solid. Except they aren’t adding the 17th game this year. That won’t start until 2021.

  11. computojon says:
    February 28, 2020 at 2:49 pm
    Of course the cap is just an artificial limit set by the owners. I’m trying to think of an analogous cap in any other profession, including the other professional sports.
    ——————–
    The players receive a percentage of the revenue earned per year in the form of a salary cap which teams are required to spend on players. There’s more to it like minimum percentage a team must spend over time, but that’s the basics.
    There is nothing “Artificial” about it.

  12. Here we go let’s increase the cap so irresponsible teams that have overspent can get some relief. Bunch of bs.

  13. aj66shanghai says:
    February 28, 2020 at 2:25 pm
    Are Dallas fans really so invested in Dak? That’s your guy, all-in? Personally I wouldn’t want him even at a steep discount, but maybe I am missing something
    ——————————————————————————

    I don’t think it is so much a case of Dak being a legitimate “franchise QB” as it is a case of being “who else are you going to go get that is better than Dak?”.

    If you go after a free agent QB you have three choices. A) An absolute top notch franchise QB that is past his peak and will cost you $30 to $40M per year and will not be with you for more than 2 or 3 years. or B) A younger QB who is not as good as Dak and will cost you $20 to $30M per year (or more). or C) Phillip Rivers…a mix of A and B.

    It clearly would not make any sense to go for option B. Why would anyone choose to spend $20M+ to get worse? You clearly don’t want option C. Why would anyone want Phillip Rivers at this point of his career unless you want a proven guy to teach a rookie how to trash talk without dropping an F-bomb. So that leaves you with option A. Unless you are ready to start annually sinking mid-round picks into a possible franchise QB for the next two or three years If you get really lucky you end up with another Dak. But if you don’t you’ve now blown multiple picks for zero return on your investment.

    Really the only choice Dallas has right now is to sign Dak now and hope you can do it with not too much guaranteed. I don’t think he will ever be the next Mahomes or the next Brees, but he could be plenty good enough to lead his team to a SB win. And if he isn’t…and you signed him without too much guaranteed…you can change directions in the next couple years without too much of a cap issue.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.