Report: Bears have spoken to Bengals about Andy Dalton trade

Getty Images

The potential destinations for this year’s free agent quarterbacks have been a popular topic of conversation this offseason, but there’s also the possibility of some movement on the trade front.

With the Bengals expected to pick a quarterback first overall, Andy Dalton is at the top of the list of players that could be dealt this offseason. Paul Dehner of TheAthletic.com reports that the Bears have spoken to the team about a deal.

Adding an alternative to Mitch Trubisky in the quarterback room makes the same sense for Chicago that signing Ryan Tannehill made for the Titans last year. Tannehill signed a one-year deal and Dalton only has one year left on his deal, so there wouldn’t be any commitment in the event Trubisky progresses or the Bears decide to go in an entirely different direction in 2021.

The Bears hired former Bengals offensive coordinator Bill Lazor to fill the same job on Matt Nagy’s staff, so Chicago would provide some familiarity for Dalton. That could be a factor given the Bengals’ stated plan to include Dalton in any trade discussions.

Nothing in the report suggests things have progressed to that point and Dalton may be one of many dominoes that wait to fall into place until Tom Brady makes his call about the 2020 season.

23 responses to “Report: Bears have spoken to Bengals about Andy Dalton trade

  1. Well if he goes to the Bears then we know we aren’t getting a 1st. They traded their next 4 1st rounders for Kahlil Mack lol.

  2. Definitely makes sense. Andy Dalton can be a good player with enough weapons and protection around him. Hope he does well wherever he ends up, solid guy.

  3. Much like Tannehill he Dalton would finish the year as the starter but will they wait to late to make the change?

  4. So the answer to an obviously bad QB draft pick is to trade a pick for a guy who could no longer hack it in Cincinnati? Ryan apace is going to destroy the already minimal chance the Bears have to get out of this death spiral. The next GM will have no high picks to use on the rebuild.

  5. Dalton would do fine in Chicago, although I doubt the move excites him. He will want to go to a place he can start. I still believe New England is where he’s headed, assuming Brady leaves. He fits the NE mold. He’ll just keep his mouth shut, play hard, and win over his teammates.

  6. The issues that caused Trubisky to struggle last season won’t be magically fixed by Dalton. The Bears would be better off spending the money on upgrading the line and getting some receivers and TE’s.

  7. This would be a great opportunity for the Bengals to look like they made a good move…..they’ll screw it up.

    Brady – sat his first year
    Brees – sat his first year
    Rogers – sat his first couple of years
    Mahomes – sat his first year

    P Manning is one of the few in nearly recent history that did not sit his first year, and still ended up being on the the best of all time.

    I don’t know why these bad teams will never learn, that it is more valuable to sit a rookie QB so he can learn. I get so mad that the same teams continue to ruin QB after QB.

    Burrow will get ruined in Cincinnati.

  8. The Mack trade which cost the Bears two 1st rounders was an all-in trade for an immediate Superbowl. Year 1 got them to the playoffs (double dink) and by Year 2, everybody can see the trade was not going to pan out the way the Bears hoped.

    Now if the Bears give the Bungles anything more than a 4th rounder for a one-year rental, the fans should storm Halas Hall and take the GM down to the local Grayhound Station with a one-way ticket out of town.

  9. The Dalton trade makes sense if Chicago upgrades it’s WR core. The Chicago WR situation mirrors the Niners at the beginning of last season: a bunch of 2’s and 3’s, but no clear cut #1 guy. They should make a Godfather offer to Amari Cooper (if he’s not tagged) and draft a WR in the first 3 rounds. Then a trade for Dalton makes a lot of sense. Dalton has his faults, but unlike Trubisky, he actually knows how to complete passes down the field in the NFL.

  10. dburr10085 says:
    March 1, 2020 at 3:00 pm
    This would be a great opportunity for the Bengals to look like they made a good move…..they’ll screw it up.

    Brady – sat his first year
    Brees – sat his first year
    Rogers – sat his first couple of years
    Mahomes – sat his first year

    P Manning is one of the few in nearly recent history that did not sit his first year, and still ended up being on the the best of all time.

    I don’t know why these bad teams will never learn, that it is more valuable to sit a rookie QB so he can learn. I get so mad that the same teams continue to ruin QB after QB.

    Burrow will get ruined in Cincinnati.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Yes! I’ve been banging that same drum for a long time.

    I used to say “For every Andrew Luck, there are a dozen Christian Ponders. Now I have to wonder if (and how much) starting right away affected at least some of the injuries that drove Luck into early retirement.

    Either way, I’m with you.

  11. They need to figure out if they’re talking the 5th year option first…

    Options
    1. No on 5th year, and trade for Dalton
    2. No on 5th year, and sign Tannehill (more expensive, but keeps draft pick)
    3. Yes on 5th year, and draft a upside QB in the 2nd round

    This is almost a no win situation. I can’t see Dalton making the Bears Super Bowl contenders. I’d go option #3. There seems to be some good QBs that will fall to the 2nd round because of studs at other positions.

  12. dburr10085 says:
    March 1, 2020 at 3:00 pm
    This would be a great opportunity for the Bengals to look like they made a good move…..they’ll screw it up.

    Brady – sat his first year
    Brees – sat his first year
    Rogers – sat his first couple of years
    Mahomes – sat his first year

    P Manning is one of the few in nearly recent history that did not sit his first year, and still ended up being on the the best of all time.

    I don’t know why these bad teams will never learn, that it is more valuable to sit a rookie QB so he can learn. I get so mad that the same teams continue to ruin QB after QB.

    Burrow will get ruined in Cincinnati.

    ——

    Cincy has had two starting QB’s since 2004- barring injury. It is not the place QB’s go to die. That’s Cleveland. They’ve had 25qbs since then.

  13. Re: “ Burrow will get ruined in Cincinnati“

    I don’t think ‘ruined’ is the word they’re looking for…

    They probably meant “Burrow won’t achieve his full potential in Cincinnati”.

    That would be a true statement. On the bright side, Burrow would probably be paid well in Cincinnati.

  14. seanismorriscom says:
    March 1, 2020 at 3:54 pm
    They need to figure out if they’re talking the 5th year option first…

    Options
    1. No on 5th year, and trade for Dalton
    2. No on 5th year, and sign Tannehill (more expensive, but keeps draft pick)
    3. Yes on 5th year, and draft a upside QB in the 2nd round

    This is almost a no win situation. I can’t see Dalton making the Bears Super Bowl contenders. I’d go option #3. There seems to be some good QBs that will fall to the 2nd round because of studs at other positions.
    —————————————————————————-
    You ain’t signing Tannehill cause he’s gonna cost 25 million per season multi year deal.

    You draft a “high upside” qb in round two your gonna have to wait around at least a season before you can find out if he can even play. You think Nagy is gonna stick his neck out for that?

    Dalton is your guy at least for this season and he can win if you give him the time and Nagy can consistently stick to the running game. The question is how is Chicago gonna get a third round pick to the bengals for Dalton? Looks to me that they may have to trade down in the 2nd for 2- 3’s?

  15. The Bears need to rebuild, I would not trade for Dalton.
    If he’s cut I probably still wouldn’t be interested.

    I’d draft a QB or pick up some so-so free agent.
    The Bears are in a bad situation and will need to rebuild for a while.

  16. Dalton is decent and a change of scenery could do him good. The Bears might have more pieces for Dalton than the Bengals had overall the last few years.

  17. I guess we shouldnt be surprised. They need something besides Trubisky at QB.

  18. AD can run Lazors offense. No learning curve. The Bears have a solid team. Built to make a run. Question is how much faith do you have in Trubisky to rapidly improve his play?

  19. He won’t command much in a trade, so this really isn’t a risky move. A 3rd or 4th rounder would probably get it done. Sure would be nice to have some insurance for Trubiski who has been in over his head all along. That poor kid will forever be mentioned in the same breath as Mahomes and Watson and that shouldn’t be his fault.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.