Patrick Mahomes should ask for a percentage of the cap

Getty Images

As the Patrick Mahomes contract talks hover over the NFL post-Tom Brady free-agency decision, the simplest solution to Mahomes’ situation continues to hide in plain sight.

Mahomes should ask that his compensation be tied to a specific percentage of the annual salary cap.

Others have tried to get it. All have failed, possibly because the NFL (via its Management Council) has strongly encouraged teams to not do it. (Yes, it would be collusion if the teams blindly follow directives from the league office. Good luck proving it.)

Mahomes could be the first to get a percentage of the cap, via a very basic, fair, commonsense case for ensuring that the Chiefs will always have enough money to spend on other players by tying his own pay to a chunk of the cap. This would keep Mahomes from having to sign a long-term deal that would pay him what he deserves for the first three years and then becomes outdated by changes to the cap and the market in years four, five, and six. It also would give the Chiefs certainty, not as to dollars but as to the slice of total cap pie that annually would go to the team’s franchise quarterback.

If, for example, Mahomes gets 18 percent of the cap on a six-year deal that starts this year, and if the cap goes up by 10 percent per year, Mahomes would make $36 million in 2020 (18 percent of $200 million), $39.6 million in 2021 (18 percent of $220 million), $43.56 million in 2022 (18 percent of $242 million), $47.916 million in 2023 (18 percent of $266.2 million), $52.7 million in 2024 (18 percent of $292.82 million), and $57.97 million in 2025 (18 percent of $322.1 million). That works out to a six-year, $277.75 million deal, with an average value of $46.29 million.

Through it all, Mahomes would count for 18 percent of the cap, with 82 cents of every dollar available to be used on every other player on the roster. And the ultimate percentage for Mahomes would have to be negotiated carefully, whether it’s 16 or 17 or 17.8 or 18.1 or 19.05473. Regardless, it’s the fairest way to balance the immense value Mahomes brings to the franchise with the franchise’s ability to pay other players.

Mahomes and the Chiefs also would have to decide on the structure of the guarantees. But when it comes to quarterback contracts for short-list franchise players, the deal is typically guaranteed until it expires or a new deal is done. Rarely if ever does a true top-five quarterback lose his fastball or suffer the kind of long-term injury that undermines his value. Chances are that, if Mahomes were to sign a six-year deal that gives him 18 percent of the cap, he’d cash every check until the Chiefs and Mahomes rip up the contract and replace it with a new one.

But here’s the thing: Why would they? If 18 percent works for both sides, it would continue until Mahomes’ gets deep enough into his 30s (or maybe 40s) for his uncanny skills to begin to slip.

If Mahomes decides to proceed this way, maybe other teams will realize that, when it comes to quarterback contracts, the best way to proceed is to give the quarterback a specific chunk of the annual spending limit. This would ensure that the team always would have money for other players, and that the quarterback would never be underpaid.

54 responses to “Patrick Mahomes should ask for a percentage of the cap

  1. Chiefs are lucky to have Mahomes. League MVP, SB Champion, SB MVP, ROY. I wish my Vikes had him. Easily the best QB in the league with his overall traits. If he stays healthy, very good shot at being the GOAT when he retires.

  2. there is a systemic problem in the nfl where 1.8% of the roster could represent 15-18% a team’s cap. without a supporting cast that one player will not have success. i recognize its the most important position, however, it still is too much for one player.

  3. Tying it to a set percentage of the cap makes perfect sense for both parties.

    Therefore, it is highly unlikely to happen.

  4. Sure, and then the left tackle will want a specific %, then the stud OLB, then the Kicker…… see where this goes?

  5. You can’t give a guy a market-value first-year salary if you’re giving him a fully guaranteed 10% raise every year. The only reason these quarterback contracts have a chance to work at all is that the rising salary cap makes the percentage of the cap decrease and non-guaranteed years allow you to reduce the cap hit by spreading out the signing bonus. Any team that does what you’re suggesting would be set up for utter failure.

  6. Great. Now instead of hearing how player Z got $5 more than player X, we can hear about player B getting 0.05% more than player A.

    The absolute only way I would be in support of this is if they hard cap the percentage. No lore than 15%, or 18%, or whatever. But it has to be a league wide cap.

  7. Since 2011, the top QB cap hit was between 14-16% of the salary cap, with the exception of 2018 when the 49ers had an abundance of cap space and gave Jimmy G an unusual amount of money in the first year of his contract (Jimmys 2018 cap hit was 42% higher than the next closest player in the league).

    In addition, since 2013, the cap has increased between 6-8% each year, with the increase percentage getting smaller (cap only increased 6.3% in 2020).

    So a fair number for the Chiefs and Mahomes would be 15%. Factoring cap growth of 7% each year, here are his cap numbers:

    2020: $30 million
    2021: $32.1 million
    2022: $34.3 million
    2023: $36.8 million
    2024: $39.3 million
    2025: $42 million

    6 years, $214 million ($35.75 million average)

    Remember, this would be paying him (percentage-wise) equal to the highest cap hit each season over the past 9 years. No one gets that kind of treatment. Each year, the latest player to sign surpasses the field. A percentage would ensure that Mahomes would be at the top year in, year out.

    Still, this is a huge dice roll for both sides. If the cap growth stays on the decline, Mahomes is leaving a ton of money on the table. If the cap growth reverses trend and accelerates, Mahomes hits the jackpot. Whereas for the team, no matter what the cap does, they’re still on the hook for 15% (aka the highest single cap hit in the league) each year with no way out.

  8. Yes he should absolutely ask for a percentage of the cap. Forget about the fact that no QB EVER has won a Super Bowl while accounting for 13% or more of the cap. Do it Mahomes. Ask Russell Wilson how great its been since he started accounting for 15%+ of Seattle’s cap.

  9. Just designate one player’s salary, every year, exempt from the cap. That would allow each team to free up an additional 25 to 35 million in cap space. Now every player on the team benefits from it, not just the QB.

  10. Ridiculous.

    If you don’t want to lock yourself in a fixed long-term contract as salary cap rises, then sign only one-year deals.

  11. “Mahomes should ask that his compensation be tied to a specific percentage of the annual salary cap.”

    And the Kansas City Chiefs should say NO!

  12. Rodgers tried that angle. It didn’t work then,… and I’ll doubt it does for Mahomes.

  13. Would this be a guaranteed contract? Because, if I recall, all NFL teams are required to put the full amount of guaranteed contracts into escrow when they’re signed – good luck KC, having to park somewhere between $250-300 million dollars in cash, next year, if this gets done.

    Also, as a counter to this, what’s stopping KC from offering that same $277m contract now?

    Maybe it’s because any sane financial planner would never assume a year-over-year increase of 10+ % on the cap? What if a bad year happens and the cap drops? (I know it hasn’t happened, but it could.) He’d be making a higher % of salary, thus hindering the team from spending money elsewhere.

    As someone noted above – the 1st guy that gets his contract tied as a % of the cap, means someone will be #2, #3, etc and it’s impossible to have everyone tied as a % of the cap, so there’s some potential for discord in the locker room when someone is told they’re not worthy of that type of contract.

  14. edukator44 says:

    March 9, 2020 at 10:53 am

    there is a systemic problem in the nfl where 1.8% of the roster could represent 15-18% a team’s cap. without a supporting cast that one player will not have success. i recognize its the most important position, however, it still is too much for one player.
    ———-
    Is it a systemic problem in the NFL or is it simply the way every business is ran? The higher up you are and the more important your position is thought of the more you make.

  15. One reason teams balk at the idea is it puts the reality right upfront, ain’t no easy way to sugarcoat it or obfuscate it, and fans will know what it is. When every article about the QB includes “he gets 18% of the cap”, that’s more real than “he makes $35M per year”. Most fans don’t do the math, even if they know what the cap is, which they don’t. So they don’t realize what $35M is in relation to total payroll. But with 18%, they would.

  16. And the owner should say No. 53 man rosters. Cant pay 1 player 15-20% of it for long

  17. Although it hasn’t happened yet but doesn’t mean it won’t, what happens when/if the cap drops one year? Does Mahomes take, heaven forbid, a pay cut?

  18. If Mahomes is smart he will take a fair deal, to leave money to spend on the rest of the team. This concept of needing to set a new salary level is dumb. No matter how great Mahomes is, he needs good players around him, to succeed and stay healthy behind an excellent offensive line. It’s not like he’s going to be paid peanuts.

  19. Chiefs would take it in a second if they didn’t have to bone up some massive amount up front. Easier to budget and protects you if league every has a downturn (don’t laugh, it could happen). You would be left with only the question of how many years of it to guarantee. But players/agents these days generally want some massive signing bonus (and numerous players disappear after getting that). Great trade from Chiefs standpoint if they get the downside protection of large bonuses dimming future drive.

  20. The crazier thing would be doing anything like this with the Cowboys’ QB. Already quoting ludicrous amounts for him. This league stupidity of the latest QB signing having to set a new record is stupid. At some point, just let the guy walk. Other players will respect the heck out of it (maybe quietly) when they know more money will come to the rest of them with a lower paid QB.

  21. konacoug says:
    If Mahomes is smart he will take a fair deal, to leave money to spend on the rest of the team.
    ******************
    A good thought,….. however I sincerely doubt Mahomes agent has the same thought.
    His commission depends on how much money he can pry away from the Hunt family and the team.
    It’s an ego thing.

  22. denverdave3 says:
    March 9, 2020 at 1:22 pm
    Mahomes already gets a percentage of the cap. So does everybody else
    ====

    He’s right you know.

  23. This type of contract negotiation would have to be adopted league wide for it to work otherwise the Chiefs are at a disadvantage because they would have no years in the contract that give them extra room under the cap like the rest of the contracts done around the league. There is also the potential for top players at other positions then looking to get a percentage instead of a negotiated deal. At that point you either have to give each position a set percentage or it will lead to chaos. In summary: this will never happen.

  24. And what happens when “Mr. 18% of the CAP” is no longer worth anything close to 18% of the CAP?

  25. Capitalism; the best players get paid more.

    Socialism, all players get paid the same as the long snapper.

  26. No, he shouldn’t. No one player should. Let’s stop making this QB market go crazy, freakin Dak is demanding 35m+ because of this bs lol. Way too many overpaid players crippling teams, but they don’t learn. We need to control the cap and spread it out rather than inflate the QB market.

  27. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit to see him take less for the sake of the team. He just seems like a Brady type of guy.

  28. It’s not hard to see where this slippery slops goes off the rails. Once one superstar pulls it off, it get easier for the next. Contracts are always an arms race and as son as you tie a % to anything, the arms race gets a very real brick wall in front of it.

  29. The owners would never allow this…I bet they decided this is an NO NO internally

  30. Give him profit sharing with the organization as 20% owner of the team with a possibility of 35% owner of the team if he wins 2 more super bowls over the life of the 6 year contract

  31. The better performing teams are not alone in their concern for overpaying certain player positions at the determent of not being able to afford the supporting players who allow these players to perform at higher levels. As rookie salaries are transformed into higher salaries based upon performance, many want to be paid liked the top dog in their position. The NFL salary cap prevents that from happening and prevents teams from holding on to skilled players. This explains why the Tom Brady’s take less in salary to hold together the best team they can. This could lead to salary caps for player positions that in total can’t exceed the team cap. And 12% cap for QBs should be the starting point. This is a Team sport that require a good supporting cast of players to be successful. Without a good supporting team, players will struggle to even be average.

  32. “Just designate one player’s salary, every year, exempt from the cap. That would allow each team to free up an additional 25 to 35 million in cap space. Now every player on the team benefits from it, not just the QB.”

    Which would then allow big money big market teams to outbid anyone else for the handful of premier players in the game.

  33. If Mahomes gets 18%, another player will demand 19%. Then someone will say they want 20%. And so on and so forth. Just like it is now with dollars. Then what?

  34. Didnt even read the post because it is flawed…if a qb is worth X percent of the cap …than an OL is worth more…QB cant perform without an OL. Without an OL, your QB is throwing up hairballs.

  35. What’s left out here is the Pandora’s box this type of deal would create. Every star player would want the same thing. I prefer the Tom Brady method. Take a reasonable salary so the rest of your teammates can get paid. It really boggles my mind that people refer to players making 8 figured annually as “underpaid”.

  36. Seems like a good idea with the cap going up every year. Keeps Mahomes one of the highest paid players. Lets the Chiefs know how much they have to spend every year. Downside is it will hamstring the Chiefs if that percentage is too high. Big gamble but can be a big payoff if done right.

  37. harrisonhits2 says:
    March 9, 2020 at 6:23 pm
    “Just designate one player’s salary, every year, exempt from the cap. That would allow each team to free up an additional 25 to 35 million in cap space. Now every player on the team benefits from it, not just the QB.”

    Which would then allow big money big market teams to outbid anyone else for the handful of premier players in the game.
    ________________

    Bingo. But maybe he’s on to something. Instead of shaving the top contract off the books, perhaps the league should only count the top 20 contracts instead of top 51. For most teams, players 21-51 have cap hits under $1 million so its not like teams would be able to stack their rosters.

  38. Mahomes is a team oriented guy, so if this idea benefits the Chiefs, I’m sure Patrick will embrace it. If he does it and the Chiefs continue to win, I’m sure other teams will follow suit.

  39. Okay, another question.. Suppose some players do get a percentage of the cap, and they go with the suggestion that you can only have one “percentage player” per team.

    What happens when that player gets traded? Can he only be traded to a team that doesn’t already have a percentage player, or do we start introducing the entirely overcomplex NBA system of Bird rights, midlevel exceptions, max salary, supermax, etc?

    Or, we can just keep paying players a dollar amount for the season, like the NFL has been doing for 100 seasons. Keep It Simple, Stupid.

  40. There’s a lot of people who want to take our nations salary cap and give an equal percent of it to every citizen, no matter what their position in life is. Funny we’re ok giving more important people higher amounts of money in something simple as sports but we support socialism when it comes to our very lives.

  41. No, he shouldn’t be selfish because you want him to be. He should handle his own financial situation the way he sees fit. People get so hung up on being the best or being paid the best. Mahomes will be set for life whether he signs for $50m or $15m a year. The difference is, at $50m he might as well get fond of that one SB ring because that’d likely be all he gets. Something tells me that’s what Florio wants to see.

  42. ARod(in his collarbone) says:
    March 9, 2020 at 10:47 am
    Chiefs are lucky to have Mahomes. League MVP, SB Champion, SB MVP, ROY. I wish my Vikes had him. Easily the best QB in the league with his overall traits. If he stays healthy, very good shot at being the GOAT when he retires.

    Uhh when was he ROY he only played one game in his rookie season lol. Phenominal player though.

  43. ezpkns34 says:
    March 9, 2020 at 1:27 pm
    Wonder will get next year’s “percentage of the cap” suggestion

    23 3 Rate This
    ———————
    Lamar Jackson

  44. Doesn’t matter. A lot of teams wish thy had drafted him. (especially The Bears who picked Tribisky with the 2nd choice that year).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.