NFL has an opportunity to revolutionize in-game advertising

Getty Images

As the NFL stares at the possibility of games played with no one staring at the field from the stands, the league is looking at the loss of significant revenue. The challenge becomes replacing it.

Deep in an item from Jonathan Jones of CBSSports.com resides a clue to how the NFL could replace lost ticket money: An explosion in on-field advertising revenue.

The ads would be seen by the millions watching the games on TV. Jones specifically mentions the possibility of new ads on the walls surrounding the field, ads on a tarp in empty seats that would be visible in TV shots, ads on the nets behind the goal posts, and virtual advertising that could be rotated digitally throughout the game.

But why stop there? At a time when sports fans will be starved for sports, will anyone complain about, for example, the placement of ads on uniforms? Or how about a green-screen decal on the helmet that becomes a rotating advertisement during close-up shots?

If the NFL had put ads on uniforms from the inception of the league 100 years ago, no one would care that ads are on the uniforms now, like a NASCAR jumpsuit or the full front of the shirts worn by soccer clubs. As the NFL tries to turn a negative into a positive, one very lucrative positive could be an opportunity to jump with both feet onto what had long been regarded a third rail for the NFL and embrace a proliferation of advertising, all in the name of replacing the revenue lost via the absence of fans.

And then, once fans are back and the bridge has been crossed, the new approach to advertising will simply continue, ostensibly to help further replace the revenue lost during the 2020 season. Then, after a few years of getting everyone used to it, the ads will just stay put.

79 responses to “NFL has an opportunity to revolutionize in-game advertising

  1. I wish they would have started this years ago. Ads on the field. Ads on jerseys. Ad walls around the field. All with the idea of having LESS TV commercial breaks. Less TV friendly major sports like soccer and rugby do this.

  2. Seems the easiest, and least obtrusive, would be to have graphics that show up on the screen, much like the down and distance markers. They could pop up for 5-10 seconds between plays and disappear when the ball is snapped.

  3. A: Mahomes, back to pass. Has time….he finds TE Kelce in the back of the endzone, TOUCHDOWN! BROUGHT TO YOU BY TD AMERITRADE! America’s #1 online broker!

    B: Wow, you just can’t give Mahomes that much time. He will find a way to beat you if you give him a clean pocket.

    A: A HOT POCKET, indeed! Hot Pocket, every football fans favorite game-time snack. So good, even when you’re not drunk!
    **********************************************************************************

    That, plus the new Meineke Care Care jerseys are gonna be SWEET!

    Home Depot Falcons? #letsgo

    Can’t wait

  4. But why stop there? At a time when sports fans will be starved for sports, will anyone complain about, for example, the placement of ads on uniforms? Or how about a green-screen decal on the helmet that becomes a rotating advertisement during close-up shots?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Umm. Yes, people would complain. These ideas and concepts have been discussed before and the majority of fans do not like it. Same thing with the superimposed ads in the end zones that was brought up before.

    Maybe it’s just me but I abhor in-your-face advertising. If it persists I always refuse that brand and seek out a competitor if I happen to need a similar product.

    Currently, the players scream about “partners” only when they seek more money and never look at the deal as a shared burden of cost. Maybe the league should leave things as they are, take a loss (not really a loss but rather a lower gain) this season and see what happens to the cap’s impact on salaries.

  5. Would anybody complain about ads on uniforms: yes, yes they would.

    And that NASCAR comparison is terrible. Their fans don’t much care about ads on driver jumpsuits because…read the sentence again…DRIVER. Not player. The drivers are in enclosed vehicles while competing. You also might not have noticed, but the NASCAR fan doesn’t have a reputation as being the most scrutinizing, as parodied (with some truth) in the movie Talladega Nights.

  6. Thanks Florio, just speed us up into situations like in Idiocracy where we walk around with ads all over our clothing. Or like in BASEketball where sports are all about the money and not at all about the game.

    Funny how you rave about the various new jersey designs then specifically want to ruin those good looking jerseys with junk and noise. I won’t be buying any more of whatever product I see on jerseys. Keep the ads in the stands sure, but not on jerseys. No thank you.

  7. Ticket sales as a percentage of revenue has steadily fallen from just over 20% in 2010 to 15.47% in 2018. There shouldn’t be that much to make up. NFL actions seem criminal to me when Roger sends a memo to teams telling them not to have any public Plan B for their own ticket holders. I spend almost $4k a year on season tickets and my team is not allowed to tell me what plans they may have given the unprecedented season ahead. Add this to the list of reasons I’m not a fan of Roger and the league office.

  8. Shad Con loves that idea in Jax. He probably never considered placing ads on the green tarp on the upper deck. BTW, who paid for that stadium in Duuu-vaalll? Taxpayers or owners?

  9. I heard the Raiders are going to put The Moonlite Bunny Ranch on their jerseys but that’s just a rumor right now.

  10. Cable TV started many, many years ago with the promise, aka lie, that there would have to be a charge for it because they needed the revenue since they swore there would be no commercials. In the beginning people were generally dead set against paying for TV that was already free to them but eventually relented because of the promise of no commercials. Florio is right about this. They institute this lie about needing the revenue now because of what has happened in society, you can count on the fact that since the fans will get used to it, it will remain a permanently ugly reality.

  11. Please no. I don’t want to be that bombarded with ads for companies. Specially when you will still have Extra point, Commercial, kickoff, commercial, time out, commerical. It becomes close to unwatchable at times.

  12. How about every play having a sponsor? I can hear it now: “This first down is brought to you by Budweiser….This third and long is brought to you by Buffalo Wild Wings….This field goal attempt is brought to you by….”. The possibilities are endless.

  13. Adds on uniforms is the final line in the dirt. But I’m an old school fan who can barely recognize the game anymore and it is painfully obvious the league is well past catering to fans like me.

  14. steve11blog says:
    May 12, 2020 at 10:17 am
    Genius, but then the players will want their cut as well

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The players will get their share without saying a word. The cap is tied to revenue. More revenue, more cap.

  15. We’re all adults and understand that the NFL is a business. It’s scrambling to find revenue that will be lost from gate receipts, parking and concessions. Have at it. When fans can return to the satisfaction of the PC crowd, maybe drop some prices so the average Joe can afford to go.

  16. electricboogalo says:

    I wish they would have started this years ago. Ads on the field. Ads on jerseys. Ad walls around the field. All with the idea of having LESS TV commercial breaks. Less TV friendly major sports like soccer and rugby do this.

    _____________________________

    I like the idea of this, as well. But we all know there is a 0% chance the NFL willingly replaces existing TV ad revenue with any other ad income. If anything, they’ll just pile on in-game / on-field ads in addition to the already over-saturated TV ads.

    The NFL’s revenue is a lot like taxes. There are always new taxes that can be implemented. But it’s exceedingly rare that old, outdated taxes come to an end even if their usefulness is long gone.

  17. “But why stop there? At a time when sports fans will be starved for sports, will anyone complain about, for example, the placement of ads on uniforms?”

    Why would they not complain? Just because there are no fans in the stands and the NFL players and owner stand to lose money yes the fans come to the rescue again. I would hate seeing all that advertising on everything . I can’t stand the amount of advertising now. You think I would welcome it because millionaires and billionaires are losing money. Flat out yes I will complain but what good will it do. The issue is when they get back to football as usual this will be left behind as the owners and the player jump in piles of money as the fans get to watch what amount to a bunch of NASCAR running around the field plastered in advertising.

  18. This is a horrible idea.

    When I was college age, I loved watching college hockey. I also loved the NHF. That is, until they started having electronic advertising in the fronts of the tears between lower and upper sections. The electronics was totally distracting, destroyed the ambience of the game, and drove me completely away from hockey. I refuse to attend a game or to watch a game where I see that kind of advertising.

    If they do it in the NFL, I will not attend another game. I will not watch. I will find something else to do with my time and my attention.

  19. NO! not on the uniforms….
    The worse part about a NASCAR “athlete” interview is how they have to reference their lead advertiser. “The M&M Chevy…” “The Bush Beer Nissan”…
    Does any of want to hear “The Budweiser Vegas Raiders…” or “The Monistat Dallas Cowboys”?

  20. I would be all-in if it meant reducing the insufferable commercial interruptions, but that doesn’t seem likely.

  21. Imagine the money to be made if you could selectively target Viking fans with weight loss products.

  22. The more you bother me with your ads, the more resistant people
    become to the ads

  23. How about fans get a 10% ticket rebate if they wear 2 NFL approved advertising patches on their clothing at games?

  24. electricboogalo says:
    May 12, 2020 at 10:24 am

    I wish they would have started this years ago. Ads on the field. Ads on jerseys. Ad walls around the field. All with the idea of having LESS TV commercial breaks. Less TV friendly major sports like soccer and rugby do this.
    —————
    to an extent,absolutely. can’t believe all the down votes in favor of all the “TV timeouts” that are in place.

  25. I hate advertising generally, this is horrible. I won’t watch if they execute on any of these ideas.

  26. The unintended consequence of ads on the jerseys will be a dramatic drop in jersey sales.

  27. It’s coming. And there is nothing we can do about it as fans, except not watch.

    I’m not a fan, but even the iconic Boston Celtics home uniform now carries the patch of a corporate sponsor (GE).

    Soon it will be the Green Bay Johnsonville Bratwurst Packers…

  28. But why stop there???

    Why start.

    Why not just put a big ole Brawnade logo on the field, while you’re at it.

  29. I was in New York City with some Divisional Managers from the organization that employed me.
    One of them came up with ” A Great Idea” for advertising which was going to require Me ( Not them ) to be in New York City a couple of weekends a year. I was there enough for business and had no desire to kill any more of my weekends working. While we were walking I diverted our group to walk through Times Square. If you have not been there it is a mass of video ad bombardment. When we stopped for a drink, I asked everyone which ads they liked the best in Times Square. Few in the group could remember any, only 1 could remember more then one ad.
    My point was that when you are over saturated with advertising, it has the same effect as no advertising. It just blends in to the walls. I saved my weekends ( main objective ) and believe I saved the company from wasting money on useless advertising. Hopefully the NFL sees it the same way, because when sales don’t increase the advertisers will.

  30. I will complain. Yeah, if this happens,, the pandemic has won. Just give up. Ugh…

  31. This would create way to much of a distraction to be able to watch a game. As we all know, there is far to much advertising on the internet, so much in fact, it hard to even read an article without having to click out of about 5 ads on average. This is a horrible idea. Especially in a sport most feel has to many commerical advertisements anyway. I read somewhere on a sports site, that an actual game only has between 12-15 minutes of actual game play.

  32. I dont mind any of this, but ONLY if it is to go away when the fans return. Nothing on the field. Nothing on the players. Keep it strictly on the walls and in the stands. Think about it, MLB has been doing this for years now. Every team has a green screen on the wall behind home plate. And the advertisement changes every inning (give or take). This is not that hard to do. But the point is, you make sure that the places that the advertisement is placed is only present now because the fans arent there (with some type of green screen tarp over the seats, as a perfect example). As in, once the fans return and sit in those seats, the advertisements have to go away

  33. The one (and only) good thing about the minor hell of commercial interruptions is that, if you’re patient enough, you can watch a game relatively free of the mind pollution of advertising. Mute the sound, change the channel, walk away for a couple minutes.

    When my kids occasionally watch a game with me, I like them to not be hit with incessant advertising. I switch it over to PBS Kids during breaks.

    The ideas in this post are, frankly, horrible. I want to be able to see the game being played, and not with every visible surface covered in some kind of ad or logo. The scenario described here would turn me off from watching, probably ever.

    What I’ve thought of in the past is something akin to what I’ve seen at times with soccer, which is to have logos & ad images slide in along the bottom of the screen from time to time (not constantly) during the game. They become part of the broadcast but aren’t in the field of play itself. The ads on the barrier around the pitch are an okay tradeoff, but not ideal. Anything more than that would be repugnant.

    The NFL would still make plenty of money with fewer commercials and none of this nonsense. But they don’t know the meaning of the word “enough”. These ideas for wall-to-wall ads are right in the territory that Mark Cuban warned about.

  34. Yeah, because tickets aren’t expensive enough. Even if no tickets are sold this year, once that advertising cherry is popped there will be no going back. Imagery around the field in lieu of TV commercials (as is done in soccer) would be great, but it won’t stop there.

  35. If they do that this will be the last game I will ever watch. I will be done with the NFL!!! I am close to being done anyway. At a time like this all the filthy rich league is looking at is how to make more money. I am sure no one cares about my opinion but I am serious!

  36. There are a lot of people in this world loosing what little money they have. So I could care less about what the NFL is loosing.

  37. I’m sure this is what every NFL fan wants to see: team jerseys looking like a NASCAR jumpsuit..for real, for real….

  38. Why not make them interactive with the action on the field, too! A virtual FedEx guy holding a package and racing down the field with the runner. How exciting!

    Maybe virtual odds posted on the game too, fans could be on the site and make live bets on anything posted! Players helmets flashing logos, it’ll all be so great!

  39. Tacky and tone deaf. More is not usually better in marketing, so that’s a bad idea. But it is tone deaf because were are at the highest unemployment level in 100 years and you’re talking about how to squeeze more money?

    Bad strategy and bad optics.

  40. A few years ago Goodell said in an interview that owners intended to grow the then $10 billion per year NFL to $25 billion per year by 2025.

    COVID-19 may be a speed bump in that plan, but as much as fans talk about disliking international expansion and increased ad revenue, it’s the way of the future because the owners want to grow grow grow.

    All those billions have to come from somewhere, and none of it comes from appealing to traditional, long-time fans.

  41. Advertising is completely out of control.
    It doesn’t work as well as they think it does.

  42. NFL makes enough money to not have to worry about this. What’s 60k in attendance lost when you’re making so much off TV deals.

    I’m cool with the sideline ads and tarps over empty seats and whatever, but please leave the ads out of the actual field and off of player uniforms.

  43. > So, “revolutionize” now means “completely imitate European soccer.”

    European soccer places ads on every square inch they possibly can, including player’s jerseys. The trade off is that they don’t have commercial breaks every 5 minutes.

    The current NFL revenue scheme consists of selling broadcast rights to various networks so they can sell coveted ad time during the numerous commercial breaks in return for paying a premium to be the exclusive broadcaster of the game. We all know that is never going away as it is the most lucrative scheme the NFL has ever come up with, and revenues generated from advertisements inside stadiums are not shared with the network. As such, this wouldn’t be imitating European soccer as much as a complete and vulgar display of outright commercialism that would pretty much serve as to replace the game itself.

    No thanks.

  44. Why all this cynicism? Come on, it will be just like all the times a new temporary tax is levied to cover an emergency condition, right? As soon as the emergency is over, the tax goes away. Right?

    So relax, there’s no need to worry.

  45. I don’t watch soccer and part of the reason is I can’t tell one team from another. I don’t want to have to do a google search for who sponsors what team.

  46. whodatdomefieldadvantage says:
    May 12, 2020 at 12:09 pm

    Soon it will be the Green Bay Johnsonville Bratwurst Packers…
    ***************************************************

    And…all announcers, league personnel, etc. will have to refer to them in that way-

    “Who do we play after the bye week, Stan?”
    “Glad you asked, Ollie, we’re going up to Wisconsin to play the Green Bay Johnsonville Bratwurst Packers.”

  47. Screw the NFL’s revenue. What about the business’s based around having fans attend the games? Everybody from the restaurants, hotels, stadium workers, to the parking attendants. You know the ones who actually need revenue or face extinction.

    When the NFL comes up with a plan to help them, then I will care about how much money Roger, Kraft, and Jerrah are losing.

  48. Advertising is so over rated. If I like Coke all the commercials I watch is not going to make me buy Pepsi. All the advertising is out of control and so fake.
    But wait if you order now you can get double the order for only $19.99!

  49. dejc421 says:
    May 12, 2020 at 11:56 am
    electricboogalo says:
    May 12, 2020 at 10:24 am

    I wish they would have started this years ago. Ads on the field. Ads on jerseys. Ad walls around the field. All with the idea of having LESS TV commercial breaks. Less TV friendly major sports like soccer and rugby do this.
    —————
    to an extent,absolutely. can’t believe all the down votes in favor of all the “TV timeouts” that are in place.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The down votes are not in favor of the TV timeouts and current ad saturation. That will NOT reduce no matter what the “plan” may be. This junk will be in addition to all the stuff we currently have. So, your support is actually for MORE ads, not less along with the desecration of the team fields, logos and even helmets. Just wait. They will eventually split the actual game view on the screen to a window with another window for continuous ads. Your 65″ HDTV won’t matter because much of that space will be taken up by the continuous ads much like the news stations and their continuous chyrons of “breaking news” on the bottom of the screen. No thanks. HARD PASS for me.

  50. Post game interview like NASCAR. We fought hard, glad we got the win & I’d like a shout out to Prep H.

  51. Or we could not junk up uniforms and make stadiums and players look like nascar drivers(and soccer players).

    I was not a fan of the NFL has jacking up the number of playoff teams for more money. I’m sure not a fan of increased advertising and player/field spamming.

  52. I want a law that forces politicians to wear the logos of the companies from which they receive campaign “contributions” on their suits.

  53. There is a difference between having new places to put ads, and having new places to put effective ads. The former does not always lead to the latter.

  54. The NCAA thinks this is a good idea. Do you want to borrow their “Good Hands” field goal nets?

  55. I’ve never watched a commercial and thought “I need to go buy that”

    I don’t need Doritos to advertise. I already love you, Doritos. I will never cheat on you.

  56. With everyone out of work or soon to be, who will be able to buy any of these products being advertised?

  57. Litter the free product with green screened ads all over – or you can pay to have the ads removed with SUNDAY TICKET

  58. I wouldn’t mind advertisements over the empty seats, that should be enough anything more would cheapin the game. Especially on the walls and the goal post nets. I would think advertisements over the empty seats those companys would pay more then the fans would for the seats including what they would pay for food and drink.

  59. If they were to go this route, starting players should wear corporate advertising. & back-up, special teams, & coaches should wear local/small business sponsors of the state/city they’re in.

  60. If the NFL had put ads on uniforms from the inception of the league 100 years ago, no one would care that ads are on the uniforms now, like a NASCAR jumpsuit or the full front of the shirts worn by soccer clubs
    ———–
    And if the NFL from inception kicked the ball instead of threw it, went endzone to endzone in a car and the fastest gets 3 points no one would care right now either. Thats a horrible statement and you can say that about anything

  61. If so, eventually the fans will get used to them and ignore most of them. There are too many ads and fans may tune them out, although focus groups probably would not admit it.

  62. ajg314 says:
    May 12, 2020 at 10:46 am

    Cable TV started many, many years ago with the promise, aka lie, that there would have to be a charge for it because they needed the revenue since they swore there would be no commercials.
    ————-

    That’s BS. Community Access Television started as an alternate method for people to receive broadcast television, commercials and all.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.